Abstract
The Memory Validity Profile (MVP) is a recently designed performance validity test for children and adolescents aged 5 through 21 years. The MVP is distinguished as the first stand-alone performance validity test specifically designed, nationally standardized, and validated for use with this specific age range. The measure includes verbal and visual subtests. The current article explores the MVP and examines its structure as well as the underlying clinical intent. Advantages, such as its brief administration and scoring time and under reliance on cognitive skills, are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Delis, D. C., Kramer, J. H., Kaplan, E., & Ober, B. A. (1994). California verbal learning test-children’s version (CVLT-C). San Antonio, TX: Pearson.
Faust, D., Hart, K. J., & Guilmette, T. J. (1988). Pediatric malingering: the capacity of children to fake believable deficits on neuropsychological testing. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 578–582.
Feifer, S. G. (2015). Feifer assessment of reading (FAR). Lutz, FL: PAR.
Gast, J., & Hart, K. J. (2010). The performance of juvenile offenders on the test of memory malingering. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 10(1), 53–68.
Gioia, G. A., Isquith, P. K., Guy, S. C., & Kenworthy, L. (2000). Behavior rating inventory of executive function (BRIEF). Lutz, FL: PAR.
Green, P. (2004). Green’s medical symptom validity test (MSVT) for microsoft windows: user’s manual. Edmonton, Canada: Green’s Publishing.
Green, P., Lees-Haley, P. R., & Allen III, L. M. (2002). The word memory test and the validity of neuropsychological test scores. Journal of Forensic Neuropsychology, 2, 97–124.
Kirkwood, M. W., Kirk, J. W., Blaha, R. Z., & Wilson, P. (2010). Noncredible effort during pediatric neuropsychological exam: a case series and literature review. Child Neuropsychology, 16, 604–618.
Kirkwood, M. W., Yeates, K. O., Randolph, C., & Kirk, J. W. (2011). The implications of symptom validity test failure for ability-based test performance in a pediatric sample. Psychological Assessment, 24(1), 36–45.
Lu, P. H., & Boone, K. B. (2002). Suspect cognitive symptoms in a 9-year-old child: malingering by proxy? The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 16(1), 90–96.
MacAllister, W. S., Nakhutina, L., Bender, H. A., Karantzoulis, S., & Carlson, C. (2009). Assessing effort during neuropsychological evaluation with the TOMM in children and adolescents with epilepsy. Child Neuropsychology, 15, 521–531.
Messer, M. A. (2014). Academic achievement battery (AAB). Lutz, FL: PAR.
Meyers, J. E., & Meyers, K. R., (1995). Rey Complex Figure Test and Recognition Trial (RCFT).
Reynolds, C. R., & Voress, J. K. (2007). Test of memory and learning, second edition (TOMAL-2). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
Sherman, E., & Brooks, B. (2015). Children and adolescent memory profile (ChAMP). Lutz, FL: PAR.
Sherman, E., & Brooks, B. (2016). Memory validity profile (MVP). Lutz, FL: PAR.
Tombaugh, T. N. (1996). Test of memory malingering (TOMM). New York: MultiHealth Systems Inc..
Wechsler, D. (2003). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for children, fourth edition (WISC-IV). San Antonio, TX: Pearson.
Wechsler, D. (2012). Wechsler preschool and primary scale of intelligence (WPPSI-IV). San Antonio, TX: Pearson.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by the author.
Conflict of Interest
The authors of this review were provided with a complimentary test kit and record forms. The authors declare that they have no other conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Favreau, Z., Tross, B., Wolff, M. et al. Test Review of the Memory Validity Profile (MVP). J Pediatr Neuropsychol 3, 223–226 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40817-017-0037-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40817-017-0037-0