Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Personality and bullying: Pathways to adolescent social dominance

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The current study examined whether personality traits were related to social dominance, directly, and indirectly through bullying, in samples of Western (Canadian) and Eastern (Chinese) adolescents. Self-report measures of personality, bullying, and social dominance were completed by 442 Chinese adolescents (293 boys), ages 14 to 19 (M = 14.63, SD = 1.53), and 389 Canadian adolescents (161 boys), ages 12 to 18 (M = 14.64, SD = 1.53). It was predicted that personality traits involving arrogance and exploitativeness (i.e., low Honesty-Humility) and impulsivity (i.e., low Conscientiousness) would be indirectly associated with social dominance, through bullying, in both samples. Consistent with evolutionary psychological perspectives, Honesty-Humility was directly and indirectly related to social dominance in both samples, whereas Conscientiousness was indirectly associated through bullying in Canadian and Chinese participants. Some relations differed across cultural contexts, in line with evolutionary and ecological perspectives suggesting that the expression of predispositions toward bullying and dominance depends on the costs and benefits afforded by the environmental (cultural) context. Specifically, eXtraversion was indirectly related to social dominance through bullying only in the Chinese sample, whereas Agreeableness was directly related to social dominance only for Canadian participants. We discuss the implications of these results for future research and intervention efforts along with the need to further verify the cross-cultural validity of adolescent behavior measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We tested whether gender moderated the significant direct or indirect effects and found no significant differences (ps > .05). Furthermore, all significant direct and indirect effects in the original analyses were replicated when gender was included as a covariate.

References

  • Anderson, C., Srivastava, S., Beer, J. S., Spataro, S. E., & Chatman, J. A. (2006). Knowing your place: Self-perceptions of status in face-to-face groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1094–1110.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 150–166.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2018). How well do big five measures capture HEXACO scale variance? Journal of Personality Assessment, 1–7.

  • Berger, C., & Caravita, S. C. (2016). Why do early adolescents bully? Exploring the influence of prestige norms on social and psychological motives to bully. Journal of Adolescence, 46, 45–56.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Book, A. S., Volk, A. A., & Hosker, A. (2012). Adolescent bullying and personality: An adaptive approach. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 218–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brislin, R. W. (1983). Cross-cultural research in psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 34, 363–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (2011). Personality and the adaptive landscape: The role of individual differences in creating and solving social adaptive problems. In D. M. Buss & P. H. Hawley (Eds.), The evolution of personality and individual differences (pp. 29–57). Toronto: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chagnon, N. A. (1983). Yanomamo: The fierce people. Toronto: Holt ,Rinehart, & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, H. C. O., & Wong, D. S. (2015). Traditional school bullying and cyberbullying in Chinese societies: Prevalence and a review of the whole-school intervention approach. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 23, 98–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S. (2003). The relationship between school children's bully behavior and their personality traits. Psychological Exploration, 1, 55–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, B. B. (2016). Conscientiousness and everyday creativity among Chinese undergraduate students. Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 56–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, J. T., Tracy, J. L., Foulsham, T., Kingstone, A., & Henrich, J. (2013). Two ways to the top: Evidence that dominance and prestige are distinct yet viable avenues to social rank and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 103–125.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, G. A., Jr., & Peter, J. P. (1984). Research design effects on the reliability of rating scales: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 21, 360–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cillessen, A. H., & Mayeux, L. (2004). From censure to reinforcement: Developmental changes in the association between aggression and social status. Child Development, 75, 147–163.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cillessen, A. H., & Rose, A. J. (2005). Understanding popularity in the peer system. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 102–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dane, A. V., Marini, Z. A., Volk, A. A., & Vaillancourt, T. (2017). Physical and relational bullying and victimization: Differential relations with adolescent dating and sexual behavior. Aggressive Behavior, 43, 111–122.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Vries, R. E., Tybur, J. M., Pollet, T. V., & van Vugt, M. (2016). Evolution, situational affordances, and the HEXACO model of personality. Evolution and Human Behavior, 37(5), 407–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duckitt, J. (2006). Differential effects of right wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation on outgroup attitudes and their mediation by threat from and competitiveness to outgroups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(5), 684–696.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duriez, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Soenens, B., & De Witte, H. (2007). The social costs of extrinsic relative to intrinsic goal pursuits: Their relation with social dominance and racial and ethnic prejudice. Journal of Personality, 75, 757–782.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, B. J., Del Giudice, M., Dishion, T. J., Figueredo, A. J., Gray, P., Griskevicious, V., et al. (2012). The evolutionary basis of risky adolescent behavior: Implications for science, policy, and practice. Developmental Psychology, 48, 598–623.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, B. J., Volk, A. A., Gonzalez, J. M., & Embry, D. D. (2016). The meaningful roles intervention: An evolutionary approach to reducing bullying and increasing prosocial behavior. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 26, 622–637.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eslea, M., Menesini, E., Morita, Y., O'Moore, M., Mora-Merchán, J. A., Pereira, B., & Smith, P. K. (2004). Friendship and loneliness among bullies and victims: Data from seven countries. Aggressive Behavior, 30, 71–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan, Y., Zhichen, X., Beibei, C., & Jixia, W. (2015). The characteristics of Chinese people’s honesty-humility personality and its implicit and explicit relationships. Journal of Psychological Science, 5, 1162–1169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanti, K. A., & Kimonis, E. R. (2012). Bullying and victimization: The role of conduct problems and psychopathic traits. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 22, 617–631.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, A. H., & Volk, A. A. (2017). Social ecology and adolescent bullying: Filtering risky environments through antisocial personality. Children and Youth Services Review, 83, 85–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, A. H., Provenzano, D. A., Dane, A. V., Marini, Z. A., & Volk, A. A. (2017). Maternal knowledge, adolescent personality, and bullying. Personality and Individual Differences, 104, 413–416.

  • Goodboy, A. K., Martin, M. M., & Rittenour, C. E. (2016). Bullying as a display of social dominance orientation. Communication Research Reports, 33, 159–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawley, P. H. (2003). Prosocial and coercive configurations of resource control in earlyadolescence: A case for the well-adapted Machiavellian. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49, 279–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawley, P. H. (2015). Social dominance in childhood and its evolutionary underpinnings: Why it matters and what we can do. Pediatrics, 135(Supplement 2), S31–S38.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hawley, P. H., Little, T. D., & Card, N. A. (2008). The myth of the alpha male: A new look at dominance-related beliefs and behavior among adolescent males and females. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 32, 76–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, G., Book, A., Visser, B. A., Volk, A. A., Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2018). Is the dark triad common factor distinct from low honesty-humility? Journal of Research in Personality, 73, 123–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, H., Hong, J. S., & Espelage, D. L. (2013). Understanding factors associated with bullying and peer victimization in Chinese schools within ecological contexts. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 22, 881–892.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hui, C. H., & Triandis, H. C. (1985). Measurement in cross-cultural psychology: A review and comparison of strategies. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 16, 131–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. L., Leedom, L. J., & Muhtadie, L. (2012). The dominance behavioral system and psychopathology: Evidence from self-report, observational, and biological studies. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 692–743.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Juvonen, J., & Graham, S. (2014). Bullying in schools: The power of bullies and the plight of victims. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 159–185.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kiefer, S. M., & Ryan, A. M. (2008). Striving for social dominance over peers: The implications for academic adjustment during early adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 417–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equational modeling (4th ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koh, J. B., & Wong, J. S. (2017). Survival of the fittest and the sexiest: Evolutionary origins of adolescent bullying. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32, 2668–2690.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kokkinos, C. M., Antoniadou, N., Dalara, E., Koufogazou, A., & Papatziki, A. (2013). Cyber-bullying, personality and coping among pre-adolescents. International Journal of Cyber Behavior, Psychology and Learning, 3, 55–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kokkinos, C. M., Baltzidis, E., & Xynogala, D. (2016). Prevalence and personality correlates of Facebook bullying among university undergraduates. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 840–850.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, H. D. (1948). Power and personality. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K., Ashton, M. C., Morrison, D. L., Cordery, J., & Dunlop, P. D. (2008). Predicting integrity with the HEXACO personality model: Use of self-and observer reports. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 81, 147–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K., Ashton, M. C., Wiltshire, J., Bourdage, J. S., Visser, B. A., & Gallucci, A. (2013). Sex, power, and money: Prediction from the dark triad and honesty–humility. European Journal of Personality, 27, 169–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leone, L., Desimoni, M., & Chirumbolo, A. (2012). HEXACO, social worldviews and socio- political attitudes: A mediation analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 995–1001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mace, R., Jordan, F., & Holden, C. (2003). Testing evolutionary hypotheses about human biological adaptation using cross-cultural comparison. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology, 136, 85–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machiavelli, N., & Wootton, D. (1995). The prince. Indianapolis: Hackett Pub. Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margoni, F., Baillargeon, R., & Surian, L. (2018). Infants distinguish between leaders and bullies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 1–9.

  • Mayeux, L. (2014). Understanding popularity and relational aggression in adolescence: The role of social dominance orientation. Social Development, 23, 502–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2017). Mplus. User’s guide. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olthof, T., Goossens, F. A., Vermande, M. M., Aleva, E. A., & van der Meulen, M. (2011). Bullying as strategic behavior: Relations with desired and acquired dominance in the peer group. Journal of School Psychology, 49, 339–359.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parkhurst, J. T., & Hopmeyer, A. (1998). Sociometric popularity and peer-perceived popularity: Two distinct dimensions of peer status. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 18, 125–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearl, J. (2012). The causal foundations of structural equational modeling. In R. R. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equational modeling (pp. 68–91). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrini, A. D., & Long, J. D. (2002). A longitudinal study of bullying, dominance, and victimization during the transition from primary school through secondary school. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20, 259–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R. A. (1994). A meta-analysis of Cronbach's coefficient alpha. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 381–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, R. (2012). The financial costs of bullying, violence and vandalism. Proceedings of the National Association of Secondary School Principals, 28–29.

  • Pouwels, J. L., Lansu, T. A., & Cillessen, A. H. (2016). Participant roles of bullying in adolescence: Status characteristics, social behavior, and assignment criteria. Aggressive Behavior, 42, 239–253.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratto, F., Liu, J. H., Levin, S., Sidanius, J., Shih, M., Bachrach, H., & Hegarty, P. (2000). Social dominance orientation and the legitimization of inequality across cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31, 369–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pronk, J., Lee, N. C., Sandhu, D., Kaur, K., Kaur, S., Olthof, T., & Goossens, F. A. (2017). Associations between Dutch and Indian adolescents’ bullying role behavior and peer- group status: Cross-culturally testing an evolutionary hypothesis. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 41, 735–742.

    Google Scholar 

  • Provenzano, D. A., Dane, A. V., Farrell, A. H., Marini, Z. A., & Volk, A. A. (2018). Do bullies have more sex? The role of personality. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 4, 221–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reijntjes, A., Vermande, M., Goossens, F. A., Olthof, T., van de Schoot, R., Aleva, L., & van der Meulen, M. (2013a). Developmental trajectories of bullying and social dominance in youth. Child Abuse & Neglect, 37, 224–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reijntjes, A., Vermande, M., Olthof, T., Goossens, F. A., Van De Schoot, R., Aleva, L., & Van Der Meulen, M. (2013b). Costs and benefits of bullying in the context of the peer group: A three wave longitudinal analysis. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 41, 1217–1229.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reijntjes, A., Vermande, M., Thomaes, S., Goossens, F., Olthof, T., Aleva, L., & Van der Meulen, M. (2016). Narcissism, bullying, and social dominance in youth: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 44, 63–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sandstrom, M. J., & Cillessen, A. H. (2006). Likeable versus popular: Distinct implications for adolescent adjustment. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 30, 305–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapolsky, R. M. (2005). The influence of social hierarchy on primate health. Science, 308, 648–652.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7, 147–177.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, N. (1996). Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha. Psychological Assessment, 8, 350–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7(4), 422–445.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sibley, C. G., Harding, J. F., Perry, R., Asbrock, F., & Duckitt, J. (2010). Personality and prejudice: Extension to the HEXACO personality model. European Journal of Personality, 24, 515–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., & Mitchell, M. (1994). In-group identification, social dominance orientation, and differential intergroup social allocation. The Journal of Social Psychology, 134, 151–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sijtsema, J. J., Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., & Salmivalli, C. (2009). Empirical test of bullies' status goals: Assessing direct goals, aggression, and prestige. Aggressive Behavior, 35, 57–67.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sijtsema, J. J., Ojanen, T., Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., Hawley, P. H., & Little, T. D. (2010). Forms and functions of aggression in adolescent friendship selection and influence: A longitudinal social network analysis. Social Development, 19, 515–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. K., Kwak, K., & Toda, Y. (2016). School bullying in different cultures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somerville, L. H. (2013). The teenage brain: Sensitivity to social evaluation. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 121–127.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Vaillancourt, T., Hymel, S., & McDougall, P. (2003). Bullying is power: Implications for school- based intervention strategies. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 19, 157–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2001). The evolution of cross-cultural research methods. In D. Matsumoto (Ed.), Handbook of culture and psychology (pp. 77–97). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Vijver, F. J., & Poortinga, Y. H. (1997). Towards an integrated analysis of bias in cross- cultural assessment. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 13, 29–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vargas-Salfate, S., Paez, D., Liu, J. H., Pratto, F., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2018). A comparison of social dominance theory and system justification: The role of social status in 19 nations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1–17.

  • Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., Munniksma, A., & Dijkstra, J. K. (2010). The complex relation between bullying, victimization, acceptance, and rejection: Giving special attention to status, affection, and sex differences. Child Development, 81, 480–486.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Volk, A., Camilleri, J., Dane, A., & Marini, Z. (2012). Is adolescent bullying an evolutionary adaptation? Aggressive Behavior, 38, 222–238.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Volk, A. A., Dane, A. V., & Marini, Z. A. (2014). What is bullying? A theoretical redefinition. Developmental Review, 34, 327–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volk, A. A., Dane, A. V., Marini, Z. A., & Vaillancourt, T. (2015). Adolescent bullying, dating, and mating: Testing an evolutionary hypothesis. Evolutionary Psychology, 13, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volk, A. A., Veenstra, R., & Espelage, D. L. (2017). So you want to study bullying? Recommendations to enhance the validity, transparency, and compatibility of bullying research. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 36, 34–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volk, A. A., Schiralli, K., Xia, X., Zhao, J., & Dane, A. V. (2018). Adolescent bullying and personality: A cross-cultural approach. Personality and Individual Differences, 125, 126–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolke, D., & Lereya, S. T. (2015). Long-term effects of bullying. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 100, 879–885.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wrong, D. (2017). Power: Its forms, bases and uses. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, W., Chen, L., & Chen, G. (2016). Research on school bullying in mainland China. In P. K. Smith, K. Kwak, & Y. Toda (Eds.), School bullying in different cultures (pp. 113–132). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Z., Cai, C., & Zhao, D. (2006). Self-perceived peer relationship among different aggression/victims groups. Psychological Development and. Education, 2, 23–28.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Daniel A. Provenzano

    Present address: University of Windsor, Windsor, Canada

  2. Ann H. Farrell

    Present address: University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Brock University, St Catharines, ON, L2S 3A1, Canada

    Anthony A. Volk, Andrew V. Dane & Elizabeth P. Shulman

Authors
  1. Anthony A. Volk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Daniel A. Provenzano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ann H. Farrell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Andrew V. Dane
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Elizabeth P. Shulman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anthony A. Volk.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Volk, A.A., Provenzano, D.A., Farrell, A.H. et al. Personality and bullying: Pathways to adolescent social dominance. Curr Psychol 40, 2415–2426 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00182-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00182-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation