Abstract
Vakil and Matchett-Wood (Discriminants in the Grothendieck ring of varieties, 2013. arXiv:1208.3166) made several conjectures on the topology of symmetric powers of geometrically irreducible varieties based on their computations on motivic zeta functions. Two of those conjectures are about subspaces of \(\text {Sym}^n(\mathbb {P}^1)\). In this note, we disprove one of them and prove a stronger form of the other, thereby obtaining (counter)examples to the principle of Occam’s razor for Hodge structures.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
For a smooth and proper variety X over \(\mathbb {C}\), the Hodge–Deligne polynomial determines the Hodge numbers, but that is no longer the case when X is not smooth or proper. To elaborate, for any variety X over \(\mathbb {C}\), the compactly supported cohomology groups \(H^i_c(X,\mathbb {Q})\) carry Deligne’s mixed Hodge structures. One defines the Hodge–Deligne polynomial as:
Here, \(e_{p,q}\) are virtual Hodge–Deligne numbers, defined in terms of pure Hodge structures that the associated grades for the weight filtration on \(H^*_c(X,\mathbb {Q})\) are equipped with
When X is smooth and proper, one has \(e_{p,q} = (-1)^i h_{p,q}(H^i(X,\mathbb {Q})).\) There are many examples where the simplest possibility holds, i.e. there is a simplest Hodge structure on \(H^i_{c}(X,\mathbb {Q})\) for all i in agreement with the virtual Hodge structure. In [9], Vakil and Wood dub this well-known principle as ‘Occam’s razor for Hodge structures’. This principle led them to conjecture about the stable rational cohomology of certain subspaces of \(\text {Sym}^m(\mathbb {P}^1)\), the m-fold symmetric product of \(\mathbb {P}_{\mathbb {C}}^1\).Footnote 1\(^{,}\)Footnote 2 This note provides examples (from Conjectures G’ and H’ of [9]).
We now fix some notations and state the conjectures of Vakil and Wood. For a complex quasiprojective variety X, let \(\text {Sym}^m(X)\) denote the n-fold symmetric product, i.e.
where the symmetric group over m letters, \(\mathfrak {S}_m\) acts on \(X^m\) by permuting its factors. For a partition \(\lambda \) of m, let \(w_{\lambda }(X)\) denote the locally closed subset of \(\text {Sym}^m (X)\) with multiplicities precisely \(\lambda \). For example, \(w_{1^m}(X)\) is the space of unordered configuration of m points on X corresponding to the partition \(m=\underbrace{1+1\cdots +1}_{m\text { times}}\).
Conjecture H’ of [9] states that the values of \(i>0\) for which
is periodic in i, and the nonzero limits equal 1. Conjecture G’ of [9] states that
Our main theorem disproves Conjecture G’ of [9].
Theorem A
We have
Furthermore, \(H^i(w_{1^n22}(\mathbb {P}^1);\mathbb {Q})\) is pure of weight \(-2i\) and Hodge type \((-i,-i)\) for all i. \(\square \)
The following corollary to Theorem A is a refinement of the statement of Conjecture G’ of [9].
Corollary 1
We have
Furthermore, \(H^i(w_{1^n22}(\mathbb {P}^1);\mathbb {Q})\) is pure of weight \(-2i\) and Hodge type \((-i,-i)\) for all \(0\le i\le n+2\). \(\square \)
A question along the lines of the conjectures based on the Occam’s razor of Hodge structures would be: can one determine the rational cohomology of a variety over \(\mathbb {C}\) by counting the number of \(\mathbb {F}_q\) points of that variety? The answer, in general, is in negative. In fact, the conjectures in [9] were made on the very basis of such point-counts. The Grothendieck–Lefschetz trace formula (see [5]) allows one to count the number of \(\mathbb {F}_q\) points of a variety X from its topology when X is a reasonably nice variety. On a larger scale, the Weil conjectures form a bridge between the topology of \(X(\mathbb {C})\) and the number theoretic properties of \(X(\mathbb {F}_q)\). However, there is no sufficient criterion to cross that bridge and go from \(|X(\mathbb {F}_q)| \) to the rational Betti numbers of \(X(\mathbb {C})\).
The existing literature on the (co)homology of configuration spaces is already extremely rich. Instead of attempting to add that, the purpose of this note is to give rather simple examples of varieties X for which points counts, or the principle of Occam’s razor of Hodge structure, do not carry us across the said bridge from \(|X(\mathbb {F}_q)| \) (that Vakil and Wood computed) to the rational Betti numbers of \(X(\mathbb {C})\) (which we compute in this note).
2 Cohomological stability of some locally closed strata of \(\text {Sym}^m(\mathbb {P}^1)\)
In this section, we prove Theorem A and Corollary 1. We will prove the theorem and the corollary together. Our proof can be outlined through the following steps:
-
1.
Describe the spaces \(w_{1^n23}(\mathbb {P}^1)\) and \(w_{1^n22}(\mathbb {P}^1)\) as fibre-bundles over \(\textit{PConf}_n\mathbb {P}^1\) and \(\textit{UConf}_2(\mathbb {P}^1)\), respectively, with fibres isomorphic to \(\textit{UConf}_n \mathbb {C}^{\times }\). Here, for a space X we define \(\textit{UConf}_n X:= w_{1^n}(X)\) and \(\textit{PConf}_nX:= (X^n - \text {union of all diagonals})\).
-
2.
Invoke [1, Corollary 2] to compute \(H^*_c(\textit{UConf}_n\mathbb {C}^{\times };\mathbb {Q})\), the compactly supported rational cohomology of \(\textit{UConf}_n \mathbb {C}^{\times }\).
-
3.
Analyse the Serre spectral sequence for a fibration to compute \(H^*(w_{1^n22}(\mathbb {P}^1);\mathbb {Q})\) and \(H^*(w_{1^n23}(\mathbb {P}^1);\mathbb {Q})\).
Now a few words about the proof. Steps 2 and 3 constitute the core of the proof. The cohomology \(H^*(\textit{UConf}_n \mathbb {C}^{\times };\mathbb {Q})\) is very well known; for example, Cohen [2] does it by computing the homology of free \(E_n\) algebras; Totaro, by considering the Leray spectral sequence for the inclusion \(\textit{PConf}_n X\hookrightarrow X^n\), and describing ring structure and the weight filtration on its \(E_2\) page, when X is a smooth algebraic variety over \(\mathbb {C}\) (see [8] and the references therein), etc. With the aim of computing (a) \(H^*(\textit{UConf}_n\mathbb {C}^{\times };\mathbb {Q})\) with the weights, and (b) bypassing the significant combinatorial complexities that arise if we approach \(H^*(\textit{UConf}_n\mathbb {C}^{\times };\mathbb {Q})\) via \(H^*(\textit{PConf}_n\mathbb {C}^{\times };\mathbb {Q})\); we use the spectral sequence constructed in [1], which in turn has been developed from Deligne’s theory of cohomological descent (see [4]).
Since we only consider cohomology with \(\mathbb {Q}\)-coefficients, the field of coefficients will be almost always suppressed. Moreover, we implicitly use the fact that on a nice topological space X, if \(A_X\) denotes the constant sheaf of R-modules with stalks isomorphic to the R-module A, then the singular cohomology \(H^i(X;A)\) and the sheaf cohomology \(H^i(X,A_X)\) are isomorphic. As such, we use \(H^*(X)\) to denote the sheaf cohomology \(H^*(X,\mathbb {Q}_X)\) and by extension, the singular cohomology \(H^*(X;\mathbb {Q})\). And all varieties are defined over \(\mathbb {C}\).
Proof of Theorem A and Corollary 1
Step 1 For any positive integer n define the maps
where the fibres are
and
where the fibres are
Note that we have the following commutative diagram:
where \(\hat{\tau } : w_{1^n23}(\mathbb {P}^1) \rightarrow w_{1^n22}(\mathbb {P}^1) \) is induced by
the \(\mathbb {Z}/2\)-quotient map defined by swapping the coordinates of the points in \(\textit{PConf}_2(\mathbb {P}^1)\); and
is identity.
Step 2 We compute \(H^*_c(\textit{UConf}_n\mathbb {C}^{\times })\) by directly quoting Corollary 2 from [1]:
Let X be a connected locally compact Hausdorff topological space. Then, there exists a spectral sequence:
where \(\textit{sgn}_p\) denotes the sign representation of \(\mathfrak {S}_{p}\) on \(H^l_c(X^p)\), induced by \(\mathfrak {S}_p\) acting on \(X^p\) by permuting the coordinates; and it follows from, say, [7] that
where
and \(\big (\text {Sym}^i H_c^{\text {odd}}(X) \otimes \Lambda ^j H_c^{\text {even}}(X)\big )^{(l)} \) denotes the \(l^{(\mathrm {th})}\)-graded summand of the cohomology \(\text {Sym}^i H_c^{\text {odd}}(X) \otimes \Lambda ^j H_c^{\text {even}}(X)\).
The strategy behind (2.4) can be summarised briefly as follows:
-
1.
Observe that if \(T_p := X^p \times \text {Sym}^{n-2p} X\), then for all \(p\ge 0\) there are natural face maps
$$\begin{aligned}&f_p: T_p \rightarrow \text {Sym}^n X (x_1,x_2, \ldots , x_{p}),\\&\quad \{x'_1, x'_2,\ldots , x'_{n-2p}\} \mapsto \{x_1,x_1, x_2,x_2,\ldots , x_p, x_p, x'_1, x'_2,\ldots , x'_{n-2p}\} \end{aligned}$$i.e. by raising the coordinates of the points of \(X^p\) to multiplicity 2, and then forgetting the ordering of the resulting n-tuple.
-
2.
This results in an augmented cosemisimplicial object in the category of locally constant sheaves on \(\textit{UConf}_n X\):
$$\begin{aligned} j_{!} \mathbb {Q}_{\textit{UConf}_n X} \rightarrow f_{{\bullet }_{*}}\mathbb {Q}_{T_{\bullet }}, \end{aligned}$$where \(j:\textit{UConf}_n X\hookrightarrow \text {Sym}^nX\) is the inclusion. See [4] for further details, and [3] for a modern treatment of it.
-
3.
In turn, one shows that there’s a quasi-isomorphism of locally constant sheaves
$$\begin{aligned} j_{!} \mathbb {Q}_{\textit{UConf}_n X}\xrightarrow {\cong } \Big (f_{p_{*}}\mathbb {Q}_{T_p} \otimes \textit{sgn}_{p}\Big )^{\mathfrak {S}_{p}}, \end{aligned}$$where \(\mathfrak {S}_{p}\) acts on \(T_p = X^p\times \text {Sym}^{n-2p}X\) by permuting the first p factors, and \(\textit{sgn}_p\) denotes the sign representation of \(\mathfrak {S}_{p}\) on \(f_{p_{*}}\mathbb {Q}_{T_p}\) (see, for example, [1]).
A simple but important takeaway from the above discussion is that those X for which all the differentials vanish and the spectral sequence in (2.4) degenerates on its \(E_1\) page, every cohomology class in \(H^*_c(\textit{UConf}_n X)\) is a linear combination of classes of the form \(\alpha \otimes \beta \) where \(\alpha \in \Big (H^l_c(X^p)\otimes \textit{sgn}_p\Big )^{\mathfrak {S}_p}\), which we dub as the ‘alternating part’ of a cohomology class, and \(\beta \in H^m_c(\text {Sym}^{n-2p}X)\), which we dub as the ‘symmetric part’ of a cohomology class. Also observe that when X is a quasiprojective algebraic variety over \(\mathbb {C}\), all the face maps are algebraic morphisms, and the spectral sequence in (2.4) is a spectral sequence of mixed Hodge structures.
Now put \(X=\mathbb {C}^{\times }\) in (2.4). Then, for \(p\ge 1\), the spectral sequence (2.4) reads as:
and for \(p=0\) one has
with the differentials going horizontally \(E_1^{p,q} \rightarrow E_1^{p+1,q}\) (see Fig. 1). The differentials clearly vanish, and the spectral sequence degenerates on the \(E_1\) page. Furthermore, one can read off the weights from the explicit description of the terms \(E_1^{p,q}\) of the spectral sequence in (2.5) by noting that \(H^1(\mathbb {C}^{\times })\) is pure of weight \(-2\) and Hodge type \((-1,-1)\). Letting \(\mathbb {Q}(1)\) denote the Tate Hodge structure of weight \(-2\) and Hodge type \((-1,-1)\), and using Poincaré duality and the universal coefficient theorem, in that order, we obtain for all i:
and in particular, we have:
\(\square \)
Finally, we record a list of the bases of \(H^i(\textit{UConf}_n\mathbb {C}^{\times };\mathbb {Q})\) for each i, in terms of the cohomology classes in \(H^*(\mathbb {C}^{\times };\mathbb {Q})\). Let \(\omega \in H^1(\mathbb {C}^{\times };\mathbb {Z})\) correspond to, in terms of de Rham cohomology, the integral holomorphic one-form \(\frac{dz}{z}\), and we continue to denote its image in \(H^1(\mathbb {C}^{\times };\mathbb {Z})\otimes \mathbb {Q}\) by \(\omega \); and let \(\mathbb {1}\) denote a generator of \(H^0(\mathbb {C}^{\times })\). Then, plugging these in (2.6) we get
where the terms preceding \(\otimes \) are the ‘alternating parts’ of these cohomology classes and the terms succeeding \(\otimes \) are the ‘symmetric parts’. We should also keep in mind that any cohomology class of the form \(\omega ^i\mathbb {1}^j\otimes \beta \), for some \(\beta \) in the ‘symmetric part’, vanishes whenever \(j\ge 2\), because as noted earlier, the ‘alternating part’ comes from \(\Big (H^l_c(X^p)\otimes \textit{sgn}_p\Big )^{\mathfrak {S}_p}\) for some l and p, and in its Künneth decomposition, \(H^0(\mathbb {C}^{\times })\) can occur only at most once. Decomposing the generators of \(H^*(\textit{UConf}_n\mathbb {C}^{\times })\) into their ‘alternating’ and ‘symmetric’ parts will play a crucial role in the endgame.
Step 3 Now we use the Serre spectral sequence for the fibre bundles
and
and for simplicity we introduce the following notations that will be used for the rest of this paper:
Case 1 (Proving Theorem A) The space \(\hat{B} = \Big (\mathbb {P}^1\times \mathbb {P}^1 - \text {diagonal}\Big )\) is isomorphic to a \(\mathbb {C}\)-bundle over \(\mathbb {P}^1\), and is therefore simply connected. And we have
The Serre spectral sequence for \( \pi : \hat{E}_n\rightarrow \hat{B}\) is given by
where the second equality follows from the fact that the locally constant sheaf \( \mathrm {R}^q \pi _* \mathbb {Q}_{F_n}\) is actually a constant sheaf, \(\hat{B}\) being simply connected. Paired with (2.7), the spectral sequence (2.9) reads as follows:
The only differentials which can be nonzero are
To understand the differentials, we first consider the well-known case of \(n=1\). In that case, we are dealing with \(w_{123}(\mathbb {P}^1)\), which is a \(\mathbb {C}^{\times }\)-bundle on \(\textit{PConf}_2 \mathbb {P}^1\), and observe that
The cohomology of the latter can be deduced easily using several well-known methods. A quick way is to observe that the action of \(PGL_2(\mathbb {C})\) on \(\mathbb {P}^1\) by Möbius transformations is sharply 3-transitive. Therefore,
On the other hand, thinking of \(\textit{PConf}_3 \mathbb {P}^1\) as a \(\mathbb {C}^{\times }\)-bundle on \(\hat{B} = \textit{PConf}_2\mathbb {P}^1\), the resulting Serre spectral sequence is given by
and the only differential that might be nonzero is \(\delta : H^0(\hat{B}) \otimes H^1(\mathbb {C}^{\times }) \rightarrow H^2(\hat{B})\otimes H^0(\mathbb {C}^{\times })\):
Armed with the knowledge of \(H^*(\textit{PConf}_3 \mathbb {P}^1)\), we see that \(\delta \) is indeed an isomorphism of \(\mathbb {Q}\)-vector spaces. Therefore,
for some \(c\in \mathbb {Q}^{\times }\), and where \(\mathbb {1}\in H^0(\mathbb {C}^{\times })\) as before, and e denotes a generator of the \(\mathbb {Q}\)-vector space \(H^2(\hat{B})\).
The differentials \(d_2^{p,q}\) in (2.11) are induced by \(\delta \). Indeed, given any fibre bundle \(F\rightarrow E\rightarrow B\), its Serre spectral sequence is related to that of the fibre bundles
and
by the naturality properties that their respective spectral sequences satisfy. To ease our path towards computing \(d_2^{p,q}\) in (2.11), let us write down these relations explicitly in the case when \(n=2\) (for general n it follows likewise), and when the base is simply connected (which is our case here).
We have the following diagram of fibre bundles:
where \(p_i\) denotes projection to the \(i^{th}\) factor, \(i=1,2\) . By naturality properties of their respective Serre spectral sequences, the following diagram commutes:
where \(\delta _2^{p,q}\) and \(\widetilde{d}_2^{p,q}\) are the differentials in the spectral sequences for the respective bundles, and \(p_i^*\) is an abuse of notation that really denotes the map \(id_B\otimes p_i^*\). Then,
and this is enough for our purposes because we have achieved expressing \(\widetilde{d}_2^{p,q}\) entirely in terms of \(\delta _2^{p,q}\) and \(p_i^*\). We make a similar argument for the following pair of fibre bundles:
where the map \(\rho \) forgets the order of a tuple. Then, as before, naturality implies that the following diagram commutes:
Recall that elements of \(H^*(\text {Sym}^2 F)\) are linear combinations of elements of the form \(\alpha _1\alpha _2\), where the product is alternating if and only if both \(\alpha _1\) and \(\alpha _2\) have odd cohomology degrees, and symmetric otherwise (see [7] for further details). Therefore,
Now the terms in the spectral sequence (2.5) (as (2.4), or its proof in [1] shows in details) come from considering cohomology of the spaces \((\mathbb {C}^{\times })^p\times \text {Sym}^{n-2p}\mathbb {C}^{\times }\) for various values of p. Therefore, plugging \(E= w_{123}\), \(B=\textit{PConf}_2\mathbb {P}^1\) and \(F=\mathbb {C}^{\times }\), we have explicit formula for the Serre spectral sequence of the bundles
which in turn gives us (again, by naturality) the formula for the differentials in (2.11). In particular, what is sufficient for our purposes is to know where \(\omega \) is mapped to under the differentials; and we have
Recalling the generators listed in (2.8), a straightforward computation gives us:
where \(\lambda _i\in \mathbb {Q}^{\times }\) for all \(1\le i\le 3\). In particular, all the differentials in (2.11) are \(\mathbb {Q}\)-linear maps of rank 1. Therefore, the \(E_2\) page of the spectral sequence in (2.9) results in an \(E_3\) page that looks like:
and all the differentials \(E_3^{p,q}\rightarrow E_3^{p+3,q-2}\) vanish. So the spectral sequence (2.16) degenerates on the \(E_3\) page, and this completes our proof of Theorem A.
Case 2 (Proving Corollary 1) Now we turn our focus to the fibre bundle
and recall that we set up the notations \(E_n = w_{1^n22}(\mathbb {P}^1)\), \(B = \textit{UConf}_2\mathbb {P}^1\) and \(F_n = \textit{UConf}_n\mathbb {C}^{\times }.\) The fundamental group of B is \(\mathbb {Z}/2\mathbb {Z}\). Also, noting that B is a Zariski open dense subvariety of \(\text {Sym}^2\mathbb {P}^1\cong \mathbb {P}^2\) (and thus, connected), with its complement \(\text {Sym}^2\mathbb {P}^1 -B\) a smooth conic (the discriminant locus of a quadratic form), it follows from, say, the long exact sequence of cohomology that \(H^*(B) \cong \mathbb {Q}\).
Now observe that since \(\mathbb {Z}/2\mathbb {Z}\) is a finite group and we are concerned with cohomology with \(\mathbb {Q}\)-coefficients, and thanks to the commutative diagram (2.3), the Serre spectral sequence for this fibre bundle is simply the term-wise \(\mathbb {Z}/2\mathbb {Z}\) invariants of (2.9). More precisely, if \(\Gamma (X,\bullet )\) denotes the global section functor on a space X, as well as the invariants under X when X is a group, then in the derived category of locally constant sheaves on \(E_n\) we have the following:
where (2.17) follows from the definition of \(\hat{\tau }\) in the commutative diagram (2.3); (2.17) to (2.18) follow from the fact that there are no Ext groups because \(\mathbb {Z}/2\mathbb {Z}\) is a finite group and \(R\Gamma (\hat{E}_n, \hat{\tau }^*\mathbb {Q}_{E_n})\) is a complex of locally constant sheaves of vector spaces over \(\mathbb {Q}\); (2.19) follows from the fact that \( \hat{\tau }^*\mathbb {Q}_{E_n} \cong \mathbb {Q}_{\hat{E}_n}\); and \(R\Gamma (\hat{B}, R\pi _* \mathbb {Q}_{F_n})\) is the complex that gives rise to the Serre spectral sequence in (2.9), which explains (2.20). On the other hand,
gives the Serre spectral sequence for the fibre bundle \(F_n\rightarrow E_n \rightarrow B\). Comparing (2.20) and (2.21), we get that
and where the differentials are given by (2.15). Now we are left with figuring out how \(\mathbb {Z}/2\mathbb {Z}\) acts on \(E_2^{p,q}(F_n\rightarrow \hat{E}_n \rightarrow \hat{B})\) from (2.9), which, in turn, boils down to understanding how \(\mathbb {Z}/2\mathbb {Z}\) acts on \(H^q(F_n)\), and on \(H^p(\hat{B})\).
Let \(\sigma \in \mathbb {Z}/2\mathbb {Z}\) denote the order 2 element. It is not hard to see that for \(\{x,y\}\in B\), the fundamental group \(\mathbb {Z}/2\mathbb {Z}\) acts on the stalks \(R^q\upsilon _*\mathbb {Q}_{F_n}\Big \vert _{\{a,b\}} \cong H^q(F_n)\) by
For example, if we mark two distinct points x and y on \(\mathbb {P}^1\), thinking of it as the sphere \(S^2\), then if the Poincaré dual of \(\omega \) is represented by an oriented circle that leaves x and y on different hemispheres, then \(\sigma \), which is a half Dehn twist, reverses the orientation of the Poincaré dual of \(\omega \). Now looking back on the generators of \(H^q(F_n)\) in (2.8), we see that
and
On the other hand, for the element \(e\in H^2(\hat{B})\) chosen earlier, we have
Combining (2.22), (2.23), and (2.24), see that the spectral sequence \(E_2^{p,q}(F_n\rightarrow E_n \rightarrow B)\) reads as:
and
and for all other values of p, we have \( E_2^{0,q}(F_n\rightarrow E_n \rightarrow B) =0\) and where the differentials are still rank 1, wherever that makes sense (see (2.28)). Clearly, all differentials vanish on the \(E_3\) page, and the spectral sequence on its \(E_3\) page looks like (see (2.29)):
Spectral sequence \(E_2^{p,q}(F_n\rightarrow E_n \rightarrow B)\).
Spectral sequence \(E_3^{p,q}(F_n\rightarrow E_n \rightarrow B)\).
References
Banerjee, O.: Filtration of cohomology via semi-simplicial spaces (2019). arXiv:1909.00458
Cohen, F.R., Lada, T.J., May, J.P.: The Homology of Iterated Loop Spaces. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 533. Springer, Berlin (1976)
Conrad, B.: Cohomological descent. https://math.stanford.edu/~conrad/papers/hypercover.pdf
Pierre, D.: Théorie de hodge?: lll. Publ. Math. IHES 44, 6–77 (1975)
Grothendieck, A.: Cohomologie l-adique et fonctions l. Séminaire de Géométrie Algébrique du Bois-Marie SGA 5, 1965–66
Kupers, A., Miller, J.: Some stable homology calculations and Occam’s razor for Hodge structures. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 218(7), 1219–1223 (2014)
Macdonald, I.G.: The Poincare polynomials of a symmetric product. Math. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 58(4), 563–568 (1962)
Totaro, B.: Configuration spaces of algebraic varieties. Topology 35(4), 1057–1067 (1996)
Vakil, R., Matchett-Wood, M.: Discriminants in the Grothendieck ring of varieties (2013). arXiv:1208.3166
Vakil, R., Matchett-Wood, M.: Discriminants in the Grothendieck ring of varieties. Duke Math. J. 164(6), 1139–1185 (2015)
Acknowledgements
I am grateful to Benson Farb for his helpful comments and patient guidance. My warm thanks to Melanie Matchett-Wood for her feedback on an earlier draft of the manuscript. And a very special thanks to the anonymous referee for his valuable comments on the paper.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Banerjee, O. On the cohomology of certain subspaces of \(\text {Sym}^n(\mathbb {P}^1)\) and Occam’s razor for Hodge structures. Res Math Sci 8, 25 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40687-021-00261-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40687-021-00261-8