Abstract
The aim of this paper is to prove the theorem which generates many examples of functions belonging to a geometrically defined class of uniformly starlike functions introduced by Goodman in 1991. Only a very few explicit uniformly starlike functions were known until now. Next we obtain inclusion relations between some subclasses of convex functions and the class of uniformly starlike functions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Let \({\mathcal {S}}\) denote the class of all functions f that are analytic and univalent in the open unit disk \(U=\{z \in {\mathbb {C}}: |z| < 1\}\) and normalized by \(f(0) = f'(0) - 1 = 0\).
A set \(D \subset {\mathbb {C}}\) is said to be starlike with respect to \(w_0\), an interior point of D, if the intersection of each half-line beginning at \(w_0\) with the interior of D is connected.
We denote by \({{\mathcal {S}}}{{\mathcal {T}}}\) the class of all starlike functions, i.e., the subclass of \({\mathcal {S}}\) consisting of functions that map U onto domains starlike with respect to \(w_0=0\) (briefly starlike domains). Recall that a function \(f \in {\mathcal {S}}\) is starlike if and only if
Let \({{\mathcal {C}}}{{\mathcal {V}}}\) denote the class of all functions \(f \in {\mathcal {S}}\) that are convex in U, i.e., such that f(U) is a convex domain.
Let \(\gamma : z=z(t), t \in [a,b],\) be a smooth, directed arc and suppose that a function f is analytic on \(\gamma \). Then the arc \(f(\gamma )\) is said to be
- starlike with respect to \(w_0 \notin f(\gamma )\) if \(\textrm{arg}(f(z(t))-w_0)\) is a nondecreasing function of t,
- convex if the argument of the tangent to \(f(\gamma )\) is a nondecreasing function of t.
In 1991, Goodman ([1, 2]) introduced geometrically defined classes \(\mathcal {UCV}\) and \(\mathcal {UST}\) of uniformly convex and uniformly starlike functions, respectively.
Recall that a function \(f \in {\mathcal {S}}\) is in the class \(\mathcal {UCV}\) (\(\mathcal {UST}\)) if for every circular arc \(\gamma \subset U\) with center \(\zeta \in U\), the arc \(f(\gamma )\) is convex (starlike with respect to \(f(\zeta )\)).
If we take \(\zeta \) such that \(|\zeta | \le k, 0 \le k \le 1\) we obtain the following natural extension of the concept of uniform starlikeness (see [11] and also [10, 12]). Namely, a function \(f \in {\mathcal {S}}\) is said to be k-uniformly starlike in U, if the image of every circular arc \(\gamma \) contained in U with center at \(\zeta \), where \(|\zeta | \le k\), is starlike with respect to \(f(\zeta )\).
We denote by \(k \text{- } \mathcal {UST}\) the class of all k-uniformly starlike functions. Notice that \({0 \text{- } \mathcal {UST}}={{\mathcal {S}}}{{\mathcal {T}}}\) and \({1 \text{- } \mathcal {UST}}=\mathcal {UST}.\) Moreover, it is clear that \(\mathcal {UST} \subset k \text{- } \mathcal {UST}\subset {{\mathcal {S}}}{{\mathcal {T}}}\) for every \(k \in [0,1]\).
Goodman obtained the analytic conditions for \(\mathcal {UCV}\) and \(\mathcal {UST}\) expressed by two complex variables. For an arbitrary k such that \(0 \le k \le 1\), the class \(k \text{- } \mathcal {UST}\) can be characterized (see [11]) as follows
For \(k=1\), we get Goodman’s condition for uniform starlikeness.
It turned out that (see [3, 7])
Finding this analytic condition essentially simplified further investigations of uniformly convex functions ([3, 4, 7, 8]).
It is more difficult to investigate the class \(\mathcal {UST}\) (\(k \text{- } \mathcal {UST}\)) because of its characterization in terms of two complex variables. In particular checking whether a function belongs to the class \(\mathcal {UST}\) leads to very complicated computations. Hence only simple examples of uniformly starlike functions are known.
In this paper, we give many examples of members of the class of uniformly starlike functions \(\mathcal {UST}\) and we establish its connections with some subclasses of convex functions. For instance, we get that all functions convex of order 3/4 are uniformly starlike.
2 Some Members of the Class of Uniformly Starlike Functions
Goodman ([2]) gave some examples of uniformly starlike functions. He proved that
and
It was proven in [11] that
For \(k=1\) we get
This result was mentioned by Goodman, but without a proof.
We have also more general result (see [11]):
If \(0 < k \le 1\) and for some integer \(n \ge 2\)
then \(f(z) = z + Az^n \in k \text{- } \mathcal {UST}.\)
For \(k=1\) we get the result of Merkes and Salmassi ([5]), which improves the bound \(|A| \le 1/(\sqrt{2}n)\) obtained by Goodman.
Merkes and Salmassi ([5]) proved the following result.
Theorem 2.1
Let \(f \in {\mathcal {S}}\). If for all \(z \in U\), \(w \in U\)
then \(f \in \mathcal {UST}.\)
Using this, we get the following sufficient condition for uniform starlikeness
Theorem 2.2
Let \(f(z) = z + \sum _{n=2}^{\infty }\,a_nz^n\), \(z \in U\). If
then \(f \in \mathcal {UST}.\)
Proof
Let f be analytic in U and normalized by \(f(0)=f'(0)-1=0\). Assume that \(|\textrm{Arg}{f'(z)}| \le \pi /4, z \in U.\) This condition implies that \(\textrm{Re}f'(z) > 0\) for \(z \in U\), hence \(f \in {\mathcal {S}}\). Moreover if \(z \in U\), \(w \in U\) then
This is equivalent to
Thus by Theorem 2.1, \(f \in \mathcal {UST}\).
This result generates many examples of uniformly starlike functions. \(\square \)
Example 2.1
Let
Then \(P_1(U) = \{w \in {\mathbb {C}}: |\textrm{Arg}\, w| < \pi /4\}.\)
If \(f_1'(z) = P_1(z)\), then in view of Theorem 2.2, \(f_1 \in \mathcal {UST}\). Thus the function
is uniformly starlike in U.
Example 2.2
Let
This function plays an important role in the class \(\mathcal {UCV}\) of uniformly convex functions. It is known (see [3, 7]) that \(f \in \mathcal {UCV}\) if and only if
The image of the unit disk U under \(P_2\) is bounded by the parabola
Moreover \(|\textrm{Arg}P_2(z)| < \pi /4\) for z in U. Thus \(f'_2(z) = P_2(z)\) for \( z \in U,\) implies \(f _2 \in \mathcal {UST}\).
Using standard methods of integration after some calculations we get that
belongs to the class \(\mathcal {UST}\).
Example 2.3
Let
where \(0 < A \le \sqrt{2}-1.\)
Then \(P_3\) maps U onto the disk
For \(0 < A \le \sqrt{2}-1\) the disk \(P_3(U)\) is contained in the region \(\{w \in {\mathbb {C}}: |\textrm{Arg}\, w| < \pi /4\}.\) Hence if \(f_3'(z)=P_3(z)\) then \(f_3 \in \mathcal {UST}\), since \(|\textrm{Arg}f_3'(z)| < \pi /4\) for \(z \in U.\)
Thus the function
is in the class \(\mathcal {UST}\).
Example 2.4
Let
This function maps the unit disk onto the domain bounded by the hyperbola
and clearly \(P_4(U) \subset \{w \in {\mathbb {C}}: |\textrm{Arg}\, w| < \pi /4\}.\) Thus
is uniformly starlike in U, because of \(f_4'(z)=P_4(z)\) for \( z \in U.\)
Example 2.5
Let
The image of the unit disk U under \(P_5\) is bounded by the lemniscate
and is contained in the region \(\{w \in {\mathbb {C}}: |\textrm{Arg}\, w| < \pi /4\}.\) Hence the function
belongs to the class \(\mathcal {UST}\), since \(f_5'(z)=P_5(z)\) for \(z \in U.\)
3 Uniformly Starlike Functions and Subclasses of Convex Functions
Let \(\varphi \) be an analytic univalent function which satisfies the following conditions: \(\textrm{Re}\,\varphi (z) > 0\) for \(z \in U\), \(\varphi (0)=1, \varphi '(0) > 0\) and \(\varphi (U)\) is convex and symmetric with respect to the real axis.
By \({{\mathcal {C}}}{{\mathcal {V}}}(\varphi )\), we denote the subclass of convex functions defined by
In particular
and for
the class \({{\mathcal {C}}}{{\mathcal {V}}}(\varphi _2)\) coincides with the class \({{\mathcal {C}}}{{\mathcal {V}}}(\alpha )\) consisting of all functions that are convex of order \(\alpha \), thus
We need the following result of Suffridge [9]
Theorem 3.1
Let h be starlike in U with \(h(0)=0\) and let \(p(z)=a+a_nz^n + a_{n+1}z^{n+1}+ \dots \) be analytic in U. If
then
The function q is convex and is the best (a, n)-dominant.
Corollary 3.1
(Corollary 3.1d.1 in [6]) Let h be starlike in U, with \(h(0)=0\) and let \(p(z)=a+a_nz^n + a_{n+1}z^{n+1}+ \dots \) be analytic in U with \(a\ne 0\). If
then
and q is the best (a, n)-dominant.
Theorem 3.2
Let \(f \in {{\mathcal {C}}}{{\mathcal {V}}}(\varphi )\). If
then \(f \in \mathcal {UST}.\)
Proof
If \(f \in {{\mathcal {C}}}{{\mathcal {V}}}(\varphi )\) then
or
Since \(\varphi (z)-1\) is convex, therefore is starlike, we get by Theorem 3.1
From Corollary 3.1, we may also conclude that
Thus from Theorem 2.2, if
then \(f \in \mathcal {UST}.\) \(\square \)
Corollary 3.2
provided that
Theorem 3.3
Proof
Let \(f \in {{\mathcal {C}}}{{\mathcal {V}}}(\alpha ), \, 0 \le \alpha < 1\). Then from the subordination
we get
We have
Hence for \(3/4 \le \alpha < 1\) the function \(f'\) satisfies the condition
By Theorem 3.2 we get
\(\square \)
Theorem 3.4
where
Proof
If \(f \in {{\mathcal {C}}}{{\mathcal {V}}}(\varphi _3)\) then
Hence
and since
we get
Thus by Theorem 3.2, f is uniformly starlike in U.
Theorem 3.4 can be written in an equivalent form as follows: \(\square \)
Corollary 3.3
Let \(f \in {\mathcal {S}}\). If
then \(f \in \mathcal {UST}.\)
Proof
Let \(f \in {\mathcal {S}}\). Then for \(z \in U\)
Hence \(f \in {{\mathcal {C}}}{{\mathcal {V}}}(\varphi _3)\) with \(A=\pi /4\), so by Theorem 3.4 the result follows. \(\square \)
References
Goodman, A.W.: On uniformly convex functions. Ann. Polon. Math. 56(1), 87–92 (1991)
Goodman, A.W.: On uniformly starlike functions. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 155, 364–370 (1991)
Ma, W., Minda, D.: Uniformly convex functions. Ann. Polon. Math. 57(2), 165–175 (1992)
Ma, W., Minda, D.: Uniformly convex functions II. Ann. Polon. Math. 58, 275–285 (1993)
Merkes, E., Salmassi, M.: Subclasses of uniformly starlike functions. Int. J. Math. Math. Sci. 15, 449–454 (1992)
Miller, S.S., Mocanu, P.T.: Differential Subordinations—Theory and Applications, CRC Press, (2000)
Rønning, F.: Uniformly convex functions and a corresponding class of starlike functions. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 118, 189–196 (1993)
Rønning, F.: On starlike functions associated with parabolic regions. Ann. Univ. Mariae Curie-Skłodowska Sect. A 45, 117–122 (1991)
Suffridge, T.J.: Some remarks on convex maps of the unit disk. Duke Math. J. 37, 755–777 (1970)
Wiśniowska-Wajnryb, A.: A Survey on k-Uniformly Starlike Functions, Current Research in Mathematical and Computer Sciences, Publisher UWM, Olsztyn, pp. 225–232. (2017)
Wiśniowska-Wajnryb, A.: On classes of uniformly starlike functions. Ann. Polon. Math. 108(1), 11–19 (2013)
Wiśniowska-Wajnryb, A.: The order of starlikeness of the class of uniformly starlike functions. Math. Nachr. 289(16), 2083–2088 (2016)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author has no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Additional information
Communicated by See Keong Lee.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Wiśniowska-Wajnryb, A. On a Simple Sufficient Condition for the Uniform Starlikeness. Bull. Malays. Math. Sci. Soc. 46, 151 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40840-023-01545-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40840-023-01545-8