Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Social capital and firm performance in transition economies

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Eurasian Business Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study explores how social capital affects the performance of small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in a transition economy. Social capital is referred to as firm’s social interactions with formal and informal creditors, which is financial social capital, and social interactions with politicians and civil servants, which is political social capital. Using a control function estimation method with longitudinal data from repeated surveys of small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in Vietnam, we find an inverted U-shaped relationship between social capital and SMEs’ performance, which is measured by gross profit and labor productivity. We further show that there is a positive complementary effect between innovation and social capital in affecting performance of SMEs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

Data are available upon request.

Code availability

Stata.

Notes

  1. We also use network intensity, which is frequency of network assistance to conduct robustness analysis.

  2. As a result, we removed these SMEs from our sample. The number of removed SMEs were 18, 10, 8, 7, 46, and 70 in 2005, 2007, 2009, 2011, 2013 and 2015, respectively.

  3. We used the question “In this year, how many people do you have regular contact at least once every 3 months, which you find useful for your business operations?” in the questionnaire to capture network size of SME, which is answered for politicians and credit provider separately. We also measure financial and political social capital using different variables providing information on the number of times that bank officers and politicians and civil servants assisted the owner/manager over firm operational issues during the previous year. We will discuss about them in Sensitivity Tests section.

  4. This instrument variable is utilized by answering the question “What was the previous main work’s experience/positions of respondent before owning or managing this firm?” in the questionnaire.

  5. \({\overline{Z} }_{1i}\) in Eq. (4) includes \({\overline{LCs} }_{i}\), \({\overline{IN} }_{i}\), \({\overline{X} }_{i}\) and the time averages of social capital and the square of social capital. \({\overline{Z} }_{2i}\) in Eq. (5) includes \({\overline{Z} }_{1i}\) and the time averages of interaction variables (\({SC.IN}_{it}\) and \({SC}^{2}.{IN}_{it}\)), which are able to eliminate the unobserved firm heterogeneity in the second stage.

  6. We use the command xtreg y x, re vce(cluster firmid) in Stata 16 to estimate Eqs. (4) and (5).

  7. To test for inverted U-shaped relationships, we use Lind and Mehlum’s (2019) user-written utest command in Stata.

  8. We use the nlcom and test commands in Stata to test for this difference.

  9. Only value of jointly testing for endogeneity of financial social capital—chi2(2) = 4.15, p-value = 0.1258, in column (3) for operating profit is weak confirmation. However, the residual of financial social capital is still significant at 10%, which may confirm its endogeneity. Furthermore, we estimate Eq. (4) without controlling for endogeneity by using the “native” RE models and the CRE models. The estimation results are consistent with Columns from (1) to (4) in Table 4. The estimation results are available upon request.

  10. The estimation results will be provided upon request.

  11. We re-estimate Eq. (5) by removing \({SC}_{it}^{2}\), \({SC}^{2}.{IN}_{it}\), and \({\widehat{v}}_{it}^{2}\), then we use “margins, dydx(IN) at(FSC = (0(1)60)) vsquish” and “marginsplot, recast(line) yline(0) xlabel(0(2)60) xlabel(, angle(90))” commands in Stata 16 to obtain Figs. 3 and 4.

  12. To control for possible effects of different foreign markets on inducing the innovation and conditioning the social capital, we have included dummies for these markets in the replacement of the export dummy. The results are robust against this change.

  13. The regression results are available upon request.

  14. We estimated Eq. (3) by using glm command in Stata 16 with poisson or negative binomial in family function and log in link function options along with firm-clustered standard errors.

  15. The regression results are available upon request.

  16. We used the question “How many times per year did your networks assist in issues related to the operation of your firm?”. Note that this question was not mentioned in the 2005 survey questionnaire.

