Skip to main content
Log in

Spatial variability assessment of irrigation performance in the Lower Usuthu Smallholder Irrigation Project (LUSIP) in Eswatini

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Modeling Earth Systems and Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The performance of most smallholder sugarcane growers in Eswatini has been underwhelming and this has been largely attributed to inefficient irrigation systems. As such, the Government of Eswatini has made huge irrigation investments towards smallholder farming with the intention of advancing access to water and consequently, improve irrigation efficiency. There is, however, a lack of evidence to support such an assumption hence the need for this study which was conducted at the LUSIP area in Eswatini. The main objective was to assess the irrigation performance of schemes under LUSIP area over three cropping seasons using remote sensing-derived indicators. More specifically, the objective was to determine the spatiotemporal variability for adequacy, equity, reliability and water productivity using the python module for Surface Energy Balance Algorithm for Land (PySEBAL). Results showed that relative evapotranspiration \(\left({ET}_{\mathrm{rel}}\right)\) was 0.86, 0.88 and 0.82 for the 2013/14, 2014/15 and 2015/16 seasons, respectively. The seasonal coefficient of variation of \({ET}_{\mathrm{rel}}\) was 0.05, 0.07 and 0.06 for 2013/14, 2014/15 and 2015/16, respectively. All results indicated that performance indicators were within allowable limits except for water productivity. Water productivity decreased with each passing season and in 2014/15 and 2015/16 water productivity values (1.29 and 1.09 kg/m3) were below the acceptable range of 1.3–2.2 kg/m3. It was, therefore, concluded that on average, irrigation performance in the area was within allowable ranges. It was, however, recommended that in the future yield and its associated factors be investigated. Such studies could inform strategies that can be used to improve water productivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmad MD, Turral H, Nazeer A (2009) Diagnosing irrigation performance and water productivity through satellite remote sensing and secondary data in a large irrigation system of Pakistan. Agric Water Manag 96:551–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D., Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration: guidelines for computing crop requirements. Rome

  • Asaana J, Sadick A (2016) Assessment of irrigation performance using remote sensing technique at Tono irrigation area in the Upper East region of Ghana. Int Res J Agric Food Sci 1:79–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastiaanssen WG, Menenti M, Feddes RA, Holtslag AAM (1998) A remote sensing surface energy balance algorithm for land (SEBAL). 1. Formulation J Hydrol 212:198–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bastiaanssen W (1995) Regionalization of surface flux densities and moisture indicators in composite terrain: A remote sensing approach under clear skies in Mediterranean climates.

  • Bhembe B (2015) Earth Observations for irrigation management: Swaziland’s Sugar Industry. UNESCO-IHE, Delft

  • Blatchford ML, Mannaerts CM, Zeng Y, Nouri H, Karimi P (2019) Status of accuracy in remotely sensed and in-situ agricultural water productivity estimates: a review. Remote Sens Environ 234:111413.

  • Caiserman A, Faour G (2021) Spatial variability of evapotranspiration and pressure on groundwater resources: remote sensing monitoring by crop type in the Bekaa plain, Lebanon. J Appl Remote Sens 15:014517.

  • Dlamini MM, Dlamini BM (2012) Explanatory variables associated with the yield performance gap among small-medium-and large-scale sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) growers at Ubombo Sugar, Big Bend, Swaziland. Asian J Agric Sci 4:32–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Dlamini MM, Worth S (2019) Readiness of the Swaziland sugar industry towards the use of information and communication technology: perceptions of smallholder sugarcane farmers and extension officers. South African J Agric Ext 47:92–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Dlamini MA (2013) The relationship between production performance and governance in smallholder irrigation schemes in Swaziland. University of Zimbabwe

  • Ellis RD, Lankford BA (1990) The tolerance of sugarcane to water stress during its main development phases. Agric Water Manag 17:117–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eswatini Cane Growers Association (2018) SCGA Annual Report 2017/2018. Mbabane

  • Eswatini Sugar Association (2020) Integrated Annual Report 2019/20. Mbabane

  • Figueroa-Rodríguez KA, Hernández-Rosas F, Figueroa-Sandoval B, Velasco-Velasco J, Aguilar Rivera N (2019) What has been the focus of sugarcane research? A bibliometric overview. Int J Environ Res Public Health 16:3326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster T, Mieno T, Brozović N (2020) Satellite-based monitoring of irrigation water use: assessing measurement errors and their implications for agricultural water management policy. Water Resour Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goshehgir AS, Golabi M, Naseri AA (2021) Estimation and comparison actual evapotranspiration of sugarcane using separate and fusion satellite images and lysimeteric data with approach of determining water use efficiency. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 49:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hellegers PJGJ, Soppe R, Perry CJ, Bastiaanssen WGM (2009) Combining remote sensing and economic analysis to support decisions that affect water productivity. Irrig Sci 27:243–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-008-0139-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hessels, T., Opstal, J. van, Trambauer, P., Mohamed, Y., Bastiaanssen W (2016a) User Guide: pySEBAL 3.3 for Landsat imagery (beta version). Delft

  • Hessels T, Opstal J van, Trambauer P, et al (2016b) User Guide: pySEBAL 3.3 for Landsat imagery (beta version). Delft

  • International Institute for Sustainable Development (2022) Global sustainable sugarcane production shows significant growth: Report. https://www.iisd.org/articles/global-sustainable-sugarcane-production-shows-significant-growth-report. Accessed 15 Feb 2022

  • Karimi P, Bhembe B, Blatchford M, de Fraiture C (2019a) Global satellite-based ET products for the local level irrigation management: An application of irrigation performance assessment in the sugarbelt of Swaziland. Remote Sens 11:705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karimi, P., Pareeth, S., Michailovsky C (2019b) Rapid assessment of the water accounts in Urmia Lake Basin. Delft

  • Khanal S, Kushal KC, Fulton JP, Shearer S, Ozkan E (2020) Remote sensing in agriculture—accomplishments, limitations, and opportunities. Remote Sens 12:3783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kharrou MH, Le Page M, Chehbouni A, Simonneaux V, Er-Raki S, Jarlan L, Ouzine L, Khabba S, Chehbouni G (2013) Assessment of equity and adequacy of water delivery in irrigation systems using remote sensing-based indicators in semi-arid region, Morocco. Water Resour Manag 27:4697–4714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knox JW, Díaz JR, Nixon DJ, Mkhwanazi M (2010) A preliminary assessment of climate change impacts on sugarcane in Swaziland. Agric Syst 103:63–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar MD, Singh OP, Samad M, Turral H, Purohit C (2008) Water productivity of irrigated agriculture in India: potential areas for improvement.

  • Kumar MD, Niranjan V, Puri S, Bassi N (2012) Irrigation efficiencies and water productivity in sugarcane in Godavari river basin, Maharashtra. Hyderabad

  • Magagula CD (2013) Technical efficiency of sprinkler irrigation in Swaziland: a case study of the LUSIP PHASE 1 in Lubovane area. University of Zimbabwe

  • Mahmoud SH, Alazba AA (2016) Surface energy balance algorithm for land-based consumption water use of different land use-cover types in arid-semiarid regions. Water Sci Technol Water Supply 16:1497–1513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsenjwa MB (2014) Evaluation of the technical performance of the sprinkler irrigation systems used at SWADE-LUSIP. University of Swaziland

  • Mhlanga BFN, Ndlovu LS, Senzanje A (2006) Impacts of irrigation return flows on the quality of the receiving waters: a case of sugarcane irrigated fields at the Royal Swaziland sugar corporation (RSSC) in the Mbuluzi River Basin (Swaziland). Phys Chem Earth 31:804–813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2006.08.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mhlanga NK, Ihoyelo MJ, Joel N, Salam A (2012) Evaluation of the impact of climate change on the inflow to Lubovane Reservoir in Usutu catchment, Swaziland. J Sustain Dev Africa 14:96–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Mkhonta BET (2015) Hydraulic performance and productivity for large commercial and smallholder sub surface drip irrigation systems for sugarcane: a case study of the Royal Swaziland Sugar Corporation (RSSC), Cathula and Manzana farmer associations in Swaziland. Delft

  • Mlenga DH, Jordaan AJ (2019) Monitoring droughts in Eswatini: a spatiotemporal variability analysis using the standard precipitation Index. Jàmbá J Disaster Risk Stud. https://doi.org/10.4102/jamba.v11i1.725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molden D, Burton M, Bos MG (2007a) Performance assessment, irrigation service delivery and poverty reduction: Benefits of improved system management. Irrig Drain 56:307–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molden D, Oweis TY, Pasquale S, Kijne JW, Hanjra MA, Bindraban PS, Bouman BA, Cook S, Erenstein O, Farahani H, Hachum A (2007b) Pathways for increasing agricultural water productivity. In: Molden D (ed) Water for food, water for life: a comprehensive assessment of water management in agriculture. Earthscan, London,

  • Nam WH, Hong EM, Choi JY (2016) Assessment of water delivery efficiency in irrigation canals using performance indicators. Irrig Sci 34:129–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-016-0488-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Njeim N (2018) Socioeconomic impacts of infrastructure investment in Eswatini: the case of LUSIP. University of Arkansas

  • Nkambule G (2009) Baseline study report (Individual Growers). Mbabane

  • Nyolei D, Nsaali M, Minaya V, van Griensven A, Mbilinyi B, Diels J, Hessels T, Kahimba F (2019) High resolution mapping of agricultural water productivity using SEBAL in a cultivated African catchment, Tanzania. Phys Chem Earth 112:36–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olivier FC, Singels A (2015) Increasing water use efficiency of irrigated sugarcane production in South Africa through better agronomic practices. F Crop Res 176:87–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pali-Shikhulu J (2011) Environment structure and performance in Swaziland’s smallholder cane grower organisations. University of Witwatersrand

  • Sawadogo A, Hessels TIM, Gundogdu KS, Demir AO, Mustafa UNLU, Zwart SJ (2020a) Comparative analysis of the pySEBAl model and lysimeter for estimating actual evapotranspiration of soybean crop in Adana, Turkey. Int J Eng Geosci 5:60–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawadogo A, Kouadio L, Traore F, Zwart SJ, Hessels T, Gündoğdu KS (2020b) Spatiotemporal assessment of irrigation performance of the Kou Valley irrigation scheme in Burkina Faso using satellite remote sensing-derived indicators. Int J Geo-Information 9:484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shongwe MI, Tsabedze N (2021) Evaluation of irrigation adequacy in sugarcane systems in Eswatini. African J Food, Agric Nutr Dev 21:17464–17476. https://doi.org/10.18697/ajfand.97.19115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steduto P, Hsiao TC, Fereres E, Raes D (2012) Crop Yield Response to Water. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Swaziland water and agricultural development enterprise (2016) Lower usuthu smallholder irrigation project: LUSIP 1. http://www.swade.co.sz/index.php/2012-08-29-08-07-22/lusip-i. Accessed 30 Aug 2016

  • Terry A, Ogg M (2017) Restructuring the Swazi sugar industry: the changing role and political significance of smallholders. J South Afr Stud 43:585–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Traore F, Bonkoungou J, Compaoré J, Kouadio L, Wellens J, Hallot E, Tychon B (2019) Using multi-temporal Landsat images and support vector machine to assess the changes in agricultural irrigated areas in the Mogtedo region. Burkina Faso Remote Sens 11:1442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xue J, Bali KM, Light S, Hessels T, Kisekka I (2020) Evaluation of remote sensing-based evapotranspiration models against surface renewal in almonds, tomatoes and maize. Agric Water Manag 238:106228.

  • Yawson DO, Adu MO, Osei KN (2018) Spatial assessment of sugarcane (Saccharurn spp. L.) production to feed the Komenda Sugar Factory, Ghana. Heliyon 4:903.

  • Zhao D, Li Y (2015) Climate change and sugarcane production: potential impact and mitigation strategies. Int J Agron 2015:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/547386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou X, Bi S, Yang Y, Tian F, Ren D (2014) Comparison of ET estimations by the three-temperature model, SEBAL model and eddy covariance observations. J Hydrol 519:769–776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zulu NS, Sibanda M, Tlali B (2019) Factors affecting sugarcane production by small-scale growers in Ndwedwe local municipality. South Africa Agriculture 9:170

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwart SJ, Bastiaanssen WGM (2004) Review of measured crop water productivity values for irrigated wheat, rice, cotton and maize. Agric Water Manag 69:115–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwart SJ, Bastiaanssen WGM (2007) SEBAL for detecting spatial variation of water productivity and scope for improvement in eight irrigated wheat systems. Agric Water Manag 89:287–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2007.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mthokozi Phakamani Mamba.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mamba, M.P., Shongwe, M.I. Spatial variability assessment of irrigation performance in the Lower Usuthu Smallholder Irrigation Project (LUSIP) in Eswatini. Model. Earth Syst. Environ. 8, 4455–4465 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-022-01368-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-022-01368-9

Keywords

Navigation