Highlights
-
Representative methods for calculating the depth of discharge of different Zn anodes are introduced.
-
Recent advances of aqueous Zn metal batteries with high Zn utilization are reviewed and categorized according to Zn anodes with different structures.
-
The working mechanism of anode-free aqueous Zn metal batteries is introduced in detail, and different modification strategies for anode-free aqueous Zn metal batteries are summarized.
Abstract
Aqueous zinc metal batteries (AZMBs) are promising candidates for next-generation energy storage due to the excellent safety, environmental friendliness, natural abundance, high theoretical specific capacity, and low redox potential of zinc (Zn) metal. However, several issues such as dendrite formation, hydrogen evolution, corrosion, and passivation of Zn metal anodes cause irreversible loss of the active materials. To solve these issues, researchers often use large amounts of excess Zn to ensure a continuous supply of active materials for Zn anodes. This leads to the ultralow utilization of Zn anodes and squanders the high energy density of AZMBs. Herein, the design strategies for AZMBs with high Zn utilization are discussed in depth, from utilizing thinner Zn foils to constructing anode-free structures with theoretical Zn utilization of 100%, which provides comprehensive guidelines for further research. Representative methods for calculating the depth of discharge of Zn anodes with different structures are first summarized. The reasonable modification strategies of Zn foil anodes, current collectors with pre-deposited Zn, and anode-free aqueous Zn metal batteries (AF-AZMBs) to improve Zn utilization are then detailed. In particular, the working mechanism of AF-AZMBs is systematically introduced. Finally, the challenges and perspectives for constructing high-utilization Zn anodes are presented.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) have shown remarkable success for use in portable electronic devices and electric vehicles owing to their high energy densities and long lifespans [1,2,3,4]. However, further application of LIBs is limited by concerns about their organic electrolytes, inadequate lithium reserves, and high costs [5,6,7]. Consequently, it is necessary to develop alternative secondary batteries to replace LIBs [8, 9]. Aqueous zinc metal batteries (AZMBs) have become competitive candidates due to the excellent theoretical capacities (820 mAh g−1 and 5855 mAh cm−3) and low electrochemical potentials (− 0.76 V vs. standard hydrogen electrode) of zinc (Zn) metal anodes, abundant Zn resources, and intrinsic security and high ionic conductivity of aqueous electrolytes (~ 1 S cm−1 vs. 1–10 mS cm−1 of organic electrolytes) [10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. However, serious issues of Zn metal anodes, such as hydrogen evolution reaction (HER), corrosion, passivation, and dendrite growth, lead to poor reversibility, unstable cycling life, and even short-circuited failure [17,18,19,20,21,22,23]. These issues significantly impede practical application of the AZMBs. Various stabilization strategies have been suggested for Zn metal anodes, including surface modification, structure optimization, electrolyte engineering, and separator design, to overcome the issues mentioned above [24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31]. Nevertheless, these studies have yet to achieve a high Zn utilization due to the use of far excess Zn [32]. To compensate for the irreversible loss of Zn and enhance the cycling stability of the charge/discharge process, researchers typically construct Zn metal anodes with excess Zn (thickness of Zn foil ≥ 100 μm) and low areal capacities (1–5 mAh cm−2), resulting in a high capacity ratio for the negative electrode to the positive electrode (N/P, > 50) and a low depth of discharge (DOD) (< 10%) [33].
The depth of discharge (DOD) is the percentage of the capacity involved in the electrode reaction relative to the overall capacity of the Zn metal anode:
The DOD is an important metric that reflects the Zn utilization and the serviceability of the Zn metal anode under practical conditions. Meanwhile, the DOD is an essential criterion for objectively evaluating the performance of AZMBs. Consequently, according to Eq. (1), reducing the amount of Zn used in the anode is an effective strategy to improve the Zn utilization.
In previous studies, excess Zn has been commonly present in the form of thick Zn foil (thickness ≥ 100 μm) [34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41]. The excess Zn continuously replenishes the active Zn to overcome losses due to “dead Zn” and byproducts, and this practice results in a deceptive cycling lifespan and impractical Coulombic efficiency (CE) [13, 42]. Additionally, the use of excess Zn raises the cost of the battery and reduces the actual energy density (calculated from the full cell mass) [43, 44]. When Zn is no longer an unlimited supplement, it is essential to inhibit the growth of Zn dendrites and reduce the formation of byproducts [45]. There have been several strategies for constructing Zn anodes with high Zn utilization. The most direct way to improve the Zn utilization is to control the active material within a reasonable range by reducing the thickness of the Zn foil or by using a pre-deposited Zn anode.
The formula used to calculate the DOD for a Zn metal anode using Zn foil is as follows:
where x (μm) is the thickness of the Zn foil and y (mAh cm−2) represents the Zn areal capacity used in electrochemical testing (Fig. 1a).
For Zn anodes using pre-deposited Zn,
where x (mAh cm−2) is the pre-deposited Zn capacity, y (mAh cm−2) is the Zn capacity used during electrochemical testing, and m (mg cm−2) is the pre-deposited Zn mass loading (Fig. 1b).
The theoretical mass capacity (CZn,mass) and the theoretical volume capacity (CZn,volume) are described in the equations below:
where n represents the number of electrons participating in the redox reaction (n = 2 for Zn), F is Faraday’s constant (96,485 C mol−1), and M is the molecular weight in g mol−1. The factor 3.6 converts the theoretical specific capacity of C g−1 to the more broadly used mAh g−1, and ρ is the density of Zn (ρ = 7.14 g cm−3).
These equations indicate that the research strategies employed in previous studies resulted in limited enhancement of the discharge capacity due to the reduction of DOD in thick Zn foils. Thus, a notable improvement in DOD can be achieved by reducing the use of excess Zn. For instance, the DOD for a 100-μm Zn foil only increases slightly from 1.7 to 8.5% upon raising the areal discharge capacity from 1 to 5 mAh cm−2. In comparison, the DOD for a 25-μm Zn foil increases significantly from 6.8 to 34.2% with an increase in the areal discharge capacity from 1 to 5 mAh cm−2 (Fig. 1c).
The DOD is commonly employed to indicate the Zn utilization in symmetric cells, and the Zn utilization increases with the DOD. In full cells, the Zn utilization is usually increased by reducing the N/P [32, 33]. For instance, under ideal conditions when N/P = 2, the Zn utilization is 50%; when N/P ≈ 1, the Zn utilization can even reach 100% [46]. However, this is not easy to achieve in practical situations, so the Zn utilization for full cells must be reconsidered. The Zn utilization in full cells can be calculated by converting the actual areal capacity of the full cell and the discharge capacity of the anode.
Is it feasible to reduce the amount of excess Zn in the anode or to raise the Zn utilization to approximately 100%? The concept of an anode-free battery was proposed and widely studied in the previous research on lithium metal batteries [47,48,49,50,51,52,53]. Inspired by this, anode-free aqueous Zn metal batteries (AF-AZMBs) were also proposed [54]. The AF-AZMBs consist of a Zn-rich cathode as the Zn source and a Zn-free anode with shunned Zn foils or other Zn metal anodes. Zn2+ ions are plated in situ on the anode during the first charging process and are fully utilized in the following discharging and charging cycles (Fig. 1d). The deposited Zn metal is the only Zn source available for discharge. This unique Zn-free anode structure gives AF-AZMBs significant advantages over AZMBs: (1) They are more economical. Compared with AZMBs with Zn pre-deposited on the anode, the AF-AZMBs do not require a complex electroplating process to prepare the Zn anode, which reduces the manufacturing cost of the battery. Additionally, the high Zn utilization makes N/P ≈ 1, and the energy and power densities are greatly improved. (2) They are more secure. The Zn metal on the anode current collector is electroplated from the Zn-rich cathode due to the absence of the anode, which means that the assembled AF-AZMBs are fully discharged when stored [54]. This not only avoids self-discharge to increase the capacity, but also makes the storage and operation of the AZMBs safer [55]. (3) They are more accurate. The limited Zn on the cathode side makes the measurement of the CE more accurate. As a result, the electroplating/stripping behavior of Zn on the collector can be evaluated accurately.
The methods mentioned above to improve the Zn utilization are gradually being implemented. Nevertheless, how to design AZMBs with high Zn utilization has rarely been systematically discussed and summarized. Herein, we systematically discuss typical strategies for enhancing Zn utilization from the perspective of reducing the amount of excess Zn. First, we summarize the representative methods for calculating the DOD of Zn anodes with different structures. Then, we focus on establishing AZMBs with high Zn utilization by reducing the thickness of Zn foil. Next, we discuss 3D collectors as pre-deposited Zn substrates to reduce the use of excess Zn on the anodes. More importantly, we summarize strategies for constructing stabilized AF-AZMBs with Zn-free anode structures (Fig. 2). Finally, we present the challenges and perspectives for constructing high-Zn-utilization AZMBs with a view to providing comprehensive guidelines for further research.
2 Zn Foil Anode
Zn foil is a typical anode material for AZMBs. In previous studies, thick Zn foils (> 100 µm, 58.5 mAh cm−2) were commonly used on the anode [56,57,58,59]. The excess Zn constantly replenished the active Zn lost during cycling. At a lower areal capacity (≈ 2 mAh cm−2), the DOD was only approximately 3.4%, which implied a low utilization of active Zn. When assembled into full cells, the N/P was too high that led to low energy density for full cells. Therefore, overly thick Zn foils constitute a severe impediment for moving AZMBs toward practical application. Currently, a more viable strategy is to reduce the thickness of the Zn foil, but a series of resulting problems must be overcome.
Before using a Zn foil as the anode, the Zn foil surface is made as smooth as possible by polishing, but it is still not flawless. Scratches and pits on the Zn foil surface cause uneven distributions of the electric field and Zn2+ ion concentration and promote side reactions and the formation of dendrites, which reinforces the defects on the Zn foil surface and forms a vicious cycle. To make matters worse, thinner Zn foils also cause some new problems. A thin Zn foil is more susceptible to chalking and fragmentation, resulting in a significant loss of active Zn and even cell failure during repeated Zn deposition and stripping, especially with a high Zn utilization. Therefore, for thin Zn foil anodes, strategies such as applying artificial surface coating layers, electrolyte engineering, and separator designing are used to promote uniform Zn deposition and reduce side reactions. The stable Zn foil anodes give the AZMBs with high Zn utilization longer lifespan.
2.1 Artificial Surface Coating Engineering
A series of adverse reactions, such as dendrite growth, HER, corrosion, and passivation, occur at Zn metal anodes during cycling, especially with high Zn utilization. A widely used strategy is to build an artificial protective layer on the anode surface [60,61,62,63,64,65,66]. The selection of materials and the design of the protective layer structure are crucial factors, as is the material selected for construction of the artificial protective layer. The widely used protective coating materials include inorganic compounds (such as ZnS [67], ZnF2 [68], SiN [69,70,71], Zn3(PO4)2 [72], and Zn3(BO3)2 [73]), metals and alloys (such as Sn [61], Cd [62], In alloys [74], and Cu/Zn alloys [75]), carbon materials (such as graphene [76], carbon nanotubes (CNTs) [77], carbon cloth [78]and carbon fibers [79]), polymers (such as polyamide (PA) [80]and polyethylene oxide (PEO) [81]), and other materials (such as metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) [82,83,84], covalent organic frameworks (COFs) [85,86,87], and MXenes [88]). In the structural design, the artificially coated solid electrolyte interface (SEI) protective layer isolates the interface between the electrolyte and the Zn metal anode and inhibits the HER. Alloying of Zn with other metals by co-deposition effectively adjusts the physical and chemical properties of the Zn metal anode surface and induces heteroepitaxial deposition of Zn. A surface protective layer with a 3D structure can adapt to the volume changes of the Zn electroplating/stripping process, reduce the local current density, and enhance the kinetics of Zn2+ ion transfer. An effective combination of different materials and structures can give the Zn anodes with high Zn utilization more significant protection. Table 1 provides a comprehensive summary.
The construction of a strong and dense SEI on the Zn metal anode surface with inorganic compounds is an efficient strategy [67,68,69,70,71,72, 89,90,91,92,93,94,95]. Generally, an ideal SEI layer should meet the following characteristics. First, the coating should possess high Zn2+ ionic conductivity and electrical insulation to allow Zn deposition at the interface between the coating and anode. Second, the coating should be dense and stable in the electrolyte to prevent direct contact between the electrolyte and the metal anode surface. In addition, good mechanical properties and close bonding with the metal anode surface should also be considered so the coating plays a stable protective role during long-term cycling. Yang et al. proposed a method for screening potential SEIs on anodes (Fig. 3a) [73]. The charge transfer capability of different SEI materials was evaluated from the band gaps of the materials and the potential barriers for Zn2+ ion diffusion (Fig. 3b, c). The dendrite suppression capability was determined from the interfacial energy (γ) and Young’s modulus (E), γE (Fig. 3d). After a comprehensive comparison, they identified Zn3(BO3)2 (ZBO) as one of the most promising candidates that effectively promoted the uniform deposition and lateral growth of Zn. In addition, the high dissociation energy barrier for H2O on Zn@ZBO effectively inhibited side reactions (Fig. 3e). As a result, a symmetric Zn cell using Zn@ZBO was cycled stably for 250 h (50 mA cm−2, 10 mAh cm−2) with up to a 60% Zn utilization.
An advantage of constructing a metal or alloy protective layer is that it induces Zn deposition along Zn (002) plane, which causes the Zn to grow epitaxially layer by layer [74, 96]. It effectively inhibits the overgrowth of Zn dendrites, and Zn (002) planes possess a better corrosion resistant. A common approach is to construct an interfacial protective layer with a low degree of Zn lattice mismatch. In the first stage of Zn plating, the low mismatch crystalline surfaces of the protective layer provide heterogeneous nucleation and guide nucleation and epitaxial growth of Zn (002) crystalline surfaces. Finally, a uniform and dense Zn deposition layer is obtained. Huang et al. prepared a Cu–Zn alloy lattice interface-locked layer (ILL) by co-electrodeposition [75]. The ILL had a low lattice mismatch with Zn (δ = 0.036). And there is high total interfacial energy and formation energy between CuZn5 (002) and Zn (002). Therefore, the ILL can as a interfacial lattice locking layer for planar and stable Zn deposition (Fig. 3f). With a limited Zn supply (N/P = 4.72), the ILL@ZN||NMO cell was stably cycled for 2300 h (Fig. 3g).
Carbon materials are also used extensively as protective layers [78, 79, 97]. Graphene exhibits a slight lattice mismatch with Zn (002) and possesses a low binding force with Zn [98]. Chen et al. synthesized an artificial interface film comprising nitrogen (N)-doped graphene oxide (NGO) to provide a parallel and ultrathin interface modification layer (≈ 120 nm) on the Zn foil [76]. The pyrrolic nitrogen-containing functional group resulted in a high binding energy between the NGO and Zn, which enhanced the ability of Zn trapping by the NGO. The uniform electric field and zincophilic sites induced uniform distribution/adsorption of Zn2+ ions, resulting in a flat deposition morphology and stable interface at the NGO@Zn electrode. 3D structured carbon nanotubes (CNTs) have also attracted attention because of their ability to reduce the local current density and induce uniform Zn nucleation and growth. Li et al. used zincophilic CNTs as a protective layer for the Zn foil anode (Fig. 3h) [77]. After hydrophilization, the CNTs exhibited good wettability with the electrolyte and transported Zn2+ ions efficiently. They found that the CNTs were capacitive before Zn reduction at the CNTs–Zn interface. This resulted in enrichment of Zn2+ ions and electrons at the interface, which generated higher electrochemical activity at the CNT–Zn interface. The species distributions identified with time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (TOF–SIMS) indicated that Zn deposition occurred mainly at the CNTs–Zn interface (Fig. 3i). Based on these advantages, the CNTguard–Zn symmetric cells exhibited sustain good stability ranging from 2 to 97% DOD (Fig. 3j).
When constructing a hydrogel protective layer, the requirement is close bonding of the hydrogel protective layer with the Zn anode and rapid diffusion of Zn2+ ions within the gel layer [80, 99,100,101,102,103,104]. Zhang et al. designed a new ion-selective polymer gel as a protective layer for Zn metal anodes (Fig. 3k) [81]. The hydrogel layer provided fast Zn2+ ion migration with a high diffusion coefficient, showing fast Zn stripping/plating kinetics (Fig. 3l). Additionally, diffusion of water in the hydrogel was limited, which prevented direct contact of the water with the new metal anodes surface. Meanwhile, the hydrogel layer was effectively bonded to the Zn foil, resulting in a high diffusion energy barrier for lateral diffusion of Zn2+ ions at the interface and facilitating dendrite-free Zn deposition (Fig. 3m). In addition, isolating the electrode from H2O with the tightly bound gel interface layer effectively suppressed side reactions such as corrosion and passivation. On this basis, the hydrogel-protected Zn metal anode achieved a high Zn utilization of 90% at a high current density of 5 mA cm−2 for an extremely long period of 1000 h. The full cell exhibited high energy and power densities with a long lifetime. At high Zn utilization of 50%, the full cell exhibited high specific capacity of 410 mAh g−1 based on the effective mass of the cathode.
MXenes, MOFs and COFs have also been utilized as protective layers on Zn metal anodes [82,83,84,85,86,87,88, 105, 106]. Ye et al. constructed a tetramethylammonium-intercalated Ti3C2Tx MXene (MX-TMA) coating with a low Zn nucleation barrier on the surface of Zn foil (Fig. 3n) [105]. The coating showed high hydrophilicity and abundant zincophilic sites for the protective layer. Moreover, the MX-TMA guided directional and homogeneous deposition of Zn on the beneficial (002) planes by modulating the synergistic effect of zincophilic sites and a low lattice match (~ 10%) between the MXene and Zn. As a result, the lifespan of the Zn anode was extended by 3600 h at 2 mA cm−2. Even under deep discharge (DODZn ≈ 85%), the MX-TMA@Zn anode still operated stably more than 450 h. Wang et al. utilized the MOF-encapsulated Zn(TFSI)2-tris(2,2,2-trifluoroethyl)phosphate (TFEP) electrolyte to form a ZnF2-Zn3(PO4)2 SEI to inhibit Zn dendrites and HER (Fig. 3o) [82]. With the capacity ratio of Zn:MnO2 at 2:1, the full cell in Zn(TFSI)2-TFEP@MOF/H2O electrolyte still maintained 141 mAh g−1 with CE approaching 100% after 600 cycles. Lu et al. constructed an ultrathin, fluorinated two-dimensional porous covalent organic framework (FCOF) film as a protective layer on the Zn anode surface (Fig. 3p) [87]. The strong interaction between fluorine (F) in FCOF and Zn reduced the surface energy of the Zn (002) crystal plane, enabling horizontal parallel Zn deposition. Thus, the FCOF@Zn/MnO2 full cell with N/P = 5:1 exhibited a stable lifespan with more than 200 cycles even at 4 mA cm−2.
The artificial SEI layers introduced above can protect Zn anode and guide uniform Zn2+ ion plating/stripping, but their further application is hampered by some issues, such as tedious preparation process and poor compatibility among anode, protective coating and electrolyte. When Zn is deposited on the metal surface with good zincophilicity such as Ag and Cu, Zn can enter the metal lattices to form alloys, which improves the substrate zincophilicity to promote the uniform Zn plating/stripping. However, when discussing the zincophilicity of the metal, only the Zn deposition process on metal surface is considered, while the influence of the metal/alloy in the stripping process is ignored. Carbon-based coating layers play a key role in the stability of Zn anodes. This is because the porous structure can provide sufficient space for Zn deposition and homogenize the ion diffusion to avoid “tip effect”. Moreover, the good mechanical strength of carbon-based coating layers can further inhibit the dendrite growth. However, due to the conductivity of carbon materials and/or the zincophilic sites provided by heteroatoms, Zn is preferentially deposited onto the protective layer, resulting in the protection failure of the carbon-based coating layers. MOFs and COFs possess many advantages, such as high porosity, low density, large surface area, strong skeleton, adjustable porous morphology, and rich physical and chemical characteristics. Therefore, as the artificial coating layers of Zn anodes, MOFs and COFs can be used as the diffusion channels or enrichment deposition centers of metal ions to adjust the uniform Zn nucleation, guide the uniform Zn deposition, reduce the polarization voltage, and realize dendrite inhibition. Nevertheless, the further application of MOFs and COFs in AZMBs is limited by the complicated synthesis process and high cost. MXenes with 2D structure exhibit high electronic conductivity, low ion diffusion barrier and good mechanical properties. Abundant functional groups of MXenes can provide strong binding for Zn and serve as nucleation sites to induce uniform Zn nucleation and deposition. However, MXenes are easily oxidized due to the presence of many defects/vacancies and exposed metal atoms/clusters on the surface, thus deteriorating the inherent properties. Therefore, improving the chemical stability of MXenes is a critical task for practical applications. Hydrogels are constructed of saturated water and cross-linked polymer networks, which results in hydrogels and aqueous batteries being inherently compatible. The hydrogel elastomer formed by the polymer networks can promote the device flexibility, and the hydrogel anionic conductor formed by the water molecules can ensure the ion transport during charge/discharge. However, the weak ionic conductivity also brings other issues to the Zn anode. For instance, the dynamics of ion transfer may be slowed due to increased polarization.
In conclusion, the construction of artificial protective layer is an effective strategy to improve the Zn utilization and electrochemical performance of AZMBs. However, in selecting and designing protective layer materials and structures, the electrochemical performance, chemical stability, preparation process, and other factors must be considered wholistically to achieve a better protection effect.
2.2 Electrolyte Engineering
The electrolyte influences the diffusion of Zn2+ ions and the electrochemical reactions occurring at the electrode/electrolyte interface, which determines the electrochemical performance of AZMBs. Undesirable reactions at the electrode/electrolyte interface, such as dendrite growth, HER and corrosion, hinder the construction of Zn metal anodes with high Zn utilization [107,108,109]. In order to alleviate the above problems and improve the Zn utilization, electrolyte engineering mainly focuses on utilizing hybrid electrolytes, electrolyte additives, and novel electrolyte systems such as gel electrolytes and solid electrolytes. The hybrid electrolytes can effectively reduce the free water activity, break the hydrogen-bond network and weaken the Zn2+ solvation [110,111,112,113,114,115,116]. The electrolyte additives can reshape the Zn2+ solvation sheaths [117, 118], modulate the electric double layers (EDL) [119], or form protective in situ SEI layers at electrode/electrolyte interface [120]. Polymer hydrogel electrolytes possess less free water and better electrochemical stability than aqueous electrolytes, as well as good mechanical properties and flexibility required to form the reasonable interface. Table 2 provides a comprehensive summary.
During electrodeposition process, the Zn2+ ions form tight solvation sheaths ([Zn(H2O)6]2+) with six free H2O molecules and provide many reactive H2O molecules at the anode/electrolyte interface, which leads to various side reactions, such as HER [111]. In addition, the increase of local pH caused by H2O decomposition accelerates the formation of byproducts [112, 121]. Hybrid electrolytes and electrolyte additives can improve the reversibility of Zn metal anodes by modulating the solvation configuration around Zn2+ ions to inhibit Zn dendrites and side reactions [115, 116, 122,123,124]. Chen et al. added sulfolane (SL) to the electrolyte [113]. The SL changed the primary solvation structure of Zn2+ ions, effectively inhibiting the activity of H2O from the aqueous solution and significantly improving the electrochemical stability of Zn metal anodes (Fig. 4a–c). With the addition of SL, the most stable structure in the electrolyte was Zn(H2O)4ClSL, and an overly high concentration caused displacement of the SL by water molecules (Fig. 4d). With a 25% concentration of SL, the resulting Zn||Zn symmetric cell was stable for more than 80 cycles at a high Zn utilization of 80% (20 mAh cm−2) and 40 mA cm−2 with the average CE of 99.8% and the overpotential of 0.19 V (Fig. 4e, f). With N/P = 1.5, the Zn||V2O5 full cell was stable for 500 cycles at 10 A g−1, with a capacity retention of 70% and Zn utilization of up to 67%.
The electric double layer (EDL) influences the electrochemical processes occurring at the interface, such as desolvation and reduction of Zn2+ ions and the formation of SEI films [125,126,127]. Zn2+ ions and many free water molecules are tightly adsorbed on the Zn metal surface with negative charge [119, 128]. Electrostatic repulsion and shielding effects cause the solubilized Zn2+ ions to be dispersed in the diffusion layer [129,130,131]. Direct contact between the free water and Zn metal leads to HER and triggers chain reactions such as corrosion and passivation [132]. Electrolyte additives can tune the structure of the EDL precisely. The addition of high valent ions can reduce the double layer thickness and double layer repulsion, thus enabling dense and homogeneous Zn deposition [133, 134]. Additionally, competing ions can be introduced for preferential adsorption at the anode surface, so that the direct contact between water molecules and the Zn metal surface can be inhibited [135]. The electrostatic shield can prevent the “tip effect” and inhibit dendrite formation [136, 137]. Chen et al. added the amphoteric ionic liquid (ZIL) to the electrolyte, and 3-(1-methylimidazole) propane sulfonate (ImS) was stably adsorbed on the electrode surface (Fig. 4g) [138]. The strong adsorption of ImS on the Zn metal anode caused the ImS to enrich and preferentially occupy the highly active sites on the Zn metal surface, forming a dynamic electrostatic shielding layer and a unique water-poor interface on the Zn anode (Fig. 4h, i). The dynamic electrostatic shield layer inhibited deposition of Zn2+ at the high-potential protrusions. It also ensured 3D diffusion of Zn2+ ions and suppressed 2D diffusion in the adapted EDL. Formation of the water-poor interface was attributed to interaction of the ImS additive with water to release numerous active sites, thereby limiting occupation of the active sites on the surface by active water molecules. Therefore, even at a high current density (10 mA cm−2), the anode surface still exhibited a uniform and dense Zn deposition morphology, with Zn utilization as high as 85% (20 mAh cm−2) (Fig. 4j).
Although preparing SEI layers formed ex situ by chemical deposition or physical coating on a Zn foil surface is complex and time-consuming, the SEI layers formed in situ by adding electrolyte additives or utilizing hybrid electrolytes are more useful for practical application, especially when high Zn utilization is desired [108, 109, 114, 115, 120, 139,140,141,142,143,144,145,146,147,148]. Guo et al. constructed dense and stable SEI layers in AZMBs in situ by introducing Zn(H2PO4)2 into the electrolyte (Fig. 4k) [149]. The formation mechanism is as follows:
The SEI layer with a thickness of approximately 140 nm possessed a high adsorption capacity for Zn2+ ions, which led to a uniform Zn2+ ion flux at the Zn metal surface and promoted uniform Zn deposition (Fig. 4l). In addition, the Zn2+ ion diffusion channels in the SEI corresponded to low Zn2+ ion diffusion energy barriers, ensuring uniform and efficient Zn2+ ion diffusion, suppression of electrolyte-induced side reactions and a dendrite-free, uniform Zn deposition morphology, thus improving the stability and reversibility of the Zn metal anode (Fig. 4m, n).
The abundant hydrophilic groups of the gel electrolyte can adsorb considerable water molecules, giving the gel electrolyte good ionic conductivity [107, 150]. Since the gel electrolyte generally possesses the good mechanical strength and flexibility, its role is similar to that of a battery separator [151]. In addition, the reduced free water content can effectively inhibit the HER, corrosion, passivation, and by-product formation at the electrolyte/electrode interface [152]. However, ex situ prepared gel electrolytes often require more contact with the electrode interface due to the increased interfacial impedance and gradual degradation of the interface environment during long cycling, which is caused by dendrite growth and volume changes. The intrinsic reducing capacity of Zn can be used to prepare gel electrolytes in situ [153]. The reduction–oxidation reaction between Zn metal and potassium persulfate (KPS) effectively generated SO4– radical ions, which in turn triggered the polymerization of acrylamide (AM) in the precursor solution (Fig. 4o).
The storage and loss moduli of the in situ gel electrolyte led to rapid polymerization of the precursor solution at the Zn foil within 3 min (Fig. 4p). The in situ welded gel electrolyte exhibited good interfacial contact and strong bonding to the Zn metal anode. It effectively inhibited side reactions at the electrode/electrolyte interface and prevented 2D diffusion of Zn2+ ions on the anode surface. Changes in the relative transfer coefficients (RTCs) of the (101) and (002) planes showed that the solid chemically bonded interface modulated the deposition of Zn along the (002) plane, which had a lower surface energy (Fig. 4q). These properties of the in situ gel electrolyte allowed the stacked cell to achieve a stable lifespan of 240 h even at a high current density (40 mA cm−2) and DOD (40 mAh cm−2, ≈ 87%). The in situ gel electrolyte mitigated interfacial problems such as dendrite growth and interfacial side reactions through adequate contact with the solid electrode interface.
In summary, Zn anodes are effectively regulated through optimizing electrolytes to achieve dendrite-free growth and inhibit side reactions. However, when electrolyte engineering optimizes anode/electrolyte interface and changes solvation structure of Zn2+ ions, it also affects the cathode structure and cathode/electrolyte interface property. Therefore, designing electrolytes with more comprehensive functions is an important direction for the development of electrolyte engineering. Moreover, it is necessary to develop electrolyte optimization strategies with high Zn utilization and lean electrolytes for commercialization of AZMBs. Under lean electrolyte conditions, designing the electrolyte with good stability can reduce the sharp decrease in performance caused by the electrolyte decomposition.
2.3 Separator Designing
As a vital component of the battery system, the separator stores electrolytes and provides channels to connect the anode and cathode while physically isolating the anode and cathode to prevent short circuits [154, 155]. In AZMBs, the requirements of the separator are more stringent due to the volume changes and sharp dendrite formation during Zn deposition/stripping at the anode [156]. The separator direct contacts with the anode and cathode, so it is expected to regulate the chemistry of the electrode/electrolyte interface through modification of the separator [157]. Glass fibers (GFs) are commonly used as separators in AZMBs, which possess fast ionic conductivity but poor mechanical strength. Moreover, the uneven porous structure of GFs allows Zn dendrites to grow wantonly [158]. Therefore, the ideal separator should feature sufficient porosity, mechanical flexibility, ionic conductivity, ion-selective channels, and excellent electrolyte absorption and retention capacities [159, 160]. At present, one of the main strategies used to control the separator is to modify traditional GFs, e.g., by introducing zincophilic coating to increase the Zn2+ ion concentration at the anode surface and reduce the nucleation overpotential. Another widely adopted strategy is to develop a new membrane exhibiting high zincophilicity, mechanical flexibility, and electrolyte wettability [161]. These modification strategies are effective in promoting uniform Zn deposition at high Zn utilization and restraining side reactions. Table 3 provides a comprehensive summary.
Janus membrane-absorbed sulfonated cellulose graphene was employed to modify a commercial GF separator [162]. The hydrophilic sulfonated cellulose improved the wettability of the separator and electrolyte, and the sulfonic groups on the cellulose facilitated the adsorption of Zn2+ ions (Fig. 5a). The oriented graphene adsorbed on the diaphragm provided the preferred (002) texture for Zn deposition (Fig. 5b). With further deposition, the Janus separator continuously adjusted the growth morphology of Zn on the exposed Zn (002) surface and promoted the epitaxial growth of Zn. In addition to regulating the Zn deposition morphology, the ion-sieving Janus separator provided a single Zn2+ ion channel and enriched the Zn2+ ions on the anode surface. Because the sulfate radical reached the high energy barrier of the sulfonated cellulose surface and the hydrogen ions formed hydrogen bonds with the hydroxyl groups on the cellulose skeleton, it was anchored on the sulfonated cellulose surface with the lowest energy (Fig. 5c, d), thus reducing the occurrence of side reactions. The Zn symmetric batteries with Janus separators maintained stable cycling for 220 h at 28.3 mA cm−2/28.3 mAh cm−2, with a corresponding DOD value of more than 56%.
There are abundant sources of biomass cellulose (BC) in nature. The films prepared by biomass cellulose possess good hydrophilicity, abundant hydroxyl groups, strong mechanical properties, and a uniform porous structure. Therefore, BC is an ideal material for constructing the separator. The BC is rich in functional groups (–OH) (Fig. 5e) [156]. A ZnHAP/BC membrane was prepared by hydrogen bonding self-assembly method and modified with nanohydroxyapatite (HAP). The wide electrochemical window showed that the hydroxyl ZnHAP/BC separator significantly reduced the reactivity of water (Fig. 5f). Additionally, Zn was enriched on the anode surface due to the blocking effect of the negative oxygen functional groups on the SO42− in ZnHAP/BC, indicating that ZnHAP/BC enhanced the Zn2+ ionic conductivity by accelerating desolvation and migration of the Zn2+ ions (Fig. 5g, h). In addition, considerable zincophilic adsorption sites regulated the uniform Zn2+ flux toward the anode/electrolyte interface, thus promoting uniform Zn deposition (Fig. 5i, j). Polymers are also effective separator materials. Zhou et al. used a robust hydrophilic polyvinylidene difluoride-type filter as a separator (VVLP) [163]. Compared with GFs, the VVLP showed higher mechanical strength (Fig. 5k) while maintaining an ionic conductivity similar to that of the GFs (Fig. 5l). In addition, the uniformly distributed pore sizes (500 nm) provided uniform channels for ion transport, which led to a more uniform Zn2+ ion concentration gradient and fine Zn dendrite particles with adjustable size. Moreover, with high capacity, the coverage of the hydrated zinc sulfate (ZSH, (Zn(OH)2)3ZnSO4·xH2O) composite layer effectively reduced the porosity of the VVLP separator, triggering the mechanical inhibition that tended to flatten the interface of the electrodeposition zone. When the N/P was 1.35, a high capacity of 1.83 Ah was obtained with a three-layer high-energy pouch cell. At a discharge voltage of 1.35 V, the energy density reached 115.1 Wh kg−1 (Fig. 5m).
Designing novel separators is an effective strategy to improve Zn utilization by promoting homogeneous Zn2+ ion flux and inhibiting dendrite growth. Utilizing functionalized separators can reduce costs and increase energy density by avoiding the use of expensive and thick glass fibers. However, separator designing strategies to improve Zn utilization have received less attention, and existing strategies are limited in improving Zn utilization. Solving both cathode side and anode side problems is pivotal to achieve highly stable AZMBs with high Zn utilization. It is necessary to further develop functionalized separators with simple preparation methods and good mechanical properties. Additionally, strategies such as electrolyte modification and interfacial protective layers should be employed synergistically with the separator designing to achieve high Zn utilization for AZMBs.
3 Pre-deposited Zn Metal Anodes
It is easy to reduce the amount of excess Zn by reducing the thickness of the Zn foil. However, if the amount of Zn is excessively reduced, the overly thin Zn foil (< 10 μm) will be quickly destroyed during cycling and fail as a substrate for depositing Zn [164]. Therefore, to build stable Zn anode structures while reducing the amount of excess Zn and increasing Zn utilization, constructing suitable collectors for deposited Zn is an effective strategy [165]. Designs of 3D or gradient anodes can increase the contact area between the electrode and the electrolyte and the number of Zn nucleation sites while reducing the local current and nucleation overpotential, resulting in a uniform electric field and distribution of Zn2+ ions to enable uniform Zn deposition and slow the dendrite growth [46, 166]. Moreover, the 3D skeleton with good mechanical strength and toughness can adapt well to the volume changes of the anode during cycling [167, 168]. In addition, the dendrites can be better inhibited by low lattice mismatch of the collector/Zn interface [169,170,171]. The materials used in the skeleton of collector can be divided into carbon materials [98, 172,173,174,175,176,177,178,179], Zn [170, 180], other metals such as Cu [164, 167, 171, 181, 182], Ni [183], Ti [184], Al [185], and Ag [186], alloy materials [187,188,189,190], MXenes [191, 192], and MOF-based materials [193]. In brief, the preparation of Zn metal anodes by pre-deposition can reduce the amount of excess Zn and thus improve the Zn utilization. Table 4 provides a comprehensive summary.
As mentioned above, carbon materials can be used as surface coatings to protect Zn anodes [76,77,78,79, 97]. 3D structured carbon materials such as carbon fibers and carbon nanotubes possess excellent electrical conductivities, light weights, high porosities, and good mechanical strengths [174, 175]. Therefore, they can also be used as the host materials for pre-deposition. The carbon nanotube networks are highly conductive backbones for Zn deposition, and they have low Zn nucleation overpotentials (Fig. 6a) [172]. The uniformly distributed electric field can promote the dendrite-free Zn deposition. This pre-deposited host structure achieved a DOD of 28%. 3D printing is an advanced technique used in building 3D structures, which allows precise control of the size and distribution of the pore structure and directional modulation of the charge transport paths [183]. By combining graphene materials with 3D printing technology, Zeng et al. fabricated 3D-printed graphene (3DG) arrays in the form of tubes and pillars (Fig. 6b) [173]. 3DGT/P altered the distribution of Zn2+ ions by modulating the electric field so that Zn was preferentially deposited in the 3DG, avoiding large stress on the membrane (Fig. 6c). The volume distribution of Zn deposited along the z-axis can be seen in Fig. 6d. The volumes of deposited Zn metal in the top layers of the 3DGT and 3DGP were much lower than those in the deeper layers. 3DGT@Zn||V2O5 and 3DGP@Zn||V2O5 pouch cells showed high Zn utilization (47.12% and 42.94%) and areal energy densities of 3.27 and 2.72 mWh cm−2 (Fig. 6e).
In addition to carbon, metals are also introduced to design 3D structures. Compared to 2D planar Zn foils, microporous engineered Zn micromesh has excellent flexibility and mechanical strength and offers better electrolyte wetting [180]. The Zn micromesh can provide an ordered distribution of ion concentration and electric field, allowing Zn2+ ions to preferentially nucleate and grow on the inner walls of the micropores while enabling dendrite-free deposition of Zn. However, 3D Zn structures are susceptible to side reactions such as corrosion and structural damage during repeated cycling at high Zn utilization. Guan et al. prepared a triple-gradient electrode with electrical conductivity, zincophilicity, and porosity generated by simple mechanical roller pressing [194]. Nickel foams with different porosities were used as the substrates. The Ag in the bottom layer provided good electrical conductivity and zincophilicity, the NiO in the top layer was a semiconductor with poor zincophilicity, and the Ni in the middle layer had moderate electrical conductivity and zincophilicity (Fig. 6f). The triple-gradient electrode allowed regulation of the electric field, the Zn2+ ion flux, and the Zn deposition paths in Zn anodes, enabling bottom-up deposition of Zn metal and preventing short circuits due to overgrowth of dendrites piercing the septum (Fig. 6g).
Other materials such as MXenes and MOFs can also be utilized as host materials for depositing Zn. Chen et al. prepared a hybrid aerogel (MGA) rich in zincophilic sites and porous channels by assembling MXene with graphene (Fig. 6h) [191]. The fluorine-containing functional groups of MXene form ZnF2 with the initially deposited Zn as the SEI to inhibit the formation of dendrites. The mechanical toughness of the MGA can be adjusted to the volume changes due by controlling the thickness during the deposition process. Therefore, encapsulation of the deposited Zn by the MGA was achieved. A capacity retention of 91% was realized at N/P ≈ 1.67. The ZIF-8 annealed at 500 °C (ZIF-8-500) (Fig. 6i) had a trace Zn metal, porous organic ligands, and highly ordered hierarchical porous structures [193]. The trace amount of Zn0 in the framework of ZIF-8-500 showed excellent performance that CE was close to 100% and a dendrite-free characteristic. The large number of zincophilic sites in the ZIF-8-500 with the graded porous structure effectively guided the Zn deposition, and the residual Zn0 was used as a backup Zn source. The high reversibility and excellent full cell lifespan at high energy density were achieved. The pre-plated Zn (Zn@ZIF-8-500) was coupled with the I2 cathode to form the I2||Zn battery, showing a super long life of 1600 cycles and a high energy density of 140.8 Wh kg−1.
Although pre-deposited Zn anodes can approach high Zn utilization even at low capacity, such anodes with low Zn capacity still possess some limitations in practical applications compared to Zn foil anodes. The large mass and volume of the pre-deposited substrate reduce the energy density of full cells. In addition, when 3D structures are used as hosts for Zn deposition, the top side often lacks effective protection. As deposition progresses, the side reactions such as HER will be intense. Therefore, for pre-deposited 3D collector structures, lighter materials are required to accommodate increased deposition and discharge capacity. It is also necessary to synergistically optimize 3D structures and surface protection layers for stable and reversible Zn metal anodes.
In previous studies, achieving a DOD of 40% was identified as a reasonable target to evaluate AZMBs for practical applications [165]. The Zn utilization using different modification strategies is summarized in Fig. 7, with a value of 40% as the evaluation criterion. The Zn utilization of AZMBs can be improved by using different Zn anodes to reduce the Zn amount. In addition, the Zn utilization is also affected by other factors, such as the areal capacity during charge/discharge, which is reflected in Eq. 1. Therefore, increasing the areal capacity while reducing the Zn amount is an effective strategy to further improve the Zn utilization of AZMBs.
4 Anode-Free Aqueous Zn Metal Batteries
Anode-free batteries have recently been proposed and widely studied in lithium and sodium metal batteries [47]. Benefiting from the excellent theoretical capacity of Zn, the anode-free configuration was introduced into AZMBs and further optimized [54]. Unlike AZMBs using Zn foils or pre-deposited Zn as anodes, the AF-AZMBs are characterized by the light weight attributed to eliminating the excess Zn (Fig. 8a). Almost all Zn sources in the AF-AZMBs are utilized and contribute to the battery capacity. This distinctive design maximizes the energy density beyond those of traditional metal-based batteries. The configuration of AF-AZMBs differs significantly from normal AZMBs, with a Zn-free current collector as the anode and a pre-intercalated cathode or Zn-salt electrolyte as the only Zn reservoir. When AF-AZMBs are assembled, the batteries are fully discharged and in a low-energy state. After the first full charge, Zn2+ ions pre-embedded in the cathode or electrolyte are removed and deposited on the anode. Therefore, the DOD of AF-AZMBs can approach 100%. Nevertheless, the AF-AZMBs generally show poor stability. A critical factor for stable AF-AZMBs is the CE of Zn plating/stripping, which determines the battery reversibility and actual cycling lifespan. When the Zn source in the battery becomes limited, any slight loss of Zn will significantly reduce the cycling lifespan. The formula used to calculate the cycle number for different CE is as follows:
Theoretically, according to Eq. (10), if the battery is defined to fail with 80% capacity retention, 99.5% of the CE sustains only 45 cycles (Fig. 8b). When the CE achieves 99.95%, the lifespan of the battery will be approximately 450 cycles. In AF-AZMBs, the dendrites are directly formed on the collector surface, which is a crucial parameter affecting the CE [195]. Excess growth of dendrites to form “dead Zn” and side reactions that generate byproducts cause irreversible wastes of Zn and decrease the CE [196, 197]. Therefore, constructing dendrite-free Zn anodes and inhibiting interfacial side reactions are required to improve the electrochemical performance of AF-AZMBs. Recent strategies used in constructing AF-AZMBs will be described in terms of anode current collector engineering and electrolyte engineering. Table 5 provides a comprehensive summary.
4.1 Anode Current Collector Engineering
Zincophilic materials (e.g., Cu foil) are usually used as the current collectors for the anodes in AZMBs due to their low activities for the competitive HER [198]. Nevertheless, if these current collectors are directly utilized, the low CE and uncontrollable dendrite formation will seriously affect the performance of AF-AZMBs. Therefore, some strategies for designing and modifying the current collectors have been proposed to improve the performance of AF-AZMBs, such as designing surface protection layers on the current collectors [54, 55, 199,200,201,202], alloying the anode surfaces [203, 204], and constructing 3D nanostructure hosts [196, 197, 205,206,207].
4.1.1 Anode Surface Coating Engineering
Surface modification has been utilized to avoid Zn dendrite formation and side reactions at anode/electrolyte interfaces in AZMBs. When applied to AF-AZMBs, the coating layers should ensure high Zn2+ conductivity and robust adhesion to the anode surface. However, a large volume and mass of the coating layer will decrease the energy density. Cui et al. demonstrated a first workable anode-free Zn-MnO2 battery [54]. The anode was a Cu foil coated with a nucleation layer of carbon nanodiscs (C/Cu anode). The pre-intercalated MnO2 cathode (via electrochemically intercalating Zn2+ into β-MnO2) was used as the sole Zn source. Zn2+ ions were electroplated directly on the surface of the carbon nucleation layer due to the high redox potential of the Zn/Zn2+ couple (− 0.76 V vs. SHE) (Fig. 9a). The high electrical conductivity of the carbon nucleation layer induced homogeneous Zn nucleation and deposition. The slight lattice misfit between the carbon nanodiscs and the Zn metal and the lower energy barriers facilitated Zn nucleation and homogeneous plating/stripping. The C/Cu anode achieved a high average CE of 99.7% at 3 mAh cm−2 with 50 stable cycles. A high average CE at a low current density is critical in assembling reliable AF-AZMBs. The average CE of the C/Cu anode reached 97.1%, even at a low current density of 0.2 mA cm−2. Ensuring adequate areal capacity with a high CE is another essential factor for constructing high-energy density AF-AZMBs. The assembled anode-free battery was in the fully discharged state (Fig. 9b). When it was fully charged, Zn2+ ions were transferred to the anode from the pre-intercalated cathode and plated on the surface of the C/Cu anode. The battery state appeared to be similar to that with pre-deposited Zn for AZMBs (Fig. 9c). Compared with the high-capacity retention of AZMBs, the capacity of the anode-free Zn||MnO2 battery was maintained at 68.2% after 80 cycles owing to limited irreversible loss of Zn (Fig. 9d). Nevertheless, the energy density of the Zn||MnO2 battery with a Zn metal anode was only 81 Wh kg−1, while the energy density of the anode-free Zn||MnO2 battery reached 135 Wh kg−1 (Fig. 9e), showing the greatest advantage of anode-free structures.
Although the concept of AF-AZMBs has been proposed, the effect of protecting anodes with simple nanocarbon coatings is not ideal. How to improve the CE is the primary problem to be faced. In addition to using carbon as the protective layer, multifunctional carbon composite materials are more potent for AF-AZMBs. MXenes (e.g., Ti3C2Tx) are widely used in building Zn-based anodes, which exhibit excellent mechanical properties, ample hydrophilicity, high electrical conductivity, and good ionic adsorption capacity [208]. Chen et al. prepared a Ti3C2Tx/nanocellulose (derived from soybean straw) hybrid film by simple solution casting and used it as a Zn-free anode in an aqueous hybrid Zn–Li battery (Fig. 9f) [199]. The ultralow diameter of the nanocellulose provided a membrane with excellent electrolyte wettability. The nanocellulose formed pillars to prevent restacking of the Ti3C2Tx. The abundant hydroxyl groups interacted strongly with Zn2+ ions to limit two-dimensional diffusion during the Zn deposition process. Additionally, hydrogen bonding promoted dissolution of Zn hydrate ions to reduce the Zn nucleation overpotential and promote the uniform Zn deposition. Meanwhile, the weak zincophilicity and the low lattice mismatch between the Ti3C2Tx (002) surface (2D Ti3C2Tx surface) and the Zn (002) surface induced Zn epi-plating along the horizontal [002] direction. The synergistic effect of nanocellulose and Ti3C2Tx inhibited the growth of Zn dendrites and reduced the occurrence of side reactions, which led to a higher CE for Zn plating/peeling. As shown in Fig. 9g, an anode-free flexible quasi-solid-state battery cycled at 1 A g−1. Only a slight capacity decay was observed with increasing bending angles, indicating that the battery was highly resistant to deformation. Moreover, Ti3C2Tx/nanocellulose hybrid films were coated onto the stainless-steel foils (SS-TN80) used as the Zn-free anode in an aqueous hybrid Zn–Na battery [161]. The Na3V2(PO4)3 cathode and a “water-in-salt” (18 M NaClO4 + 2 M Zn(ClO4)2) aqueous electrolyte were used to construct a hybrid Zn–Na battery. The high-concentration electrolyte salts prevented freezing of the battery, which tolerated low-temperature working environments. Moreover, since the Na3V2(PO4)3 cathode did not contain Zn2+ ions and did not pre-intercalate Zn2+ ions after preparation, the Zn2+ ions in the electrolyte were the sole Zn source. During the first cycle, Zn2+/Na+ ions were co-intercalated and co-extracted in the Na3V2(PO4)3 cathode.
For further practical application, the influence of different environmental factors such as temperature on battery performance should be studied when improving the cycling life of high energy density AF-AZMBs. Qian et al. prepared an aluminum hydroxide fluoride (AOF) layer on the Cu foil surface as surface modification of the Cu collector anode [201]. The AOF layer exhibited strong adsorption and binding energy and accelerated the Zn desolvation and regulated the Zn2+ ion flux (Fig. 9h). In addition to the uniform Zn2+ ion concentration on the surface, the uniformly distributed current density on the AOF surface suppressed the peak effect of Zn growth, which promoted the uniform Zn deposition (Fig. 9i). Meanwhile, the low diffusion energy barrier for the AOF surface promoted 2D diffusion and growth of Zn. These advantages of the Cu@AOF electrode provided stable cycling performance even at low temperature (− 20 °C) and high average CE (99.76%) at 500 cycles. The anode-free cells were stable for 2000 cycles (Fig. 9j) and displayed a long lifespan of 400 cycles with a high average CE of 99.94% at − 20 °C (Fig. 9k). The effective protection from the Cu@AOF enabled excellent cycling of the AF-AZMBs, which showed the great potential of AF-AZMBs for use in practical applications.
Unlike the protective layer on the surface of Zn foil, the protective layer of the anode in AF-AZMBs requires close contact with the collector surface and should have a significant binding energy with the deposited Zn. This places higher demands on the protective layers of AF-AZMBs for two main reasons. First, when Zn is deposited below the protective layer, the artificial coating may break down and peel off due to the weak bonding energy of the deposited Zn. Second, the bonding energy between the protective layer and the collector should also be considered, as the protective layer will be in complete contact with the collector at the beginning of battery assembly and subsequently during the complete charge and discharge process (100% DOD). In addition, further consideration of the interface between the collector and the deposited Zn is necessary. The collector materials are weakly zincophilic but often have surface defects such as scratches and pits. Therefore, in addition to coating with the protective layer, it is possible to construct an interfacial zincophilic layer between the collector and the protective layer with a high binding energy to the collector so that the Zn is deposited uniformly and densely on the surface of the collector.
4.1.2 Anode Surface Alloying Engineering
As noted above, researchers have directly coated a protective layer on the current collector surface to inhibit side reactions and the formation of Zn dendrites while achieving a high CE and superior performance of AF-AZMBs. It is simple and convenient to operate. However, the protective layer is not bound tightly to the current collector, and there is a risk of breaking and peeling during repeated cycling. Eventually, the anode loses protection. Uniform nucleation of Zn can be realized by alloying the Zn plating/stripping interface with a zincophilic material to generate a uniform electric field on the anode.
Chen et al. designed a robust two-dimensional heterostructural interface (Fig. 10a) [203]. Antimony (Sb) was used to form a Cu2Sb phase on the surface of a Cu electrode, which promoted strong bonding between the two metals and formed a robust Sb/Cu interface (Sb@Cu). When Zn was electroplated on the Sb@Cu, the Zn spontaneously alloyed with the Sb and formed an Sb/Sb-Zn heterostructural interface (Sb/Sb2Zn3-HI). XRD patterns showed that the Sb2Zn3 alloy phase formed during the initial plating stage and when the plating capacity reached a high capacity of 10 mAh cm−2. The characteristic peaks for the alloy phase disappeared, and those of metallic Zn were significantly enhanced (Fig. 10b). This indicated that the alloying process occurred only at the Sb@Cu surface and subsequently directed uniform Zn deposition. However, the Sb2Zn3 alloy phase remaining after Zn stripping was the complete Sb@Cu substrate, implying that the Sb/Sb2Zn3-HI formed in the initial Zn electrodeposition stage was retained in Sb@Cu and continued to regulate Zn nucleation in subsequent cycles. Initial Zn/Sb alloying enabled strong adsorption of Zn atoms by the Sb/Sb2Zn3-HI and formed a uniform electric field in the Zn coating, which resulted in uniform Zn nucleation on the Sb/Sb2Zn3-HI and consistently promoted uniform Zn deposition (Fig. 10c, d). Thus, the Zn|Sb@Cu asymmetric cell showed stable cycling over 220 h at ultrahigh areal capacity and maintained an average CE of 98.3% at 50 mA cm−2 (Fig. 10e). The excellent performance offered the possibility for commercial applications of AF-AZMBs. Therefore, they assembled an anode-free ZnBr2 pouch cell with Sb@Cu as the anode, carbon felt (CF) as the cathode, and inexpensive ZnBr2 and tetrapropylammonium bromide (TPABr) as the electrolyte. The reactions of the battery were as follows:
The cell exhibited a high energy density of ∼ 274 Wh kg−1. More importantly, in further attempts to develop anode-free ZnBr2 batteries, the capacities of the ZnBr2 cells were increased to 500 mAh with an alternating electrode stacking structure. A ZnBr2 cell was prepared with two pairs of electrodes with separate areas of 36 cm−2 (corresponding to a surface area of ∼ 7 mAh cm−2). The cell exhibited 400 stable cycles with an average CE of 98.5%. Moreover, batteries with different combinations still exhibited good electrochemical performance. Four Zn–Br2 cells operated at 1500 mAh were concatenated into a module exhibiting approximately 9 kWh (6 W and 1.5 mAh), which was then charged by photovoltaic panels (6 W and 9 V) during the day for approximately 2 h (Fig. 10g). The solar cell module continuously lit a 10-W LED display at night (Fig. 10f). In conclusion, this work opened a new stage and moved AF-AZMBs from the initial exploration stage toward practical application. Huang et al. utilized SnBr2 as additive to form an in situ Cu/Sn/Zn alloy anode on a Cu current collector and assembled an anode-free aqueous hybrid Cu||LFP full cell (Fig. 10h) [204]. They optimized the electrolyte and cathode capacity (E/C) ratio to obtain better electrochemical performance for AF-AZMBs. Moreover, they utilized in-operando transmission X-ray microscopy (TXM) measurements to determine the mechanism for in situ Zn and Sn plating/stripping at the Cu collector current. The temporal points selected during the events were marked with their corresponding TXM images (Fig. 10i). The electrolyte containing the SnBr2 additive formed an in situ Sn coating at the anode surface and a well-nucleated alloy with Cu to guide uniform and smooth Zn deposition. The Cu/Sn/Zn alloy promoted nucleation and dense and uniform Zn deposition. The reactions of the assembled anode-free aqueous hybrid Cu||LFP full cell were as follows:
This meant that Zn only affected the anode, and intercalation/removal of the Li+ contributed to the cathode capacity.
4.1.3 Anode 3D Structural Design
Compared with the coating protection layer of a 2D planar structure, the 3D structure anodes can adapt more readily to the drastic volume changes caused by Zn metal deposition/stripping, thus improving the cycling stability of Zn anodes. The zincophilic sites in the 3D structure control the nucleation energy and provide uniform deposition of Zn [209]. In addition, the 3D structure homogenizes the local electric field on the surface [207]. The large contact interface between the electrode and the electrolyte balances the Zn2+ flux along the anode surface, which provides sufficient charge centers and nucleation sites. Dong et al. designed a 3D Cu/Zn alloy network (Cu@Cu3Zn) for Zn deposition (Fig. 11a) [205]. They found that the electrochemical behavior of AF-AZMBs differed significantly from those of conventional AZMBs in CV experiments (Fig. 11b, c). It is certain that the reduced Zn contents in different batteries, i.e., AF-AZMBs with limited Zn, significantly alter the electrochemical behavior during Zn deposition/stripping. Therefore, it is critical to improve the area capacity of the anode in AF-AZMBs and compare the electrochemical characteristics. Lu et al. used a Cu foil as the deposition substrate and added a trace amount of I3− (10 mM) to the aqueous ZnSO4 electrolyte [196]. The strongly oxidizing I3− reacted quickly with the Cu surface to form copper iodide (CuI). In the Cu/Zn half-cell, CuI was electrochemically reduced in situ and reconstructed into porous Cu nanoclusters (CuNCs) from the outside (Fig. 11d). For the CuNC@Cu electrode, Cu and Zn alloying and dealloying were observed during the formation of copper nanoparticles (Fig. 11e). In addition to the typical (100), (110), and (111) planes, the Cu nanostructures with high specific surface areas had more exposed edges than the Cu foil, and the abundant zincophilic sites on these edges lowered the Zn nucleation barrier (Fig. 11f). In addition, due to the number of exposed zincophilic sites in CuNCs and the ample space for Zn deposition, the Zn showed a sheet morphology and was horizontally distributed on the surface of the CuNCs. Moreover, numerous Cu nanoparticles were dispersed between the Zn sheets, thus forming a horizontally stacked Zn/Cu composite structure. Subsequently, an anode-free G/PVP@ZnI2||CuNC battery with a ZnI2 cathode was assembled (Fig. 11g). After the immersion pre-cycles, the G/PVP@ZnI2 cathode was placed in a 2 M ZnSO4 electrolyte for 24 h, and UV spectroscopy showed that immersion of the G/PVP@ZnI2 cathode in the electrolyte generated a significantly weaker iodine absorption peak, indicating that the G/PVP effectively inhibited the shuttle effect (Fig. 11h). The assembled anode-free Zn||I2 batteries (AFZIBs) had gravitational energy density of 162 Wh kg−1 (based on the total mass of the active material), which was much larger than the 15 Wh kg−1 value of the Zn||I2 batteries (ZIBs) with the Zn foil anode (Fig. 11i).
In addition to the number of zincophilic sites, it is also important to establish a uniform electric field on the 3D anode surface. With increasing current density or deposition capacity, nonuniform Zn deposition was increasingly evident due to the limited influence of these modifications. Moreover, base metals that provide zincophilic sites should also be selected. In short, the higher binding energy between an adsorbed Zn atom and the surface site contributes to the overpotential of the Zn metal deposition process. A strong binding energy between the adsorbed Zn atoms and the substrate enhances the resistance of the Zn metal stripping process on the substrate, leading to inhomogeneous Zn deposition/stripping behavior. In addition, as mentioned earlier, one of the essential indicators for AF-AZMBs is high and stable CE with an ultrahigh current density and surface capacity during long cycling. However, in the case of a large current and large surface capacity, the utility of the protective layer with a 2D structure is very limited. With increasing current density or deposition capacity, the influence of Zn on these protective layers continues to weaken after continuous electroplating on the anode surface, resulting in uneven Zn deposition. Huang et al. constructed a 3D light silver nanowire aerogel (AgNWA) via vertical self-assembly (Fig. 11j) [197]. The zincophilic silver metal substrate showed the highest Zn adsorption energy. The silver nanowires in the AgNWAs enabled rapid electron conduction at the interface. The cross-linked network provided a uniformly distributed electric field for evenly reversible Zn deposition/stripping. The Zn deposition simulation showed highly reversible and smooth Zn metal deposition on the 3D AgNWAs. In addition, the 3D AgNWAs with a porous structure maintained close contact with the electrolyte and exhibited good hydrophilicity while limiting the sharp volume changes of Zn metal deposition/stripping. This promoted uniform Zn metal deposition/stripping during the cycling process. The AgNWA anodes achieve dendrite-free Zn deposition with ultrahigh current density and capacity (40 mA cm−2, 10 mAh cm−2) and high CE (99.8%). The AgNWAs were directly coupled with a pre-galvanized MnO2 cathode (ZnMO), which formed a complete AF-AZMB. The anode-free AgNWA||ZnMO battery provided an initial capacity of 230 mAh g−1 and a high capacity retention rate of 73% at 0.5 A g−1 after 600 cycles with a 100% Zn utilization (Fig. 11k).
When the limited Zn in the cathode is deposited to the anode, it is important for AF-AZMBs to minimize the Zn loss and promote the uniform Zn deposition. Therefore, the collector of AF-AZMBs should possess good electrical conductivity and zincophilicity and can inhibit the dendrite growth and side reactions as much as possible. Strategies such as surface coating engineering, surface alloying engineering, and 3D structure design can reduce the energy barrier of Zn deposition, promote the uniform Zn nucleation, decrease the Zn loss during cycling, and improve the CE. In addition, in order to further increase the energy density of AF-AZMBs, it is necessary to further reduce the proportion of current collector in the full cell.
4.2 Electrolyte Engineering
The electrolyte directly contributes to anode/electrolyte interface problems, such as dendrite growth, HER, and the formation of byproducts [210, 211]. For AF-AZMBs, the importance of the electrolyte is more prominent. Zn2+ ions in the electrolyte can be used as the Zn source of AF-AZMBs, and the loss of electrolyte due to anode/electrolyte interface issues is lethal for AF-AZMBs. This leads to decreased cycle lifespan and capacity for batteries. Electrolyte optimization is a promising way to regulate the anode/electrolyte interface. In addition, reducing the amount of free H2O in the electrolyte is an effective and feasible strategy for mitigating side reactions and corrosion [212]. Electrolyte additives can change the conductivity of the electrode and optimize the current distribution, thereby suppressing the growth of dendrites [213, 214]. Electrolyte additives mainly play two roles, one is to form effective protective layers at the anode surface, and the other is to suppress HER by changing the solvation structure of the electrolyte.
4.2.1 Anode/Electrolyte Interface Design
Additives can regulate the anode/electrolyte interfaces to manage Zn2+ ion mobility and Zn plating/stripping. Feng et al. added zinc fluoride (ZnF2) to the electrolyte to form stable F-rich interface on the anode surface (Fig. 12a) [210]. The anode was combined with a LiMn2O4 (LMO) cathode in an anode-free cell. This F-rich interface effectively reduced the nucleation overpotential and plateau overpotential for Zn deposition, thus regulating the distribution of Zn2+ ions and inducing uniform Zn deposition. As seen from the XRD pattern obtained for the anode after cycling, the peaks of Zn4SO4(OH)6H2O were weaker and changed little during cycling. Additionally, the XPS patterns of the anode after different numbers of cycles showed that the intensity of the F peak became stronger, indicating that during the cycling process, a F-rich layer was constantly formed on the anode surface, which effectively inhibited side reactions (Fig. 12b). Therefore, a high CE (99.14% after 100 cycles) was observed even with a high current density (40 mA cm−2) and areal capacity (3.0 mAh cm−2).
In addition to forming a single fluorine-rich protective interface on the anode surface, the multielement synergistic effect of the electrolyte additives in forming the SEI was also studied. One way to inhibit dendrite growth and side reactions on the anode surface is to build a Zn2+-conductive SEI on the anode/electrolyte interface. Wang et al. added trimethylethylammonium trifluoromethanesulfonate (Me3EtNOTF) to the dilute acid electrolyte (Zn(OTF)2) [215]. The additive formed a fluorinated and hydrophobic SEI on the collector surface. The composite SEI was composed of ZnF2, ZnCO3, ZnSO3, and polyanions (Fig. 12e, f). DFT calculations revealed the formation process of the SEI film. The Me3EtNOTF defluorination reaction generated (SO3)F2C and reacted with ethylene in a high-strength polymerization reaction. The reaction shifted radicals to the H2C. This was stabilized by adsorbing Zn at the interface until the second reduction product was added. In addition, the downstream reaction produced by decomposition of the alkylammonium reagent led to the formation of ZnCO3. The amines easily reacted with CO2 or HxCO3 (x = 1, 2) in the aqueous environment to form CO32− (Fig. 12c). The fluorinated and hydrophobic interface formed in situ prevented the HER and allowed the migration of Zn2+ ions. The interface enriched in ZnF2 promoted the diffusion of Zn2+ ions while protecting the Zn surface and preventing side reactions. In addition, the ZnF2/Zn interface inhibited dendrite growth by promoting 2D Zn2+ ion migration and deposition. The addition of Me3EtNOTF provided a wider stability window of approximately 2.7 V, and the limits of the cathode (− 0.1 V vs. Zn/Zn2+) and the anode (2.6 V vs. Zn/Zn2+) were expanded (Fig. 12d). Specifically, Me3EtNOTF extended the cathode limit, inhibited the precipitation of oxygen, and increased the initial oxidation potential from 2.55 to 2.6 V. Additionally, the initial potential for water reduction was reduced from 358 to 157 mV (relative to Zn/Zn2+) and then slightly reduced at − 64 mV. Zn plating occurred at − 108 mV. The HER current at the cathode side was eliminated. The presence of Me3EtNOTF promoted the formation of the SEI. After 100 cycles, the CE was increased to 99.9%, and the average value for 1000 cycles was 99.8%. To verify the role of ZnF2 in the SEI, a pure ZnF2 SEI was designed with the bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide anion (FSI−) as the fluorine source. This was tested in a Zn||MnO2 battery with limited Zn. The battery delivered a high energy density of 350 Wh kg−1 and capacity retention rate of 88.5% after 1000 cycles. Additionally, the electrolyte formed by the SEI also allowed the Ti||ZnxVOPO4 anode-free pouch cell to operate reversibly for 100 cycles at 100% DOD.
In addition to the SEI, nucleophilic reagents have been used to construct an interface protection layer in situ. The key to forming this interfacial layer is to screen nucleophilic reagents and find one with appropriate electron donor properties. Hu et al. used tetramethylammonium chloride (TMACl) as a nucleophilic agent containing N to construct a uniform nucleophilic interface layer (NIL) from Zn acetate acetamide [216]. The NIL was uniform and dense, and it conducted Zn2+ ions to provide dendrite-free Zn deposition (Fig. 12g). In an aqueous electrolyte comprising ZnSO4-LiCl, an uneven layer of Zn(OH)2 was formed on the anode surface due to occurrence of HER. After combination of the Cl− anion and Zn(OH)2, the inhomogeneous alkaline Zn5(OH)8Cl2·H2O interfacial layer (AIL) was finally formed on the anode surface. Due to the low resistance, Zn2+ ions were preferably deposited around the thinner area of the interface layer, and the dendritic morphology of the deposited Zn was finally observed. In the nucleophilic electrolyte containing ZnSO4–LiCl–TMACl, Zn2+ ions promoted the reaction between the N(CH3)4+ ions and O2, and (CH3)4NCl had a higher HOMO (highest occupied molecular orbital) energy than H2O (− 0.19213 vs. − 0.31926 eV). Therefore, (CH3)4NCl provided electrons more easily than H2O (Fig. 12h). This caused the N(CH3)4+ to react preferentially with the nucleophilic electrolyte and form a Zn acetate acetamide protective layer. The uniform NIL provided more nucleation sites for Zn2+ ion deposition, thus promoting the uniform Zn electrodeposition. In in situ SEM studies (Fig. 12i), unlike the dendritic Zn surface observed on the cycling Zn anodes with AIL, the electroplated Zn on the NIL showed excellent uniformity. A NIL@Ti anode was prepared in the anode-free Zn–Cl2 battery. The electrode underwent 200 stable cycles at 20 mA cm−2.
4.2.2 Electrolyte Structure Design
The CE for Zn plating/stripping is the most critical factor for stable AF-AZMBs, and it is inevitably limited by water-induced side reactions and dendrite growth. The Zn2+ ion solvation structure Zn(H2O)62+ controls the HER on the Zn metal anode. A proper electrolyte structure replaces the original Zn(H2O)62+ with a new water-free solvation structure. Chen et al. designed an anionic water-free electrolyte for Zn2+ ion solvation (ASE) as ZnCl42− by adding a chloride salt with a bulky cation (1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride) to a ZnSO4 aqueous electrolyte [217]. The Fourier transformation of extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) spectra by the wavelet transform clearly present the difference in the Zn2+ ion coordination states (Fig. 13a). DFT calculations revealed the coordination mechanism of Cl− ions (Fig. 13b). Zn2+ ions were strongly coordinated by Cl− anions. The coordination of Cl− ions released the waters bound to Zn2+ ions and reconstructed the electrolyte structure. The Zn(H2O)62+ solvation structure was replaced by ZnCl42−. The energy of ZnCl42− was lower than that of Zn(H2O)62+. The transformation was a spontaneous process, and 60.1 kcal mol−1 was released.
In addition, compared with the Zn centers in ZnCl42− and Zn(H2O)62+, the Zn atomic charge in ZnCl42− (+ 0.24) was lower than that in Zn(H2O)62+ (+ 0.56), suggesting that Cl− was a more potent electron donor for Zn2+ than H2O. The Zn–Cl bond order (0.61) was much higher than that of the Zn–OW bond (0.23), and the electron density around the Zn in ZnCl42− was higher than that around the Zn in Zn(H2O)62+, demonstrating a more robust interaction between the Zn2+ and Cl− (Fig. 13c). During the Zn plating process, adsorption of the bulky cation EMIm+ inhibited Zn plating on the tips, and ZnCl42− was repelled by the electrostatic shield on the Zn tips. The ZnCl42− anion was only deposited via 2D diffusion in a weak electric field (Fig. 13d). Therefore, growth of dendrites at the Zn tips was inhibited, and the electrolyte showed uniform Zn deposition with an average Zn plating/stripping CE of ≈ 99.9% (Fig. 13e). The anode-free battery with a Cu foil anode, a Zn polyaniline (Z-PANI) cathode, and the ASE electrolyte exhibited a high capacity of 154.4 mAh g−1 with a capacity retention rate of 78.8% after 300 cycles (Fig. 13f).
Alshareef et al. proposed a salting-in-effect-induced hybrid electrolyte by adding Zn triflate (Zn(OTf)2) into propylene carbonate (PC)/water mixtures (Fig. 13g) [218]. PC is immiscible with water and most Zn salts. An apparent stratified phase was observed when the PC content was higher than 16.7 vol%. After adding 1 M ZnSO4, the ZnSO4 attracted the water dissolved in the PC due to the salting-out effect, resulting in enhanced liquid phase separation. The salting-in effect occurred when 1 M Zn(OTf)2 was added to the mixed solvent, which made the initially miscible mixture completely miscible (Fig. 13h). The radial distribution function (RDF) plots showed that PC and OTf− replaced the water and participated in the formation of Zn2+-solvated shells (Fig. 13i). Triflate anions contain the strongly hydrophobic –CF3 group and the hydrophilic –SO3− group. Anions coordinated by the PC (or water) were dispersed in the solvent as [PC–OTf−–H2O]amphipathic complexes present in the Zn2+ solvation sheath in the presence of PC. After adding the PC, the Zn(H2O)62+ was replaced by OTf− and PC. In addition, different PC concentrations resulted in different structures of the Zn2+-solvated sheaths. When the PC content was 50 vol%, only two water molecules were present in the first solvation layer of each Zn2+, and PC and OTf− were predominant. When the PC content was increased to 90 vol%, the solvating water molecules were replaced by PC or OTf−. The substitution of solvent water reduced the water activity in the hybrid electrolyte and inhibited the occurrence of side reactions. Moreover, the unique solvation structure resulted in the reduction of anions, thus forming a hydrophobic SEI that achieved uniform galvanizing and prevented side reactions. The presence of the hybrid electrolyte in the Zn2+ solvent shell and the formation of the hydrophobic electrode/electrolyte SEI inhibited side reactions and excess dendrite growth, which gave the Zn2+ a high CE for electroplating/stripping and was crucial for AF-AZMBs.
In situ SEI can regulate the deposition behavior of Zn2+ ions, inhibit side reactions and Zn dendrites, and reduce the Zn loss during cycling. The change of electrolyte structure is conducive to inhibiting HER and regulating Zn deposition kinetics. However, the formation of SEI inevitably loses some Zn2+ ions, which should be avoided for AF-AZMBs. Moreover, the complex electrode surface renders it more difficult to investigate the interfacial reaction mechanism. To further expand the application of AF-AZMBs, it is necessary to develop gel electrolytes and solid electrolytes for AF-AZMBs. The synergistic modification strategy of electrolyte and collector is a potential direction to improve the performance of AF-AZMBs.
Although AF-AZMBs offer advantages such as high energy densities and low initial energy states, there are stricter requirements for Zn electroplating/stripping efficiency at the anode. The main problem with the anodes of AF-AZMBs is the “dead Zn” formed by excess dendrite growth and the by-products produced by the side reactions, which result in low CEs for electroplating/stripping and limit the cycling life of the battery [54, 197]. In addition, preventing the decomposition of the electrolyte during the cycling process is the key to improving the Zn utilization [218]. Therefore, we will summarize the challenges associated with the anode of AF-AZMBs and propose solutions to improve the CEs and cycling performance.
To overcome the problems of AF-AZMBs, we first need to classify them. Based on the different sources of Zn, they can be divided into electrolyte Zn source anode-free Zn metal batteries (ES-AFZMBs) and cathode pre-embedded Zn (Zn source form cathode) anode-free Zn mental batteries (CS-AFZMBs). The ES-AFZMBs are more convenient than the CS-AFZMBs, which must be pre-embedded with Zn in advance. However, during the first discharge cycle, side reactions such as water electrolysis are more likely to occur on the cathode side [55]. Based on different reactions on the cathode, the AF-AZMBs can be divided into traditional Zn2+ ion-embedded/detached and new AF-AZMBs with different cathode electrochemical reactions, such as Zn–Li [199, 204, 214], Zn–Na [200], Zn–Br2 [203, 206], Zn–Cl2 [216] and Zn–I2 [196, 213]. Most of the Zn sources in the new battery system come from the Zn-rich electrolyte, so it belongs to ES-AFZMB system. This overcomes the lack of a suitable Zn-rich cathode. Nevertheless, the electrochemical processes of cathode in different systems will also bring new problems, such as the shuttle effect of iodine and the diffusion of liquid bromine. These problems make single modification strategy of the anode or electrolyte insufficient. Therefore, in constructing AF-AZMBs, the cathode/electrolyte interface reaction must be regulated with multiple or multifunctional modification strategies. At present, the lack of Zn-rich cathodes may be the main reason for constructing various new systems in AF-AZMBs [54]. For CS-AFZMBs, similar to the “bucket effect”, the low Zn capacity of the cathode seriously limits the energy density of AF-AZMB. The concentrations and cost of Zn2+ ions in aqueous electrolytes also limit the construction of AF-AZMB with high energy densities.
5 Conclusions and Perspectives
Aqueous Zn metal batteries have received considerable attention due to their high energy densities, intrinsic safety, and low costs. However, compared with the successful industrialization and market dominance of lithium-ion batteries, the commercialization of AZMBs is still a long way off. One of the main reasons is the need for excess Zn in the Zn metal anode, which leads to the ultralow Zn utilization, resulting in large gaps between the actual and theoretical energy densities of AZMBs. Therefore, limiting the use of excess Zn while effectively suppressing dendrite formation and side reactions has become an urgent problem. In this review, we have discussed in depth how to design AZMBs with high Zn utilization along the main line of reducing the amount of excess Zn, from utilizing thinner Zn foils to constructing anode-free structures with theoretical Zn utilization of 100%:
-
1.
Thinner Zn foils increase the Zn utilization. However, the Zn lost during cycling cannot be replenished promptly, and the defects on the thin Zn foil surface are magnified and expose it to the risks of shattering and rapid cell failure. An effective protection strategy to minimize Zn loss during cycling becomes more critical in such a situation. Zn losses are mainly due to the formation of "dead Zn" from the overgrowth of dendrites produced by a nonuniform electric field on the anode surface and the byproducts of HER, corrosion, and passivation processes. Strategies such as artificial interface protection, electrolyte additives, and separator design protect the thin Zn foil anode at high Zn utilization and promote uniform and dense Zn deposition. Depending on the material, artificial interface protection layers can be classified as inorganic salts, metals and their alloys, carbon materials, and polymers. Electrolyte additives can be classified by the mode of action as solvent–water structural modification, EDL modulation, in situ SEI formation, and hydrogel electrolytes. Separator modifications can be classified into glass fiber surface modifications and new material separator construction. These strategies effectively protect the thin Zn foil anodes in various ways, resulting in high Zn utilization with stable cycling performance.
-
2.
Pre-depositing active Zn on a collector to form the anode is an effective strategy to improve the Zn utilization of the Zn anode. Constructing a 3D structured collector is the primary protection strategy for pre-deposited Zn. They can be classified as carbon materials (e.g., CNTs and 3D-printed graphene), metal materials, and 2D MXene and MOF derivatives. These 3D structured materials reduce the energy of Zn formation through internal uniform distribution of the zincophilic sites. The uniformly distributed pore structure and good electrical conductivity enable uniform distribution of the electric field and Zn ion flux, which promotes uniform Zn deposition.
-
3.
AF-AZMBs have been proposed to maximize the Zn utilization. The Zn in an AF-AZMB is pre-distributed in the electrolyte or cathode, at which point there is no Zn on the anode. Theoretically, for AF-AZMBs with N/P = 1, the Zn2+ in the electrolyte or cathode will be deposited on the anode collector during the first charge and utilized in subsequent cycles when the Zn utilization reaches 100%. However, in practice, since the Zn content is minimal, even a minor loss of Zn can significantly reduce the cycling life of the battery. As a result, AF-AZMBs often require high CEs. This means that side reactions and the growth of Zn dendrites during cycling must be suppressed as much as possible. Therefore, higher demands are placed on the anode protection strategy. For collector modification, the main strategies are surface coating, alloying, and 3D structural design. For electrolyte additives, protection strategies have been proposed for both electrode/electrolyte interface design and electrolyte structural design. Although research on AF-AZMBs is still in its initial stages, these strategies provide new directions for the development of AF-AZMBs.
Although significant progress has been made in constructing Zn metal anodes with high utilization, some problems still need to be solved. Therefore, in order to further reasonably reduce the amount of excess Zn and designing AZMBs with high Zn utilization, our viewpoints and recommendations are shown below:
-
a.
While achieving a high Zn utilization and good performance at high DOD (in symmetrical cells) with an overly thick Zn foil is possible, this will result in the need to increase the capacity or load of the matched cathode when assembling a full cell if a low N/P is desired. An overly thick cathode will result in slow ion migration kinetics and high impedance, reducing cathode utilization. A full cell assembled with a thicker cathode will result in excess use of the Zn anode due to the limited cathode utilization, even if a low N/P is achieved. Further optimization of the cathode is required to achieve a high energy density with thick Zn foils. Therefore, the load of the cathode should also be increased to unify the anode and cathode while improving the Zn utilization by reducing the thickness of the Zn foil or controlling the Zn capacity by pre-deposition.
-
b.
The amount and form of the Zn in the anode should be consistent during material characterization and battery performance tests. Some researchers have investigated the electrode/electrolyte interfacial properties and Zn deposition behavior when using a Zn foil as the anode and achieved a high Zn utilization. When assembling full cells, a certain amount of Zn in the collector (such as carbon cloth and Cu foil) is pre-deposited to serve as the anode and achieve a high energy density. This leads to further decreases in the N/P. Nevertheless, the change in Zn deposition and the environment at the anode/electrolyte interface must be investigated due to the shift from Zn foils to pre-deposited Zn anodes.
-
c.
The purpose of reducing the excess Zn in the anode is to reduce the N/P for the full cell, increase the energy density, and promote industrial application of AZMBs. In addition to reducing the excess Zn, the inactive collector and separator must be optimized to improve the energy density, such as by using lighter materials or adjusting the 3D structure of the collector to reduce its mass and volume or reducing the thickness of the diaphragm while maintaining its mechanical properties. Additionally, industrialization of AZMBs also requires controlling the manufacturing cost. For the anode, preparation with some protection strategies is very complicated, which undoubtedly increases the manufacturing cost of the battery. Therefore, further optimization of the material preparation process is needed.
-
d.
A synergistic combination of multiple protection strategies could be applied. Given the relationships among dendrite overgrowth and the various side reactions occurring at the Zn metal anode, more reliance on diversified protection strategies is needed. In addition, the anode/electrolyte interface becomes more unstable as the Zn utilization at the anode increases. The synergistic effect of multiple protection strategies can simultaneously control the effects of multiple factors on the Zn deposition process. For example, establishing a multigradient anode with hydrophilic and zincophilic gradients could promote uniform Zn deposition while isolating water from the metal anode surface. In addition, in situ growth of a protective hydrogel electrolyte layer with a powerful binding force on the surface of the metallic Zn anode would eliminate the need for a septum while protecting the Zn anode.
-
e.
For AF-AZMBs, we have three recommendations for assessing the performance of anode-free cells: (1) First, the E/C ratio must be introduced [where E is the electrolyte capacity (mAh), and C is the areal capacity of the positive electrode (mAh)]. While the electrolyte is the only Zn source, the E/C cannot be kept as close to 1 as it is with N/P because Zn2+ ions are not deposited entirely on the surface of the anode to contribute 100% of the capacity. At this point, calculation of the Zn utilization for an AF-AZMB should be based on the capacity of the Zn deposited on the negative electrode during the first charge. (2) The next step is to tighten the test conditions for anode-free batteries with high area capacities, which are the critical indicators needed to move anode-free batteries from the laboratory to practical application. In addition, more attention should be given to changes in the electrochemical behavior of the anode surface arising from Zn depletion at high current densities and high area capacities, which may improve the CE for electroplating. (3) The CE for the first plating/stripping cycles should be improved. The magnitude of the CE directly affects the Zn utilization of the anode-free cell. Most anode-free cells lose a significant amount of Zn during the first plating/stripping cycle, significantly reducing the energy density. Second, the average CE should also be considered. In addition, double ion cells, rocker cells, and electrode-less cells, which also use limited amounts of Zn, are gaining interest for increasing the energy density of the cell.
-
f.
Improving the Zn utilization is an inevitable requirement for the further development of AZMBs. What is the optimal Zn utilization for AZMBs? It depends on the usage scenario and market demand of AZMBs. In other words, optimal Zn utilization is required to meet the economic cost and energy density. As a candidate for the next generation of large-scale energy storage, AZMB systems have relatively low energy density requirements for an individual cell, so the Zn utilization does not need to be increased to 100%. For other applications such as wearable electronics, AZMBs with high Zn utilization, especially AF-AZMBs with 100% Zn utilization, just meet the requirements of high energy density.
Although there are still many challenges in developing AZMBs with high Zn utilization, outstanding research results are constantly emerging. It is believed that with the continuous innovation of anode-free structures and the deepening of mechanism research, designing and constructing commercialized AZMBs with high Zn utilization of 100% will ultimately be achieved.
References
X.-B. Cheng, R. Zhang, C.-Z. Zhao, Q. Zhang, Toward safe lithium metal anode in rechargeable batteries: a review. Chem. Rev. 117, 10403–10473 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00115
L. Dong, L. Zhang, S. Lin, Z. Chen, Y. Wang et al., Building vertically-structured, high-performance electrodes by interlayer-confined reactions in accordion-like, chemically expanded graphite. Nano Energy 70, 104482 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.104482
G. Zheng, S.W. Lee, Z. Liang, H.W. Lee, K. Yan et al., Interconnected hollow carbon nanospheres for stable lithium metal anodes. Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 618–623 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2014.152
M. Sathiya, G. Rousse, K. Ramesha, C.P. Laisa, H. Vezin et al., Reversible anionic redox chemistry in high-capacity layered-oxide electrodes. Nat. Mater. 12, 827–835 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3699
L. Wang, L. Zhang, Y. Meng, Y. Zhang, J. Kang et al., Fluorinated hybrid interphases enable anti-corrosion and uniform zinc deposition for aqueous zinc metal batteries. Sci. China Mater. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40843-023-2598-0
J. Liu, Z. Bao, Y. Cui, E.J. Dufek, J.B. Goodenough et al., Pathways for practical high-energy long-cycling lithium metal batteries. Nat. Energy 4, 180–186 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-019-0338-x
S. Yuan, T. Kong, Y. Zhang, P. Dong, Y. Zhang et al., Advanced electrolyte design for high-energy-density Li-metal batteries under practical conditions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 25624–25638 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202108397
L. Zhang, Y. Liu, Z. Zhao, P. Jiang, T. Zhang et al., Enhanced polysulfide regulation via porous catalytic V2O3/V8C7 heterostructures derived from metal-organic frameworks toward high-performance Li–S batteries. ACS Nano 14, 8495–8507 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.0c02762
Y. Fang, X. Xie, B. Zhang, Y. Chai, B. Lu et al., Regulating zinc deposition behaviors by the conditioner of PAN separator for zinc-ion batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 32, 2109671 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202109671
L. Zhang, Y. Hou, Comprehensive analyses of aqueous Zn metal batteries: characterization methods, simulations, and theoretical calculations. Adv. Energy Mater. 11, 2003823 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202003823
Z. Wang, M. Zhou, L. Qin, M. Chen, Z. Chen et al., Simultaneous regulation of cations and anions in an electrolyte for high-capacity, high-stability aqueous zinc–vanadium batteries. eScience 2, 209–218 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esci.2022.03.002
Z. Luo, Y. Xia, S. Chen, X. Wu, R. Zeng et al., Synergistic “anchor-capture” enabled by amino and carboxyl for constructing robust interface of Zn anode. Nano-Micro Lett. 15, 205 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-023-01171-w
Q.-N. Zhu, Z.-Y. Wang, J.-W. Wang, X.-Y. Liu, D. Yang et al., Challenges and strategies for ultrafast aqueous zinc-ion batteries. Rare Met. 40, 309–328 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12598-020-01588-x
Y. Liu, S. Liu, X. Xie, Z. Li, P. Wang et al., A functionalized separator enables dendrite-free Zn anode via metal-polydopamine coordination chemistry. InfoMat 5, e12374 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/inf2.12374
R. Chen, W. Zhang, Q. Huang, C. Guan, W. Zong et al., Trace amounts of triple-functional additives enable reversible aqueous zinc-ion batteries from a comprehensive perspective. Nano-Micro Lett. 15, 81 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-023-01050-4
R. Khezri, S. Rezaei Motlagh, M. Etesami, A.A. Mohamad, F. Mahlendorf et al., Stabilizing zinc anodes for different configurations of rechargeable zinc-air batteries. Chem. Eng. J. 449, 137796 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2022.137796
H.-X. Zhang, P.-F. Wang, C.-G. Yao, S.-P. Chen, K.-D. Cai et al., Recent advances of Ferro-/piezoelectric polarization effect for dendrite-free metal anodes. Rare Met. 42, 2516–2544 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12598-023-02319-8
L. Zhang, Y. Liu, Aqueous zinc–chalcogen batteries: emerging conversion-type energy storage systems. Batteries 9, 62 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries9010062
L. Zhang, High-performance metal–chalcogen batteries. Batteries 9, 35 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries9010035
Y. Tang, C. Liu, H. Zhu, X. Xie, J. Gao et al., Ion-confinement effect enabled by gel electrolyte for highly reversible dendrite-free zinc metal anode. Energy Storage Mater. 27, 109–116 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2020.01.023
Y. Meng, L. Wang, J. Zeng, B. Hu, J. Kang et al., Ultrathin zinc–carbon composite anode enabled with unique three-dimensional interpenetrating structure for high-performance aqueous zinc ion batteries. Chem. Eng. J. 474, 145987 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2023.145987
M. Zhu, Q. Ran, H. Huang, Y. Xie, M. Zhong et al., Interface reversible electric field regulated by amphoteric charged protein-based coating toward high-rate and robust Zn anode. Nano-Micro Lett. 14, 219 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-022-00969-4
W. Kao-ian, A.A. Mohamad, W.-R. Liu, R. Pornprasertsuk, S. Siwamogsatham et al., Stability enhancement of zinc-ion batteries using non-aqueous electrolytes. Batter. Supercaps 5, 2100361 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/batt.202100361
W. Nie, H. Cheng, Q. Sun, S. Liang, X. Lu et al., Design strategies toward high-performance Zn metal anode. Small Methods (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/smtd.202201572
Y. Song, P. Ruan, C. Mao, Y. Chang, L. Wang et al., Metal-organic frameworks functionalized separators for robust aqueous zinc-ion batteries. Nano-Micro Lett. 14, 218 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-022-00960-z
C. Liu, X. Xie, B. Lu, J. Zhou, S. Liang, Electrolyte strategies toward better zinc-ion batteries. ACS Energy Lett. 6, 1015–1033 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.0c02684
Y. Zou, X. Yang, L. Shen, Y. Su, Z. Chen et al., Emerging strategies for steering orientational deposition toward high-performance Zn metal anodes. Energy Environ. Sci. 15, 5017–5038 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1039/D2EE02416K
K. Wu, J. Yi, X. Liu, Y. Sun, J. Cui et al., Regulating Zn deposition via an artificial solid-electrolyte interface with aligned dipoles for long life Zn anode. Nano-Micro Lett. 13, 79 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-021-00599-2
M. Gu, A.M. Rao, J. Zhou, B. Lu, In situ formed uniform and elastic SEI for high-performance batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 16, 1166–1175 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1039/D2EE04148K
M. Gopalakrishnan, S. Ganesan, M.T. Nguyen, T. Yonezawa, S. Praserthdam et al., Critical roles of metal–organic frameworks in improving the Zn anode in aqueous zinc-ion batteries. Chem. Eng. J. 457, 141334 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2023.141334
M. Kar, C. Pozo-Gonzalo, Emergence of nonaqueous electrolytes for rechargeable zinc batteries. Curr. Opin. Green Sustain. Chem 28, 100426 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsc.2020.100426
J.F. Parker, J.S. Ko, D.R. Rolison, J.W. Long, Translating materials-level performance into device-relevant metrics for zinc-based batteries. Joule 2, 2519–2527 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2018.11.007
C. Li, S. Jin, L.A. Archer, L.F. Nazar, Toward practical aqueous zinc-ion batteries for electrochemical energy storage. Joule 6, 1733–1738 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2022.06.002
R. Yuksel, O. Buyukcakir, W.K. Seong, R.S. Ruoff, Metal-organic framework integrated anodes for aqueous zinc-ion batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 10, 1904215 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201904215
J. Wang, Z. Cai, R. Xiao, Y. Ou, R. Zhan et al., A chemically polished zinc metal electrode with a ridge-like structure for cycle-stable aqueous batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12, 23028–23034 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c05661
K. Guan, L. Tao, R. Yang, H. Zhang, N. Wang et al., Anti-corrosion for reversible zinc anode via a hydrophobic interface in aqueous zinc batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 12, 2270037 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202270037
R. Meng, H. Li, Z. Lu, C. Zhang, Z. Wang et al., Tuning Zn-ion solvation chemistry with chelating ligands toward stable aqueous Zn anodes. Adv. Mater. 34, e2200677 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202200677
Y. Ou, Z. Cai, J. Wang, R. Zhan, S. Liu et al., Reversible aqueous Zn battery anode enabled by a stable complexation adsorbent interface. EcoMat 4, e12167 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/eom2.12167
J.-E. Qu, H. Luo, Z. Liu, H. Wang, Y. Chen et al., Effect of sodium-zinc EDTA and sodium gluconate as electrolyte additives on corrosion and discharge behavior of Mg as anode for air battery. Mater. Corros. 73, 1776–1787 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/maco.202213322
J. Xu, W. Lv, W. Yang, Y. Jin, Q. Jin et al., In situ construction of protective films on Zn metal anodes via natural protein additives enabling high-performance zinc ion batteries. ACS Nano 16, 11392–11404 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.2c05285
M. Zhang, H. Hua, P. Dai, Z. He, L. Han et al., Dynamically interfacial pH-buffering effect enabled by N-methylimidazole molecules as spontaneous proton pumps toward highly reversible zinc-metal anodes. Adv. Mater. 35, e2208630 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202208630
G. Zampardi, F. La Mantia, Open challenges and good experimental practices in the research field of aqueous Zn-ion batteries. Nat. Commun. 13, 687 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-28381-x
P. Ruan, S. Liang, B. Lu, H.J. Fan, J. Zhou, Design strategies for high-energy-density aqueous zinc batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61, e202200598 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202200598
Y. Shang, D. Kundu, A path forward for the translational development of aqueous zinc-ion batteries. Joule 7, 244–250 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2023.01.011
J.F. Parker, C.N. Chervin, I.R. Pala, M. Machler, M.F. Burz et al., Rechargeable nickel-3D zinc batteries: an energy-dense, safer alternative to lithium-ion. Science 356, 415–418 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aak9991
D. Deng, K. Fu, R. Yu, J. Zhu, H. Cai et al., Ion tunnel matrix initiated oriented attachment for highly utilized Zn anodes. Adv. Mater. 35, e2302353 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202302353
W. Yao, P. Zou, M. Wang, H. Zhan, F. Kang et al., Design principle, optimization strategies, and future perspectives of anode-free configurations for high-energy rechargeable metal batteries. Electrochem. Energy Rev. 4, 601–631 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41918-021-00106-6
Y. Wang, Y. Liu, M. Nguyen, J. Cho, N. Katyal et al., Stable anode-free all-solid-state lithium battery through tuned metal wetting on the copper current collector. Adv. Mater. 35, e2206762 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202206762
J. Qian, B.D. Adams, J. Zheng, W. Xu, W.A. Henderson et al., Anode-free rechargeable lithium metal batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 26, 7094–7102 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201602353
A.J. Louli, A. Eldesoky, R. Weber, M. Genovese, M. Coon et al., Diagnosing and correcting anode-free cell failure via electrolyte and morphological analysis. Nat. Energy 5, 693–702 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-020-0668-8
T.M. Hagos, H.K. Bezabh, C.J. Huang, S.K. Jiang, W.N. Su et al., A powerful protocol based on anode-free cells combined with various analytical techniques. Acc. Chem. Res. 54, 4474–4485 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.1c00528
J. Sun, S. Zhang, J. Li, B. Xie, J. Ma et al., Robust transport: an artificial solid electrolyte interphase design for anode-free lithium-metal batteries. Adv. Mater. 35, 2209404 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202209404
S. Pyo, S. Ryu, Y.J. Gong, J. Cho, H. Yun et al., Lithiophilic wetting agent inducing interfacial fluorination for long-lifespan anode-free lithium metal batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 13, 2203573 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202203573
Y. Zhu, Y. Cui, H.N. Alshareef, An anode-free Zn–MnO2 battery. Nano Lett. 21, 1446–1453 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c04519
G. Wang, M. Zhu, G. Chen, Z. Qu, B. Kohn et al., An anode-free Zn–graphite battery. Adv. Mater. 34, e2201957 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202201957
H. Zhang, Y. Zhong, J. Li, Y. Liao, J. Zeng et al., Inducing the preferential growth of Zn (002) plane for long cycle aqueous Zn-ion batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 13, 2203254 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202203254
P. Cao, X. Zhou, A. Wei, Q. Meng, H. Ye et al., Fast-charging and ultrahigh-capacity zinc metal anode for high-performance aqueous zinc-ion batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2100398 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202100398
Y. Liu, Y. Li, X. Huang, H. Cao, Q. Zheng et al., Copper hexacyanoferrate solid-state electrolyte protection layer on Zn metal anode for high-performance aqueous zinc-ion batteries. Small 18, e2203061 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202203061
W. Zhang, Y. Dai, R. Chen, Z. Xu, J. Li et al., Highly reversible zinc metal anode in a dilute aqueous electrolyte enabled by a pH buffer additive. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62, e202212695 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202212695
H. Jin, S. Dai, K. Xie, Y. Luo, K. Liu et al., Regulating interfacial desolvation and deposition kinetics enables durable Zn anodes with ultrahigh utilization of 80. Small 18, e2106441 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202106441
Y. Li, H. Jia, U. Ali, B. Liu, Y. Gao et al., In-situ interfacial layer with ultrafine structure enabling zinc metal anodes at high areal capacity. Chem. Eng. J. 450, 138374 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2022.138374
D. Lv, H. Peng, C. Wang, H. Liu, D. Wang et al., Rational screening of metal coating on Zn anode for ultrahigh-cumulative-capacity aqueous zinc metal batteries. J. Energy Chem. 84, 81–88 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2023.05.028
L. Wang, Z. Zhao, Y. Yao, Y. Zhang, Y. Meng et al., Highly fluorinated non-aqueous solid-liquid hybrid interface realizes water impermeability for anti-calendar aging zinc metal batteries. Energy Storage Mater. 62, 102920 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2023.102920
L. Zhang, B. Zhang, T. Zhang, T. Li, T. Shi et al., Eliminating dendrites and side reactions via a multifunctional ZnSe protective layer toward advanced aqueous Zn metal batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2100186 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202100186
C. Choi, J.B. Park, J.H. Park, S. Yu, D.-W. Kim, Simultaneous manipulation of electron/Zn2+ ion flux and desolvation effect enabled by in situ built ultra-thin oxide-based artificial interphase for controlled deposition of zinc metal anodes. Chem. Eng. J. 456, 141015 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2022.141015
P. Tangthuam, W. Kao-ian, J. Sangsawang, C. Rojviriya, P. Chirawatkul et al., Carboxymethyl cellulose as an artificial solid electrolyte interphase for stable zinc-based anodes in aqueous electrolytes. Mater. Sci. Energy Technol. 6, 417–428 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mset.2023.04.003
J. Hao, B. Li, X. Li, X. Zeng, S. Zhang et al., An in-depth study of Zn metal surface chemistry for advanced aqueous Zn-ion batteries. Adv. Mater. 32, e2003021 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202003021
S. Wu, S. Zhang, Y. Chu, Z. Hu, J. Luo, Stacked lamellar matrix enabling regulated deposition and superior thermo-kinetics for advanced aqueous Zn-ion system under practical conditions. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2107397 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202107397
S. Zhou, Y. Wang, H. Lu, Y. Zhang, C. Fu et al., Anti-corrosive and Zn-ion-regulating composite interlayer enabling long-life Zn metal anodes. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2104361 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202104361
W. Li, Q. Zhang, Z. Yang, H. Ji, T. Wu et al., Isotropic amorphous protective layer with uniform interfacial zincophobicity for stable zinc anode. Small 18, e2205667 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202205667
M. Zhao, Y. Lv, S. Zhao, Y. Xiao, J. Niu et al., Simultaneously stabilizing both electrodes and electrolytes by a self-separating organometallics interface for high-performance zinc-ion batteries at wide temperatures. Adv. Mater. 34, e2206239 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202206239
Z. Xing, Y. Sun, X. Xie, Y. Tang, G. Xu et al., Zincophilic electrode interphase with appended proton reservoir ability stabilizes Zn metal anodes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62, e202215324 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202215324
D. Wang, H. Liu, D. Lv, C. Wang, J. Yang et al., Rational screening of artificial solid electrolyte interphases on Zn for ultrahigh-rate and long-life aqueous batteries. Adv. Mater. 35, e2207908 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202207908
J. Zou, Z. Zeng, C. Wang, X. Zhu, J. Zhang et al., Ultraconformal horizontal zinc deposition toward dendrite-free anode. Small Struct. 4, 2200194 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/sstr.202200194
J. Ji, Z. Zhu, H. Du, X. Qi, J. Yao et al., Zinc-contained alloy as a robustly adhered interfacial lattice locking layer for planar and stable zinc electrodeposition. Adv. Mater. 35, e2211961 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202211961
J. Zhou, M. Xie, F. Wu, Y. Mei, Y. Hao et al., Ultrathin surface coating of nitrogen-doped graphene enables stable zinc anodes for aqueous zinc-ion batteries. Adv. Mater. 33, e2101649 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202101649
Y. Zhou, J. Xia, J. Di, Z. Sun, L. Zhao et al., Ultrahigh-rate Zn stripping and plating by capacitive charge carriers enrichment boosting Zn-based energy storage. Adv. Energy Mater. 13, 2203165 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202203165
H. Ying, P. Huang, Z. Zhang, S. Zhang, Q. Han et al., Freestanding and flexible interfacial layer enables bottom-up Zn deposition toward dendrite-free aqueous Zn-ion batteries. Nano-Micro Lett. 14, 180 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-022-00921-6
Y. Li, D. Zhao, J. Cheng, Y. Lei, Z. Zhang et al., A bifunctional nitrogen doped carbon network as the interlayer for dendrite-free Zn anode. Chem. Eng. J. 452, 139264 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2022.139264
Z. Zhao, J. Zhao, Z. Hu, J. Li, J. Li et al., Long-life and deeply rechargeable aqueous Zn anodes enabled by a multifunctional brightener-inspired interphase. Energy Environ. Sci. 12, 1938–1949 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1039/C9EE00596J
Y. Jiao, F. Li, X. Jin, Q. Lei, L. Li et al., Engineering polymer glue towards 90% zinc utilization for 1000 hours to make high-performance Zn-ion batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2107652 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202107652
L. Cao, D. Li, T. Deng, Q. Li, C. Wang, Hydrophobic organic-electrolyte-protected zinc anodes for aqueous zinc batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59, 19292–19296 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202008634
Y. Xiang, Y. Zhong, P. Tan, L. Zhou, G. Yin et al., Thickness-controlled synthesis of compact and uniform MOF protective layer for zinc anode to achieve 85% zinc utilization. Small 19, e2302161 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202302161
H. Gan, J. Wu, R. Li, B. Huang, H. Liu, Ultra-stable and deeply rechargeable zinc metal anode enabled by a multifunctional protective layer. Energy Storage Mater. 47, 602–610 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2022.02.040
V. Aupama, W. Kao-ian, J. Sangsawang, G. Mohan, S. Wannapaiboon et al., Stabilizing a zinc anode via a tunable covalent organic framework-based solid electrolyte interphase. Nanoscale 15, 9003–9013 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1039/d3nr00898c
J. Zhao, Y. Ying, G. Wang, K. Hu, Y.D. Yuan et al., Covalent organic framework film protected zinc anode for highly stable rechargeable aqueous zinc-ion batteries. Energy Storage Mater. 48, 82–89 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2022.02.054
Z. Zhao, R. Wang, C. Peng, W. Chen, T. Wu et al., Horizontally arranged zinc platelet electrodeposits modulated by fluorinated covalent organic framework film for high-rate and durable aqueous zinc ion batteries. Nat. Commun. 12, 6606 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26947-9
W. Xu, X. Liao, W. Xu, K. Zhao, G. Yao et al., Ion selective and water resistant cellulose nanofiber/MXene membrane enabled cycling Zn anode at high currents. Adv. Energy Mater. 13, 2300283 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202300283
H. Jin, S. Dai, Z. Zhu, Y. Luo, B. Qi et al., Crystal water boosted Zn2+ transfer kinetics in artificial solid electrolyte interphase for high-rate and durable Zn anodes. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 5, 10581–10590 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.2c01340
G. Li, X. Wang, S. Lv, J. Wang, W. Yu et al., In situ constructing a film-coated 3D porous Zn anode by iodine etching strategy toward horizontally arranged dendrite-free Zn deposition. Adv. Funct. Mater. 33, 2208288 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202208288
H. Yan, S. Li, Y. Nan, S. Yang, B. Li, Ultrafast zinc–ion–conductor interface toward high-rate and stable zinc metal batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 11, 2100186 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202100186
R. Wang, S. Xin, D. Chao, Z. Liu, J. Wan et al., Fast and regulated zinc deposition in a semiconductor substrate toward high-performance aqueous rechargeable batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 32, 2207751 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202207751
J. Zheng, G. Zhu, X. Liu, H. Xie, Y. Lin et al., Simultaneous dangling bond and zincophilic site engineering of SiNx protective coatings toward stable zinc anodes. ACS Energy Lett. 7, 4443–4450 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.2c02282
S. Zhang, J. Ye, H. Ao, M. Zhang, X. Li et al., In-situ formation of hierarchical solid-electrolyte interphase for ultra-long cycling of aqueous zinc-ion batteries. Nano Res. 16, 449–457 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-022-4688-5
C. Ma, K. Yang, S. Zhao, Y. Xie, C. Liu et al., Recyclable and ultrafast fabrication of zinc oxide interface layer enabling highly reversible dendrite-free Zn anode. ACS Energy Lett. 8, 1201–1208 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.2c02735
Y. Zou, Y. Su, C. Qiao, W. Li, Z. Xue et al., A generic “engraving in aprotic medium” strategy towardStabilized Zn anodes. Adv. Energy Mater. 13, 2300932 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202300932
J.B. Park, C. Choi, J.H. Park, S. Yu, D.-W. Kim, Synergistic design of multifunctional interfacial Zn host toward practical Zn metal batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 12, 2202937 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202202937
J. Zheng, Q. Zhao, T. Tang, J. Yin, C.D. Quilty et al., Reversible epitaxial electrodeposition of metals in battery anodes. Science 366, 645–648 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax6873
J.-L. Yang, J. Li, J.-W. Zhao, K. Liu, P. Yang et al., Stable zinc anodes enabled by a zincophilic polyanionic hydrogel layer. Adv. Mater. 34, 2202382 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202202382
H. He, J. Liu, Suppressing Zn dendrite growth by molecular layer deposition to enable long-life and deeply rechargeable aqueous Zn anodes. J. Mater. Chem. A 8, 22100–22110 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1039/D0TA07232J
A. Chen, C. Zhao, J. Gao, Z. Guo, X. Lu et al., Multifunctional SEI-like structure coating stabilizing Zn anodes at a large current and capacity. Energy Environ. Sci. 16, 275–284 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1039/D2EE02931F
J. Dong, H. Peng, J. Wang, C. Wang, D. Wang et al., Molecular deciphering of hydrophobic, zinc-philic and robust amino-functionalized polysilane for dendrite-free Zn anode. Energy Storage Mater. 54, 875–884 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2022.11.026
Q. Duan, K. Xue, X. Yin, D.Y.W. Yu, A cationic polymeric interface enabling dendrite-free and highly stable aqueous Zn-metal batteries. J. Power. Sources 558, 232356 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.232356
Z. Meng, Y. Jiao, P. Wu, Alleviating side reactions on Zn anodes for aqueous batteries by a cell membrane derived phosphorylcholine zwitterionic protective layer. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62, e202307271 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202307271
X. Zhu, X. Li, M.L.K. Essandoh, J. Tan, Z. Cao et al., Interface engineering with zincophilic MXene for regulated deposition of dendrite-free Zn metal anode. Energy Storage Mater. 50, 243–251 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2022.05.022
L. Zhang, Y. Hou, The rise and development of MOF-based materials for metal-chalcogen batteries: current status, challenges, and prospects. Adv. Energy Mater. 13, 2204378 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202204378
J. Zhou, L. Zhang, M. Peng, X. Zhou, Y. Cao et al., Diminishing interfacial turbulence by colloid-polymer electrolyte to stabilize zinc ion flux for deep-cycling Zn metal batteries. Adv. Mater. 34, 2200131 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202200131
H. Tian, J.-L. Yang, Y. Deng, W. Tang, R. Liu et al., Steel anti-corrosion strategy enables long-cycle Zn anode. Adv. Energy Mater. 13, 2370004 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202370004
C. Li, A. Shyamsunder, A.G. Hoane, D.M. Long, C.Y. Kwok et al., Highly reversible Zn anode with a practical areal capacity enabled by a sustainable electrolyte and superacid interfacial chemistry. Joule 6, 1103–1120 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2022.04.017
J. Wang, H. Qiu, Q. Zhang, X. Ge, J. Zhao et al., Eutectic electrolytes with leveling effects achieving high depth-of-discharge of rechargeable zinc batteries. Energy Storage Mater. 58, 9–19 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2023.03.014
J. Hao, L. Yuan, C. Ye, D. Chao, K. Davey et al., Boosting zinc electrode reversibility in aqueous electrolytes by using low-cost antisolvents. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 7366–7375 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202016531
K. Zhou, Z. Li, X. Qiu, Z. Yu, Y. Wang, Boosting Zn anode utilization by trace iodine ions in organic-water hybrid electrolytes through formation of anion-rich adsorbing layers. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62, e202309594 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202309594
M. Wang, J. Ma, Y. Meng, J. Sun, Y. Yuan et al., High-capacity zinc anode with 96% utilization rate enabled by solvation structure design. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62, e202214966 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202214966
S. Jin, F. Duan, X. Wu, J. Li, X. Dan et al., Stabilizing interface pH by mixing electrolytes for high-performance aqueous Zn metal batteries. Small 18, e2205462 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202205462
J. Zhao, C. Song, S. Ma, Q. Gao, Z. Li et al., Antifreezing polymeric-acid electrolyte for high-performance aqueous zinc-ion batteries. Energy Storage Mater. 61, 102880 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2023.102880
S.R. Motlagh, R. Khezri, M. Etesami, A.A. Mohamad, P. Kidkhunthod et al., Mitigating water-related challenges in aqueous zinc-ion batteries through ether-water hybrid electrolytes. Electrochim. Acta 468, 143122 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2023.143122
Z. Hou, H. Tan, Y. Gao, M. Li, Z. Lu et al., Tailoring desolvation kinetics enables stable zinc metal anodes. J. Mater. Chem. A 8, 19367–19374 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1039/D0TA06622B
H. Huang, D. Xie, J. Zhao, P. Rao, W.M. Choi et al., Boosting reversibility and stability of Zn anodes via manipulation of electrolyte structure and interface with addition of trace organic molecules. Adv. Energy Mater. 12, 2270157 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202270157
L. Ma, T.P. Pollard, Y. Zhang, M.A. Schroeder, M.S. Ding et al., Functionalized phosphonium cations enable zinc metal reversibility in aqueous electrolytes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 12438–12445 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202017020
D. Wang, D. Lv, H. Liu, S. Zhang, C. Wang et al., In situ formation of nitrogen-rich solid electrolyte interphase and simultaneous regulating solvation structures for advanced Zn metal batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61, e202212839 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202212839
X. Zhao, X. Zhang, N. Dong, M. Yan, F. Zhang et al., Advanced buffering acidic aqueous electrolytes for ultra-long life aqueous zinc-ion batteries. Small 18, e2200742 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202200742
J. Yang, Y. Zhang, Z. Li, X. Xu, X. Su et al., Three birds with one stone: tetramethylurea as electrolyte additive for highly reversible Zn-metal anode. Adv. Funct. Mater. 32, 2209642 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202209642
P. Zou, R. Lin, T.P. Pollard, L. Yao, E. Hu et al., Localized hydrophobicity in aqueous zinc electrolytes improves zinc metal reversibility. Nano Lett. 22, 7535–7544 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c02514
Y. Wang, T. Wang, S. Bu, J. Zhu, Y. Wang et al., Sulfolane-containing aqueous electrolyte solutions for producing efficient ampere-hour-level zinc metal battery pouch cells. Nat. Commun. 14, 1828 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-37524-7
C. Huang, X. Zhao, S. Liu, Y. Hao, Q. Tang et al., Stabilizing zinc anodes by regulating the electrical double layer with saccharin anions. Adv. Mater. 33, e2100445 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202100445
T.C. Li, C. Lin, M. Luo, P. Wang, D.-S. Li et al., Interfacial molecule engineering for reversible Zn electrochemistry. ACS Energy Lett. 8, 3258–3268 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.3c00859
Y. Zhao, H. Hong, L. Zhong, J. Zhu, Y. Hou et al., Zn-rejuvenated and SEI-regulated additive in zinc metal battery via the iodine post-functionalized zeolitic imidazolate framework-90. Adv. Energy Mater. 13, 2300627 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202300627
Y. Zhong, Z. Cheng, H. Zhang, J. Li, D. Liu et al., Monosodium glutamate, an effective electrolyte additive to enhance cycling performance of Zn anode in aqueous battery. Nano Energy 98, 107220 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.107220
Z. Xu, H. Li, Y. Liu, K. Wang, H. Wang et al., Durable modulation of Zn(002) plane deposition via reproducible zincophilic carbon quantum dots towards low N/P ratio zinc-ion batteries. Mater. Horiz. 10, 3680–3693 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1039/D3MH00261F
P. Xiong, C. Lin, Y. Wei, J.-H. Kim, G. Jang et al., Charge-transfer complex-based artificial layers for stable and efficient Zn metal anodes. ACS Energy Lett. 8, 2718–2727 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.3c00534
Z. Shen, J. Mao, G. Yu, W. Zhang, S. Mao et al., Electrocrystallization regulation enabled stacked hexagonal platelet growth toward highly reversible zinc anodes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62, e202218452 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202218452
S.-J. Zhang, J. Hao, Y. Zhu, H. Li, Z. Lin et al., pH-triggered molecular switch toward texture-regulated Zn anode. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62, e202301570 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202301570
R. Zhao, H. Wang, H. Du, Y. Yang, Z. Gao et al., Lanthanum nitrate as aqueous electrolyte additive for favourable zinc metal electrodeposition. Nat. Commun. 13, 3252 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-30939-8
X. Shi, J. Wang, F. Yang, X. Liu, Y. Yu et al., Metallic zinc anode working at 50 and 50 mAh cm–2 with high depth of discharge via electrical double layer reconstruction. Adv. Funct. Mater. 33, 2211917 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202211917
X. Huang, Q. Li, X. Zhang, H. Cao, J. Zhao et al., Critical triple roles of sodium iodide in tailoring the solventized structure, anode-electrolyte interface and crystal plane growth to achieve highly reversible zinc anodes for aqueous zinc-ion batteries. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 650, 875–882 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2023.07.037
A. Bayaguud, X. Luo, Y. Fu, C. Zhu, Cationic surfactant-type electrolyte additive enables three-dimensional dendrite-free zinc anode for stable zinc-ion batteries. ACS Energy Lett. 5, 3012–3020 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.0c01792
C. Meng, W. He, L. Jiang, Y. Huang, J. Zhang et al., Ultra-stable aqueous zinc batteries enabled by β-cyclodextrin: preferred zinc deposition and suppressed parasitic reactions. Adv. Funct. Mater. 32, 2207732 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202207732
Y. Lv, M. Zhao, Y. Du, Y. Kang, Y. Xiao et al., Engineering a self-adaptive electric double layer on both electrodes for high-performance zinc metal batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 15, 4748–4760 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1039/D2EE02687B
N. Wang, X. Chen, H. Wan, B. Zhang, K.-Y. Guan et al., Zincophobic electrolyte achieves highly reversible zinc-ion batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202300795
D. Wang, D. Lv, H. Peng, C. Wang, H. Liu et al., Solvation modulation enhances anion-derived solid electrolyte interphase for deep cycling of aqueous zinc metal batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62, e202310290 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202310290
C. Huang, X. Zhao, Y. Hao, Y. Yang, Y. Qian et al., Self-healing SeO2 additives enable zinc metal reversibility in aqueous ZnSO4 electrolytes. Adv. Funct. Mater. 32, 2112091 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202112091
Y. Zhang, X. Zheng, K. Wu, Y. Zhang, G. Xu et al., Nonionic surfactant-assisted In situ generation of stable passivation protective layer for highly stable aqueous Zn metal anodes. Nano Lett. 22, 8574–8583 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c03114
X. Xu, H. Su, J. Zhang, Y. Zhong, Y. Xu et al., Sulfamate-derived solid electrolyte interphase for reversible aqueous zinc battery. ACS Energy Lett. 7, 4459–4468 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.2c02236
J. Hao, L. Yuan, Y. Zhu, M. Jaroniec, S.-Z. Qiao, Triple-function electrolyte regulation toward advanced aqueous Zn-ion batteries. Adv. Mater. 34, 2206963 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202206963
Y. Zhu, H.Y. Hoh, S. Qian, C. Sun, Z. Wu et al., Ultrastable zinc anode enabled by CO2-induced interface layer. ACS Nano 16, 14600–14610 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.2c05124
K. Wang, T. Qiu, L. Lin, X.-X. Liu, X. Sun, A low fraction electrolyte additive as interface stabilizer for Zn electrode in aqueous batteries. Energy Storage Mater. 54, 366–373 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2022.10.029
J. Ge, Y. Zhang, Z. Xie, H. Xie, W. Chen et al., Tailored ZnF2/ZnS-rich interphase for reversible aqueous Zn batteries. Nano Res. 16, 4996–5005 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-022-5325-z
X. Li, H. Yao, Y. Li, X. Liu, D. Yuan et al., Cellulose-complexing strategy induced surface regulation towards ultrahigh utilization rate of Zn. J. Mater. Chem. A 11, 14720–14727 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1039/D3TA02117C
X. Zeng, J. Mao, J. Hao, J. Liu, S. Liu et al., Electrolyte design for in situ construction of highly Zn2+-conductive solid electrolyte interphase to enable high-performance aqueous Zn-ion batteries under practical conditions. Adv. Mater. 33, e2007416 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202007416
H. Zhang, X. Gan, Z. Song, J. Zhou, Amphoteric cellulose-based double-network hydrogel electrolyte toward ultra-stable Zn anode. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62, e202217833 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202217833
Y. Cheng, Y. Jiao, P. Wu, Manipulating Zn002 deposition plane with zirconium ion crosslinked hydrogel electrolyte toward dendrite free Zn metal anodes. Energy Environ. Sci. 16, 4561–4571 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1039/D3EE02114A
F. Wang, J. Zhang, H. Lu, H. Zhu, Z. Chen et al., Production of gas-releasing electrolyte-replenishing Ah-scale zinc metal pouch cells with aqueous gel electrolyte. Nat. Commun. 14, 4211 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-39877-5
Y. Qin, H. Li, C. Han, F. Mo, X. Wang, Chemical welding of the electrode-electrolyte interface by Zn-metal-initiated in situ gelation for ultralong-life Zn-ion batteries. Adv. Mater. 34, e2207118 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202207118
X. Yang, W. Li, J. Lv, G. Sun, Z. Shi et al., In situ separator modification via CVD-derived N-doped carbon for highly reversible Zn metal anodes. Nano Res. 15, 9785–9791 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-021-3957-z
X. Ge, W. Zhang, F. Song, B. Xie, J. Li et al., Single-ion-functionalized nanocellulose membranes enable lean-electrolyte and deeply cycled aqueous zinc-metal batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 32, 2200429 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202200429
H. Qin, W. Chen, W. Kuang, N. Hu, X. Zhang et al., A nature-inspired separator with water-confined and kinetics-boosted effects for sustainable and high-utilization Zn metal batteries. Small 19, e2300130 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202300130
J. Ming, J. Guo, C. Xia, W. Wang, H.N. Alshareef, Zinc-ion batteries: materials, mechanisms, and applications. Mater. Sci. Eng. R. Rep. 135, 58–84 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mser.2018.10.002
W. Zhou, M. Chen, Q. Tian, J. Chen, X. Xu et al., Cotton-derived cellulose film as a dendrite-inhibiting separator to stabilize the zinc metal anode of aqueous zinc ion batteries. Energy Storage Mater. 44, 57–65 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2021.10.002
L. Yao, G. Wang, F. Zhang, X. Chi, Y. Liu, Highly-reversible and recyclable zinc metal batteries achieved by inorganic/organic hybrid separators with finely tunable hydrophilic–hydrophobic balance. Energy Environ. Sci. 16, 4432–4441 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1039/D3EE01575K
D.J. Arnot, M.B. Lim, N.S. Bell, N.B. Schorr, R.C. Hill et al., High depth-of-discharge zinc rechargeability enabled by a self-assembled polymeric coating. Adv. Energy Mater. 11, 2101594 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202101594
X. Yang, Z. Zhang, M. Wu, Z.-P. Guo, Z.-J. Zheng, Reshaping zinc plating/stripping behavior by interfacial water bonding for high-utilization-rate zinc batteries. Adv. Mater. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202303550
X. Zhang, J. Li, K. Qi, Y. Yang, D. Liu et al., An ion-sieving Janus separator toward planar electrodeposition for deeply rechargeable Zn-metal anodes. Adv. Mater. 34, e2205175 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202205175
H. Yang, R. Zhu, Y. Yang, Z. Lu, Z. Chang et al., Sustainable high-energy aqueous zinc–manganese dioxide batteries enabled by stress-governed metal electrodeposition and fast zinc diffusivity. Energy Environ. Sci. 16, 2133–2141 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1039/D2EE03777G
Q. Li, H. Wang, H. Yu, M. Fu, W. Liu et al., Engineering an ultrathin and hydrophobic composite zinc anode with 24µm thickness for high-performance Zn batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 33, 2303466 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202303466
J. Li, Q. Lin, Z. Zheng, L. Cao, W. Lv et al., How is cycle life of three-dimensional zinc metal anodes with carbon fiber backbones affected by depth of discharge and current density in zinc-ion batteries? ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 14, 12323–12330 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c00344
Y. Mu, Z. Li, B.-K. Wu, H. Huang, F. Wu et al., 3D hierarchical graphene matrices enable stable Zn anodes for aqueous Zn batteries. Nat. Commun. 14, 4205 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-39947-8
B. Zhou, B. Miao, Y. Gao, A. Yu, Z. Shao, Self-assembled protein nanofilm regulating uniform Zn nucleation and deposition enabling long-life Zn anodes. Small 19, 2300895 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202300895
Y. Zeng, P.X. Sun, Z. Pei, Q. Jin, X. Zhang et al., Nitrogen-doped carbon fibers embedded with zincophilic Cu nanoboxes for stable Zn-metal anodes. Adv. Mater. 34, e2200342 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202200342
Z. Yi, J. Liu, S. Tan, Z. Sang, J. Mao et al., An ultrahigh rate and stable zinc anode by facet-matching-induced dendrite regulation. Adv. Mater. 34, e2203835 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202203835
S.D. Pu, C. Gong, Y.T. Tang, Z. Ning, J. Liu et al., Achieving ultrahigh-rate planar and dendrite-free zinc electroplating for aqueous zinc battery anodes. Adv. Mater. 34, 2202552 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202202552
C. Xie, H. Ji, Q. Zhang, Z. Yang, C. Hu et al., High-index zinc facet exposure induced by preferentially orientated substrate for dendrite-free zinc anode. Adv. Energy Mater. 13, 2203203 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202203203
Y. Zeng, X. Zhang, R. Qin, X. Liu, P. Fang et al., Dendrite-free zinc deposition induced by multifunctional CNT frameworks for stable flexible Zn-ion batteries. Adv. Mater. 31, e1903675 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201903675
B. Wu, B. Guo, Y. Chen, Y. Mu, H. Qu et al., High zinc utilization aqueous zinc ion batteries enabled by 3D printed graphene arrays. Energy Storage Mater. 54, 75–84 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2022.10.017
W. Dong, J.-L. Shi, T.-S. Wang, Y.-X. Yin, C.-R. Wang et al., 3D zinc@carbon fiber composite framework anode for aqueous Zn–MnO2 batteries. RSC Adv. 8, 19157–19163 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1039/C8RA03226B
Y. Zhou, X. Wang, X. Shen, Y. Shi, C. Zhu et al., 3D confined zinc plating/stripping with high discharge depth and excellent high-rate reversibility. J. Mater. Chem. A 8, 11719–11727 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1039/D0TA02791J
Z. Xu, S. Jin, N. Zhang, W. Deng, M.H. Seo et al., Efficient Zn metal anode enabled by O, N-codoped carbon microflowers. Nano Lett. 22, 1350–1357 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c04709
R. Wang, L. Wu, Y. Wei, K. Zhu, H. Wang et al., ‘Two Birds with One Stone’ design for dendrite-free zinc-metal anodes: three-dimensional highly conductive skeletons loaded with abundant zincophilic sites. Mater. Today Energy 29, 101097 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtener.2022.101097
B. Jiang, W. Liu, Z. Ren, R. Guo, Y. Huang et al., Oxygen plasma modified carbon cloth with C=O zincophilic sites as a stable host for zinc metal anodes. Front. Chem. 10, 899810 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2022.899810
L. Wang, G. Fan, J. Liu, L. Zhang, M. Yu et al., Selective nitrogen doping on carbon cloth to enhance the performance of zinc anode. Chin. Chem. Lett. 32, 1095–1100 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2020.08.022
H. Liu, J. Li, X. Zhang, X. Liu, Y. Yan et al., Ultrathin and ultralight Zn micromesh-induced spatial-selection deposition for flexible high-specific-energy Zn-ion batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2106550 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202106550
Q. Zhang, J. Luan, L. Fu, S. Wu, Y. Tang et al., The three-dimensional dendrite-free zinc anode on a copper mesh with a zinc-oriented polyacrylamide electrolyte additive. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58, 15841–15847 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201907830
Z. Zhang, X. Yang, P. Li, Y. Wang, X. Zhao et al., Biomimetic dendrite-free multivalent metal batteries. Adv. Mater. 34, e2206970 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202206970
G. Zhang, X. Zhang, H. Liu, J. Li, Y. Chen et al., 3D-printed multi-channel metal lattices enabling localized electric-field redistribution for dendrite-free aqueous Zn ion batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 11, 2003927 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202003927
Y. An, Y. Tian, S. Xiong, J. Feng, Y. Qian, Scalable and controllable synthesis of interface-engineered nanoporous host for dendrite-free and high rate zinc metal batteries. ACS Nano 15, 11828–11842 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.1c02928
C. Xie, S. Liu, W. Zhang, H. Ji, S. Chu et al., Robust and wide temperature-range zinc metal batteries with unique electrolyte and substrate design. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62, e202304259 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202304259
R. Xue, J. Kong, Y. Wu, Y. Wang, X. Kong et al., Highly reversible zinc metal anodes enabled by a three-dimensional silver host for aqueous batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 10, 10043–10050 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1039/D2TA00326K
L. Wang, W. Huang, W. Guo, Z.H. Guo, C. Chang et al., Sn alloying to inhibit hydrogen evolution of Zn metal anode in rechargeable aqueous batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 32, 2108533 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202108533
M. Kwon, J. Lee, S. Ko, G. Lim, S.-H. Yu et al., Stimulating Cu–Zn alloying for compact Zn metal growth towards high energy aqueous batteries and hybrid supercapacitors. Energy Environ. Sci. 15, 2889–2899 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1039/D2EE00617K
H. Chen, Z. Guo, H. Wang, W. Huang, F. Pan et al., A liquid metal interlayer for boosted charge transfer and dendrite-free deposition toward high-performance Zn anodes. Energy Storage Mater. 54, 563–569 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2022.11.013
M. Fayette, H.J. Chang, X. Li, D. Reed, High-performance InZn alloy anodes toward practical aqueous zinc batteries. ACS Energy Lett. 7, 1888–1895 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.2c00843
J. Zhou, M. Xie, F. Wu, Y. Mei, Y. Hao et al., Encapsulation of metallic Zn in a hybrid MXene/graphene aerogel as a stable Zn anode for foldable Zn-ion batteries. Adv. Mater. 34, e2106897 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202106897
J. Gu, Y. Tao, H. Chen, Z. Cao, Y. Zhang et al., Stress-release functional liquid metal-MXene layers toward dendrite-free zinc metal anodes. Adv. Energy Mater. 12, 2200115 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202200115
Z. Wang, J. Huang, Z. Guo, X. Dong, Y. Liu et al., A metal-organic framework host for highly reversible dendrite-free zinc metal anodes. Joule 3, 1289–1300 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2019.02.012
Y. Gao, Q. Cao, J. Pu, X. Zhao, G. Fu et al., Stable Zn anodes with triple gradients. Adv. Mater. 35, e2207573 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202207573
M. Cui, Y. Xiao, L. Kang, W. Du, Y. Gao et al., Quasi-isolated Au particles as heterogeneous seeds to guide uniform Zn deposition for aqueous zinc-ion batteries. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2, 6490–6496 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.9b01063
Y. Zhang, L. Wang, Q. Li, B. Hu, J. Kang et al., Iodine promoted ultralow Zn nucleation overpotential and Zn-rich cathode for low-cost, fast-production and high-energy density anode-free Zn-iodine batteries. Nano-Micro Lett. 14, 208 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-022-00948-9
W. Ling, Q. Yang, F. Mo, H. Lei, J. Wang et al., An ultrahigh rate dendrite-free Zn metal deposition/striping enabled by silver nanowire aerogel with optimal atomic affinity with Zn. Energy Storage Mater. 51, 453–464 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2022.07.002
M. Wang, W. Wang, Y. Meng, Y. Xu, J. Sun et al., Crystal facet correlated Zn growth on Cu for aqueous Zn metal batteries. Energy Storage Mater. 56, 424–431 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2023.01.026
H. Chen, M. Chen, W. Zhou, X. Han, B. Liu et al., Flexible Ti3C2Tx/nanocellulose hybrid film as a stable Zn-free anode for aqueous hybrid Zn–Li batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 14, 6876–6884 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c23402
H. Chen, W. Zhou, M. Chen, Q. Tian, X. Han et al., Ultrathin Zn-free anode based on Ti3C2Tx and nanocellulose enabling high-durability aqueous hybrid Zn–Na battery with Zn2+/Na+ co-intercalation mechanism. Nano Res. 16, 536–544 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-022-4916-z
C. Wang, D. Wang, D. Lv, H. Peng, X. Song et al., Interface engineering by hydrophilic and zincophilic aluminum hydroxide fluoride for anode-free zinc metal batteries at low temperature. Adv. Energy Mater. 13, 2204388 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202204388
R. Zhao, J. Yang, X. Han, Y. Wang, Q. Ni et al., Stabilizing Zn metal anodes via cation/anion regulation toward high energy density Zn-ion batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 13, 2370034 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202370034
X. Zheng, Z. Liu, J. Sun, R. Luo, K. Xu et al., Constructing robust heterostructured interface for anode-free zinc batteries with ultrahigh capacities. Nat. Commun. 14, 76 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-35630-6
T.A. Nigatu, H.K. Bezabh, S.-K. Jiang, B.W. Taklu, Y. Nikodimos et al., An anode-free aqueous hybrid batteries enabled by in situ Cu/Sn/Zn alloy formation on pure Cu substrate. Electrochim. Acta 443, 141883 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2023.141883
S. Xie, Y. Li, L. Dong, Stable anode-free zinc-ion batteries enabled by alloy network-modulated zinc deposition interface. J. Energy Chem. 76, 32–40 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2022.08.040
K. Xu, X. Zheng, R. Luo, J. Sun, Y. Ma et al., A three-dimensional zincophilic nano-copper host enables dendrite-free and anode-free Zn batteries. Mater. Today Energy 34, 101284 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtener.2023.101284
C. Li, L. Liang, X. Liu, N. Cao, Q. Shao et al., A lean-zinc anode battery based on metal–organic framework-derived carbon. Carbon Energy 5, e301 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/cey2.301
T. Zhang, L. Zhang, Y. Hou, MXenes: synthesis strategies and lithium-sulfur battery applications. eScience 2, 164–182 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esci.2022.02.010
C. Li, Q. Shao, K. Luo, Y. Gao, W. Zhao et al., A lean-zinc and zincophilic anode for highly reversible zinc metal batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202305204
Y. An, Y. Tian, K. Zhang, Y. Liu, C. Liu et al., Stable aqueous anode-free zinc batteries enabled by interfacial engineering. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2101886 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202101886
X. Yi, A.M. Rao, J. Zhou, B. Lu, Trimming the degrees of freedom via a K+ flux rectifier for safe and long-life potassium-ion batteries. Nano-Micro Lett. 15, 200 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-023-01178-3
W.-Y. Kim, H.-I. Kim, K.M. Lee, E. Shin, X. Liu et al., Demixing the miscible liquids: toward biphasic battery electrolytes based on the kosmotropic effect. Energy Environ. Sci. 15, 5217–5228 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1039/D2EE03077B
C. Li, R. Kingsbury, A.S. Thind, A. Shyamsunder, T.T. Fister et al., Enabling selective zinc-ion intercalation by a eutectic electrolyte for practical anodeless zinc batteries. Nat. Commun. 14, 3067 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-38460-2
J. Duan, L. Min, M. Wu, T. Yang, M. Chen et al., “Anode-free” Zn/LiFePO4 aqueous batteries boosted by hybrid electrolyte. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 114, 317–322 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2022.07.021
L. Cao, D. Li, T. Pollard, T. Deng, B. Zhang et al., Fluorinated interphase enables reversible aqueous zinc battery chemistries. Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 902–910 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-021-00905-4
Y. Xu, X. Zheng, J. Sun, W. Wang, M. Wang et al., Nucleophilic interfacial layer enables stable Zn anodes for aqueous Zn batteries. Nano Lett. 22, 3298–3306 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c00398
Q. Zhang, Y. Ma, Y. Lu, X. Zhou, L. Lin et al., Designing anion-type water-free Zn2+ solvation structure for robust Zn metal anode. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 23357–23364 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202109682
F. Ming, Y. Zhu, G. Huang, A.-H. Emwas, H. Liang et al., Co-solvent electrolyte engineering for stable anode-free zinc metal batteries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 7160–7170 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.1c12764
Acknowledgements
L. Z. and Y. L. acknowledge the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 52201201, 52372171), the State Key Lab of Advanced Metals and Materials (Grant No. 2022Z-11), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. 00007747, 06500205), and the Initiative Postdocs Supporting Program (Grant No. BX20190002).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no interest conflict. They have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, X., Zhang, L., Jia, X. et al. Design Strategies for Aqueous Zinc Metal Batteries with High Zinc Utilization: From Metal Anodes to Anode-Free Structures. Nano-Micro Lett. 16, 75 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-023-01304-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-023-01304-1