    17 The estimation results will be provided upon request.

References

  • Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S.-W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agénor, P.-R., & Dinh, H. T. (2015). Social capital, product imitation and growth with learning externalities. Journal of Development Economics, 114, 41–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akçomak, I. S., & Ter Weel, B. (2009). Social capital, innovation and growth: Evidence from Europe. European Economic Review, 53(5), 544–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, H. E., & Kim, P. H. (2007). Small worlds, infinite possibilities? How social networks affect entrepreneurial team formation and search. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(1–2), 147–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexy, O. T., Block, J. H., Sandner, P., & Ter Wal, A. L. (2012). Social capital of venture capitalists and start-up funding. Small Business Economics, 39(4), 835–851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antoci, A., Sabatini, F., & Sodini, M. (2013). Economic growth, technological progress and social capital: The inverted U hypothesis. Metroeconomica, 64(3), 401–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arinaitwe, J. (2006). Factors constraining the growth and survival of small scale businesses. A developing countries analysis. Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge, 8(2), 167–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., & Keilbach, M. (2004). Entrepreneurship and regional growth: An evolutionary interpretation. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 14(5), 605–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., Seitz, N., & Rouch, K. M. (2018). Tolerance and innovation: The role of institutional and social trust. Eurasian Business Review, 8(1), 71–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auh, S., & Menguc, B. (2005). Top management team diversity and innovativeness: The moderating role of interfunctional coordination. Industrial Marketing Management, 34(3), 249–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batjargal, B. (2003). Social capital and entrepreneurial performance in Russia: A longitudinal study. Organization Studies, 24(4), 535–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batjargal, B. (2007). Internet entrepreneurship: Social capital, human capital, and performance of Internet ventures in China. Research Policy, 36(5), 605–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batjargal, B. (2010). The effects of network’s structural holes: Polycentric institutions, product portfolio, and new venture growth in China and Russia. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 4(2), 146–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batjargal, B., & Liu, M. (2004). Entrepreneurs’ access to private equity in China: The role of social capital. Organization Science, 15(2), 159–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A. N., & Udell, G. F. (2002). Small business credit availability and relationship lending: The importance of bank organisational structure. The Economic Journal, 112(477), F32–F53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhagavatula, S., Elfring, T., Van Tilburg, A., & Van De Bunt, G. G. (2010). How social and human capital influence opportunity recognition and resource mobilization in India’s handloom industry. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(3), 245–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boudreaux, C., Clarke, G., & Jha, A. (2022). Social capital and small informal business productivity: The mediating roles of financing and customer relationships. Small Business Economics, 59(3), 955–976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1980). Le capital social: Notes provisoires. Actes De La Recherche En Sciences Sociales, 31(1), 2–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, R., & Auken, H. V. (2006). Small firm bankruptcy. Journal of Small Business Management, 44(4), 493–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, S. J. (2004). Venture capital financing, strategic alliances, and the initial public offerings of Internet startups. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(5), 721–741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. C., Chen, Y.-R., & Xin, K. (2004). Guanxi practices and trust in management: A procedural justice perspective. Organization Science, 15(2), 200–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H. W. (2006). The era of open innovation. Managing Innovation and Change, 127(3), 34–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • CIEM. (2016). Characteristics of the Vietnamese business environment—evidence from a SMEs survey in 2015. Social and Labor Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, R. A. (1998). The importance of relationships to the availability of credit. Journal of Banking & Finance, 22(6–8), 959–977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coviello, N. E. (2006). The network dynamics of international new ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(5), 713–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalzic, B., & Fazlioglu, B. (2021). Innovation and firm growth: Turkish manufacturing and service SMEs. Eurasian Business Review, 11, 395–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danquah, M., & Sen, K. (2022). Informal institutions, transaction risk, and firm productivity in Myanmar. Small Business Economics, 58(3), 1721–1737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devarakonda, R., Reuer, J. J., & Tadikonda, H. (2022). Founder social capital and value appropriation in R&D alliance agreements. Research Policy, 51(4), 104474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elfring, T., & Hulsink, W. (2003). Networks in entrepreneurship: The case of high-technology firms. Small Business Economics, 21(4), 409–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enriquez-Perales, S., García-Gómez, C. D., Díez-Esteban, J. M., & Bolaños, E. R. L. (2022). Formal institutions, ICSID arbitration and firm performance: evidence from Latin America. Eurasian Business Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-022-00213-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faccio, M. (2006). Politically connected firms. American Economic Review, 96(1), 369–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, J. P., Wong, T. J., & Zhang, T. (2007). Politically connected CEOs, corporate governance, and Post-IPO performance of China’s newly partially privatized firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 84(2), 330–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisman, R. (2001). Estimating the value of political connections. American Economic Review, 91(4), 1095–1102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giudici, G., Guerini, M., & Rossi-Lamastra, C. (2018). Reward-based crowdfunding of entrepreneurial projects: The effect of local altruism and localized social capital on proponents’ success. Small Business Economics, 50(2), 307–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, E., Rocholl, J., & So, J. (2009). Do politically connected boards affect firm value? The Review of Financial Studies, 22(6), 2331–2360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greve, A., & Salaff, J. W. (2003). Social networks and entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gu, F. F., Hung, K., & Tse, D. K. (2008). When does guanxi matter? Issues of capitalization and its dark sides. Journal of Marketing, 72(4), 12–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haans, R. F., Pieters, C., & He, Z. L. (2016). Thinking about U: Theorizing and testing U-and inverted U-shaped relationships in strategy research. Strategic Management Journal, 37(7), 1177–1195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernández-Carrión, C., Camarero-Izquierdo, C., & Gutiérrez-Cillán, J. (2017). Entrepreneurs’ social capital and the economic performance of small businesses: The moderating role of competitive intensity and entrepreneurs’ experience. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 11(1), 61–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higuchi, Y. (2020). Who participates in free business training? Journal of International Economics and Management, 20(2), 49–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitt, M. A., Bierman, L., Shimizu, K., & Kochhar, R. (2001). Direct and moderating effects of human capital on strategy and performance in professional service firms: A resource-based perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 13–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, M., Morgan, R. E., Ireland, R. D., & Hughes, P. (2014). Social capital and learning advantages: A problem of absorptive capacity. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 8(3), 214–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inkpen, A. C., & Tsang, E. W. (2005). Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 146–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iorio, R., & Segnana, M. L. (2022). Is paying bribes worthwhile? Corruption and innovation in middle-income countries. Eurasian Business Review, 12(3), 475–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, S., Yang, J., Yu, M., Lin, H., Li, C., & Doty, H. (2022). Strategic conformity, organizational learning ambidexterity, and corporate innovation performance: An inverted U-shaped curve? Journal of Business Research, 149, 424–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi, R., & Wooldridge, J. M. (2019). Correlated random effects models with endogenous explanatory variables and unbalanced panels. Annals of Economics and Statistics, 134, 243–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khoshmaram, M., Shiri, N., Shinnar, R. S., & Savari, M. (2020). Environmental support and entrepreneurial behavior among Iranian farmers: The mediating roles of social and human capital. Journal of Small Business Management, 58, 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King-Kauanui, S., Ngoc, S. D., & Ashley-Cotleur, C. (2006). Impact of human resource management: SME performance in Vietnam. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 11(1), 79–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch, M. J., & McGrath, R. G. (1996). Improving labor productivity: Human resource management policies do matter. Strategic Management Journal, 17(5), 335–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laursen, K., Masciarelli, F., & Prencipe, A. (2012a). Regions matter: How localized social capital affects innovation and external knowledge acquisition. Organization Science, 23(1), 177–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laursen, K., Masciarelli, F., & Prencipe, A. (2012b). Trapped or spurred by the home region? The effects of potential social capital on involvement in foreign markets for goods and technology. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(9), 783–807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laursen, K., Masciarelli, F., & Reichstein, T. (2016). A matter of location: The role of regional social capital in overcoming the liability of newness in R&D acquisition activities. Regional Studies, 50(9), 1537–1550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 131–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le, T. K. N., Duvernay, D., & Le, T. H. (2021). Determinants of financial performance of listed firms manufacturing food products in Vietnam: Regression analysis and Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition analysis. Journal of Economics and Development, 23(3), 267–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Van, C., Nguyen, N. A., Nguyen, N. M., & Simioni, M. (2018). Growth strategy with social capital, human capital and physical capital - theory and evidence: The case of Vietnam. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 20(5), 768–787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, N., Sameen, H., & Cowling, M. (2015). Access to finance for innovative SMEs since the financial crisis. Research Policy, 44(2), 370–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, H., & Atuahene-Gima, K. (2001). Product innovation strategy and the performance of new technology ventures in China. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1123–1134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, H., & Zhang, Y. (2007). The role of managers’ political networking and functional experience in new venture performance: Evidence from China’s transition economy. Strategic Management Journal, 28(8), 791–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, M. B., & Kang, J. (2008). How to measure company productivity using value-added: A focus on Pohang Steel (POSCO). Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 25(2), 209–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lind, J., & Mehlum, H. (2019). UTEST: Stata module to test for a U-shaped relationship.

  • Lind, J., & Mehlum, H. (2010). With or without U? The appropriate test for a U-shaped relationship. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 72(1), 109–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y. (2003). Industrial dynamics and managerial networking in an emerging market: The case of China. Strategic Management Journal, 24(13), 1315–1327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malesky, E. J., & Taussig, M. (2009). Where is credit due? Legal institutions, connections, and the efficiency of bank lending in Vietnam. The Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 25(2), 535–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marjański, A., Sulkowski, L., & Marjańska Potakowska, J. (2019). Social capital drives SME growth: A study of family firms in Poland. German Journal of Human Resource Management, 33(3), 280–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markussen, T., & Tarp, F. (2014). Political connections and land-related investment in rural Vietnam. Journal of Development Economics, 110, 291–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masiello, B., & Izzo, F. (2019). Interpersonal social networks and internationalization of traditional SMEs. Journal of Small Business Management, 57, 658–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mateut, S. (2018). Subsidies, financial constraints and firm innovative activities in emerging economies. Small Business Economics, 50(1), 131–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Transport of Vietnam (2013). Báo cáo tổng hợp điều chỉnh chiến lược phát triển giao thông vận tải Việt Nam đến năm 2020 và tầm nhìn đến năm 2030.

  • Mohnen, P., & Hall, B. H. (2013). Innovation and productivity: An update. Eurasian Business Review, 3(1), 47–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molodchik, M., Jardon, C., & Yachmeneva, E. (2020). Multilevel analysis of knowledge sources for product innovation in Russian SMEs. Eurasian Business Review, 11, 247–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mundlak, Y. (1978). On the pooling of time series and cross section data. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 46, 69–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nam, V. H., Sonobe, T., & Otsuka, K. (2009). An inquiry into the transformation process of village industries: The case of a knitwear cluster in northern Vietnam. The Journal of Development Studies, 46(2), 312–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nam, V. H., Sonobe, T., & Otsuka, K. (2010). An inquiry into the development process of village-based industrial clusters: The case of an iron and steel cluster in northern Vietnam. The Journal of Comparative Economics, 37, 568–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nam, V. H., & Tram, H. B. (2021). Business environment and innovation persistence: The case of small- and meidum-sized enterprises in Vietnam. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 30(3), 239–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nieto, M. J., Rodríguez, A., & Hernández, V. (2022). International sourcing and the productivity of SMEs in transition countries: Formal and informal ‘region effects’ and the communist footprint. Journal of Business Research, 145, 347–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2005). Oslo manual, guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data. OECD.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2011). ISIC rev. 3 technology intensity definition. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/sti/ind/48350231.pdf. Accessed Sep 2022.

  • Partanen, J., Kauppila, O. P., Sepulveda, F., & Gabrielsson, M. (2020). Turning strategic network resources into performance: The mediating role of network identity of small-and medium-sized enterprises. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 14(2), 178–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrino, G., & Piva, M. (2019). Innovation, industry and firm age: Are there new knowledge production functions? Eurasian Business Review, 10, 65–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M. W. (2003). Institutional transitions and strategic choices. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 275–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (2003). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirolo, L., & Presutti, M. (2010). The impact of social capital on the start-ups’ performance growth. Journal of Small Business Management, 48(2), 197–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poon, J. P., Thai, D. T., & Naybor, D. (2012). Social capital and female entrepreneurship in rural regions: Evidence from Vietnam. Applied Geography, 35(1–2), 308–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. (1993). The prosperous community: Social capital and public life. The american prospect, 13(Spring), Vol. 4. http://www.prospect.org/print/vol/13. Accessed 7 Apr 2003.

  • Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon and schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ralston, D. A., Terpstra-Tong, J., Maignan, I., & Napier, N. K. (2006). Vietnam: A cross-cultural comparison of upward influence ethics. Journal of International Management, 12(1), 85–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rand, J., & Tarp, F. (2007). Characteristics of the Vietnamese business environment: evidence from a SME survey in 2005. Central Institute for Economic Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigo-Alarcón, J., Parra-Requena, G., & Ruiz-Ortega, M. J. (2020). Cognitive social capital and absorptive capacity as antecedents of entrepreneurial orientation: A configurational approach. Eurasian Business Review, 10(4), 493–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santarelli, E., & Tran, H. T. (2013). The interplay of human and social capital in shaping entrepreneurial performance: The case of Vietnam. Small Business Economics, 40(2), 435–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheng, S., Zhou, K. Z., & Li, J. J. (2011). The effects of business and political ties on firm performance: Evidence from China. Journal of Marketing, 75(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simsek, Z., & Heavey, C. (2011). The mediating role of knowledge-based capital for corporate entrepreneurship effects on performance: A study of small-to medium-sized firms. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 5(1), 81–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soete, L., Verspagen, B., & Ter Weel, B. (2010). Systems of innovation. Handbook of the Economics of Innovation (Vol. 2, pp. 1159–1180). Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stam, W., & Elfring, T. (2008). Entrepreneurial orientation and new venture performance: The moderating role of intra-and extraindustry social capital. Academy of Management Journal, 51(1), 97–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, Q., Wang, L., & Shen, H. (2021). How do SOEs and FIEs affect POEs’ performance in emerging economies? Moderating effects of managerial ties. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 38, 767–788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tappeiner, G., Hauser, C., & Walde, J. (2008). Regional knowledge spillovers: Fact or artifact? Research Policy, 37(5), 861–874.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The General Statistics Office of Vietnam. (2016). Business results of Vietnamese enterprises in the period 2010–2014. Statistical Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, M. (2018). Social capital, innovation and economic growth. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 73, 46–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uzzi, B. (1999). Embeddedness in the making of financial capital: How social relations and networks benefit firms seeking financing. American Sociological Review, 481–505.

  • Westlund, H., & Nilsson, E. (2005). Measuring enterprises’ investments in social capital: A pilot study. Regional Studies, 39(8), 1079–1094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wincent, J., Thorgren, S., & Anokhin, S. (2016). Costly ties: Social capital as a retardant of network-level entrepreneurial orientation. Journal of Small Business Management, 54(1), 229–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data (2nd ed.). MIT press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, J. M. (2015). Control function methods in applied econometrics. Journal of Human Resources, 50(2), 420–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, J. M. (2019). Correlated random effects models with unbalanced panels. Journal of Econometrics, 211(1), 137–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2017). Country partnership framework for the Socialist Republic of Vietnam for the period FY18-FY22. World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2022). GovData360. Available at: https://govdata360.worldbank.org/. Accessed Dec 2022.

  • Yuan, R., Luo, J., Liu, M. J., & Yu, J. (2022). Understanding organizational resilience in a platform-based sharing business: The role of absoprtive capacity. Journal of Business Research, 141, 85–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, L., Huang, H., Chen, X., & Tian, F. (2022). Functional diversity of top management teams and firm performance in SMEs: A social network perspective. Review of Managerial Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-022-00524-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work is supported by Foreign Trade University under the Research Program number FTURP01-2020-01.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contribute to the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nam Hoang Vu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts of interest/competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Doan, H.Q., Masciarelli, F., Prencipe, A. et al. Social capital and firm performance in transition economies. Eurasian Bus Rev 13, 751–780 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-022-00227-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-022-00227-y

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation