Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Cooperative Versus Coercive Dominance Strategies: Relations with the Environment and Personality

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Evolutionary Psychological Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examined whether adverse ecological conditions (i.e., socioeconomic status, neighborhood violence, and parental attachment) were indirectly related to adolescents’ use of cooperative and coercive social strategies through their association with personality traits, consistent with both evolutionary and developmental theories that personality can be adaptively calibrated to the pursuit of social goals in particular ecological contexts. As expected, ecological factors (parental attachment, SES, neighborhood violence), and individual differences (HEXACO personality traits, age, sex) were directly related to use of social dominance strategies. Specifically, anxious attachment and higher SES were indirectly related to cooperative strategies through Extraversion and low Honesty-Humility, whereas less supportive and/or violent environments were indirectly associated with coercive strategies through their relationships with selfish, impulsive, antisocial personality traits. Our results highlight the importance of adopting an ecological approach to adolescent social strategies and are consistent with evolutionary and developmental theories that posit links between individual differences and environmental factors that promote either mutualistic cooperative strategies or individualistic coercive strategies for obtaining social power.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

We do not have REB approval for sharing the current data. If desired, we can provide MPlus code and output as supplemental materials.

References

  • Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 150–166.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2020). Objections to the HEXACO model of personality structure—And why those objections fail. European Journal of Personality, Online first, 1–19.

  • Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benenson, J. F. (2014). Warriors and worriers: The survival of the sexes. Oxford University Press: Toronto, ON.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balish, S. M., Eys, M. A., & Schulte-Hostedde, A. I. (2013). Evolutionary sport and exercise psychology: Integrating proximate and ultimate explanations. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 14(3), 413–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird, R. B., Ready, E., & Power, E. A. (2018). The social significance of subtle signals. Nature human behaviour, 2(7), 452-457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird, R. B., Scelza, B., Bird, D. W., & Smith, E. A. (2012). The hierarchy of virtue: mutualism, altruism and signaling in Martu women’s cooperative hunting. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33(1), 64–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Book, A., Methot-Jones, T., Blais, J., Hosker-Field, A., Volk, A., Visser, B. A., & D’Agata, M. T. (2019). Psychopathic traits and the cheater-hawk hypothesis. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34(15), 3229–3251.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Book, A., Visser, B. A., Blais, J., Hosker-Field, A., Methot-Jones, T., Gauthier, N. Y., & D’Agata, M. T. (2016). Unpacking more “evil”: What is at the core of the dark tetrad? Personality and Individual Differences, 90, 269–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Book, A. S., Volk, A. A., & Hosker, A. (2012). Adolescent bullying and personality: An adaptive approach. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(2), 218–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment, Vol. 1 of Attachment and loss.

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32(7), 513–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm, J. S., Ellison, P. T., Evans, J., Lee, P. C., Lieberman, L. S., Pavlik, Z., & Worthman, C. M. (1993). Death, hope, and sex: Life-history theory and the development of reproductive strategies [and comments and reply]. Current Anthropology, 34(3), 227–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, B. B. (2017). Insecure attachment, resource control, and unrestricted sociosexuality: From a life history perspective. Personality and Individual Differences, 105, 213–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, B. B., & Chang, L. (2012). Adaptive insecure attachment and resource control strategies during middle childhood. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 36(5), 389–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, J. T., & Tracy, J. L. (2013). The impact of wealth on prestige and dominance rank relationships. Psychological Inquiry, 24(2), 102–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, J. T., Tracy, J. L., Foulsham, T., Kingstone, A., & Henrich, J. (2013). Two ways to the top: Evidence that dominance and prestige are distinct yet viable avenues to social rank and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(1), 103.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, J. T., Tracy, J. L., & Henrich, J. (2010). Pride, personality, and the evolutionary foundations of human social status. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(5), 334–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cillessen, A. H., & Rose, A. J. (2005). Understanding popularity in the peer system. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(2), 102-105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, J., Pepler, D., Craig, W., & Taradash, A. (2000). Dating experiences of bullies in early adolescence. Child Maltreatment, 5(4), 299–310.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1992). Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. In J. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The Adapted Mind (pp. 163–228). New York: OxfordUniversity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1997). Crime and conflict: Homicide in evolutionary psychological perspective. Crime and Justice, 22, 51–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • da Silva, D. R., Rijo, D., & Salekin, R. T. (2015). The evolutionary roots of psychopathy. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 21, 85–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. (2016). The selfish gene. Oxford university press.

  • De Bruyn, E. H., & Cillessen, A. H. (2006). Popularity in early adolescence: Prosocial and antisocial subtypes. Journal of Adolescent Research, 21(6), 607–627.

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Giudice, M. (2009). Sex, attachment, and the development of reproductive strategies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32(1), 1–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Del Giudice, M., Ellis, B. J., & Shirtcliff, E. A. (2011). The adaptive calibration model of stress responsivity. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 35(7), 1562–1592.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vries, R. E., Pronk, J., Olthof, T., & Goossens, F. A. (2020). Getting along and/or getting ahead: Differential HEXACO personality correlates of likeability and popularity among adolescents. European Journal of Personality, 34(2), 245-261. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Vries, R. E., Tybur, J. M., Pollet, T. V., & van Vugt, M. (2016). Evolution, situational affordances, and the HEXACO model of personality. Evolution and Human Behavior, 37(5), 407–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinić, B. M., & Wertag, A. (2018). Effects of Dark Triad and HEXACO traits on reactive/proactive aggression: Exploring the gender differences. Personality and Individual Differences, 123, 44–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donbaek, D. F., & Elklit, A. (2014). A validation of the experiences in close relationships-relationship structures scale (ECR-RS) in adolescents. Attachment and Human Development, 16, 58–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2013.850103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eamon, M. K. (2001). The effects of poverty on children’s socioemotional development: An ecological systems analysis. Social Work, 46(3), 256–266.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Del Ellis, B. J., Giudice, M., Dishion, T. J., Figueredo, A. J., Gray, P., Griskevicius, V., & Wilson, D. S. (2012). The evolutionary basis of risky adolescent behavior: implications for science, policy, and practice. Development Psychology, 48(3), 598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, B. J., Volk, A. A., Gonzalez, J. M., & Embry, D. D. (2016). The meaningful roles intervention: An evolutionary approach to reducing bullying and increasing prosocial behavior. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 26(4), 622–637.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Espelage, D. L. (2014). Ecological theory: Preventing youth bullying, aggression, and victimization. Theory into Practice, 53(4), 257–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, A. D., Thompson, E. L., Curran, P. J., & Sullivan, T. N. (2020). Bidirectional relations between witnessing violence, victimization, life events, and physical aggression among adolescents in urban schools. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 1–19.

  • Farrell, A. H., & Dane, A. V. (2019). Bullying, victimization, and prosocial resource control strategies: Differential relations with dominance and alliance formation. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences.

  • Farrell, A. H., & Volk, A. A. (2017). Social ecology and adolescent bullying: Filtering risky environments through antisocial personality. Children and Youth Services Review, 83, 85–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, E., Glätzle-Rützler, D., & Sutter, M. (2013). The development of egalitarianism, altruism, spite and parochialism in childhood and adolescence. European Economic Review, 64, 369–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firmin, C. (2009). Girls around gangs. Safer Communities, 8(2), 14–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flinn, M. V., Geary, D. C., & Ward, C. V. (2005). Ecological dominance, social competition, and coalitionary arms races: Why humans evolved extraordinary intelligence. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26(1), 10–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraley, R. C., Heffernan, M. E., Vicary, A. M., & Brumbaugh, C. C. (2011). The Experiences in Close Relationships-Relationship Structures questionnaire: A method for assessing attachment orientations across relationships. Psychological Assessment, 23, 615–625.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goetz, A. T., Shackelford, T. K., & Camilleri, J. A. (2008). Proximate and ultimate explanations are required for a comprehensive understanding of partner rape. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 13(2), 119–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodall, J. (1986). The chimpanzees of Gombe: Patterns of behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodall, J., Goodboy, A. K., Martin, M. M., & Rittenour, C. E. (1986). The chimpanzees of Gombe Bullying as a display of social dominance orientation MA: Harvard University Press Communication Research. Reports Cambridge, 33, 159–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodboy, A. K., Martin, M. M., & Rittenour, C. E. (2016). Bullying as a display of social dominance orientation. Communication Research Reports, 33(2), 159-165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawley, P. H. (2003). Prosocial and coercive configurations of resource control in early adolescence: A case for the well-adapted Machiavellian. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly (1982-), 279–309.

  • Hawley, P. H. (2011). The role of competition and cooperation in shaping personality: An evolutionary perspective on social dominance, Machiavellianism, and children’s social development. In D. M. Buss & P. H. Hawley (Eds.) The Evolution of Personality and Individual Differences (pp. 61–85).

  • Hawley, P. H., Little, T. D., & Card, N. A. (2008). The myth of the alpha male: A new look at dominance-related beliefs and behavior among adolescent males and females. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 32(1), 76–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henrich, J., & Gil-White, F. J. (2001). The evolution of prestige: Freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22(3), 165–196.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, G., Book, A., Visser, B. A., Volk, A. A., Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2018). Is the dark triad common factor distinct from low honesty-humility? Journal of Research in Personality, 73, 123–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong, J. S., & Espelage, D. L. (2012). A review of research on bullying and peer victimization in school: An ecological system analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17(4), 311–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kakkar, H., & Sivanathan, N. (2017). When the appeal of a dominant leader is greater than a prestige leader. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(26), 6734–6739.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, D., & Richardson, A. M. (2008). Economic inequality and homicide in the developed nations from 1975 to 1995. Homicide Studies, 12(1), 28–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, N. M., Dahlen, E. R., Bullock-Yowell, E., & Madson, M. B. (2018). The HEXACO model of personality and Dark Triad in relational aggression. Personality and Individual Differences, 122, 109–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koski, J. E., Xie, H., & Olson, I. R. (2015). Understanding social hierarchies: The neural and psychological foundations of status perception. Social Neuroscience, 10(5), 527–550.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kraemer, G. W. (1992). A psychobiological theory of attachment. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15(3), 493–511.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kraus, M. W., Côté, S., & Keltner, D. (2010). Social class, contextualism, and empathic accuracy. Psychological Science, 21(11), 1716–1723.

  • Kruger, D. J., Carrothers, J., Franzen, S. P., Miller, A. L., Reischl, T. M., Stoddard, S. A., & Zimmerman, M. A. (2018). The role of present time perspective in predicting early adolescent violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33(12), 1893-1908.

  • Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2018). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO-100. Assessment, 25(5), 543-556.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leventhal, T., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2000). The neighborhoods they live in: the effects of neighborhood residence on child and adolescent outcomes. Psychological Bulletin, 126(2), 309.

  • Low, S., & Espelage, D. (2014). Conduits from community violence exposure to peer aggression and victimization: Contributions of parental monitoring, impulsivity, and deviancy. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 61(2), 221.

  • Mayeux, L. (2014). Understanding popularity and relational aggression in adolescence: The role of social dominance orientation. Social Development, 23(3), 502–517.

  • McBride Murry, V., Berkel, C., Gaylord‐Harden, N. K., Copeland‐Linder, N., & Nation, M. (2011). Neighborhood poverty and adolescent development. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(1), 114–128.

  • McComb, S., & Dane, A. V. (2018). Evolutionary psychological perspective on peer victimization: Relations with attachment security and dating and sexual history. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 5, 243–255. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-018-0180-6

  • Meier, M. H., Slutske, W. S., Arndt, S., & Cadoret, R. J. (2008). Impulsive and callous traits are more strongly associated with delinquent behavior in higher risk neighborhoods among boys and girls. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 117(2), 377–385.

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2018). Mplus (Version 8.1) [computer software]. Los Angele: Author. Pellegrini, A. D., & Bartini, M. (2001). Dominance in early adolescent boys: Affiliative and aggressive dimensions and possible functions. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly,47(1), 142–163.

  • Pellegrini, A. D., & Bartini, M. (2001). Dominance in early adolescent boys: Affiliative and aggressive dimensions and possible functions. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly (1982), 142-163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pepper, G. V., & Nettle, D. (2017). The behavioural constellation of deprivation: Causes and consequences. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40, E314

  • Piff, P. K., Stancato, D. M., Côté, S., Mendoza-Denton, R., & Keltner, D. (2012). Higher social class predicts increased unethical behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(11), 4086–4091.

  • Prinstein, M. J., & Cillessen, A. H. (2003). Forms and functions of adolescent peer aggression associated with high levels of peer status. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49(3), 310–342.

  • Provenzano, D. A., Dane, A. V., Farrell, A. H., Marini, Z. A., & Volk, A. A. (2018). Do bullies have more sex? The role of personality. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 4(3), 221–232.

  • Pronk, J., Lee, N. C., Sandhu, D., Kaur, K., Kaur, S., Olthof, T., & Goossens, F. A. (2017). Associations between Dutch and Indian adolescents’ bullying role behavior and peer-group status: Cross-culturally testing an evolutionary hypothesis. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 41(6), 735–742.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redhead, D. J., Cheng, J. T., Driver, C., Foulsham, T., & O'Gorman, R. (2019). On the dynamics of social hierarchy: A longitudinal investigation of the rise and fall of prestige, dominance, and social rank in naturalistic task groups. Evolution and Human Behavior, 40(2), 222–234.

  • Reijntjes, A., Vermande, M., Goossens, F. A., Olthof, T., van de Schoot, R., Aleva, L., & van der Meulen, M. (2013). Developmental trajectories of bullying and social dominance in youth. Child Abuse & Neglect, 37(4), 224–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richters, J. E., & Martinez, P. (1993). The NIMH community violence project: I. Children as victims of and witnesses to violence. Psychiatry, 56(1), 7-21.

  • Roccato, M. (2008). Right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and attachment: An Italian study. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 67(4), 219–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandstrom, M. J., & Cillessen, A. H. (2006). Likeable versus popular: Distinct implications for adolescent adjustment. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 30(4), 305–314.

  • Savage, J. (2014). The association between attachment, parental bonds and physically aggressive and violent behavior: A comprehensive review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 19(2), 164–178.

  • Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations. Psychological methods, 7(4), 422-425.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sibley, C. G., Harding, J. F., Perry, R., Asbrock, F., & Duckitt, J. (2010). Personality and prejudice: Extension to the HEXACO personality model. European Journal of Personality, 24, 515–534.

  • Sigmund, K. (2017). Games of life: Explorations in ecology, evolution and behavior. NY: NY: Courier Dover Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sijtsema, J. J., Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., & Salmivalli, C. (2009). Empirical test of bullies’ status goals: Assessing direct goals, aggression, and prestige. Aggressive Behavior, 35(1), 57–67.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, C. H., King, C. S., Tucker, S. S., & Wehner, E. A. (1986). Success strategies: Winning through cooperation or competition. The Journal of social psychology, 126(4), 437-444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S., & Ullman, J. B. (2007). Using multivariate statistics, 5th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, B. G., Mumford, E. A., Okeke, N., & Rothman, E. (2020). Neighborhood violent crime and adolescent relationship aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 46(1), 25–36.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tippett, N., & Wolke, D. (2014). Socioeconomic status and bullying: a meta-analysis. American Journal of Public Health, 104(6), e48-e59.

  • Tudge, J. R., Mokrova, I., Hatfield, B. E., & Karnik, R. B. (2009). Uses and misuses of Bronfenbrenner’s bioecological theory of human development. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 1(4), 198–210.

  • Tudge, J. R., Payir, A., Merçon‐Vargas, E., Cao, H., Liang, Y., Li, J., & O'Brien, L. (2016). Still misused after all these years? A reevaluation of the uses of Bronfenbrenner’s bioecological theory of human development. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 8(4), 427–445.

  • Vaillancourt, T. (2013). Do human females use indirect aggression as an intrasexual competition strategy?. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 368(1631), 20130080.

  • Vaillancourt, T., & Hymel, S. (2006). Aggression and social status: The moderating roles of sex and peer‐valued characteristics. Aggressive Behavior, 32(4), 396–408.

  • van den Berg, Y. H., Burk, W. J., & Cillessen, A. H. (2015). Identifying subtypes of peer status by combining popularity and preference: A cohort-sequential approach. The Journal ofEarly Adolescence, 35(8), 1108–1137.

  • Vaillancourt, T., Hymel, S., & McDougall, P. (2003). Bullying is power: Implications for school-based intervention strategies. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 19(2), 157-176.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Berg, Y. H., Deutz, M. H., Smeekens, S., & Cillessen, A. H. (2017). Developmental pathways to preference and popularity in middle childhood. Child Development, 88(5), 1629–1641.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van der Ploeg, R., Steglich, C., & Veenstra, R. (2020). The way bullying works: How new ties facilitate the mutual reinforcement of status and bullying in elementary schools. Social Networks, 60, 71–82.

  • Volk, A. A., Dane, A. V., & Marini, Z. A. (2014). What is bullying? A theoretical redefinition. Developmental Review, 34(4), 327–343.

  • Volk, A. A., Schiralli, K., Xia, X., Zhao, J., & Dane, A. V. (2018). Adolescent bullying and personality: A cross-cultural approach. Personality and Individual Differences, 125, 126–132.

  • Walden, L. M., & Beran, T. N. (2010). Attachment quality and bullying behavior in school-aged youth. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 25(1), 5–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J., Yuan, M., & Kou, Y. (2020). Disadvantaged early-life experience negatively predicts prosocial behavior: The roles of Honesty-Humility and dispositional trust among Chinese adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 152, 109608.

  • Zietsch, B. P., Sidari, M. J., Murphy, S. C., Sherlock, J. M., & Lee, A. J. (2020). For the good of evolutionary psychology, let's reunite proximate and ultimate explanations. Evolution and Human Behavior, 1–10.

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank our participants, their parents and guardians, and the group leaders for their assistance with this research.

Funding

This work was supported by Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada Insight Grant No. 435-2017-0303.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Child and Youth Studies, Brock University, 1812 Sir Isaac Brock Way, St. Catharines, ON, L2S 3A1, Canada

    Anthony A. Volk, Natalie Spadafora & Kristen Buchner

  2. Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

    Katie Schiralli

  3. Department of Psychology, Brock University, St. Catharines, Canada

    Andrew V. Dane

Authors
  1. Anthony A. Volk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Katie Schiralli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Natalie Spadafora
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kristen Buchner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Andrew V. Dane
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anthony A. Volk.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.Cillessen

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Volk, A.A., Schiralli, K., Spadafora, N. et al. Cooperative Versus Coercive Dominance Strategies: Relations with the Environment and Personality. Evolutionary Psychological Science 7, 134–150 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-020-00264-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-020-00264-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation