Abstract
Ultrasound has been widely used for the diagnostic testing of structural elements, but little research has been done and no specific standard exists for its application to nonstructural materials such as mortars. These mortar coatings are usually applied on walls with more than one layer; therefore, the ultrasound technique needs more investigation to better understand the results for rendered walls and in-service conditions. This study discusses the use of this technique, using the indirect method, in assessing the performance of cement-based mortars. Experimental work was carried out in the laboratory and in situ for this purpose. It was possible to relate the pulse velocity to the mechanical properties of the mortars, proposing criteria to support the in-service performance. It was also possible to characterize the presence and severity of various anomalies, mainly discontinuities. Finally, when this technique was combined with others (on rendered walls or on extracted samples), the in-service diagnostic testing under real in-service conditions was less susceptible to subjectivity. The results showed that this technique has a great potential to characterize the in-service performance of renders and to help the diagnosis of degradation. The specific factors influencing this technique for renders should be emphasized and separated from applications in concrete.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Flores-Colen, I., de Brito, J., and Freitas, V.P., “On-Site Performance Assessment of Rendering Façades for Predictive Maintenance,” Structural Survey 29(2): 133–146 (2012).
Flores-Colen, I., de Brito, J., and Freitas, V.P., “Expedient In Situ Test Techniques for Predictive Maintenance of Rendered Façades,” Journal of Building Appraisal 2(2): 142–156 (2006).
Flores-Colen, I., de Brito, J., and Branco, F.A., “In Situ Adherence Evaluation of Coating Materials,” Experimental Techniques 33(3): 51–60 (2009).
Flores-Colen, I., de Brito, J., and Freitas, V.P., “In-Service Parameters From Façade Rendering Mortars: Bulk Density and Open Porosity Determined From Samples Collected In Situ,” Structural Survey 28(1): 17–27 (2012).
Flores-Colen, I., de Brito, J., and Freitas, V.P., “In-Service Parameters From Façade Rendering Mortars: Bulk Density and Open Porosity Determined From Samples Collected In Situ,” Structural Survey 28(1): 17–27 (2012).
Achenbach, J.D., “Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation,” International Journal of Solids and Structures 37(1–2): 13–27 (2000).
Mahmood, T.M., “Use of Combined Ultrasonic and Rebound Hammer Method for Determining Strength of Concrete Structural Members,” Concrete International 3(3): 25–29 (1981).
Subramaniam, K.V., and Lee, J., “Ultrasonic Assessment of Early-Age Changes in the Material Properties of Cementitious Materials,” Materials and Structures 40(3): 301–309 (2007).
Reinhardt, H.W., Grobe, C.U., and Herb, A.T., “Ultrasonic Monitoring of Setting and Hardening of Cement Mortar – A New Device,” Materials and Structures 33(0): 580–583 (2000).
Santos, C., Matias, L., Magalhães, A.C., Veiga, M.R., “Application of Thermography and Ultra-Sounds for Wall Anomalies Diagnosis. A Laboratory Research Study,” International Symposium Non-Destructive Testing in Civil Engineering, Berlin, DGZIP, CD, 2003.
Santos, L.A., Flores-Colen, I., and Gomes, M.G., “In-Situ Techniques for Mechanical Performance and Degradation Analysis of Rendering Walls,” Restoration of Buildings and Monuments 19(4): 255–266 (2013).
ASTM, Standard Test Method for Pulse Velocity Through Concrete, American Society for Testing Materials, Philadelphia, ASTM C597 (2009).
CEN, Testing Concrete – Part 4: Determination of Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity, Comité Européen de Normalisation, Brussels, EN 12504–4 (2004).
Nepomuceno, M.C., Non-destructive concrete tests (in Portuguese), Synthesis Work, UBI, Covilhã, 428 pp (1999).
Malhotra, V.M., “Testing Early-Age Strength of Concrete In-Place,” Concrete International 7(4): 39–41 (1985).
Stergiopoulou, C., McCuen, R.H., and Aggour, M.S., “Ultrasonic Testing of Concrete Structures Using Indirect Transmission,” Journal of Testing and Evaluation, ASTM International 36(2): 128–135 (2008).
Laranja, R., and de Brito, J., “Structural assessment of existing concrete buildings,” Progress in Structural Engineering and Materials 5(2): 90–98 (2003).
Galvão, J., Flores-Colen, I., de Brito, J., “In Situ Testing to Evaluate the Mechanical Performance of Rendered Facades – Rebound Hammer and Ultrasound Techniques,” XII DBMC – International Conference on Durability of Buildings Materials and Components, FEUP, Porto, CD (2012).
Goueygou, M., Lafhaj, Z., Kaczmarek, M., “Relationship Between Porosity, Permeability and Ultrasonic Parameters in Sound and Damaged Mortar,” International Symposium Non-Destructive Testing in Civil Engineering, Berlin, DGZIP, CD (2003).
Tan, K., Chan, B., and Guan, L., “Ultrasonic Evaluation of Cement Adhesion in Wall Tiles,” Cement Concrete Composites 18: 119–124 (1996).
Shiotani, T., and Aggelis, D.G., “Wave Propagation in Cementitious Material Containing Artificial Distributed Damage,” Materials and Structures 42:377–384 (2009). doi: 10.1617/s11527-008-9388-4.
Aggelis, D.G., Momoki, S., “Numerical Simulation of Wave Propagation in Mortar With Inhomogeneities,” Technical Paper, ACI Materials, 5 pp (2009).
Naik TR, Malhotra VM, Popovics JS. Chapter 8 – The Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity Method. Handbook of NDT of Concrete. 2nd V. M. Malhotra, N. J. Carino, CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton; 2004.
Sutan, N.M., and Meganathan, M., “A Comparison Between Direct and Indirect Method of Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity in Detecting Concrete Defects,” Russian Journal of Nondestructive Testing 8(5): 1–9 (2003).
BSI, Testing Concrete. Determination of Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity, British Standards Institution, London, BS EN 12504-4 (2004).
Galvão, J., Flores-Colen, I., de Brito, J., “In-Situ Testing to Evaluate the Mechanical Performance of Rendered Fac¸ades – Rebound Hammer and Ultrasound Techniques,” 12th DBMC International Conference on Durability of Building Materials and Components, 991–999, 2011.
CEN, Methods of Testing Cement – Part 1: Determination of Strength, Comité Européen de Normalisation, Brussels, EN 196-1 (2005).
Veiga, M.R., Velosa, A., and Magalhães, A., “Experimental Applications of Mortars With Pozzolanic Additions: Characterization and Performance Evaluation,” Construction and Building Materials 23(1): 318–327 (2009).
Flores-Colen, I., de Brito, J., and Freitas, V.P., “Expedient Render Performance Assessment Based on Impact Resistance In Situ Determination,” Construction and Building Materials 23(9): 2997–3004 (2009).
Flores-Colen, I., de Brito, J., Freitas, V., “Assessment of In-Use Performance Parameters of Rendering Fac¸ades,” Freitas, V.P. (ed), A State-of-the-Art Report on Building Pathology, CIB W86 Report, Publication 393, Rotterdam (2013).
Gron, C., Falkenberg, J.A., Andersen, J.S., Borresen, M., Pettersen, A., “Quality Control Manual for Field Measurements,” Nordic Innovation Centre, Helsinki, 86 pp, NT Technical Report TR581 (2005).
Ohdaira, E., and Masuzawa, N., “Water Content and Its Effect on Ultrasound Propagation in Concrete – The Possibility of NDE,” Ultrasonics 38(0): 546–552 (2000).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Flores-Colen, I., de Brito, J. & de Freitas, V.P. Using Ultrasound for In-Service Assessment of Rendered Walls. Exp Tech 40, 1203–1214 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40799-016-0118-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40799-016-0118-5