Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Bed electrodes in microbial electrochemistry: setup, operation and characterization

  • Lecture Text
  • Published:
ChemTexts Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Microbial electrochemical technologies have become a vital field of interest in the last two decades. Their reactors are of interest for a large community of scientists working in environmental engineering and technology, biochemistry, electrochemistry, physics, mathematical modeling, microbiology and other disciplines. Due to the fascinating fundamentals and the high promises for application at the horizon, the field is increasingly reflected in the curricula of students of the aforementioned disciplines. The main motivation for this article is to give scientists and students an overview on one specific sub-topic: bed electrodes and bed electrode reactors. After a brief introduction, these granulated electrodes are analyzed from an engineering, electrochemical and microbiological point of view. Thereby we guide the potential future operator for deciding which biotechnological processes and applications under which operational conditions (i.e. fixed-bed electrodes versus fluidized bed electrodes) may benefit by using bed electrodes. Special focus is given to the electrochemical and microbial characterization of granules. Thus we discuss a recent tool that opens the possibility to survey the electrochemical behavior of microbial biofilms on bed electrodes—the e-Clamp. Finally, two case studies of bed electrode reactors are briefly discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

(reproduction with permission of respective publisher)

Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Potter MC (1911) Electrical effects accompanying the decomposition of organic compounds. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B 84(571):260–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lovley DR, Phillips EJP (1988) Novel mode of microbial energy metabolism: organic carbon oxidation coupled to dissimilatory reduction of iron or manganese. Appl Environ Microbiol 54(6):1472–1480

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Myers CR, Nealson KH (1988) Bacterial manganese reduction and growth with manganese oxide as the sole electron acceptor. Science 240(4857):1319–1321. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.240.4857.1319

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schröder U (2011) Discover the possibilities: microbial bioelectrochemical systems and the revival of a 100-year-old discovery. J Solid State Electrochem 15(7):1481–1486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10008-011-1395-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Schröder U (2018) A basic introduction into microbial fuel cells and microbial electrocatalysis. ChemTexts 4(4):19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40828-018-0072-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rosenbaum M, Aulenta F, Villano M, Angenent LT (2011) Cathodes as electron donors for microbial metabolism: which extracellular electron transfer mechanisms are involved? Bioresour Technol 102(1):324–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.07.008

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim BH, Kim HJ, Hyun MS, Park DH (1999) Direct electrode reaction of Fe(III)-reducing bacterium, Shewanella putrefaciens. J Microbiol Biotechnol 9:127–131

    Google Scholar 

  8. Koch C, Harnisch F (2016) Is there a specific ecological niche for electroactive microorganisms? ChemElectroChem 3(9):1282–1295. https://doi.org/10.1002/celc.201600079

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Carmona-Martínez AA, Harnisch F, Kuhlicke U, Neu TR, Schröder U (2013) Electron transfer and biofilm formation of Shewanella putrefaciens as function of anode potential. Bioelectrochemistry 93:23–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioelechem.2012.05.002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lovley DR (2011) Live wires: direct extracellular electron exchange for bioenergy and the bioremediation of energy-related contamination. Energy Environ Sci 4(12):4896–4906. https://doi.org/10.1039/C1EE02229F

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Estevez-Canales M, Kuzume A, Borjas Z, Fueg M, Lovley D, Wandlowski T, Esteve-Nunez A (2015) A severe reduction in the cytochrome C content of Geobacter sulfurreducens eliminates its capacity for extracellular electron transfer. Environ Microbiol Rep 7(2):219–226. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-2229.12230

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Busalmen JP, Esteve-Núñez A, Berná A, Feliu JM (2008) C-type cytochromes wire electricity-producing bacteria to electrodes. Angew Chem Int Ed 47(26):4874–4877

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Esteve-Núnez A, Busalmen JP, Berná A, Gutiérrez-Garrán C, Feliu JM (2011) Opportunities behind the unusual ability of Geobacter sulfurreducens for exocellular respiration and electricity production. Energy Environ Sci 4(6):2066–2069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Koch C, Korth B, Harnisch F (2017) Microbial ecology-based engineering of microbial electrochemical technologies. Microb Biotechnol 11(1):22–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.12802

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Aguirre-Sierra A, Bacchetti-De Gregoris T, Berná A, Salas JJ, Aragón C, Esteve-Núñez A (2016) Microbial electrochemical systems outperform fixed-bed biofilters in cleaning up urban wastewater. Environ Sci Water Res Technol 2(6):984–993. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ew00172f

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Logan BE, Rabaey K (2012) Conversion of wastes into bioelectricity and chemicals by using microbial electrochemical technologies. Science 337(6095):686–690

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hegner R, Rosa LFM, Harnisch F (2018) Electrochemical CO2 reduction to formate at indium electrodes with high efficiency and selectivity in pH neutral electrolytes. Appl Catal B 238:546–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.07.030

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Jourdin L, Freguia S, Flexer V, Keller J (2016) Bringing high-rate, CO2-based microbial electrosynthesis closer to practical implementation through improved electrode design and operating conditions. Environ Sci Technol 50(4):1982–1989

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Patil SA, Arends JB, Vanwonterghem I, Van Meerbergen J, Guo K, Tyson GW, Rabaey K (2015) Selective enrichment establishes a stable performing community for microbial electrosynthesis of acetate from CO2. Environ Sci Technol 49(14):8833–8843

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kretzschmar J, Böhme P, Liebetrau J, Mertig M, Harnisch F (2018) Microbial electrochemical sensors for anaerobic digestion process control–performance of electroactive biofilms under real conditions. Chem Eng Technol 41(4):687–695

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Rodrigo Quejigo J, Dörfler U, Schroll R, Esteve-Núñez A (2016) Stimulating soil microorganisms for mineralizing the herbicide isoproturon by means of microbial electroremediating cells. Microb Biotechnol 9(3):369–380

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Pous N, Balaguer MD, Colprim J, Puig S (2017) Opportunities for groundwater microbial electro-remediation. Microb Biotechnol 11(1):119–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.12866

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Rodrigo Quejigo J, Domínguez-Garay A, Dörfler U, Schroll R, Esteve-Núñez A (2018) Anodic shifting of the microbial community profile to enhance oxidative metabolism in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 116:131–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.09.012

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Dominguez-Garay A, Rodrigo Quejigo J, Dorfler U, Schroll R, Esteve-Nunez A (2017) Bioelectroventing: an electrochemical-assisted bioremediation strategy for cleaning-up atrazine-polluted soils. Microb Biotechnol 11(1):50–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.12687

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Rodrigo Quejigo J, Boltes K, Esteve-Nuñez A (2014) Microbial-electrochemical bioremediation and detoxification of dibenzothiophene-polluted soil. Chemosphere 101:61–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Aulenta F, Puig S, Harnisch F (2018) Microbial electrochemical technologies: maturing but not mature. Microb Biotechnol 11(1):18–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kerzenmacher S (2017) Engineering of microbial electrodes. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1007/10_2017_16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yu YY, Zhai DD, Si RW, Sun JZ, Liu X, Yong YC (2017) Three-dimensional electrodes for high-performance bioelectrochemical systems. Int J Mol Sci 18(1):90. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18010090

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Wei J, Liang P, Huang X (2011) Recent progress in electrodes for microbial fuel cells. Bioresour Technol 102(20):9335–9344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.07.019

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Wei W, Zhang Y, Komorek R, Plymale A, Yu R, Wang B, Zhu Z, Liu F, Yu XY (2017) Characterization of syntrophic Geobacter communities using ToF-SIMS. Biointerphases 12(5):05g601. https://doi.org/10.1116/1.4986832

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Chen X, Cui D, Wang X, Wang X, Li W (2015) Porous carbon with defined pore size as anode of microbial fuel cell. Biosens Bioelectron 69:135–141

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Hiddleston J, Douglas A (1970) Current/potential relationships and potential distribution in fluidized bed electrodes. Electrochim Acta 15(3):431–443

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Hiddleston JN, Douglas AF (1968) Fluidized bed electrodes—fundamental measurements and implications. Nature 218:601. https://doi.org/10.1038/218601a0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Berent T, Mason R, Fells I (1971) Fluidised-bed fuel-cell electrodes. J Appl Chem Biotechnol 21(3):71–76

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Sedahmed G (1996) Mass transfer behaviour of a fixed bed electrochemical reactor with a gas evolving upstream counter electrode. Can J Chem Eng 74(4):487–492

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Ibl N (1983) Current distribution. Comprehensive treatise of electrochemistry. Springer, New York, pp 239–315

    Book  Google Scholar 

  37. Rabaey K, Clauwaert P, Aelterman P, Verstraete W (2005) Tubular microbial fuel cells for efficient electricity generation. Environ Sci Technol 39(20):8077–8082. https://doi.org/10.1021/es050986i

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Tran HT, Ryu JH, Jia YH, Oh SJ, Choi JY, Park DH, Ahn DH (2010) Continuous bioelectricity production and sustainable wastewater treatment in a microbial fuel cell constructed with non-catalyzed granular graphite electrodes and permeable membrane. Water Sci Technol 61(7):1819–1827. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2010.140

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Liu J, Zhang F, He W, Zhang X, Feng Y, Logan BE (2014) Intermittent contact of fluidized anode particles containing exoelectrogenic biofilms for continuous power generation in microbial fuel cells. J Power Sources 261:278–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.03.071

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Deeke A, Sleutels TH, Donkers TF, Hamelers HV, Buisman CJ, Ter Heijne A (2015) Fluidized capacitive bioanode as a novel reactor concept for the microbial fuel cell. Environ Sci Technol 49(3):1929–1935. https://doi.org/10.1021/es503063n

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Tejedor-Sanz S, de Gregoris TB, Salas JJ, Pastor L, Esteve-Núñez A (2016) Integrating a microbial electrochemical system into a classical wastewater treatment configuration for removing nitrogen from low COD effluents. Environ Sci Water Res Technol 2(5):884–893

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Tejedor-Sanz S, Quejigo JR, Berna A, Esteve-Nunez A (2017) The planktonic relationship between fluid-like electrodes and bacteria: wiring in motion. ChemSusChem 10(4):693–700. https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201601329

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Tejedor-Sanz S, Ortiz JM, Esteve-Núñez A (2017) Merging microbial electrochemical systems with electrocoagulation pretreatment for achieving a complete treatment of brewery wastewater. Chem Eng J 330:1068–1074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.08.049

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Tejedor-Sanz S, Fernández-Labrador P, Hart S, Torres CI, Esteve-Núñez A (2018) Geobacter dominates the inner layers of a stratified biofilm on a fluidized anode during brewery wastewater treatment. Front Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.00378

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Di Lorenzo M, Curtis TP, Head IM, Velasquez-Orta SB, Velasquez-Orta SB, Scott K (2009) A single chamber packed bed microbial fuel cell biosensor for measuring organic content of wastewater. Water Sci Technol 60(11):2879–2887. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2009.699

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Jiang D, Li B (2009) Granular activated carbon single-chamber microbial fuel cells (GAC-SCMFCs): a design suitable for large-scale wastewater treatment processes. Biochem Eng J 47(1):31–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2009.06.013

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Feng Y, Lee H, Wang X, Liu Y, He W (2010) Continuous electricity generation by a graphite granule baffled air–cathode microbial fuel cell. Bioresour Technol 101(2):632–638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.08.046

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Kong W, Guo Q, Wang X, Yue X (2011) Electricity generation from wastewater using an anaerobic fluidized bed microbial fuel cell. Ind Eng Chem Res 50(21):12225–12232. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie2007505

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Cardenas-Robles A, Martinez E, Rendon-Alcantar I, Frontana C, Gonzalez-Gutierrez L (2013) Development of an activated carbon-packed microbial bioelectrochemical system for azo dye degradation. Bioresour Technol 127:37–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.09.066

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Zhang X, Shi J, Liang P, Wei J, Huang X, Zhang C, Logan BE (2013) Power generation by packed-bed air–cathode microbial fuel cells. Bioresour Technol 142:109–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.05.014

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Huggins T, Wang H, Kearns J, Jenkins P, Ren ZJ (2014) Biochar as a sustainable electrode material for electricity production in microbial fuel cells. Bioresour Technol 157:114–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.01.058

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Gonzalez-Gutierrez L, Frontana C, Martinez E (2015) Upflow fixed bed bioelectrochemical reactor for wastewater treatment applications. Bioresour Technol 176:292–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.11.018

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Liu D, Roca-Puigros M, Geppert F, Caizan-Juanarena L, Na Ayudthaya SP, Buisman C, Ter Heijne A (2018) Granular carbon-based electrodes as cathodes in methane-producing bioelectrochemical systems. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 6:78. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2018.00078

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Nicolella C, Van Loosdrecht M, Heijnen J (2000) Wastewater treatment with particulate biofilm reactors. J Biotechnol 80(1):1–33

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Gupta CK, Sathiyamoorthy D (1998) Fluid bed technology in materials processing. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  56. Scott K, Yu EH (2015) Microbial electrochemical and fuel cells: fundamentals and applications. Woodhead Publishing, Newcastle University, UK

    Google Scholar 

  57. Wu H, Zhang J, Ngo HH, Guo W, Hu Z, Liang S, Fan J, Liu H (2015) A review on the sustainability of constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment: design and operation. Bioresour Technol 175:594–601

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Ramírez-Vargas CA, Prado A, Arias CA, Carvalho PN, Esteve-Núñez A, Brix H (2018) Microbial electrochemical technologies for wastewater treatment: principles and evolution from microbial fuel cells to bioelectrochemical-based constructed wetlands. Water 10(9):1128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Aguirre A (2017) Integrating microbial electrochemical systems in constructed wetlands, a new paradigm for treating wastewater in small communities. Universidad de Alcalá

  60. Esteve-Núñez A, Fernandez Ontivero J, Salas JJ, Berna A, Reija Maqueda A, Aragon C, Aguirre-Sierra MA, Bacchetti de Gregoris T, Esteve-Núñez R, Barroeta B, Pidre JR (2014) Long-term demonstration of a bioelectrochemically constructed wetland for urban wastewater treatment. In: Conference: 11th IWA leading edge conference on water and wastewater technologies LET 2014’, Abu Dabi

  61. Rabaey I, Ossieur W, Verhaege M, Verstraete W (2005) Continuous microbial fuel cells convert carbohydrates to electricity. Water Sci Technol 52(1–2):515–523

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Huggins TM, Pietron JJ, Wang H, Ren ZJ, Biffinger JC (2015) Graphitic biochar as a cathode electrocatalyst support for microbial fuel cells. Bioresour Technol 195:147–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.06.012

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Logan BE, Hamelers B, Rozendal R, Schröder U, Keller J, Freguia S, Aelterman P, Verstraete W, Rabaey K (2006) Microbial fuel cells: methodology and technology. Environ Sci Technol 40(17):5181–5192

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Krewer U, Song Y, Sundmacher K, John V, Lübke R, Matthies G, Tobiska L (2004) Direct methanol fuel cell (DMFC): analysis of residence time behaviour of anodic flow bed. Chem Eng Sci 59(1):119–130

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Kumar S, Ramamurthy T, Subramanian B, Basha A (2008) Studies on the fluidized bed electrode. Int J Chem React Eng. https://doi.org/10.2202/1542-6580.1610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Kreysa G, Pionteck S, Heitz E (1975) Comparative investigations of packed and fluidized bed electrodes with non-conducting and conducting particles. J Appl Electrochem 5(4):305–312

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Rennie AJ, Martins VL, Smith RM, Hall PJ (2016) Influence of particle size distribution on the performance of ionic liquid-based electrochemical double layer capacitors. Sci Rep 6:22062

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Crittenden JC, Trussell RR, Hand DW, Howe KJ, Tchobanoglous G (2012) MWH’s water treatment: principles and design. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  69. Fradler KR, Kim JR, Boghani HC, Dinsdale RM, Guwy AJ, Premier GC (2014) The effect of internal capacitance on power quality and energy efficiency in a tubular microbial fuel cell. Process Biochem 49(6):973–980

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Aguirre-Sierra A, Reija A, Berná A, Salas JJ, Esteve-Núñez (2014) A Microbial Electrochemical Constructed Wetlands (METlands): design and operation conditions for enhancing the removal of pollutants in real urban wastewater. In: Conference: 2nd European Meeting of the International Society for Microbial Electrochemistry and Technology (EU-ISMET 2014)

  71. Austin G, Yu K (2016) Constructed wetlands and sustainable development. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  72. Iza J (1991) Fluidized bed reactors for anaerobic wastewater treatment. Water Sci Technol 24(8):109–132

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Nedovic V, Willaert R (2013) Fundamentals of cell immobilisation biotechnology, vol 8. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  74. Aelterman P, Freguia S, Keller J, Verstraete W, Rabaey K (2008) The anode potential regulates bacterial activity in microbial fuel cells. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 78(3):409–418

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Carmona-Martinez AA, Harnisch F, Kuhlicke U, Neu TR, Schroder U (2013) Electron transfer and biofilm formation of Shewanella putrefaciens as function of anode potential. Bioelectrochemistry 93:23–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioelechem.2012.05.002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Huang JS, Yang P, Li CM, Guo Y, Lai B, Wang Y, Feng L, Zhang Y (2015) Effect of nitrite and nitrate concentrations on the performance of AFB-MFC enriched with high-strength synthetic wastewater. Biotechnol Res Int. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/798397

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Santoro C, Guilizzoni M, Baena JC, Pasaogullari U, Casalegno A, Li B, Babanova S, Artyushkova K, Atanassov P (2014) The effects of carbon electrode surface properties on bacteria attachment and start up time of microbial fuel cells. Carbon 67:128–139

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Das DM (2017) Fuel cell: a bioelectrochemical system that converts waste to watts. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  79. Bastian P, Kraus J, Scheichl R, Wheeler M (2013) Simulation of flow in porous media: applications in energy and environment, vol 12. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  80. Huh T (1985) Electrical and electrochemical behavior of fluidized bed electrodes. University of California, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  81. Sabacky B, Evans J (1977) The electrical conductivity of fluidized bed electrodes—its significance and some experimental measurements. Metall Trans B 8(1):5–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Villasenor J, Capilla P, Rodrigo M, Canizares P, Fernandez F (2013) Operation of a horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetland–microbial fuel cell treating wastewater under different organic loading rates. Water Res 47(17):6731–6738

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Larrosa-Guerrero A, Scott K, Head I, Mateo F, Ginesta A, Godinez C (2010) Effect of temperature on the performance of microbial fuel cells. Fuel 89(12):3985–3994

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Behera M, Murthy S, Ghangrekar M (2011) Effect of operating temperature on performance of microbial fuel cell. Water Sci Technol 64(4):917–922

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Michie IS, Kim JR, Dinsdale RM, Guwy AJ, Premier GC (2014) The influence of anodic helical design on fluid flow and bioelectrochemical performance. Bioresour Technol 165:13–20

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. Erable B, Etcheverry L, Bergel A (2011) From microbial fuel cell (MFC) to microbial electrochemical snorkel (MES): maximizing chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal from wastewater. Biofouling 27(3):319–326

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Xie X, Criddle C, Cui Y (2015) Design and fabrication of bioelectrodes for microbial bioelectrochemical systems. Energy Environ Sci 8(12):3418–3441

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Dennis PG, Virdis B, Vanwonterghem I, Hassan A, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW, Rabaey K (2016) Anode potential influences the structure and function of anodic electrode and electrolyte-associated microbiomes. Sci Rep 6:39114. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep39114

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. Torres CI, Krajmalnik-Brown R, Parameswaran P, Marcus AK, Wanger G, Gorby YA, Rittmann BE (2009) Selecting anode-respiring bacteria based on anode potential: phylogenetic, electrochemical, and microscopic characterization. Environ Sci Technol 43(24):9519–9524. https://doi.org/10.1021/es902165y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Levar CE, Hoffman CL, Dunshee AJ, Toner BM, Bond DR (2017) Redox potential as a master variable controlling pathways of metal reduction by Geobacter sulfurreducens. ISME J 11(3):741–752. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2016.146

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. Peng L, You S-J, Wang J-Y (2010) Electrode potential regulates cytochrome accumulation on Shewanella oneidensis cell surface and the consequence to bioelectrocatalytic current generation. Biosens Bioelectron 25(11):2530–2533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2010.03.039

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Yoho RA, Popat SC, Torres CI (2014) Dynamic potential-dependent electron transport pathway shifts in anode biofilms of Geobacter sulfurreducens. ChemSusChem 7(12):3413–3419. https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201402589

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Levar CE, Chan CH, Mehta-Kolte MG, Bond DR (2014) An inner membrane cytochrome required only for reduction of high redox potential extracellular electron acceptors. MBio 5(6):e02034. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.02034-14

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  94. Koch C, Muller S, Harms H, Harnisch F (2014) Microbiomes in bioenergy production: from analysis to management. Curr Opin Biotechnol 27:65–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2013.11.006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Fricke K, Harnisch F, Schröder U (2008) On the use of cyclic voltammetry for the study of anodic electron transfer in microbial fuel cells. Energy Environ Sci 1 (1). https://doi.org/10.1039/b802363h

  96. Rodrigo Quejigo J, Rosa LFM, Harnisch F (2018) Electrochemical characterization of bed electrodes using voltammetry of single granules. Electrochem Commun 90:78–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2018.04.009

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Borsje C, Liu D, Sleutels THJA, Buisman CJN, ter Heijne A (2016) Performance of single carbon granules as perspective for larger scale capacitive bioanodes. J Power Sources 325:690–696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.06.092

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. Lovley DR (2011) Reach out and touch someone: potential impact of DIET (direct interspecies energy transfer) on anaerobic biogeochemistry, bioremediation, and bioenergy. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 10(2):101–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Donlan RM (2002) Biofilms: microbial life on surfaces. Emerg Infect Dis 8(9):881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Rijnaarts HH, Norde W, Bouwer EJ, Lyklema J, Zehnder AJ (1993) Bacterial adhesion under static and dynamic conditions. Appl Environ Microbiol 59(10):3255–3265

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  101. Rittman BE (1982) The effect of shear stress on biofilm loss rate. Biotechnol Bioeng 24(2):501–506

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  102. Hamilton M (2003) The biofilm laboratory: step-by-step protocols for experimental design, analysis, and data interpretation. Cytergy

  103. Lewandowski Z, Beyenal H (2013) Fundamentals of biofilm research, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL

    Book  Google Scholar 

  104. Pawley J (2010) Handbook of biological confocal microscopy. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  105. Sun D, Cheng S, Wang A, Li F, Logan BE, Cen K (2015) Temporal-spatial changes in viabilities and electrochemical properties of anode biofilms. Environ Sci Technol 49(8):5227–5235

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  106. Kramer J, Soukiazian S, Mahoney S, Hicks-Garner J (2012) Microbial fuel cell biofilm characterization with thermogravimetric analysis on bare and polyethyleneimine surface modified carbon foam anodes. J Power Sources 210:122–128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  107. Eaton A, Franson M (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  108. Bhatt P, Kumar MS, Mudliar S, Chakrabarti T (2007) Biodegradation of chlorinated compounds—a review. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 37(2):165–198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  109. Aulenta F, Tocca L, Verdini R, Reale P, Majone M (2011) Dechlorination of trichloroethene in a continuous-flow bioelectrochemical reactor: effect of cathode potential on rate, selectivity, and electron transfer mechanisms. Environ Sci Technol 45(19):8444–8451

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  110. Strycharz SM, Gannon SM, Boles AR, Franks AE, Nevin KP, Lovley DR (2010) Reductive dechlorination of 2-chlorophenol by Anaeromyxobacter dehalogenans with an electrode serving as the electron donor. Environ Microbiol Rep 2(2):289–294

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  111. Matsuno Y, Tsutsumi A, Yoshida K (1996) Electrode performance of fixed and fluidized bed electrodes for a molten carbonate fuel cell anode. Int J Hydrog Energy 21(8):663–671

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  112. Logan B, Cheng S, Watson V, Estadt G (2007) Graphite fiber brush anodes for increased power production in air-cathode microbial. Fuel Cell Environ Sci Technol 41(9):3341–3346

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  113. Xie X, Ye M, Hu L, Liu N, McDonough JR, Chen W, Alshareef HN, Criddle CS, Cui Y (2012) Carbon nanotube-coated macroporous sponge for microbial fuel cell electrodes. Energy Environ Sci 5:5265–5270

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

FH acknowledges support by the BMBF (Research Award “Next generation biotechnological Processes—Biotechnology 2020+”) and the Helmholtz-Association (Young Investigators Group). This work was supported by the Helmholtz-Association within the Research Programme Renewable Energies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Environmental Microbiology, Helmholtz Center for Environmental Research GmbH-UFZ, Permoserstraße 15, 04318, Leipzig, Germany

    Jose Rodrigo Quejigo & Falk Harnisch

  2. The Molecular Foundry, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 1 Cyclotron Road, MS 67-5113, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA

    Sara Tejedor-Sanz

  3. University of Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain

    Abraham Esteve-Núñez

  4. IMDEA-WATER Parque Tecnologico de Alcala, Madrid, Spain

    Abraham Esteve-Núñez

Authors
  1. Jose Rodrigo Quejigo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sara Tejedor-Sanz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Abraham Esteve-Núñez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Falk Harnisch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Falk Harnisch.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rodrigo Quejigo, J., Tejedor-Sanz, S., Esteve-Núñez, A. et al. Bed electrodes in microbial electrochemistry: setup, operation and characterization. ChemTexts 5, 4 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40828-019-0078-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40828-019-0078-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation