Highlights
-
Fundamental principles for designing highly efficient two-electron oxygen reduction reaction catalysts are briefly reviewed.
-
Strategies to integrate the components into an efficient device for hydrogen peroxide production are discussed.
-
The challenges and perspectives for catalyst and cell design are discussed.
Abstract
Electrochemical synthesis of H2O2 via a selective two-electron oxygen reduction reaction has emerged as an attractive alternative to the current energy-consuming anthraquinone process. Herein, the progress on electrocatalysts for H2O2 generation, including noble metal, transition metal-based, and carbon-based materials, is summarized. At first, the design strategies employed to obtain electrocatalysts with high electroactivity and high selectivity are highlighted. Then, the critical roles of the geometry of the electrodes and the type of reactor in striking a balance to boost the H2O2 selectivity and reaction rate are systematically discussed. After that, a potential strategy to combine the complementary properties of the catalysts and the reactor for optimal selectivity and overall yield is illustrated. Finally, the remaining challenges and promising opportunities for high-efficient H2O2 electrochemical production are highlighted for future studies.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) is a high-value and environmentally friendly oxidizing agent with a wide range of applications in chemical synthesis, paper and pulp, and wastewater [1, 4]. Currently, 95% of H2O2 production predominantly depends on the anthraquinone oxidation (AO) process [5−7]. However, this process involves multistep reactions, including a sequential hydrogenation/oxidation of anthraquinone molecules and separations (extraction of H2O2 from organic solvents), which require enormous energy input and sophisticated facilities [8,9,10]. The hydrogenation process is initially performed over a Pd catalyst followed by rapid O2 oxidation to produce concentrated H2O2. Then, the H2O2 is removed by solvent extraction. Despite being able to yield concentrated H2O2, the large energy input, multiple facilities, and the usage of Pd catalyst increase the cost, and the high concentration of H2O2 has a risk of storage and transportation, further increasing the cost. These drawbacks have triggered researchers to explore alternative green H2O2 synthesis technologies. A popular alternative to the traditional AO process is the direct synthesis using H2 and O2 as the starting reactants [11,12,13,14,15]. This process is performed over noble metal catalysts such as Pd, which can enable continuous and decentralized H2O2 production. However, the most substantial barrier to the development of this process is the safety issues originating from the explosive nature of H2 and O2. Thus, to enable large-scale application, other efficient and economic routes for H2O2 electrosynthesis are highly desirable.
Fortunately, the electrochemical strategy through a two-electron oxygen reduction reaction (2e− ORR) pathway provides an attractive route to produce H2O2, which is portable and safety [16,17,18,19]. Moreover, the electrocatalytic oxygen reduction process just needs water and O2 as the starting material, and it could be coupled with renewable energy sources [20,21,22]. Figure 1 briefly describes the different synthesis methods of H2O2. The electrochemical strategy is more cost-effective and environmentally friendly than the traditional AO and direct process. In the electrochemical process, the H2O2 product can be directly generated by the reduction of O2 at the cathode. The electrochemical H2O2 production via a 2e− ORR process was first reported in the 1930s [7, 23]. Since then, the on-site H2O2 generation from ORR has been widely used for the pulp and paper bleaching process [24,25,26]. Despite these advantages, the sluggish reaction kinetics and the competing reactions limit the overall energy efficiencies. Thus, the pre-requirements of the H2O2 electrochemical production process are the rational design of specialized catalysts with high activity, high selectivity, and good stability. The emerging electrocatalyst is divided into noble metal catalysts, transition metal-based catalysts, and carbon-based catalysts. A timeline illustrating the important finding is shown in Fig. 2. H2O2 is electrochemically produced on the electrode either using a classic H-cell or flow cell with a gas diffusion layer. Therefore, beyond the catalyst-level designs, the electrode and the reaction reactor with the capacity for rapid mass transfer and reactants/products circulating can further enable an efficient H2O2 production rate.
The research on electrochemical production of H2O2 via a selective 2e− ORR process is an emerging field. Recent intensive studies have led to the development of various promising catalysts, electrodes, and reaction reactors [20, 27]. Although extensive review articles regarding tailoring the 4e− ORR pathway to the 2e− ORR pathway for H2O2 production have been reported, the attention paid to the complementary of catalysts with other cell components into an efficient device for H2O2 production is rare. In this review, the recent advances in the disclosed catalyst design and the improvements made to the electrode and cell design that enables unprecedented H2O2 electrochemical production are discussed. In the last part, a perspective on some major challenges and opportunities for the rational design of high-efficient catalysts, electrode engineering, and the reaction reactor is presented to accelerate the development of H2O2 electrochemical production in future studies.
2 Fundamentals of H2O2 Production from Selective Oxygen Reduction Reaction
2.1 Reaction Mechanism of Two-Electron Oxygen Reduction Reaction
In general, the ORR is a multistep process that can proceed with the dissociative mechanism and the associative mechanism [28]. The dissociative mechanism refers to the breakage of O–O bond to form O upon oxygen adsorption, which is reduced successively to OHads and H2Oads. The associative mechanism means that the O–O bond is maintained and the final product can be H2O or H2O2 depending on the ability of the catalyst to dissociate the O–O bond in the *OOH intermediate [28,29,30]. For the ORR to produce H2O2, it is generally believed that the O–O bond cleavage is unfavorable, and the associative mechanism is dominant. As displayed in Fig. 3a, the O2 molecule was firstly adsorbed onto the active sites, followed by a proton-coupled electron transfer process to form *OOH [29, 31]. Subsequently, *OOH would be reduced to the final product of H2O2, which is desirable for the electrosynthesis of H2O2 [32]. However, provided that the cleavage of O–O bond occurs, the following reduction of *O would be proceeded, resulting in the formation of undesirable H2O [33, 34]. Therefore, protecting the O–O bond and modulating the adsorption energy of *OOH is crucial for achieving high H2O2 production.
In addition, previous studies have shown that different electrolytes can lead to distinct H2O2 electrosynthesis performance because solvation effects, surface-adsorbed species (such as OHads and electrolyte anions), and other factors can affect their ORR pathway. Researchers have studied the ORR performance of Pt/C catalyst in varied pH electrolyte. It was found that in the alkaline medium, the hydroxyl species was strongly adsorbed on the catalyst surface, which is a source of protons and transfers electrons to the water-solvated molecular O2 (O2·(H2O)n). The mechanism of the outer-sphere electron transfer for the ORR is dominant in the alkaline medium. Solvated O2 and anions filled the outer Helmholtz plane (OHP) (shown in Fig. 3b). O2 chemisorption is not a prerequisite, and this process is not specific and can proceed on all catalysts. Therefore, all catalysts can be used for H2O2 production in alkaline electrolytes. Especially for metal compounds and other catalysts that is semiconductor, this mechanism gives the reasons that can be used for H2O2 electrosynthesis. The first step of this mechanism is the O2 molecules are solvated (O2·(H2O)n), followed by proton and electron transfer to form *OOH intermediates. The selectivity to H2O2 or H2O depends on the cleavage capability of O–O bonds in the *OOH intermediate. For the metal compounds, the binding energy of *OOH on the catalyst surface is weak, thus promoting the desorption of *OOH to form H2O2. It can be illustrated as:
In acidic electrolytes, the high mobility of protons leads to low concentration of adsorbed hydroxyl species on the catalyst surface. O2 molecules are chemisorbed on the catalyst surface, then getting electrons from the electrode. This mechanism is called the inner-Helmholtz plane (IHP) process (shown in Fig. 3b). Therefore, the catalysts used for acidic H2O2 production are conductors, which can facilitate O2 chemisorption and electrons transfer. This mechanism elaborates that noble metal-based catalysts and the emerging M–N–C catalysts with high ORR activity can be used for H2O2 production in acidic electrolyte. The elemental steps for acidic H2O2 production are:
These ORR pathways give an insight into the pH effect on the H2O2 electrosynthesis performance and guide us to design catalysts. However, there is rare study about the H2O2 production mechanism in neutral electrolyte. In the neutral electrolyte, the hydroxyl species is barren as well as the protons. Thus, we should further investigate the ORR pathway to reveal the underlying pH effect on the H2O2 production.
2.2 Performance Evaluation: Rotating-Ring Disk Electrode Versus Practical Devices
The current H2O2 electrosynthesis performance evaluation mainly relies on the rotating ring-disk electrode (RRDE) technique in a three-electrode system. This technique is an effective yet facile electrochemical method for quantifying ORR activity, electron transfer number (n), and H2O2 selectivity (%) in a laboratory setting. Typically, a glassy carbon disk with a Pt ring electrode is used as the working electrode. The ink dripped on the disk was used for H2O2 production, while the ring is set with 1.2 V (vs. RHE) to quantify the H2O2 amount [35,36,37]. The negative current at the disk is used to evaluate the electrocatalyst activity. The ORR current on the ring is negligible as the ORR occurs on the disk and the H2O2 is oxidized on the ring electrode. Therefore, the positive current on the ring is in an index of the H2O2 selectivity. The electron transfer number (n) and H2O2 selectivity (%) can be determined by measuring the current at the disk and the ring as the following equations:
where Iring and Idisk refer to ring current and disk current, respectively. N represents the collection efficiency of the ring electrode, which is generally obtained via the oxidation–reduction reaction of [Fe(CN)6]4−/[Fe(CN)6]3−. In the ORR, the value of n closer to 2 indicates the pathway is toward the 2e− ORR pathway to produce H2O2, while the value of n closer to 4 indicates the 4e− ORR pathway to produce H2O. The higher H2O2 selectivity means that the 2e− ORR pathway is dominant.
The practical H2O2 production performance of the catalyst can also be evaluated by utilizing electrolyzer configurations. The H2O2 electrosynthesis performance under such devices can represent the “real world” relative to the RRDE technique and can be used to test catalyst stability and bulk production over an extended time. The H2O2 concentration can be determined by a traditional Ce(SO4)2 titration method. The yellow Ce4+ ion has a strong absorption peak around 316 nm and can be reduced by H2O2 to colorless Ce3+. Thus, the concentration of H2O2 will be obtained by the concentration of Ce4+ before and after the reaction. Moreover, the faradaic efficiency (FE) in these real devices is calculated to evaluate the catalyst performance (H2O2 production rate, accumulated H2O2 concentration, and energy efficiency).
where CH2O2 is the actual produced H2O2 concentration, VCe4+ refers to the volume of Ce(SO4)2, V1, electrolyte is the volume of removed electrolyte from the electrolyzer. CbeforeCe4+ is the initial concentration of Ce(SO4)2, CafterCe4+ is the final concentration of Ce(SO4)2 after H2O2 is added, V2, electrolyte refers to the total electrolyte volume. In Eq. 10, C is the H2O2 concentration, V is the volume of the electrolyte, F is the faraday constant (96,485 C mol−1), and Q is the consumed charge. The value of FE is more meaningful to evaluate the H2O2 electrosynthesis performance compared to the H2O2% obtained by the RRDE technique.
There could be a distinct gap in the performance evaluation between the RRDE and electrolyzer set-ups because the RRDE technique tends to overperform while the catalyst performance in practical devices shows a more truthful H2O2 selectivity (faradaic efficiency). A recent work by Yang [7] gave a comparison of the FE of kinds of catalysts on RRDE (Fig. 4a), gas diffusion electrode (submerged, air-breathing) (Fig. 4b), and membrane electrode assembly (MEA) (Fig. 4c). An obvious difference in the selectivity between the RRDE and the practical devices can be clearly seen in Fig. 4d. The main reason behind this phenomenon may be attributed to mass transfer (including oxygen bubbles to the catalyst surface, ions transport, and the H2O2 transport away from the catalyst surface) and electron transfer (electron transfer from the substrate to the catalyst). For the RRDE technique, the produced H2O2 at the disk is instantly oxidized at the ring due to the electrode rotation, which can accelerate the H2O2 transfer and reduce the residence time of H2O2 on the catalyst surface. Moreover, the rotation can promote ion diffusion and reduce concentration polarization. Nevertheless, the solubility of O2 in the electrolyte is very low (70 mg O2 L−1). The insufficient O2 mass transfer restricts the ORR performance. In addition, in the case of the device, the accumulated H2O2 on the catalyst surface can accelerate the H2O2 corrosion process and the catalyst can easily deviate from the substrate, resulting in a large deviation in H2O2 performance evaluation. In this perspective, research efforts under conditions that are more representative of the “real world” are necessary to minimize the gap between fundamental research and practical implementation.
Currently, catalyst development is mainly focused on tuning the 4e− ORR pathway toward the 2e− ORR pathway to produce H2O2. With the increasing demand for on-site H2O2 production, the facile electrode preparation has encouraged more search for the integrated electrode with high activity and high selectivity. This review will describe the current insights for H2O2 electrosynthesis, in which the rational catalyst design, their application, and reactor design strategies are highlighted.
3 Catalysts for H2O2 from the Oxygen Reduction Reaction
The common catalysts used for H2O2 electrochemical production include noble-metal-based catalysts, transition metal-based catalysts, and carbon-based catalysts. Extensive efforts have been made in the ORR electrocatalysts investigation due to the increasing demand for H2O2. In this section, the developed catalysts will be concluded and discussed in detail.
3.1 Noble Metal-Based Catalysts
Various noble metal-based catalysts for H2O2 production have been studied recently including noble metals and their alloys, single-atom catalysts, and so on. Noble metal-based catalysts have been a topic in fuel cells for their high activity and stability [38,39,40,41]. It was found that noble metals can produce a trace of H2O2 when working in fuel cells [42,43,44,45]. Therefore, catalysts that undergo incomplete oxygen reduction are less useful but may be a candidate for H2O2 electrosynthesis [32].
3.1.1 Pure Noble Metals
Several noble metals such as Au, Ag, and Hg that have a weak interaction with O2 were demonstrated to be able to reduce O2 selectively to H2O2 [46,47,48]. The produced H2O2 on the Hg substrate via ORR is stable without further reduction within the operated potential window (E ≤ 0.5 V) [49]. In contrast, there was an evident drop in the H2O2 electrochemical production on the Ag and Au substrate with a more negative potential of 0.025 V [50]. Moreover, a 2e− ORR pathway was observed on the Au cluster, especially on Au(111) and Au(110) surfaces reported in 1983s [51, 52]. Since then, various Au nanostructures were found to be active catalysts for H2O2 electrochemical production. For example, Au nanoclusters of Au25 (consisting of 25 Au atoms) could produce H2O2 in alkaline media with a high H2O2 selectivity reaching 90% [53,54,55]. The enhanced H2O2 electrosynthesis performance on Au25 clusters was strongly related to the Au cluster with low Miller index faces of the crystallographic orientation. Au nanomaterials presented enhanced catalytic activity but low H2O2 selectivity because of higher surface energy. Therefore, there are few reports about pure noble metals for H2O2 electrosynthesis due to their harsh synthesis conditions.
3.1.2 Noble Metal Alloys
Pure metals with high ORR activity, such as Pt and Pd, have an extensive application in fuel cells, and they dominate a 4e− ORR pathway. Thus, they can be coupled with weak interacting metals to fabricate bimetallic/ multi-metallic catalysts to improve both electroactivity and H2O2 selectivity [56,57,58,59]. For example, some successful alloys such as Pt-Hg, Pd-Au, and so on, have an extensive study for H2O2 electrosynthesis. Schiffrin first found that isolating Pd atoms within the Au enhanced the H2O2 electrosynthesis performance compared to the pure Au and Pd metals [56]. O2 is adsorbed “side-on” on the continuous active sites, which makes the cleavage of O−O and H2O production easy. Discrete reactive sites could be formed with Au content increasing and O2 prefers “end-on” adsorption, which could hinder the O−O breakage and promote the H2O2 formation (Fig. 5a) [1]. It was demonstrated that when the Pd concentration was increased to 8%, nearly 95% H2O2 production selectivity was realized (Fig. 5b). Inspired by this, Schiffrin further adopted Au (111) as the substrate and computationally selected other electroactive surfaces containing discrete guest transition metal atoms as Au-M reactive centers. Isolating Pt or Rh atoms by alloying with Au could also enhance H2O2 production. In addition, Amal et al. [58] reported that Au–Ni core–shell nanoparticles and Au-Pt-Ni core-sandwich-shell nanoparticles also exhibited relatively high ORR activity and H2O2 selectivity in 0.1 M KOH [60]. Following this, Stephens [11] identified Pt–Hg as a promising candidate (Fig. 5c). It possessed an optimal *OOH binding energy along with a smaller thermodynamic overpotential than the previously reported Pd/Au, indicative of an optimal electrocatalyst for H2O2 electrosynthesis (Fig. 5d). The PtHg is the only catalyst fulfilling all our criteria for activity, selectivity, and stability among the screening catalysts. Electrochemical results revealed that the as-prepared PtHg4 possesses excellent ORR activity with dominant 2e− selectivity under a wide range of potential in 0.1 M HClO4. Moreover, PtHg4 also remained high activity after 8000 cycles, verifying its stability during the ORR process. Inspired by these results, this group further explored other alloys (CuHg, PdHg, and AgHg) to replace Pt and found that PdHg exhibited more superior ORR activity and H2O2 selectivity than previously reported PtHg catalyst (Fig. 5e) [61]. DFT calculations revealed that the Pd–Hg exhibited the lowest overpotential (Fig. 5f). The strategy implies that alloying with inert metals can isolate the continuous active sites and facilitate the end-on O2 adsorption configuration. Using this strong interaction to prevent the formation of continuous active sites can successfully screen catalysts with high activity and selectivity.
3.1.3 Metal-Support Interaction
The transformation from a 4e− ORR pathway to a 2e− ORR pathway for high-performance H2O2 production is realized by alloying with inert metals. The DFT calculations indicated that the intrinsic property is the O2 adsorption model and the *OOH intermediates binding. Therefore, the major challenge for 2e− ORR catalysts design is to switch the O2 adsorption mode from “side-on” configuration to “end-on” configuration. Pt/C catalyst has been studied for decades in fuel cells. Unexpectedly, Choi observed that precisely coating amorphous carbon layers on Pt catalysts could induce O2 adsorbed with end-on configuration, which remarkably enhanced the H2O2 electrosynthesis performance (Fig. 6a) [62]. Notably, the optimized C(Pt)C catalyst showed superior catalytic stability originating from the protection of the coated carbon layers compared to the previously studied AuPd alloy. Inspired by this, Liu created an encapsulating Ti oxide overlayer on the Pd species by the ball milling method (Fig. 6b) [63]. A reduced TiO2-x layer was found, and the Pd surface was partially oxidized upon increasing the balling time to 5 h (Fig. 6c, d). The electrochemical results indicated when the balling time is 6 h, the obtained catalysts showed excellent H2O2 electrosynthesis performance. The Pd catalysts encapsulated with Ti oxide overlayer show a much higher mass activity related to the previously reported catalysts and increased long stability. Combined spectroscopy characterization and in situ techniques were used to give an understanding of the reaction mechanism and reaction pathway. In situ Raman spectroscopy results showed that various oxygenated species were observed over the 6 h-Pd/TiC sample (Fig. 6e). The observed signals located at 733 and 846 cm−1, which were assigned to the OOH*, corresponded to the bridge site and top site adsorption on the Pd, respectively. The DFT calculations further shed light on the reaction mechanism. The Ti oxide layer reduced the low overpotential (0.07 eV) while increased the negative charge over Pd because the charge was transferred from the Ti oxide layer to Pd active sites (Fig. 6f, g). These results revealed that the electronic and geometric modifications were conducive to optimal adsorption energies of reaction intermediates. The powerful interaction of the support and the noble metals can realize the charge transfer and decrease the surface energy of noble metals.
3.1.4 Surface Poisoning
Although the approach of alloying with weak catalysts to isolate the active sites could enable catalysts with superior H2O2 electrosynthesis performance, a high dosage of metals increases the cost. Alternatively, the incorporation of nonmetal elements, such as P, S, and B, has also been demonstrated as an attractive and effective way for site isolation. Particularly, Li et al. [64] designed and synthesized a PtP2 alloy catalyst and explored its electrochemical ORR behavior. PtP2 nanocrystals with a uniform size of 3 nm exhibited excellent H2O2 selectivity compared with Pt nanoparticles (Pt NCs). DFT calculation disclosed the underlying performance improvement. The shifted ORR pathway from 4e− to 2e− originated from the electronegative P incorporation, which changed the electronic density of Pt and increased the separation of adjacent Pt atoms (Fig. 7a).
The DFT results further demonstrated a lower free-energy difference of OOH* to H2O2 (0.106 eV) than the 0.180 eV for that of *OOH to O*, indicating a suitable *OOH binding energy for H2O2 formation (Fig. 7b). In addition, to improve electrocatalytic ORR stability, the ultra-small PtP2 nanoparticles were treated by atomic layer deposition of an alumina overcoat and post-annealing to suppress PtP2 NCs aggregation (Fig. 7c). The coated catalysts achieved a long-term (> 120 h) cycle stability with a high H2O2 concentration (3.0 wt% with 600 mL) in a neutral medium (pH = 6.6), which can meet the requirement of medical disinfection and sewage disposal (Fig. 7d).
Recently, masking partial active metal surface by adsorbing poisonous ions, such as halogen ions, SCN−, CN− and S2−, also has been demonstrated as an effective strategy to improve H2O2 selectivity. In 1999, Markovic et al. [65] studied the effects of Br− ion on Pt (111) surface and found that H2O2 oxidation currents would increase after Br− ion adsorption. Strongly adsorbed Br− circumvented the formation of paired platinum sites. The effect of S2− ion on the Pt (111) surfaces was further investigated in 0.05 M H2SO4 and 0.1 M HClO4 [66]. The strong adsorption of sulfate ions led to a significant decline in the ORR activity of Pt catalysts and an improvement of 2e− ORR selectivity. Currently, the strategy by the addition of CN− was also proved to improve the H2O2 selectivity of Pt catalysts [67]. Recently, Niu et al. [68] restudied the influences of SCN−, S2−, and halide ions on the Pt surface (Fig. 7e). RRDE results revealed that SCN− was the most efficiently poisoning agent for Pt/C catalyst (Fig. 7f). Also, the representative Pt/C-SCN catalyst showed negligible performance loss after long-term stability. A possible mechanism from a 4e− ORR pathway to a 2e− ORR pathway was proposed, as shown in Fig. 7g. Adsorbing halogen ions will poison the noble metal active sites and decrease the continuous active sites, which is almost equivalent to the noble metal alloying catalysts by intrinsically modulating the O2 adsorption configuration.
3.1.5 Atomically Dispersion
Alloying with inert atoms or surface poisoning has been demonstrated to be effective to isolate the active site, promoting end-on adsorption for H2O2 production. Currently, researchers are devoted to noble metal minimization [69,70,71]. Constructing atomically dispersed catalysts has received extensive attention, which could lower the cost and realize end-on adsorption [72,73,74]. These factors, such as ligand effect, support effect, and impact of metal loading has an evident influence on the ORR activity and selectivity. Lee et al. [75] studied the effect of Pt loading supported on TiN on the ORR performance. Pt/TiN catalyst with 5 wt% Pt loading exhibited comparable ORR performance to the commercial Pt/C. The ORR current decreased and H2O2 selectivity increased with the Pt loading decreased. The electrocatalytic activity and H2O2 selectivity struck a balance when the Pt loading was 0.35 wt%. The ORR current showed a sharp decrease with lower Pt loading although the H2O2 selectivity reached as high as 90%. Lee et al. further investigated the ORR performance of Pt catalysts supported by different carriers. They found that the H2O2 selectivity of single Pt atoms anchored on TiN support and TiC support was 53% and 68%, respectively (Fig. 8a) [76]. The higher H2O2 selectivity on the TiC support was ascribed to the weaker adsorption energy toward *OOH than that on TiN (Fig. 8b). Thus, creating atomically dispersed metal sites on well-defined support is of great importance for H2O2 selectivity via regulating the O2 adsorption configuration.
Although atomically dispersed catalysts exhibit excellent ORR performance to H2O2 electrosynthesis, they are inclined to aggregation during the preparation process because of their high surface energy. To solve this problem, Li et al. [77] proposed a novel redox-based ion-exchange method (Fig. 8c) and successfully implemented a high concentration of single atomic Pt sites (24.8 at%) on amorphous CuSx hollow nanospheres (h-Pt1-CuSx). The Cu1.94S support with abundant vacancies has a self-reducibility, which can induce efficient coordination and stabilization with Pt single atoms. Electrochemical results displayed that the h-Pt1-CuSx catalyst exhibited a H2O2 selectivity of 92–96% over a wide potential range of 0.05–0.7 V (vs. RHE) in HClO4 electrolyte. Importantly, the h-Pt1-CuSx catalyst could produce H2O2 with a yield of 546 mol kgcat−1 h−1 (Fig. 8d), which was the highest value among the reported atomically dispersed electrocatalysts for H2O2 production.
Metal compounds, such as TiO2, TiN, and TiC, can stabilize the noble metal single atoms by coordination interaction or other interactions, but their low electrical conductivity is not conducive to charge transfer during electrocatalysis. Carbon-based materials with high surface area and conductivity in combination with their ligand effect are favorable to stabilizing the noble metal atomically dispersion. Choi et al. [78, 79] reported that a sulfur-doped zeolite-templated carbon could stabilize a relatively high loading of Pt (5 wt%) in the form of isolated atoms (Fig. 8e). Pt species in Pt/HSC (a high S-content) were Pt–S coordination instead of Pt–Pt coordination. The Pt/HSC catalyst exhibited a perfect 2e− ORR pathway (Fig. 8f). After a long cycle stability test, the ORR activity had no significant degradation. Joo et al. [80] recently presented a “trapping-and-immobilizing” strategy toward atomically dispersed noble metal catalysts for H2O2 synthesis. Precious metal precursors are trapped into a heteroatom-doped carbonaceous layer and “immobilized” by a SiO2 layer during thermal activation. This strategy is effective to obtain a series of atomically dispersed precious metal catalysts.
Researchers also study the pH effects on the noble-metal-based catalysts. Lee et al. [41] reported the distinct H2O2 production performance of Pd–Se–B in various electrolytes. Pd–Se–B showed a surprising activity in neutral electrolyte. Moreover, it exhibited the highest H2O2 selectivity of 90% in neutral electrolyte than that in 0.5 M H2SO4 (55%) and 0.1 M KOH (55%) (Table 1). The markable changes of cyclic voltammetry (CV) curves in neutral, acidic, and alkaline electrolytes were indicative of the variable H2O2 selectivity. Under repeated hydrogen underpotential deposition, Pd2+ was reduced to metallic Pd, leading to the increasing ORR activity and decreasing H2O2 selectivity. While the Pd–Se–B exhibited negligible changes under the potential cycling in neutral electrolyte. This result is against the traditional mechanisms, indicating that the pH effect is of great significance to the H2O2 electrosynthesis.
3.2 Transition Metal-Based Catalysts
Compared with the noble metal-based catalysts, transition metal-based catalysts (such as Fe, Co, Ni, and Cu) have aroused interest due to their earth-abundant and tunable electronic structure of the central transition metal atoms [81,82,83,84]. Transition metal-based materials, including metal complexes, metal compounds, and transition nitrogen-doped carbon materials, have been reported as efficient electrocatalysts for O2 reduction to H2O2 [85,86,87].
3.2.1 Metal Complexes
Porphyrin iron in hemoglobin can act as an oxygen carrier for transport, which can effectively convert inspired oxygen into H2O. Subsequently, a series of metal (Fe, Co, Cu, Ni) porphyrins, phthalocyanines, and their derivatives are studied successively as ORR catalysts [88,89,90,91,92]. Especially, the represented Fe and Co macrocyclic compounds showed good ORR activity [93,94,95,96]. Factors that direct the reaction pathway are the types of metal–oxygen intermediates, such as binuclear peroxo and electronic and steric effects of ligands in catalysts [97]. However, the high cost and unsatisfactory durability of these catalysts largely prohibited their practical applications.
3.2.2 Metal Compounds
Jin et al. [98] demonstrated that cobalt pyrite (CoS2) exhibited a well 2e− ORR performance in acidic solution. The H2O2 selectivity was chemically quantified to be 70% at 0.5 V (vs. RHE). The modest binding of *OOH on the Co site on the (100) plane of CoS2 and the kinetically disfavored O−O bond scission promoted H2O2 electrosynthesis because S could break Co ensemble active sites.
Motivated by this, they further investigated the effect of homotopy Se embeds in Co lattice on the electrosynthesis of H2O2 (Fig. 9a) [99]. It was found that the embedded Se atom had a larger atomic radius than the S atom, which can efficiently enable the separation of the neighboring Co active sites. The computational results were given to elucidate the ORR activity and H2O2 selectivity. The first step of *OOH formation was 0.27, 0.24, and 0.35 eV, corresponding to the c-CoS2 (100), c-CoSe2 (100), and o-CoSe2 (101) surfaces, respectively (Fig. 9b). This result suggested all these three samples were intrinsically active toward the 2e− ORR. The 2e− ORR selectivity was determined by the capability of O−O bond cleavage in the intermediate *OOH. The o-CoSe2 (101) showed a higher OOH* dissociation barrier (0.72 eV) than the c-CoS2 (100) and the c-CoSe2 given as the calculated results. Overall, the DFT results suggest that all CoSe2 are intrinsically electroactive and selective toward H2O2 electrosynthesis. Consequently, the o-CoSe2 exhibited much more effectiveness than CoS2 for the amply electrosynthesis of H2O2 and the accumulated H2O2 can effectively remove the RhB (Fig. 9c) [24]. Besides Co compounds, Ni compounds [100] were also studied as highly efficient and selective catalysts for the electrosynthesis of H2O2. Ni vacancies (VNi)-enriched Ni2−xP–VNi electrocatalyst was fabricated as the schematic (Fig. 9d). The as-fabricated electrocatalyst exhibited excellent 2e− ORR performance with a FE over 95% in 0.1 M KOH (Fig. 9e). DFT theoretical calculations were performed to investigate the enhanced H2O2 production performance on the Ni2−xP-VNi electrocatalyst. The closest distance of two Ni atoms in the Ni2−xP–VNi (3.72 Å) is much larger than that of the Ni2P (≈2.61 Å), far from the distance of O–O bond in *OOH intermediate (≈1.52 Å). Therefore, the *OOH adsorption on Ni2−xP–VNi prefers end-on bonding, promoting H2O2 electrochemical production. The calculated free energy on the Ni2P and Ni2−xP–VNi is − 1.14 and − 0.68 eV, respectively (Fig. 9f). The Ni2−xP-VNi delivered the lowest energy deviation (− 0.01 eV), demonstrating the best 2e− ORR thermodynamics. Moreover, the Ni2−xP-VNi exhibited optimal binding energy of *OOH (ΔG*OOH = 4.21 eV) with end-on adsorption, approaching the volcano apex (4.22 eV). The theoretical calculations and experimental results demonstrated that the Ni vacancies facilitated the electrochemical production of H2O2. Additionally, the practical H2O2 production of Ni2−xP-VNi in 0.1 M KOH, 0.1 M PBS, and 0.5 M H2SO4 was evaluated by flow cell technique. The FE in 0.1 M KOH was 80.7%, higher than that in 0.1 M PBS (71.1%) and 0.5 M H2SO4 (77.1%). These results proved that neutral electrolyte was not conducive to the oxygen selectively electrochemically reduction to H2O2, which is in consistent with the OHP and IHP mechanisms. Following this, various types of metal compounds such as metal oxides and metal borides are also fabricated for H2O2 electrosynthesis [101,102,103,104].
Currently, amorphous transition metal-based materials are found to own more intrinsic active sites and higher electrocatalytic activity compared to their crystalline counterparts due to their short-range order, unique electronic structure, and more abundant defects [85, 87]. Although there are very limited studies on amorphous metal compounds as catalysts for 2e− ORR, the traces demonstrate that the amorphous metal compounds materials can be competitive catalysts. Kang et al. [87] found that amorphous nickel borides (Ni3B, Ni2B, NiB, NiB2, and NiB3) showed better H2O2 electrosynthesis performance than the previously reported crystalline nickel borides (Fig. 9g). In situ Raman revealed the main active sites are Ni. Especially for the amorphous NiB2, it delivered excellent electroactivity and H2O2 selectivity close to 100%, superior to the state-of-the-art transition metal compounds. Moreover, the amorphous NiB2 exhibited superior stability decay after undergoing a prolonged time test. DFT calculation demonstrated that the ∆GOOH* (3.75 eV) value was approaching to the optimal value of 3.52 eV, indicating an optimal adsorption/desorption ability for *OOH (Fig. 9h, i). The optimal adsorption ability of *OOH can protect the O–O bond, in favor of H2O2 production. Furthermore, the higher ratio of Ni to B (such as for Ni3B, Ni2B, and NiB) induced a side-on model adsorption for *OOH presented, leading to a 4e− ORR. However, when the ratio of B to Ni was increased, the B atoms could effectively isolate the neighboring Ni atoms, which promoted an end-on adsorption model of *OOH, in favor of the preservation of O–O bond and H2O2 production. Following this, Zhang and Hong et al. [85, 103] noted that the amorphous metal oxides (a-NiO) also show a balanced electrocatalytic activity and selectivity toward H2O2 production. The amorphous NiO nanosheets (a-NiO NSs) show much higher H2O2 selectivity than that of crystalline NiO nanosheets (c-NiO NSs), although the electrocatalytic activity is slightly lower. The ORR activity of a-NiO NSs can be increased by tuning short-range order and manufacturing more defects. The amorphous materials are competitive 2e− ORR catalysts superior to their crystalline counterpart. It can be concluded that tuning short-range order in the amorphous materials can enhance more numbers of intrinsic active sites and induce unique electronic structure, thus optimizing the ORR activity. Moreover, apparent unsaturated coordination atoms in amorphous materials promote more defects, furthering increasing the ORR activity. Amorphous materials with high ORR activity and 2e− ORR selectivity can be achieved for H2O2 electrosynthesis.
3.2.3 Atomically Dispersed Transition Metal Catalysts
The high cost of metal complexes and unsatisfactory electrical conductivity of metal compounds largely prohibited their practical applications [105, 106]. Nevertheless, some studies also reported the significant catalytic activity and durability improvement of metal complexes through heat treatment, tracing back to 1964 [107]. The coordination metal-heteroatom (e.g., Co-N4, Fe-N4) structure can be maintained, and remarkable ORR performance is achieved [106, 108,109,110,111]. Inspired by this, researchers are dedicated to transitional metal-nitrogen-doped carbon (M–N–C, M = Fe, Co, Mn, Cu, Ni) materials, as a promising alternative to the conventional noble metal-based catalysts (e.g., Pd, Au, or Pt) [112, 113]. M–N–C materials exhibit high activity comparable to the noble metal-based catalysts with much lower cost [74, 114,115,116,117]. Normally, their ORR activity and selectivity are affected by the central metal atoms, coordination heteroatoms, and other environmental atoms. It is universally believed that central metal atoms are active sites. Therefore, the selection of central metal atoms plays a crucial role in determining the ORR activity and selectivity.
In M–N-C materials, 3d transition metals with different d orbital electron numbers render them different d band centers, which can greatly affect the adsorption and desorption of reaction intermediate during the electrocatalysis process. Therefore, the selection of the central metal atom is extremely crucial to tuning the adsorption energy of the reaction intermediate. Strasser’s group [118] studied a series of 3d transition metals (Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, and Cu) over M–N–C materials through DFT calculation. Calculated results revealed that the Co–N–C catalyst had an optimal *OOH adsorption energy located on the top of the 2e− ORR volcano. Fe–N–C and Mn–N–C catalysts possessed strong adsorption ability for *OOH, which might result in a predominant 4e− ORR pathway. While for Cu–N–C and Ni–N–C catalysts, the binding of *OOH was too weak, which could not perform the ORR process efficiently. To verify the reliability of the calculation and unveil the trends in electrochemical H2O2 synthesis, a series of M–N–C catalysts were constructed by ball milling of metal precursors and successive high-temperature pyrolysis. It revealed that Co–N–C material exhibited the best 2e− ORR performance, consistent with the DFT calculation results. The real H2O2 productivity over the Co–N–C catalyst was also measured in a microflow cell, reaching 4 mol peroxide gcatalyst−1 h−1 at a current density of 50 mA cm−2. Subsequently, Liu’s group [119] also demonstrated that the Co–N–C catalyst was an optimal 2e− ORR catalyst with moderate ORR activity among a series of M–N–C (Fe, Co, Mn, Ni, Cu) catalysts combined DFT calculation and experiment (Fig. 10a, b). In their research, the ORR pathway was revealed by adopting kinetic analysis. The results showed that the kinetic current of ORR and reaction orders of O2 were related to O2 partial pressure, pH, and the applied overpotential. The O2 partial pressures experiment suggested that the overpotential increased with the reaction order of O2 increasing. The pH effect experiment results showed that the reaction order of H+ was approaching zero, suggesting that H+ was not involved in the rate-determining step. The in situ techniques confirmed that the active sites were Co centers. The ORR step is illustrated in Fig. 10c, suggesting that the electron transfer step of adsorbed O2 (* + O2 → *O2−) was the rate-limiting step, while the protonation process was fast (* + O2 + H+ + e− → *OOH) included in the DFT calculations. The electron transfer step is accelerated with the overpotential increasing. It is reasonable to assume that the overall reaction rate is more limited by the O2 adsorption process.
Environmental atoms are not directly connected to the central atoms. But the introduction of some functional groups into the local environment of metal-heteroatom-carbon is another effective way to indirectly change the electronic structure of active center atoms. For example, Hyeon et al. [120] calculated the ORR catalytic activity for the production of H2O and H2O2 of M−N4 (Fig. 10d). None of the M−N4 catalysts are proper for H2O2 production. It is significant to slightly modify M−N4 for H2O2 production while maintaining the high catalytic activity. Electron-rich species, such as O, adsorbed near the Co-N4 moiety (CoN4 (O)), could endow a positive charge state of the Co atom (Fig. 10e). While the electron-poor species, such as H+, adsorbed near the Co-N4 moiety (CoN4(H)) would enable it more negative. Consequently, electron-rich O species adsorbed near the Co-N4 moiety (Co-N4(O)) would increase the free energy of *OOH. ∆GOOH* was increased to 4.1 eV after O* was adsorbed, approaching the optimal value for the H2O2 production (4.2 eV), which was favorable for the 2e− ORR pathway. Electrochemical results revealed that the as-synthesized Co1-NG(O) catalyst exhibited high activity and 2e− ORR selectivity (Fig. 10f). The pH effect was also studied, as shown in Table 1. The activity tendency of Co1-NG(O) was 0.1 M KOH > 0.1 M HClO4 > 0.1 M PBS. While the H2O2 selectivity tendency was different: 0.1 M KOH > 0.1 M PBS > 0.1 M HClO4, which could be due to the different ORR mechanism. Combining spectroscopic results and computational modeling, Lu et al. [121] demonstrated that the presence of epoxy groups near the Co-N4 centers was key to enhancing H2O2 productivity. In the electrochemical measurement process, they found that the selectivity of the CoN@CNTs catalyst toward H2O2 production falls dramatically after long-term exposure to air. O 1 s spectra showed that the epoxy groups had a drastic decrease, while the ketonic content in the aged CoN@CNTs sample increased significantly compared with the fresh CoN@CNTs. It was speculated that the epoxy groups would be critical to improving H2O2 productivity. Additionally, DFT calculation results also verified that the introduction of epoxy oxygen bonded to the Co-N4 configuration resulted in a weakened *OOH binding on the Co atoms. The binding energy of *OOH of Co-N4(2O) and Co-N4(3O) was located at the peak of the volcano for the 2e− ORR. Batch experiments and DFT calculation results demonstrated that catalysts with Co-N4 configuration bonded to nearby epoxy groups showed superior activity and selectivity for H2O2 electrosynthesis. The performance is comparable to the state-of-the-art noble metal-based catalysts in acidic conditions. This work gives us an understanding of the basic relationship between the coordination environment of atomic sites and the H2O2 electrocatalytic properties for catalyst design.
An interesting discovery was recently reported in Qiao’s group [114]; they demonstrated that the neighboring C adjacent to the O could be the actual catalytic active sites in Co single-atom catalysts for the electrochemical H2O2 synthesis. Specifically, they adopted DFT calculations for the first time and demonstrated that the ORR activity and selectivity were mainly determined by modifying the first (N or/and O coordination) and second (C–O–C groups) coordination spheres. For CoN4, the optimized *OOH adsorption site is the center Co atom, while for CoN2O2 and CoO4, it is the C atom adjacent to the coordinated O atom. The *OOH binding on CoN4 was too strong (3.9 eV), very close to the 4e− volcano peak. The *OOH binding was dramatically decreased after replacing coordination atoms N with O. The ΔG*OOH values for CoN2O2 and CoO4(O) were 4.23 and 4.21 eV, respectively, approaching the peak of the 2e− volcano (4.2 eV) (Fig. 10g). This, therefore, improves the 2e− ORR to H2O2 generation due to the weaker *OOH adsorption. Three kinds of catalyst Co-N4-C configuration (derived from the metal–organic framework) and CoNOC/CoOC (Co2+ ions anchored on the oxidized CB followed by annealing under Ar with/without NH3) were precisely synthesized to verify the DFT calculations. Electrochemical results revealed that the CoNOC catalyst displayed the H2O2 selectivity nearly 100% over a wide range of potential with high activity, while CoNC exhibited a typical 4e− ORR process (Fig. 10h). Combined thiocyanide (SCN−) poisoning experiment and in situ techniques confirmed that the actual active site of CoNOC was the C atom adjacent to the coordinated O atom. Based on this discovery, the authors concluded that the design principles for metal–heteroatom–carbon materials for H2O2 electrosynthesis are to regulate the binding strength of *OOH on different atoms by modifying the atomic configuration. The proposed molecular-level structure is given in Fig. 10i. Considering this, the active sites are adjustable via regulating the coordination atoms/environment.
A wide range of practical applications could be realized with these low-cost transition metal-based catalysts for highly efficient H2O2 generation, involving organic contaminants degradation and disinfection. Organic wastewater poses considerable risks to the health of both humans and ecosystems. Cui et al. [117] demonstrated that Cu–N–C could produce H2O2 at a low cost. The total cost for producing 10 g L−1 H2O2 in 0.1 M Na2SO4 was only US$2.93 per m3, much lower than the traditional anthraquinone method (Fig. 11a).
Moreover, the produced H2O2 can treat the synthetic wastewater (containing 10 ppm triclosan, 17α-ethinyl oestradiol, and cefazolin sodium) to be below the detection limit. The zebrafish embryo teratogenicity analysis demonstrated that the effluent was safe for ecosystems (Fig. 11b). With the goal of global carbon neutrality, sustainable energy is the most ideal energy supply in the future. The electricity generated from wind and solar is an appropriate energy supply for the onsite production of H2O2 [21]. A wide range of practical applications could be realized with accessible inputs including sunlight for electricity, air for O2, and water as shown in Fig. 11c. The potential to deliver a 20 mA cm−2 constant current for H2O2 generation remained unchanged over the whole electrolysis course. The in situ producing H2O2 combined with the green electricity demonstrates a rapid disinfection efficiency delivering 43% bacteria inactivation in 5 min and more than 99.9999% in 120 min (Fig. 11d).
3.3 Carbon-Based Catalysts
In the past decades, carbon-based materials have been widely studied in electrocatalysis due to their low cost, high surface area, and high conductivity [122,123,124,125]. It has been well accepted that the electrochemical performances of metal-free carbon-based materials are strongly determined by structures. The most effective and facile strategy is to endow the carbon materials with porous structures since a large surface area and high pore volume are beneficial for mass transfer and active sites exposed. Generally, the pristine carbon materials show poor ORR performance because of electroneutral carbon atoms. It is important to activate the inert carbon surfaces by creating defective carbon sites and doping heteroatoms.
3.3.1 Porous Carbon-Based Materials
The most widely utilized structure regulation strategy is well-developed pore structure, pores volume, large surface area, and so on [126,127,128,129]. The structural properties play a substantial role during the electrocatalytic reaction process because they are closely linked to mass transport and the utilization of active sites [130]. For instance, a hierarchically porous carbon (HPC) derived from the metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) was presented for H2O2 electrosynthesis (Fig. 12a) [131]. The obtained HPC exhibited high catalytic activity and selectivity for electrochemical reduction of O2 to H2O2 over a wide pH range (1−7). The HPC catalyst with abundant micro-, meso-, or even macropores endowed it with plentiful exposed catalytic sites and shortened diffusion paths. Micropores could expose more active sites and provide additional active sites for ORR. The meso- and macropores allowed for fast transport of H2O2 from the catalyst surface to the bulk solution and reduced residence time, thus avoiding H2O2 further reduction to H2O. Especially for the carbon materials with a layered structure, most of the catalytic sites are buried in carbon layers in which interlayer spacing is too small to expose the catalytic sites. Using a template (silica, MgCl2, mesoporous aluminosilicate, and son) can create micropores or mesopores after template removal and thus expose more active sites [132]. Joo et al. [133] demonstrated that graphitic ordered mesoporous carbon (GOMC) nanocatalyst could expose abundant edge sites via mesoporous silica template introduction, rendering it with 28 times higher mass activity than that of a basal plane-rich CNT. Lee et al. [134] also demonstrated that 3D crumpled graphene showed an increased active surface area and could expose most of the buried active sites within 2D carbon layers through the MgCl2 introduction.
3.3.2 Heteroatom Doping
Porosity has been demonstrated to affect the performance of pristine carbon catalysts. The incorporation of heteroatoms (such as N, B, and P) into the carbon framework also is shown to be an effective way to improve the H2O2 electrochemical production performance. Altering the electronic structure of carbon atoms could result in a pronounced enhancement of both activity and selectivity for H2O2 production [135,136,137,138,139,140]. For N-doped electron-rich carbon nanostructures, the carbon π electrons can be activated by conjugating with the lone-pair electrons from N dopants. Thus, O2 molecules get reduced on the positively charged C atoms neighboring N. Qiao’s group [141] developed nitrogen-rich few-layered graphene (N-FLG) with a tunable nitrogen configuration for electrochemical H2O2 generation (Fig. 12b). The experiment results showed that the high nitrogen doping content could effectively alter the electronic structure and facilitate the O2 adsorption. Combined spectroscopic results and electrochemical performance suggested that the OOH* intermediates could be substantially preserved with the presence of a high amount of pyrrolic-N, leading to a 2e− ORR pathway on the adjacent carbon atoms (Fig. 12c), while the 4e− ORR pathway was supposed to preferentially occur on the carbon atoms adjacent to the pyridinic-N. Moreover, a positive correlation between the content of pyrrolic-N and the H2O2 selectivity was experimentally observed (Fig. 12d). Recently, Wang et al. [142] reported a series of nonmetal dopants, including B, N, P, and S, were anchored on a carbon support, and the resulting catalysts were screened for H2O2 electrosynthesis. The electrochemical results indicated that all doping samples showed enhanced performance than pure C. Among those candidates, the boron-doped carbon (B–C) catalyst presented the best performance with high activity (saving more than 210 mV overpotential) under industrial-relevant currents (up to 300 mA cm−2). Moreover, it maintained high H2O2 selectivity (85%–90%) compared with the state-of-the-art carbon catalyst. DFT calculations revealed that the boron dopant site is responsible for high activity and H2O2 selectivity due to low thermodynamic and kinetic barriers. The author further studied the pH effect on the H2O2 production. The B–C catalyst showed higher H2O2 selectivity up to 90% than that in 0.1 M Na2SO4 (80%) when tested by the RRDE technique, which is due to the lack of hydroxyl species. However, the ORR activity and the H2O2 selectivity show negligible difference when evaluated by the flow-cell device. It was noted that the solid-state electrolyte resulted in dramatically increased activity and H2O2 selectivity, originating from the decreased distance between the cathode and the anode. These results all illustrate that for electron-rich doping (such as N), the O2 molecules get reduced on the positively charged C atoms neighboring N, while for electron-deficient doping (such as B), O2 molecules are reduced on the positively charged B sites. Two main points to transform inert sp2 carbon into active metal-free ORR catalysts by heteroatomic doping can be summarized: (1) breaking the electroneutrality of sp2 carbon to create charged sites favorable for O2 adsorption despite whether the dopants are electron-rich (as N) or electron-deficient (as B) and (2) maximizing the effective O2 through activating carbon π electrons.
Except for single atom doping, co-doping/multi-doping could further optimize the carbon-based metal-free electrocatalysts [143]. For example, Chen et al. [139] presented the synergic mechanism of the doped N and F atoms in the process of electrocatalytic H2O2 electroproduction. Nitrogen- and fluoride-co doped carbon nanocages (NF-Cs) showed excellent electrocatalytic performance for H2O2 electroproduction with high FE both in alkaline solution (pH 13) (89.6%) and in acid solution (pH 0.35) (88%). The strong synergistic effect between the doped N and F atoms facilitated the H2O2 electroproduction. The doped N atoms promoted O2 molecule adsorption on the catalyst surface, while the F atoms facilitated the desorption of the *OOH intermediate, thus enhancing the catalytic activity and selectivity for H2O2 production. Moreover, different electronegative elements co-doping strategy was found to have a distinct influence on the catalytic activity and selectivity toward H2O2 production. Hu et al. [123] investigated B and N co-doped sp2 carbon materials. The experimental and theoretical results jointly indicated that when B and N were bonded together, doping hardly influences the electronic structure of carbon atoms and the CNTs material remained inert. The B and N co-doping could turn CNTs into excellent ORR electrocatalysts when the B and N atoms were separated. This phenomenon could be explained by the distinguish electronegativity of B and N atoms. The separation of B from N prevented the neutralization because N is the electron donor while B is the acceptor, so they were still capable of conjugating with the sp2 carbon, as in the single-doping. These results imply that the heteroatomic doping strategy plays a pivotal role in regulating this activity–selectivity dilemma. The essence of heteroatom doping and defects construction is to break the electroneutrality of sp2 carbon to create charged sites favorable for O2 adsorption.
3.3.3 Oxygen Functionalization
In addition to heteroatomic doping, oxygen functionalization strategies prove to be a facile but powerful method to promote electrochemical H2O2 production. The oxygen species can modulate the electronic structure of carbon, thereby controlling the binding energy of OOH* intermediate species for optimal electrochemical H2O2 production. There are many methods to introduce oxygen functional groups to carbon-based materials, such as acid surface oxidation, H2O2 oxidation, alkaline treatment, and oxygen plasma treatment [144,145,146,147,148].
Cui and co-workers [146] demonstrated a facile and general approach to carbon catalyst development via surface oxidation to enhance both the activity and for H2O2 selectivity (Fig. 12e). The H2O2 production performance of oxidized CNTs (OCNTs) was studied in 0.1 M KOH, 0.1 M PBS, and 0.1 M HClO4. The H2O2 selectivity was increased to 90% with a higher onset potential of 0.80 V in 0.1 M KOH (Fig. 12f). It was found that both the activity and selectivity of CNTs were positively correlated with the oxygen content of the catalysts. The ORR activity and H2O2 selectivity tendency were: 0.1 M KOH > 0.1 M PBS > 0.1 M HClO4 (Table 1). Introducing oxygen functional groups by surface oxidation was also effective for other carbon materials (Fig. 12g). Combined experiment results and DFT calculations, they assigned the carbon atoms adjacent to several oxygen functional groups (–COOH and C–O–C) as the active sites for 2e− ORR. They also found that KOH and poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) treatment could increase the oxygen functional group. It was noted that the activity and selectivity via KOH treatment were comparable with nitric acid surface oxidation. Kim et al. [149] reported a highly efficient electrocatalyst for H2O2 production through mild thermal reduction of graphene oxide. By using the in situ Raman technique, they identified the sp2-hybridized carbon near-ring ether defects along sheet edges as the most active sites. Most recently, Han et al. [150] prepared the quinone-enriched carbon catalyst as an excellent catalyst for H2O2 production, and the most active motif of quinone functional groups in the edge/basal plane was determined using DFT calculations. Oxygen functionalization processes usually create a variety of surface oxygen functional groups, whose type and relative distribution are generally uncontrollable. Therefore, the true active sites for 2e− ORR are still elusive.
To understand the true active sites of oxygen-functionalized carbon materials, Liu et al. [123] described a chemical titration strategy to discriminate the H2O2 production activity for different oxygen functional groups. The oxygen-doped carbon nanosheets (OCNS700, OCNS800, OCNS900, and OCNS1000) were chosen as model catalysts. The OCNS900 exhibited excellent 2e− ORR performances with a mass activity of 14.5 A g−1 at 0.75 V (vs. RHE) and remarkable H2O2 productivity in a flow cell with an H2O2 production rate of 770 mmol g−1 h−1. The electrochemical results combined with selective chemical titration experiments indicated that the C=O species were assigned as the most active sites for H2O2 electrosynthesis. Following this progress, Joo et al. [132] further constructed a systematic study to identify the catalytically active oxygen functional groups with controlled oxygen functionalities while fixing other structural properties. The electrochemical tests showed that the activity follows the same trend with the number of carboxyl groups (GOMC < O-GOMC-LT < O-GOMC), whereas their Tafel slopes and H2O2 selectivity were almost similar. The relationship between the surface functionality and 2e− ORR activity was indicative of the carboxyl group at the edge sites of graphitic carbons as the major active site for the 2e− ORR, and the carbonyl group as a secondary active site (Fig. 12h).
4 Electrodes, Reaction Cells, and Their Architecture
Complementary to research on developing promising catalysts is the equally important pursuit of engineering the catalyst and other cell components into an efficient device. The ideal electrode structure should have sufficient active sites for oxygen adsorption, fast mass migration allowing rapid oxygen diffusion and H2O2 desorption, and electron transfer as well as good stability. The cell design plays a great role in scaling up electrochemical cells from the laboratory scale to the industrial scale.
The most common way to assess the H2O2 electrosynthesis performance is using a rotating ring-disk electrode [7]. However, the harsh test conditions make it impractical for a large-scale test. For practical applications, the H-cell setup was designed to evaluate the H2O2 electrosynthesis performance of large-area electrodes (Fig. 13a). Once the H-cell setup occurred, it received considerable attention for it was easy to operate and could generate bulk H2O2 [27, 151,152,153,154]. The electrode was submerged in the liquid electrolyte. Yamanaka et al. [155] studied the H2O2 production using an H-cell in a one-pot batch reactor. In this system, the reported H2O2 production reached a maximum value of 0.289 mmol cm−2 h−1 at the beginning. However, the H2O2 electrosynthesis performance quickly deteriorates, leading to low reaction rates, H2O2 concentrations, and FE. The H2O2 electrosynthesis performance showed a dramatic decay in a one-pot batch reactor compared to that tested in the H-cell with a membrane because the H2O2 in bulk can be decomposed on the anode surface. For the dual-chamber reactor, the cathode chamber and the anode chamber were separated with a proton-exchange membrane (PEM). However, the long distance between the cathode and the anode leads to the ion diffusion path increase accompanied by the increased solution resistance. Moreover, the low solubility of O2 in liquid electrolytes further limits the achievable H2O2 production rate. Although H-cells have been widely used for preliminary catalysts screening, they still cannot accurately evaluate how electrocatalysts and electrodes behave in industrial reactors because H-cells are not continuous and the accumulated H2O2 on the electrode surface leads to the further reduction of H2O2.
Initially, to solve the problem of the low solubility of oxygen in the electrolyte, the research has shifted to gas-diffusion electrodes (GDEs) that are composed of a hydrophobic layer [156,157,158,159,160]. These GDEs can act as a membrane between the oxygen gas and the liquid electrolyte. The GDEs are fabricated by depositing the catalyst on the gas diffusion layer and the three-phase interfaces (TPIs) accelerate the oxygen diffusion and maintain a constant O2 flow on the catalyst layer (Fig. 13b). [161, 162] The O2 can be electrochemically reduced to H2O2 as soon as it approaches the catalyst layer, promoting a high concentration of H2O2. This can effectively circumvent the problem of the low solubility of oxygen. The integrated electrodes with the advantages of fast electron transfer were constructed to reinforce the gas-diffusion channels against destruction by coating them with a thin gas-diffusion layer [163, 164]. Moreover, the established gas-diffusion layers can mitigate the H2O2 corrosion process towards the catalyst and the substrate, thus enhancing the stability and durability of catalysts. More importantly, recent studies show that PTFE treatment can slow down the H2O2 decomposition due to the decreased dielectric constant originating from the PTFE [108]. The substrates were required to supply gas flow channels to ensure the efficient contact between gas/catalyst and substrate/the catalyst [165,166,167,168]. The substrate originating from carbon showed superior compression strength, gas permeability, and corrosion resistance compared to the metal substrate.
For practical applications, the accumulated high concentrations of H2O2 near the electrode can be easily decomposed and accelerate electrode corrosion and catalyst degradation. Based on the practical experiences in water electrolysis and fuel cells for several years, the essential of promoting electrolyte flow for a long cycle is proposed. Dual-chamber reactor developed into a flow type for low-cost H2O2 electrosynthesis was reported by Chen et al. [169]. The catalyst loaded on commercial carbon support typically consisting of a GDL to enhance the O2 diffusion is used as a cathode. Studies demonstrate that O2 can effectively reach the catalyst surface. The continuous flow of reactants and products can prevent the accumulation of H2O2 near the electrode surface and accelerate the H2O2 inflow to the bulk electrolyte, promoting a higher current density accompanied by a higher reaction rate. Pérez et al. [170] reported that combined with a turbulence promoter, the efficiency in the flow cell is close to 100% with low energy consumption. The study revealed that the increase of the electrolyte inflow velocity could bring a progressive enhancement of the current density and H2O2 production. The flow cells make the H2O2 practical-scale production reliable.
Since the direct electrosynthesis of pure H2O2 solutions was up to 20 wt%, there has seen a revival of interest in H2O2 electrosynthesis. In Wang and colleagues’ work [171], a solid-electrolyte fuel cell was used to produce pure H2O2 solutions with H2 and O2 separately delivered to the anode and cathode, respectively. Protons transferred from the cation exchange membrane (CEM) and HO2− ions transferred from the anion exchange membrane (AEM) were combined in the electrolyte chamber to generate H2O2 (Fig. 13c). In this case, the membrane between the chamber and the electrode avoids flooding in the case of direct contact of electrodes with water. The H2O2 concentrations can be varied by tuning the deionized water flow rate with no impurities introduced. Over 90% faradaic efficiency was achieved by using this device. Diverse “catholyte-free” flow reactors have been designed to obtain highly concentrated H2O2 via membrane electrode assembly, which combines the component of GDE, catalyst, and ion exchange polymer membrane into one unit. Based on the previously reported microfluidic cell, Kenis et al. [172, 173] pioneered a configuration without membranes that separate each side of the cell. Precise control over the cell assembly has been demonstrated to be effective in obtaining high current densities for H2O2 electrochemical production. Recently, Xia et al. [174] also manifested a high efficiency of the membrane-free flow cell for H2O2 electrocatalytic generation (Fig. 13d). The maximum FE jumped to 200% because the hydrophilic carbon fiber paper could be used as cathode and anode to simultaneously produce H2O2. The hydrophilic layer can decrease dielectric constant of the aqueous solution, thus increasing the H2O2 decomposition overpotential and slow down the H2O2 decomposition process [108]. When the cell current arrived at 50 mA cm−2, a cell voltage was only approximately 1.7 V, whereas 1.98 V cell voltage was required for conventional cells, sharply reducing the energy consumption. Thus, biomass conversion reaction may be chosen for electrochemical oxidation as an attractive alternative to traditional water oxidation, which can not only produce a valuable product but also reduce the cell voltage to make energy consumption decreased.
5 Summary and Perspectives
In this review, significant advances in the development of electrocatalytic H2O2 production over various catalysts, electrodes, and other cell components are summarized and discussed in Table 1. SACs with lower cost are the most efficient catalysts among the available catalysts for H2O2 electrosynthesis. Much effort has been focused on the design and engineering of the electrode and electrochemical reactors to realize the industrial production of hydrogen peroxide via electrosynthesis. Despite significant advances, it is still in its infancy to realize the scale-up of H2O2 electrochemical production. Therefore, challenges and opportunities are present for the industrial production of H2O2 (Fig. 14).
-
(1)
Excavating ORR catalysts with new composition and structure is still at the heart of the H2O2 electrochemical production. To date, noble-based catalysts have been thought to be the most efficient ORR catalysts for H2O2 production. However, their high cost and scarcity restrict their industrial application. Thus, given the cost issue, precise synthesis of trace precious metal-based catalysts or precious metal-free-based high-efficient ORR catalysts is urgently needed. Recently, cost-effective amorphous materials and single-atom catalysts with maximally utilized active sites are emerging. Especially for the single-atom catalysts, they are regarded as the next-generation ORR catalysts with high ORR activity to enable the H2O2 electrochemical production large-scale [72, 84]. In the future, single atoms catalyst with amorphous structure can be expected to be explored. Catalysts must be deposited on the substrate by in situ growing on the substrate, electrodepositing process, or spraying the catalyst on the substrate. As one component of the device, the basic role of the substrate is to load the catalyst and collect the produced current. More importantly, they are required to provide gas flow channels to maximize the electrochemical utilization of gases. Metal substrates, such as SS316L, are easy to be corroded and the corrosion production increases the contact resistance. Therefore, more efforts should be devoted to developing good catalytic and corrosion-resistant electrodes and studying their effect on the industrial production of H2O2.
-
(2)
The currently developed in situ techniques can provide new insight into identifying the active sites and structure evolution, which is of critical significance for designing efficient 2e− ORR catalysts. For example, to gain in-depth into the adsorbed oxygen intermediates on the catalysts during the ORR process, operando ATR-IR measurements could be used for characterizing OOHad and HOOHad to confirm the 2e− ORR pathway [175]. In situ X-ray absorption near edge structure (XANES) and extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) could be carried out to identify the change of coordination configuration and valence states near active sites [176]. In situ Raman spectroscopy could be used to probe the chemical bond stretching and bending vibrations.
-
(3)
With the development of computer technologies, thriving theoretical chemistry has been demonstrated as an innovative technology for identifying and developing new efficient catalysts and predicting the potential reaction mechanism combined with in situ technologies [12]. For example, Hyeon et al. predicted the reaction energetics of H2O2 electrochemical production on M–N4/graphenes (M = Co, Ni, Fe, Pt, Ag, and Ru) and Co–N4/graphene with 4H*/2H* and O*/2O* adsorbed near the cobalt atom where Co–N4(O) possessed the optimal OOH* adsorption energies [120]. It is attractive to utilize theoretical chemistry to seek out new catalysts.
-
(4)
Electrochemical production of H2O2 via 2e− ORR using renewable energy is promising from the viewpoint of practical applications for water disinfection and wastewater treatment [177, 178]. The green electricity generated from solar and wind farms can realize a more efficient and cleaner onsite H2O2 production [20, 21]. Much of the literature about H2O2 production has focused on the cathode, while the anode is relatively neglected. Thus, we should combine the future study on H2O2 electrochemical production and seawater, oxidation of organic small molecules, which is more attractive than the conventional H2O2 electrosynthesis, integrating various applications [179,180,181].
References
S.C. Perry, D. Pangotra, L. Vieira, L.I. Csepei, V. Sieber et al., Electrochemical synthesis of hydrogen peroxide from water and oxygen. Nat. Rev. Chem. 3, 442–458 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41570-019-0110-6
S. Anantharaj, S. Pitchaimuthu, S. Noda, A review on recent developments in electrochemical hydrogen peroxide synthesis with a critical assessment of perspectives and strategies. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 287, 102331 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2020.102331
Y. Jiang, P. Ni, C. Chen, Y. Lu, P. Yang et al., Selective electrochemical H2O2 production through two-electron oxygen electrochemistry. Adv. Energy Mater. 8, 1801909–1801933 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201801909
X. Wang, J. Jing, M. Zhou, R. Dewil, Recent advances in H2O2-based advanced oxidation processes for removal of antibiotics from wastewater. Chin. Chem. Lett. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2022.06.044
J. Campos-Martin, G. Blanco-Brieva, J. Fierro, Hydrogen peroxide synthesis: an outlook beyond the anthraquinone process. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 45, 6962–6984 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200503779
T. Nishimi, T. Kamachi, K. Kato, T. Kato, K. Yoshizawa, Mechanistic study on the production of hydrogen peroxide in the anthraquinone process. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 4113–4120 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1002/ejoc.201100300
S. Yang, A. Verdaguer-Casadevall, L. Arnarson, J. Rossmeisl, I. Chorkendorff, I. Stephens et al., Toward the decentralized electrochemical production of H2O2: a focus on the catalysis. ACS Catal. 8, 4064–4081 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.8b00217
C. Martinez-Huitle, S. Ferro, Electrochemical oxidation of organic pollutants for the wastewater treatment: direct and indirect processes. Chem. Soc. Rev. 35, 1324–1340 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1039/b517632h
F. He, J. Zhang, Y. Chen, J. Zhang, D. Wang, Recent progress on carbon-based catalysts for electrochemical synthesis of H2O2 via oxygen reduction reaction. Energy Storage Sci. Tech. 10, 192–202 (2021). https://doi.org/10.19799/j.cnki.2095-4239.2021.0122
Q. Zeng, S. Chang, Z. Xiong, B. Zhou, Y. Liu et al., Highly-active, metal-free, carbon-based ORR cathode for efficient organics removal and electricity generation in a PFC system. Chin. Chem. Lett. 32, 2212–2216 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2020.12.062
S. Siahrostami, M. Karamad, D. Deiana, P. Malacrida, B. Wickman, J. Rossmeisl et al., Enabling direct H2O2 production through rational electrocatalyst design. Nat. Mater. 12, 1137–1143 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3795
T. Ricciardulli, S. Gorthy, C. Thompson, M. Neurock, D. Flaherty et al., Effect of Pd coordination and isolation on the catalytic reduction of O2 to H2O2 over PdAu bimetallic nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 5445–5464 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.1c00539
L. Chen, J. Medlin, H. Grönbeck, On the reaction mechanism of direct H2O2 formation over Pd catalysts. ACS Catal. 11, 2735–2745 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.0c05548
J. Edwards, E. Ntainjua, A. Carley, C. Kiely, G. Hutchings et al., Direct synthesis of H(2)O(2) from H(2) and O(2) over gold, palladium, and gold-palladium catalysts supported on acid-pretreated TiO(2). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48, 8512–8515 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200904115
Q. Simon, J. Freakley, H. Harrhy, L. Lu, J. Hutchings et al., Palladium-tin catalysts for the direct synthesis of H2O2 with high selectivity. Science 351, 965–968 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad5705
Y. Cheng, H. Song, J. Yu, J.W. Chang, S.Y. Lu et al., Carbon dots-derived carbon nanoflowers decorated with cobalt single atoms and nanoparticles as efficient electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction. Chin. J. Catal. 43, 2443–2452 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1872-2067(22)64146-9
T. Zhang, Y. Wang, Q. Ding, Y. Dang, L. Duan, J. Liu et al., Charge state modulation on boron site by carbon and nitrogen localized bonding microenvironment for two-electron electrocatalytic H2O2 production. Chin. Chem. Lett. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2022.06.019
Y. Ding, W. Zhou, J. Gao, F. Sun, G. Zhao, H2O2 electrogeneration from O2 electroreduction by N-doped carbon materials: a mini-review on preparation methods, selectivity of N sites, and prospects. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 8, 2002091 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/admi.202002091
R. Goyal, O. Singh, A. Agrawal, C. Samanta, B. Sarkar, Advantages and limitations of catalytic oxidation with hydrogen peroxide: from bulk chemicals to lab scale process. Catal. Rev. 64, 229–285 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/01614940.2020.1796190
Y. Wen, T. Zhang, J. Wang, H. Yamashita, X. Qian, Y. Zhao et al., Electrochemical reactors for continuous decentralized H2O2 production. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61, 202205972 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202205972
K. Jiang, S. Back, C. Xia, D. Schaak, E. Stavitski, H. Wang et al., Highly selective oxygen reduction to hydrogen peroxide on transition metal single atom coordination. Nat. Commun. 10, 3997 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11992-2
W. Shang, W. Yu, Y. Ma, M. Ni, P. Tan et al., Constructing the triple-phase boundaries of integrated air electrodes for high-performance Zn–air batteries. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 8, 2101256 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/admi.202101256
E. Berl, A new cathode process for the production of H2O2. Trans. Electrochem. Soc. 76, 359–370 (1939). https://doi.org/10.1149/1.3500291
H. Olvera-Vargas, N. Gore-Datar, O. Garcia-Rodriguez, S. Mutnuri, O. Lefebvre, Electro-Fenton treatment of real pharmaceutical wastewater paired with a BDD anode: reaction mechanisms and respective contribution of homogeneous and heterogeneous OH. Chem. Eng. J. 404, 126524 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.126524
C. Trellu, H. OlveraVargas, E. Mousset, N. Oturan, M. Oturan, Electrochemical technologies for the treatment of pesticides. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 26, 100677 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coelec.2020.100677
Z. Wei, H. Xu, Z. Lei, X. Yi, C. Feng et al., A binder-free electrode for efficient H2O2 formation and Fe2+ regeneration and its application to an electro-Fenton process for removing organics in iron-laden acid wastewater. Chin. Chem. Lett. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2021.07.006
E. Jung, H. Shin, W. HoochAntink, Y. Sung, T. Hyeon, Recent advances in electrochemical oxygen reduction to H2O2: catalyst and cell design. ACS Energy Lett. 5, 1881–1892 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.0c00812
X. Guo, S. Lin, J. Gu, S. Zhang, Z. Chen, S. Huang, Simultaneously achieving high activity and selectivity toward two-electron O2 electroreduction: the power of single-atom catalysts. ACS Catal. 9, 11042–11054 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.9b02778
N. Ramaswamy, S. Mukerjee, Influence of inner- and outer-sphere electron transfer mechanisms during electrocatalysis of oxygen reduction in alkaline media. J. Phy. Chem. C 115, 18015–18026 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp204680p
A. Gómez-Marín, J. Feliu, T. Edson, Reaction mechanism for oxygen reduction on platinum: existence of a fast initial chemical step and a soluble species different from H2O2. ACS Catal. 8, 7931–7943 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.8b01291
J. Zhang, C. Xia, H. Wang, C. Tang, Recent advances in electrocatalytic oxygen reduction for on-site hydrogen peroxide synthesis in acidic media. J. Energy Chem. 67, 432–450 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2021.10.013
D. Nocera, Proton-coupled electron transfer: the engine of energy conversion and storage. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 1069–1081 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.1c10444
J. Warren, T. Tronic, J. Mayer, Thermochemistry of proton-coupled electron transfer reagents and its implications. Chem. Rev. 122, 1482–1515 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00791
S. Cobb, Z. Ayres, M. Newton, J. Macpherson, Deconvoluting surface-bound quinone proton coupled electron transfer in unbuffered solutions: toward a universal voltammetric pH electrode. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 1035–1044 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.8b11518
J. Zhang, H. Zhang, M. Cheng, Q. Lu, Tailoring the electrochemical production of H2O2: strategies for the rational design of high-performance electrocatalysts. Small 16, 1902845 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201902845
X. Zhang, Y. Xia, C. Xia, H. Wang, Insights into practical-scale electrochemical H2O2 synthesis. Trends Chem. 2, 942–953 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trechm.2020.07.007
G. Zhang, Q. Wei, X. Yang, A. Tavares, S. Sun, RRDE experiments on noble-metal and noble-metal-free catalysts: impact of loading on the activity and selectivity of oxygen reduction reaction in alkaline solution. Appl. Catal. B 206, 115–126 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.01.001
D. Wang, H. Xin, R. Hovden, Y. Yu, H.D. Abruna et al., Structurally ordered intermetallic platinum-cobalt core-shell nanoparticles with enhanced activity and stability as oxygen reduction electrocatalysts. Nat. Mater. 12, 81–87 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3458
L. Huang, H. Xu, B. Jing, Q. Li, W. Yi et al., Progress of Pt-based catalysts in proton-exchange membrane fuel cells: a review. J. Electrochem. 28, 2108061–2108077 (2022). https://doi.org/10.13208/j.electrochem.210806
Y. Hu, S. Wang, T. Shen, Y. Zhu, D. Wang, Recent progress in confined noble-metal electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction reaction. Energy Storage Sci. Tech. 11, 1264–1277 (2022). https://doi.org/10.19799/j.cnki.2095-4239.2022.0108
J. Lee, S.W. Choi, S. Back, H. Jang, Y.J. Sa, Pd17Se15-Pd3B nanocoral electrocatalyst for selective oxygen reduction to hydrogen peroxide in near-neutral electrolyte. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 309, 121265–121272 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121265
M. Gong, T. Zhao, X. Liu, T. Shen, H. Xin et al., Structure evolution of PtCu nanoframes from disordered to ordered for the oxygen reduction reaction. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 282, 119617–119624 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119617
C.M. He, Z.L. Ma, Q. Wu, Y.Z. Cai, H.Q. Wang et al., Promoting the ORR catalysis of Pt-Fe intermetallic catalysts by increasing atomic utilization and electronic regulation. Electrochim. Acta 330, 135119–135129 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2019.135119
J. Zhang, C. Zhang, Y. Zhao, H. Zhou, Y. Tang et al., Three dimensional few-layer porous carbon nanosheets towards oxygen reduction. Appl. Catal. B 211, 148–156 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.04.038
X. Huang, W. Zhang, W. Liu, M. Song, C. Zhang et al., Nb2CT MXenes functionalized Co−NC enhancing electrochemical H2O2 production for organics degradation. Appl. Catal. B 317, 121737–121745 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121737
A. Carlos, M. Snchez-Sa´, Hydrogen peroxide production in the oxygen reduction reaction at different electrocatalystsas quantified by scanning electrochemical microscopy. Anal. Chem. 81, 8094–8100 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1021/ac901291v
J. Park, W. Dong, S. Jung, Y. Kim, J. Lee, Oxygen reduction reaction of vertically-aligned nanoporous Ag nanowires. Appl. Catal. B 298, 120586–120593 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120586
J. Linge, H. Erikson, A. Kasikov, M. Rähn, V. Sammelselg et al., Oxygen reduction reaction on thin-film Ag electrodes in alkaline solution. Electrochim. Acta 325, 134922–134929 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2019.134922
C. Bard, Hydrogen peroxide production in the oxygen reduction reaction at different electrocatalystsas quantified by scanning electrochemical microscopy. Anal. Chem. 81, 8094–8100 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1021/ac901291v
Y. Lu, W. Chen, Size effect of silver nanoclusters on their catalytic activity for oxygen electro-reduction. J. Power Sources 197, 107–110 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.09.033
D. Mei, Z. He, Y. Zheng, D. Jiang, Y. Chen, Mechanistic and kinetic implications on the ORR on a Au(100) electrode: pH, temperature and H-D kinetic isotope effects. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16, 13762–13773 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1039/c4cp00257a
Y. Lu, Y. Jiang, X. Gao, W. Chen, Charge state-dependent catalytic activity of [Au(25)(SC(12)H(25))18] nanoclusters for the two-electron reduction of dioxygen to hydrogen peroxide. Chem. Commun. 50, 8464–8467 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1039/c4cc01841a
D. Kauffman, D. Alfonso, C. Matranga, H. Qian, R. Jin, Experimental and computational investigation of Au25 clusters and CO2: a unique interaction and enhanced electrocatalytic activity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 10237–10243 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja303259q
I. Jakub, S. Jirkovsky, E. Ahlberg, M. Halasa, S. Romani et al., Effect of electronic structures of Au clusters stabilized by poly(N-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone) on aerobic oxidation catalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 7086–7093 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja810045y
X. Ding, Z. Li, J. Yang, J. Hou, Q. Zhu et al., Adsorption energies of molecular oxygen on Au clusters. J. Chem. Phys. 120, 9594–9600 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1665323
J. Jirkovsky, I. Panas, E. Ahlberg, M. Halasa, S. Romani et al., Single atom hot-spots at Au-Pd nanoalloys for electrocatalytic H2O2 production. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 19432–19441 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja206477z
X. Zhao, H. Yang, J. Xu, T. Cheng, Y. Li et al., Bimetallic PdAu nanoframes for electrochemical H2O2 production in acids. ACS Mater. Lett. 3, 996–1002 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmaterialslett.1c00263
S. Mondal, D. Bagchi, M. Riyaz, S. Sarkar, A. Singh et al., In situ mechanistic insights for the oxygen reduction reaction in chemically modulated ordered intermetallic catalyst promoting complete electron transfer. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 11859–11869 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.2c04541
Z. Li, T. Shen, Y. Hu, K. Chen, Y. Lu et al., Progress on ordered intermetallic electrocatalysts for fuel cells application. Acta Phys. Chim. Sin. 37, 2010029 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3866/PKU.WHXB202010029
Z. Zheng, Y. Ng, D. Wang, R. Amal, Epitaxial growth of Au-Pt-Ni nanorods for direct high selectivity H2O2 production. Adv. Mater. 28, 9949–9955 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201603662
A. Verdaguer-Casadevall, D. Deiana, M. Karamad, I. Chorkendorff, I. Stephens et al., Trends in the electrochemical synthesis of H2O2: enhancing activity and selectivity by electrocatalytic site engineering. Nano Lett. 14, 1603–1608 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1021/nl500037x
C. Choi, H. Kwon, S. Yook, H. Shin, H. Kim et al., Hydrogen peroxide synthesis via enhanced two-electron oxygen reduction pathway on carbon-coated Pt surface. J. Phys. Chem. C 118, 30063–30070 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp5113894
J. Zhang, J. Ma, D. Zhou, T. Zhang, B. Liu et al., Strong metal-support interaction boosts activity, selectivity, and stability in electrosynthesis of H2O2. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 2255–2263 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.1c12157
H. Li, P. Wen, D. Itanze, C. Lu, Y. Qiu et al., Scalable neutral H2O2 electrosynthesis by platinum diphosphide nanocrystals by regulating oxygen reduction reaction pathways. Nat. Commun. 11, 3928 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17584-9
H. Markovic, B. Grgur, P. Ross, Oxygen reduction reaction on Pt(111): effects of bromide. J. Electroanal. Chem. 467, 157−163 (1999). https://elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022072899000200
N. Stamenkovic, P. Ross, Structure-relationships in electrocatalysis: oxygen reduction and hydrogen oxidation reactions on Pt(111) and Pt(100) in solutions containing chloride ions. J. Electroanal. Chem. 500, 44–51 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0728(00)00352-1
E. Ciapina, P. Lopes, R. Subbaraman, E. Ticianelli, N. Markovic et al., Surface spectators and their role in relationships between activity and selectivity of the oxygen reduction reaction in acid environments. Electrochem. Commun. 60, 30–33 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2015.07.020
D. He, L. Zhong, S. Gan, J. Xie, X. Yang et al., Hydrogen peroxide electrosynthesis via regulating the oxygen reduction reaction pathway on Pt noble metal with ion poisoning. Electrochim. Acta 371, 137721–173327 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2021.137721
P. Rao, D. Wu, T. Wang, Y. Shen, Y. Chen et al., Single atomic cobalt electrocatalyst for efficient oxygen reduction reaction. eScience 2, 399–404 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esci.2022.05.004
H. Su, M. Soldatov, V. Roldugin, Q. Liu, Platinum single-atom catalyst with self-adjustable valence state for large-current-density acidic water oxidation. eScience 2, 102–109 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esci.2021.12.007
Q. Chang, P. Zhang, Y. Zhang, H. Xin, J. Chen et al., Promoting H2O2 production via 2-electron oxygen reduction by coordinating partially oxidized Pd with defect carbon. Nat. Commun. 11, 2178 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15843-3
J. Liu, Z. Gong, M. Yan, G. He, H. Gong et al., Electronic structure regulation of singleatom catalysts for electrochemical oxygen reduction to H2O2. Small 18, 2103824 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202103824
Y. Shang, X. Xu, B. Gao, S. Wang, X. Duan, Single-atom catalysis in advanced oxidation processes for environmental remediation. Chem. Soc. Rev. 50, 5281–5322 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1039/d0cs01032d
J. Shen, Y. Wen, Y. Fan, B. Liu, C. Li et al., Identifying activity trends for the electrochemical production of H2O2 on M-N–C single-atom catalysts using theoretical kinetic computations. J. Phy. Chem. C 126, 10388–10398 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c02803
S. Yang, J. Kim, Y. Tak, A. Soon, H. Lee, Single-atom catalyst of platinum supported on titanium nitride for selective electrochemical reactions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 2058–2062 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201509241
S. Yang, Y. Tak, J. Kim, A. Soon, H. Lee, Support effects in single-atom platinum catalysts for electrochemical oxygen reduction. ACS Catal. 7, 1301–1307 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.6b02899
R. Shen, W. Chen, Q. Peng, J. Zhang, C. Chen et al., High-concentration single atomic Pt sites on hollow CuSx for selective O2 reduction to H2O2 in acid solution. Chem 5, 2099–2110 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chempr.2019.04.024
J. Xi, S. Yang, J. Rossmeisl, S. Bals, S. Wang et al., Highly active, selective, and stable Pd single-atom catalyst anchored on N-doped hollow carbon sphere for electrochemical H2O2 synthesis under acidic conditions. J. Catal. 393, 313–323 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2020.11.020
C. Choi, M. Kim, S. Yun, H. Kim, M. Choi et al., Tuning selectivity of electrochemical reactions by atomically dispersed platinum catalyst. Nat. Commun. 7, 10922 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10922
J. Kim, D. Shin, J. Lee, H. Kim, S. Joo et al., A general strategy to atomically dispersed precious metal catalysts for unravelling their catalytic trends for oxygen reduction reaction. ACS Nano 14, 1990–2001 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.9b08494
F.Z. Li, J.S. Li, Y.G. Tang, H.Y. Wang, Y. Tang et al., Significantly enhanced oxygen reduction activity of Cu/CuNxCy co-decorated ketjenblack catalyst for Al–air batteries. J. Energy Chem. 27, 419–425 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2017.12.002
C. Liu, Y. Wu, H. Xiao, C. Chen, Y. Li et al., Constructing FeN4/graphitic nitrogen atomic interface for high-efficiency electrochemical CO2 reduction over a broad potential window. Chem 7, 1297–1307 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chempr.2021.02.001
T. Patniboon, H. Hansen, Acid-stable and active M–N–C catalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction: the role of local structure. ACS Catal. 11, 13102–13118 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.1c02941
C. Zhao, B. Li, J. Liu, Q. Zhang, Intrinsic electrocatalytic activity regulation of M-N-C single-atom catalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 4448–4463 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202003917
Z.K. Wu, J.J. Zou, C.J. Zhang, Y. Li, C. Zhang, Amorphous nickel oxides supported on carbon nanosheets as high-performance catalysts for electrochemical synthesis of hydrogen peroxide. ACS Catal. 12, 5911–5920 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.2c01829
R.D. Ross, H.Y. Sheng, A. Parihar, S. Jin et al., Compositionally tuned trimetallic thiospinel catalysts for enhanced electrosynthesis of hydrogen peroxide and built-In hydroxyl radical generation. ACS Catal. 11, 12643–12650 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.1c03349
J. Wu, M. Hou, Z. Chen, W. Hao, X. Pan et al., Composition engineering of amorphous nickel boride nanoarchitectures enabling highly efficient electrosynthesis of hydrogen peroxide. Adv. Mater. 34, 2202995 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202202995
M. Elsby, R. Baker, Strategies and mechanisms of metal-ligand cooperativity in first-row transition metal complex catalysts. Chem. Soc. Rev. 49, 8933–8987 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1039/d0cs00509f
D. Kuznetsov, B. Han, Y. Román-Leshkov, Y. Shao-Horn, Tuning redox transitions via inductive effect in metal oxides and complexes, and implications in oxygen electrocatalysis. Joule 2, 225–244 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2017.11.014
M. Gil-Sepulcre, A. Llobet, Molecular water oxidation catalysts based on first-row transition metal complexes. Nat. Catal. 5, 79–82 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-022-00750-1
Z. Li, Z. Zhuang, F. Lv, W. Chen, L. Mai et al., The marriage of the FeN4 moiety and MXene boosts oxygen reduction catalysis: Fe 3d electron delocalization matters. Adv. Mater. 30, 1803220 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201803220
X. Zhao, Q. Yin, X. Mao, C. Cheng, Y. Li et al., Theory-guided design of hydrogen-bonded cobaltoporphyrin frameworks for highly selective electrochemical H2O2 production in acid. Nat. Commun. 13, 2721 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-30523-0
I. Monte-Perez, S. Kundu, A. Chandra, N. Lehnert, K. Ray et al., Temperature dependence of the catalytic two-versus four-electron reduction of dioxygen by a hexanuclear cobalt complex. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 15033–15042 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.7b07127
Y. Wang, M. Pegis, J. Mayer, S. Stahl, Molecular cobalt catalysts for O2 reduction: low-overpotential production of H2O2 and comparison with iron-based catalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 16458–16461 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.7b09089
X. Wan, Q. Liu, J. Shang, R. Yu, J. Shui et al., Iron atom-cluster interactions increase activity and improve durability in Fe-N-C fuel cells. Nat. Commun. 13, 2963 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-30702-z
S. Yin, S. Yang, G. Li, Y. Jiang, S. Sun et al., Seizing gaseous Fe2+ to densify O2-accessible Fe–N4 sites for high-performance proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 15, 3033–3040 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1039/d2ee00061j
S. Fukuzumi, Y. Lee, W. Nam, Mechanisms of two-electron versus four-electron reduction of dioxygen catalyzed by earth-abundant metal complexes. ChemCatChem 10, 9–28 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/cctc.201701064
H. Sheng, E. Hermes, X. Yang, J. Schmidt, S. Jin et al., Electrocatalytic production of H2O2 by selective oxygen reduction using earthabundant cobalt pyrite (CoS2). ACS Catal. 9, 8433–8442 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.9b02546
H. Sheng, A. Janes, R. Ross, J. Schmidt, S. Jin et al., Stable and selective electrosynthesis of hydrogen peroxide and the electro-Fenton process on CoSe2 polymorph catalysts. Energy Environ. Sci. 13, 4189–4203 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ee01925a
Z. Zhou, Y. Kong, H. Tan, W. Yan, S. Zhao et al., Cation-vacancy-enriched nickel phosphide for efficient electrosynthesis of hydrogen peroxides. Adv. Mater. 34, 2106541 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202106541
R. Gao, L. Pan, Z. Li, C. Shi, Y. Yao et al., Engineering facets and oxygen vacancies over hematite single crystal for intensified electrocatalytic H2O2 production. Adv. Funct. Mater. 30, 1910539–1910546 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201910539
M. Assumpção, R. De Souza, R. Reis, M. Lanza, M. Santos, Low tungsten content of nanostructured material supported on carbon for the degradation of phenol. Appl. Catal. B 142–143, 479–486 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.05.024
R. Li, S. Yang, Y. Zhang, D. Rao, X. Hong et al., Short-range order in amorphous nickel oxide nanosheets enables selective and efficient electrochemical hydrogen peroxide production. Cell Rep. Phys. Sci. 3, 100788–100798 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xcrp.2022.100788
F. Xia, B. Li, Y. Liu, T. Marks, Y. Cheng et al., Carbon free and noble metal free Ni2Mo6S8 electrocatalyst for selective electrosynthesis of H2O2. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2104716–2104722 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202104716
B. Wang, X. Cui, J. Huang, R. Cao, Q. Zhang, Recent advances in energy chemistry of precious-metal-free catalysts for oxygen electrocatalysis. Chin. Chem. Lett. 29, 1757–1767 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2018.11.021
Y. He, S. Liu, C. Priest, Q. Shi, G. Wu, Atomically dispersed metal-nitrogen-carbon catalysts for fuel cells: advances in catalyst design, electrode performance, and durability improvement. Chem. Soc. Rev. 49, 3484–3524 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1039/c9cs00903e
R. Jasinski, A new fuel cell cathode catalyst. Nature 201, 1212–1213 (1964). https://nature.com/articles/2011212a0
Y. Yuan, H. Li, Z. Jiang, Z. Lin, Y. Tang et al., Deciphering the selectivity descriptors of heterogeneous metal phthalocyanine electrocatalysts for hydrogen peroxide production. Chem. Sci. 13, 11260–11265 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1039/d2sc03714a
I. Amiinu, X. Liu, Z. Pu, H. Zhang, S. Mu et al., From 3D ZIF nanocrystals to Co-Nx/C nanorod array electrocatalysts for ORR, OER, and Zn-air batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 28, 1704638–1704646 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201704638
J. Li, W. Xia, J. Tang, Y. Gao, J. He et al., Metal-organic framework-derived graphene mesh: a robust scaffold for highly exposed Fe-N4 active sites toward an excellent oxygen reduction catalyst in acid media. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 9280–9291 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.2c00719
S. Liu, C. Li, H. Meyer, D. Cullen, S. Litster et al., Atomically dispersed iron sites with a nitrogen–carbon coating as highly active and durable oxygen reduction catalysts for fuel cells. Nat. Energy 7, 652–663 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-022-01062-1
H. Yang, Y. Liu, P. Kruger, S. Telfer, S. Ma et al., Large-scale synthesis of N-doped carbon capsules supporting atomically dispersed iron for efficient oxygen reduction reaction electrocatalysis. eScience 2, 227–234 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esci.2022.02.005
Z. Lin, Q. Zhang, J. Pan, C. Tsounis, R. Amal et al., Atomic Co decorated free-standing graphene electrode assembly for efficient hydrogen peroxide production in acid. Energy Environ. Sci. 15, 1172–1182 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1039/d1ee02884g
C. Tang, L. Chen, H. Li, K. Davey, S. Qiao, Tailoring acidic oxygen reduction selectivity on single-atom catalysts via modification of first and second coordination spheres. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 7819–7827 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.1c03135
F. Dong, M. Wu, Z. Chen, J. Qiao, S. Sun et al., Atomically dispersed transition metal-nitrogen-carbon bifunctional oxygen electrocatalysts for Zinc-air batteries: recent advances and future perspectives. Nano-Micro Lett. 14, 36–60 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-021-00768-3
H. Gong, Z. Wei, Z. Gong, G. He, S. Zhao et al., Low-coordinated CoNC on oxygenated graphene for efficient electrocatalytic H2O2 production. Adv. Funct. Mater. 32, 2106886–2106895 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202106886
J. Xu, X. Zheng, Z. Feng, J. Chen, W. Mitch et al., High-efficiency oxygen reduction to hydrogen peroxide catalyzed by nickel singleatom catalysts with tetradentate N2O2 coordination in a three-phase flow cell. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59, 13057–13062 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202004841
Y. Sun, L. Silvioli, N. Sahraie, F. Jaouen, P. Strasser et al., Activity-selectivity trends in the electrochemical production of hydrogen peroxide over single-site metal-nitrogen-carbon catalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 12372–12381 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.9b05576
J. Gao, H. Chen, X. Yang, Y. Huang, T. Zhang et al., Enabling direct H2O2 production in acidic media through rational design of transition metal single atom catalyst. Chem 6, 658–674 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chempr.2019.12.008
E. Jung, H. Shin, B. Lee, Y. Sung, T. Hyeon et al., Atomic-level tuning of Co-N-C catalyst for high-performance electrochemical H2O2 production. Nat. Mater. 19, 436–442 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-019-0571-5
Q. Zhang, X. Tan, N. Bedford, X. Lu, L. Thomsen et al., Direct insights into the role of epoxy groups on cobalt sites for acidic H2O2 production. Nat. Commun. 11, 4181–4191 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17782-5
C. Tang, Y. Jiao, B. Shi, Q. Zhang, S. Qiao et al., Coordination tunes selectivity: two-electron oxygen reduction on high-loading molybdenum single-atom catalysts. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59, 9171–9176 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202003842
S. Chen, T. Luo, K. Chen, H. Li, M. Zhu et al., Chemical identification of catalytically active sites on oxygen-doped carbon nanosheet to decipher the high activity for electro-synthesis hydrogen peroxide. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 16607–16614 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202104480
W. Zhou, L. Xie, J. Gao, G. Zhao, J. Ma et al., Selective H2O2 electrosynthesis by O-doped and transition-metal-O-doped carbon cathodes via O2 electroreduction: a critical review. Chem. Eng. J. 410, 128368–128383 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.128368
C. Ye, L. Xu, Recent advances in the design of a high performance metal–nitrogen–carbon catalyst for the oxygen reduction reaction. J. Mater. Chem. A 9, 22218–22247 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1039/d1ta05605k
Y. Hu, J. Zhang, T. Shen, D. Wang et al., Efficient electrochemicalproduction of H2O2 on hollow N-doped carbon nanospheres with abundant micropores. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 13, 29551–29557 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c05353
C. Zhang, J. Zhang, M. Song, X. Huang, W. Liu et al., Tuning coal into graphene-like nanocarbon for electrochemical H2O2 production with nearly 100% faraday efficiency. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 9, 9369–9375 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c02357
J. Zhang, F. He, J. Zhu, D. Wang, S. Mu et al., Defect and doping co-engineered non-metal nanocarbon ORR electrocatalyst. Nano-Micro Lett. 13, 65–94 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-020-00579-y
C. Zhang, W. Liu, M. Song, J. Zhang, D. Wang et al., Pyranoid-O-dominated graphene-like nanocarbon for two-electron oxygen reduction reaction. Appl. Catal. B 307, 121173–121182 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121173
C. Niu, Y. Zhang, J. Dong, R. Yuan, W. Kou et al., 3D ordered macro-/mesoporous NixCo100-x alloys as high-performance bifunctional electrocatalysts for overall water splitting. Chin. Chem. Lett. 32, 2484–2488 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2020.12.045
Y. Liu, X. Quan, X. Fan, H. Wang, S. Chen, High-yield electrosynthesis of hydrogen peroxide from oxygen reduction by hierarchically porous carbon. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 6837–6841 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201502396
J. Lim, J. Kim, J. Woo, Y. Sa, S. Joo et al., Designing highly active nanoporous carbon H2O2 production electrocatalysts through active site identification. Chem 7, 3114–3130 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chempr.2021.08.007
Y. Sa, J. Kim, S. Joo, Active edge-site-rich carbon nanocatalysts with enhanced electron transfer for efficient electrochemical hydrogen peroxide production. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58, 1100–1105 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201812435
K. Lee, J. Lim, M. Lee, J. Kang, S. Lee et al., Structure-controlled graphene electrocatalysts for high-performance H2O2 production. Energy Environ. Sci. 15, 2858–2866 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1039/d2ee00548d
Y. Sun, I. Sinev, D. Bernsmeier, B. Paul, B. RoldanCuenya et al., Efficient electrochemical hydrogen peroxide production from molecular oxygen on nitrogen-doped mesoporous carbon catalysts. ACS Catal. 8, 2844–2856 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.7b03464
J. Zhang, G. Zhang, H. Liu, J. Qu et al., Graphitic N in nitrogen-doped carbon promotes hydrogen peroxide synthesis from electrocatalytic oxygen reduction. Carbon 163, 154–161 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2020.02.084
Y. Zhao, L. Yang, S. Chen, W. Qian, Z. Hu et al., Can boron and nitrogen co-doping improve oxygen reduction reaction activity of carbon nanotubes? J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 1201–1204 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja310566z
D. Iglesias, A. Giuliani, M. Melchionna, F. Vizza, M. Prato et al., N-doped graphitized carbon nanohorns as a forefront electrocatalyst in highly selective O2 reduction to H2O2. Chem 4, 106–123 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chempr.2017.10.013
N. Jia, T. Yang, S. Shi, Y. Chen, S. Yin et al., N, F-codoped carbon nanocages: an efficient electrocatalyst for hydrogen peroxide electroproduction in alkaline and acidic solutions. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 8, 2883–2891 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b07047
K. Zhao, Y. Su, X. Quan, Y. Liu, S. Chen et al., Enhanced H2O2 production by selective electrochemical reduction of O2 on fluorine-doped hierarchically porous carbon. J. Catal. 357, 118–126 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2017.11.008
L. Li, C. Tang, Y. Zheng, H. Xu, S. Qiao et al., Tailoring selectivity of electrochemical hydrogen peroxide generation by tunable pyrrolic-nitrogen-carbon. Adv. Energy Mater. 10, 2000789–2000798 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202000789
Y. Xia, X. Zhao, C. Xia, Y. Liu, H. Wang et al., Highly active and selective oxygen reduction to H2O2 on boron-doped carbon for high production rates. Nat. Commun. 12, 4225 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24329-9
H. Zhang, S. Yang, Y. Wang, P. Chen, R. Jia et al., Electrocatalyst derived from fungal hyphae and its excellent activity for electrochemical production of hydrogen peroxide. Electrochim. Acta 308, 74–82 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2019.04.011
J. Zhu, X. Xiao, K. Zheng, X. Wang, Y. Chen et al., KOH-treated reduced graphene oxide: 100% selectivity for H2O2 electroproduction. Carbon 153, 6–11 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2019.07.009
W. Zhu, X. Zhang, Y. Yin, Y. Qin, J. Zhang et al., In-situ electrochemical activation of carbon fiber paper for the highly efficient electroreduction of concentrated nitric acid. Electrochim. Acta 291, 328–334 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2018.08.127
Z. Lu, G. Chen, S. Siahrostami, T. Jaramillo, J. Nørskov et al., High-efficiency oxygen reduction to hydrogen peroxide catalysed by oxidized carbon materials. Nat. Catal. 1, 156–162 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-017-0017-x
Z. Wang, Q. Li, C. Zhang, B. Yakobson, J. Tour et al., Hydrogen peroxide generation with 100% faradaic efficiency on metal-free carbon black. ACS Catal. 11, 2454–2459 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.0c04735
D. Zhang, C. Tsounis, Z. Ma, R. Amal, Z. Han et al., Highly selective metal-free electrochemical production of hydrogen peroxide on functionalized vertical graphene edges. Small 18, 2105082 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202105082
H. Kim, M. Ross, N. Kornienko, L. Zhang, J. Guo et al., Efficient hydrogen peroxide generation using reduced graphene oxide-based oxygen reduction electrocatalysts. Nat. Catal. 1, 282–290 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-018-0044-2
G. Han, F. Li, W. Zou, M. Karamad, S. Siahrostamik et al., Building and identifying highly active oxygenated groups in carbon materials for oxygen reduction to H2O2. Nat. Commun. 11, 2209 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15782-z
B. Li, C. Zhao, J. Liu, Q. Zhang, Electrosynthesis of hydrogen peroxide synergistically catalyzed by atomic Co-Nx-C sites and oxygen functional groups in noble-metal-free electrocatalysts. Adv. Mater. 31, 1808173 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201808173
J. An, N. Li, Q. Zhao, X. Wang, Y. Feng et al., Highly efficient electro-generation of H2O2 by adjusting liquid-gas-solid three phase interfaces of porous carbonaceous cathode during oxygen reduction reaction. Water Res. 164, 114933 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2019.114933
J. Wang, S. Li, Q. Qin, C. Peng, Sustainable and feasible reagent-free electro-Fenton via sequential dual-cathode electrocatalysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118, 2108573118 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2108573118
T. Murayama, I. Yamanaka, Electrosynthesis of neutral H2O2 solution from O2 and water at a mixed carbon cathode using an exposed solid-polymer-electrolyte electrolysis cell. J. Phy. Chem. C 115, 5792–5799 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp1109702
I. Yamanaka, T. Murayama, Neutral H2O2 synthesis by electrolysis of water and O2. Angew. Chem. 120, 1926–1928 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.200704431
W. Zhou, X. Meng, J. Gao, F. Sun, G. Zhao, Janus graphite felt cathode dramatically enhance the H2O2 yield from O2 electroreduction by the hydrophilicity-hydrophobicity regulation. Chemosphere 278, 130382 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130382
K. Dong, J. Liang, Y. Wang, Q. Asiri, D. Ma et al., Honeycomb carbon nanofibers: a superhydrophilic O2-entrapping electrocatalyst enables ultrahigh mass activity for the two-electron oxygen reduction reaction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 10583–10587 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202101880
P. Su, M. Zhou, X. Lu, W. Yang, G. Ren et al., Electrochemical catalytic mechanism of N-doped graphene for enhanced H2O2 yield and in-situ degradation of organic pollutant. Appl. Catal. B 245, 583–595 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.12.075
Y. Wang, W. Zhou, J. Gao, Y. Ding, K. Kou, Oxidative modification of graphite felts for efficient H2O2 electrogeneration: enhancement mechanism and long-term stability. J. Electroanal. Chem. 833, 258–268 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2018.11.051
Q. Zhang, M. Zhou, G. Ren, Y. Li, Y. Li et al., Highly efficient electrosynthesis of hydrogen peroxide on a superhydrophobic three-phase interface by natural air diffusion. Nat. Commun. 11, 1731 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15597-y
W. Xu, Z. Liang, S. Gong, T. Kallio, Z. Lu et al., Fast and stable electrochemical production of H2O2 by electrode architecture engineering. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 9, 7120–7129 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c01468
Q. Zhao, J. An, C. Wang, X. Wang, N. Li et al., Superhydrophobic air-breathing cathode for efficient hydrogen peroxide generation through two-electron pathway oxygen reduction reaction. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11, 35410–35419 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b09942
L. Wan, Z. Xu, Q. Cao, Y. Liao, B. Wang et al., Nanoemulsion-coated Ni-Fe hydroxide self-supported electrode as an air-breathing cathode for high-performance zinc-air batteries. Nano Lett. 22, 4535–4543 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c01388
Z. Li, G. Jiang, Y. Hu, S. Wang, Z. Chen et al., Deep-breathing honeycomb-like Co-Nx-C nanopolyhedron bifunctional oxygen electrocatalysts for rechargeable Zn-air batteries. iScience 23, 101404 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2020.101404
W. Sun, B. Peppley, K. Karan, Modeling the influence of GDL and flow-field plate parameters on the reaction distribution in the PEMFC cathode catalyst layer. J. Power Sources 144, 42–53 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.11.035
P. Hamilton, B. Pollet, Polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) flow field plate: design, materials and characterisation. Fuel Cells 10, 489–509 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1002/fuce.201000033
R. Rosli, A. Sulong, W. Daud, E. Majlan, M. Haque et al., A review of high-temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cell (HT-PEMFC) system. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 42, 9293–9314 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.06.211
N. Aukland, A. Boudina, D. Eddy, J. Mantese, M. Thompson et al., Alloys that form conductive and passivating oxides for proton exchange membrane fuel cell bipolar plates. J. Mater. Res. 19, 1723–1729 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2004.0216
Z. Chen, S. Chen, S. Siahrostami, J. Nørskov, Z. Bao et al., Development of a reactor with carbon catalysts for modular-scale, low-cost electrochemical generation of H2O2. React. Chem. Eng. 2, 239–245 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1039/c6re00195e
T. Pérez, G. Coria, I. Sirés, J. Nava, A. Uribe, Electrosynthesis of hydrogen peroxide in a filter-press flow cell using graphite felt as air-diffusion cathode. J. Electroanal. Chem. 812, 54–58 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2018.01.054
C. Xia, Y. Xia, P. Zhu, L. Fan, H. Wang, Direct electrosynthesis of pure aqueous H2O2 solutions up to 20% by weight using a solid electrolyte. Sci. Technol. Weld. Join. 366, 226–231 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay1844
S. Jayashree, E. Choban, A. Primak, D. Natarajan, K. Larry et al., Air-breathing laminar flow-based microfluidic fuel cell. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 16758–16759 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja054599k
R. Jayashree, S. Yoon, F. Brushett, L. Markoski, P. Kenis, On the performance of membraneless laminar flow-based fuel cells. J. Power Sources 195, 3569–3578 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.12.029
C. Xia, S. Back, S. Ringe, K. Chan, H. Wang et al., Confined local oxygen gas promotes electrochemical water oxidation to hydrogen peroxide. Nat. Catal. 3, 125–134 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-019-0402-8
L. Tang, M. Xia, S. Cao, L. Zhang, L. Yu et al., Operando identification of active sites in Co-Cr oxyhydroxide oxygen evolution electrocatalysts. Nano Energy 101, 107562–107568 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.107562
F. Haase, A. Bergmann, T. Jones, C. Rettenmaier, B. Cuenya et al., Size effects and active state formation of cobalt oxide nanoparticles during the oxygen evolution reaction. Nat. Energy 7, 765–773 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-022-01083-w
S. Cheng, H. Zheng, C. Shen, B. Jiang, F. Liu et al., Hierarchical iron phosphides composite confined in ultrathin carbon layer as effective heterogeneous electro-Fenton catalyst with prominent stability and catalytic activity. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2106311 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202106311
F. Yu, M. Zhou, L. Zhou, R. Peng, A novel electro-Fenton process with H2O2 generation in a rotating disk reactor for organic pollutant degradation. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 1, 320–324 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1021/ez500178p
Q. Zhao, Y. Wang, W. Lai, F. Xiao, Y. Lyu et al., Approaching a high-rate and sustainable production of hydrogen peroxide: oxygen reduction on Co–N–C single-atom electrocatalysts in simulated seawater. Energy Environ. Sci. 14, 5444–5456 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1039/d1ee00878a
S. Luo, W. Chen, Y. Cheng, Q. Yang, K. Deng et al., Trimetallic synergy in intermetallic PtSnBi nanoplates boosts formic acid oxidation. Adv. Mater. 31, 1903683 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201903683
A. Poerwoprajitno, L. Gloag, J. Watt, W. Schuhmann, R. Tilley et al., A single-Pt-atom-on-Ru-nanoparticle electrocatalyst for CO-resilient methanol oxidation. Nat. Catal. 5, 231–237 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-022-00756-9
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation (22279036).
Funding
Open access funding provided by Shanghai Jiao Tong University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Huang, X., Song, M., Zhang, J. et al. Recent Advances of Electrocatalyst and Cell Design for Hydrogen Peroxide Production. Nano-Micro Lett. 15, 86 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-023-01044-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-023-01044-2