Abstract
Purpose of review
This review focuses on the role of psychologists in the assessment and treatment of fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS), a highly prevalent condition characterized by chronic widespread pain, fatigue, cognitive problems, distress, and disability.
Recent findings
A large body of work supports the effectiveness and cost-utility of psychological therapies for the improvement of a wide range of symptoms associated with FMS. However, patients with FMS are best assessed and treated by a multidisciplinary team, in which psychologists have an important role. Multidisciplinary treatment, in which each healthcare professional offers his or her own expertise to the patient, has been shown to produce more ubiquitous treatment effects for this complex syndrome than single discipline treatments. Considering the empirical evidence and documented experience of patients, people with FMS can benefit from integrated care, combining education, exercise, and psychotherapeutic approaches, including cognitive-behavioral therapy.
Summary
There has been a call for more health economics research to demonstrate the cost-effectiveness of psychological therapies. In this paper, we highlight the added value of psychologists as members of multidisciplinary treatment teams, who can assess and treat the maladaptive cognitive, emotional, and behavioral symptoms that are commonly seen in individuals with FMS.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Fibromyalgia (FMS) is a syndrome of unknown aetiology characterized by chronic widespread pain, fatigue, sleep disturbances, cognitive problems (often referred to as "fibrofog”), and emotional distress [1]. Estimates of the prevalence of FMS in the general population range between 0.2 and 6.6% worldwide [2]. The large variation in these estimates may reflect the inclusion of dissimilar population groups, inadequate sampling, and differences in the criteria used for diagnosing FMS. For instance, in some studies, the designation of FMS has been determined by health insurance group data without further verification, self-reported diagnosis, classification with self-reported instruments, or even with unspecified criteria. Among chronic pain conditions, FMS has the highest unemployment rate, highest disability benefits claim rate, and greatest number of days absent from work [3]. A large body of work has highlighted the high comorbidity of FMS and mental health disorders — mainly mood disorders, anxiety disorders, and post-traumatic stress disorder [4,5,6].
Currently, there are no curative treatments available for patients with FMS. However, both pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches can be used to help alleviate the constellation of FMS symptoms. Recent research suggests that the effectiveness of traditional pharmacological approaches are modest in magnitude [7•], so researchers are now testing novel drugs that seem promising [8]. Some systematic reviews and meta-analyses have determined that stand-alone non-pharmacological treatments, including physical exercise, pain neuroscience education, and psychotherapeutic approaches, can provide more ubiquitous benefits than pharmacological approaches for FMS [9, 10, 11••, 12•, 13,14,15]. However, it has been suggested that improvements in the quality of these RCTs are necessary and that non-pharmacological interventions for FMS should be tailored according to individual patient clusters or profiles [16, 17]. Moreover, there is a call for multidisciplinary treatment approaches for addressing the complexities of FMS [18].
There are many multidimensional patient-reported measures that can be employed in the assessment of the person with FMS to help clinicians better understand the patient’s attitudes, beliefs, and experiences [19]. As members of a multidisciplinary treatment team, psychologists are often in the best position to formulate individual clinical cases in detail. In clinical case formulation, the psychologist identifies the predisposing, precipitating, maintaining, and protective factors for each patient in order to establish treatments goals. A common obstacle faced by healthcare professionals is that most patients with FMS present multiple target problems. Consider the example of a middle-aged patient with FMS who is suffering with excruciating generalized pain, associated depressive symptomatology, multiple psychosocial stressors, and is overweight and physically deconditioned. What should be the primary focus of treatment? In such complex cases, detailed clinical case formulations [20] performed by psychologists can help reach a deep understanding of the patients’ problems across time and contexts and identify important and modifiable causal factors. With the aid of science-based measurements, psychologists can help the multi-professional team understand patients’ experiences and factors involved in their clinical presentation, specify treatment goals, and develop treatment plans. This paper will focus on the role of psychologists in the assessment and management of patients with FMS, the wide range of psychological factors that are often related to the development and maintenance of FMS symptoms, and ways in which clinical and health psychologists can intervene. This narrative reviewFootnote 1 is structured in the following sections: The role of psychological factors in the development and maintenance of FMS; Psychological measures in the assessment of FMS; Effectiveness of psychological therapies for FMS; and The future of psychology in the assessment and treatment of FMS.
The role of psychological factors in the development and maintenance of fibromyalgia
The specific aetiology of FMS is currently unknown. However, it is widely accepted that altered central and peripheral nervous system processes are involved [21,22,23]. A primary question is what predisposing or precipitating factors (i.e., infections, vaccination, physical and psychological trauma) contribute to the emergence of these central and peripheral alterations. To shed light on this issue, Yavne and collaborators [24] conducted a systematic review of 51 studies that focused on trauma-related precipitating factors, including physical (20 studies) and psychological (31 studies) trauma. Regarding physical factors, surgery, physical injury, and motor vehicle accidents emerged as common triggers for FMS onset in many studies. Notwithstanding, the temporal causal relationship between solely physical factors and FMS is difficult to demonstrate because psychological trauma and distress are very likely influencing or mediating this relationship. Concerning psychological factors, the authors found increased rates of prior psychologically traumatizing events in FMS subjects, including sexual/physical abuse and childhood neglect, compared to clinical and healthy controls. However, the general low quality of evidence (assessments based on self-reports, cross-sectional designs, small sample sizes, lack of adequate control groups, etc.) precludes solid conclusions. In a separate systematic review of 37 population-based prospective studies, Creed [25•] found a wide range of risk factors for FMS, including pre-existing medical disorders or other pain disorders, other somatic symptoms, female sex (except in those with pre-existing medical conditions), various childhood difficulties, middle-to-older age, smoker, high body mass index, sleep problems, negative health perception, and depression. This author supports the idea of examining causal pathways and mechanisms as related to specific subtypes of FMS rather than assuming a single pathway to the syndrome. More recently, Kaleycheva and colleagues [26•] carried out a pioneering meta-analysis of 19 case–control studies focusing on lifetime stressors in adult FMS subjects. The following factors emerged as significant (effect sizes in decreasing order): physical abuse, total abuse (collapsing all abuse types), sexual abuse, medical trauma, other lifetime stressors, and emotional abuse. Meta-regression analyses yielded no effect of publication year or study quality on effect sizes. To summarize the results of these meta-analyses, it appears that almost any type of trauma or stressful life event can contribute to the development of FMS.
In the next sections, we put the focus on reliable, valid, and useful psychological instruments for patients with FMS [27] and on some empirically validated psychological therapies for this syndrome [28].
Psychological measures in the assessment of fibromyalgia
The most important mental health assessment tool for evaluating individuals with FMS and other chronic pain conditions is the clinical interview. Patient-reported outcome measures can also provide a valuable addition to the clinical interview. A wide range of patient-reported outcome measures are available for the assessment of persons with FMS; however, this section will specifically focus on psychological measures.
The specific measures used in a test battery are based on a number of factors, including the preferences of the psychologist, the context of the assessment, and the amount of time available for the assessment. Note that it is important to choose measures that are psychometrically validated and published in peer-reviewed journals. It is beyond the scope of this article to provide a comprehensive list of potential useful measures, but in this section, we will provide an overview of some commonly-used psychological measures for FMS assessment (see Table 1). They will be grouped into four broad categories: (1) cognitive, (2) emotional, (3) coping and activity patterns, and (4) relational/contextual. See Table 1 for detailed information about each.
Cognitive variables
Pain catastrophizing has aroused great interest in FMS research due to its clear association with negative pain outcomes [56]. It can be defined as an exaggerated negative “mental set” associated with the actual or anticipated experience of pain [57]. A three-dimensional structure has been proposed, including magnification, rumination, and helplessness. Magnification refers to a disproportionate perception of pain situations and negative expectations about pain. Rumination refers to ruminating thoughts and worries and an inability to inhibit them. Helplessness refers to a perceived lack of control over pain [29, 58]. The most commonly used instrument for assessing this construct is the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), initially developed by Sullivan et al. (1995) [29] and specifically adapted to FMS populations by García-Campayo et al. [30].
Pain self-efficacy is another variable that has been of wide interest in chronic pain and FMS research, with numerous instruments available for its measurement [59], including the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) and the Chronic Pain Self-Efficacy Scale (CPSS) [60]. Of these, the PSEQ [31] has been specifically validated in patients with FMS [32]. The CPSS assesses one’s perception of competence in performing functional activities despite pain [61]. Positive self-efficacy has been found to promote healthy lifestyle and exercise behaviors in people with FMS, which ultimately results in better health outcomes [62, 63].
Perceived injustice is a multidimensional construct that includes perceived severity of loss, irreparability of loss, blame, and sense of unfairness [35]. This construct is often measured with the Injustice Experience Questionnaire [35], which has shown to be a good predictor of pain-related outcomes [36]. Total scores on this measure have been associated with higher pain severity, pain catastrophizing, fear of movement, depression, and perceived functional limitations in patients with chronic pain [35, 64, 65]. This concept is of special interest in FMS, since many patients feel that their symptoms are not taken seriously by their doctors [36].
Finally, a concept of interest in FMS, commonly referred to as fibrofog, involves a perception of dyscognition, including complaints about concentration, memory, mental agility, verbal expression, activity management and scheduling, and generally experiencing life through a haze [66]. This condition can significantly interfere with daily functioning in patients with FMS [67]. Research has shown that perceived dyscognition is related not only to objective cognitive impairments [68], but also to other types of symptoms associated with FMS, such as emotional distress, fatigue, unrefreshing sleep, and mood alterations [67, 68]. The Multidimensional Inventory of Subjective Cognitive Impairment (MISCI) [37] has been devised as a brief and comprehensive self‐report measure of cognitive function in FMS.
Motivational and emotional variables
The concept of pain-related fear proposes that for some patients, a painful experience will lead to fear of movement and avoidance behaviors as a maladaptive way of coping with pain, resulting in physical deconditioning and disability [69]. Numerous studies have examined the applicability of this cognitive behavioral model in people with FMS, especially for its implications in receptiveness and adherence to physical exercise [70]. Fear of performing physical activities or body movements has been described with a variety of conceptual definitions, among which pain-related fear, fear-avoidance beliefs, fear of movement, and kinesiophobia are the most commonly used [69, 71]. Pain catastrophizing, fear of movement, and activity avoidance, which are key factors in the fear-avoidance model of pain [72, 73], have repeatedly predicted increased emotional distress, perceived level of disability, and interference with daily activities [73]. The Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK-17) [38, 39] (with its different versions, including 11 and 13 items) is a commonly used measure of this variable.
It has been suggested that motivation towards healthy behaviors is a result of the interaction between goal preferences and mood [40, 74]. In this context, patients with FMS are often subject to goal conflicts [75] such as the preference for short-term hedonic goals (i.e., pain avoidance) vs. long term achievement goals (i.e., to start, maintain, and accomplish an activity). Karsdorp and Vlaeyen [40] developed the Goal Pursuit Questionnaire (GPQ) in people with musculoskeletal complaints to identify the individuals’ goal pursuit tendency for hedonic or achievement goals. A two-factor structure has been determined, including pain avoidance goals and mood-management goals. Pastor and colleagues [41] have validated a Spanish version of the GPQ in patients with FMS.
Emotional regulation refers to “the extrinsic and intrinsic processes responsible for monitoring, evaluating and modifying emotional reactions, especially their intensive and temporal features, to accomplishing a one’s goals” [76]. This construct is not only related to the emotional symptoms that are often present in FMS, but also to its association with other common FMS symptoms, including pain, fatigue, cognitive dysfunctions, and functional impairments [76, 77]. Impaired emotional regulation is a transdiagnostic risk factor that has been implicated in many disorders, including those related to mood, anxiety, substance use, personality, and eating [78]. Focusing on the self-regulatory and cognitive components of emotional regulation, Garnefski et al. [42] developed the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ), which evaluates eight emotional regulation strategies that people tend to use after negative life events: self-blame, blaming others, acceptance, refocusing on planning, positive refocusing, rumination, positive reappraisal, putting into perspective, and catastrophizing.
Coping and activity patterns
People can use a variety of strategies to help cope with unpleasant situations. Coping strategies have been defined as “cognitive and behavioral efforts to master, reduce, or tolerate the internal and/or external demands that are created by the stressful transaction” [79]. Many researchers suggest that negative affective states, often resulting from chronic life stressors, can trigger FMS symptoms [80, 81]. Some have gone further, proposing that FMS is an affective disorder [82]. High levels of pain and the inability to control it are sources of stress in themselves that can reduce a person’s capacity to cope effectively, and consequently, lead to depression [83]. For this reason, and in accordance with the transactional theory of Lazarus & Folkman, the analysis of the coping strategies may be helpful in the assessment of persons with FMS. The Chronic Pain Coping Inventory-42 [44] assesses coping strategies related to chronic pain in general and FMS in particular [45].
Chronic pain syndromes, including FMS, can have a negative effect on one’s ability to function with activities of daily living, so it can be helpful to analyze individual activity patterns [84]. Classically, three groups of activity patterns have been identified: avoidance (reducing activities to avoid present or future pain), pacing (regulating the intensity and duration of the activity to help manage pain symptoms), and persistence (frequent overdoing: engaging in activities without considering one’s physical limits, potentially resulting in negative consequences such as pain flare-ups) [85]. It has been found that overdoing strategies, and especially avoidance behaviors, are associated with worse pain-related outcomes [86]. The relationships of pacing and persistence remain less clear, showing that, far from deterministic models, the function and effects of activity patterns must be conceptualized within more complex models such as those established by cognitive flexibility models [87].
Relational/contextual variables
A psychological flexibility model [88] has been proposed as a unifying framework for understanding functioning in patients with FMS [89]. Psychological flexibility refers to the ability to cope with, accept, and adjust to difficult situations and to persist or change one’s behavior by incorporating conscious and open contact with thoughts and feelings while being consistent with one’s personal values and goals [90]. Within this model, psychological variables and activity patterns are not determined to be functional or dysfunctional per se, and their effects on disability are primarily related to underlying personal goals and contextual factors [91]. In this sense, the psychological flexibility model suggests that some contextual and personal variables could explain the inability of some individuals to implement adaptive coping methods in the presence of pain or related symptoms [92]. The following measures can be helpful in assessing psychological flexibility. The Psychological Inflexibility in Pain Scale (PIPS) [48, 49] — Psychological inflexibility is a pattern in which behavior is excessively controlled by one’s thoughts, feelings, and other internal experiences, or the avoidance of these experiences, at the expense of more effective and meaningful actions [92, 93]. The Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ) [50, 51] — Pain acceptance is defined as the willingness to experience continuing pain without efforts to reduce, avoid, or otherwise change it. The Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS) [52, 53] — Mindfulness is defined as “the presence or absence of attention to, and awareness of, what is occurring in the present moment” [52]. The Cognitive Fusion Scale (CFS) [54, 55] — Cognitive fusion refers to the degree to which a person is entangled with their own thoughts and takes them literally [54].
Effectiveness of psychological therapies for fibromyalgia
As seen in previous sections, psychological components are fundamental to help explain the onset and course of FMS. As a consequence, researchers and clinicians are increasingly interested in testing the effectiveness of psychological therapies for FMS. This section will review the existing evidence of clinical- and cost-effectiveness of psychological therapies for FMS.
After almost three decades of research, we now have sufficient evidence to support the effectiveness of psychotherapy for FMS, as reflected in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. In fact, the majority of institutional guidelines, including the American Pain Society, the Canadian Pain Society, and the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany, give cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) the maximum level of evidence for the treatment of FMS (“Strong for” or grade A with consistent evidence based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses) [94]. An exception to this are recent guidelines from the European League Against Rheumatism [95], which only gives the maximum level of evidence to exercise therapy and rated the evidence for CBT and all other treatments, including pharmacological and multicomponent treatments, as “Weak for.” This latter expert opinion synthesis has been criticized for overlooking psychotherapy in favor to exercise therapy only, for failing to include psychologists or psychosocial researchers in the reviewer committee [94] and for omitting studies that have supported strong evidence for CBT in FMS [96, 97]. It is important to note, however, that the European League Against Rheumatism does recommend CBT for persons with mood disorders, poor coping strategies [95], and high levels of catastrophizing [98]. All guidelines agree that management of FMS should focus on non-pharmacological treatment options first and should actively involve patients in the treatment process in order to gain self-management abilities [94]. These conclusions are based on treatment availability, safety, as well as patient preferences and treatment costs.
Indeed, psychotherapy, and particularly CBT, has been shown to be a very cost-effective treatment option for people with FMS. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis of 11 RCTs indicated that psychotherapy resulted in significantly lower health care and societal costs, compared to usual pharmacological care when compared over 6- and 12-month periods of treatment [11••]. As indicated in this review, the increased cost-effectiveness of CBT and its impact on quality-adjusted life-years, compared with other active interventions such as pharmacotherapy and non-active controls, require more research but are relatively robust. In addition to CBT, other forms of therapy are also gaining ground in the management of FMS. Two clear examples of these are Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, which will be reviewed later in this section.
CBT principles and evidence for the management of fibromyalgia
CBT is the psychological treatment of choice for patients with chronic pain in general and FMS in particular [99, 100]. This approach emphasizes the role of behaviors and cognitive interpretations of situations. Thus, cognitive factors (e.g., thoughts and beliefs) play a fundamental role in therapy under the assumption that they largely determine the emotional and behavioral responses that will occur under different situations. A basic assumption is that people with chronic pain conditions, including FMS, can hold certain negative beliefs about their pain (e.g., “I am unable to function properly as a result of my pain”) and often perceive that they have no resources to improve their situation (e.g., “there is nothing I can do to reduce my pain”). As a consequence, some individuals present a pattern of dysfunctional behavioral responses (e.g., avoidance of activities of daily living) and negative emotions (e.g., sadness), which makes it easier for negative pain-related thoughts and behaviors to dominate the person’s life. The goal of CBT is therefore to help patients learn to identify and modify distorted and dysfunctional thoughts, beliefs, and behaviors, and to help them realize that, in many cases, they have the ability and strength to deal with their daily pain-related problems more effectively. Within a CBT treatment model, pain-related emotional distress (e.g., depression, anxiety, or anger) and maladaptive behaviors (e.g., avoidance) are seen as largely influenced by cognitive variables (e.g., attention, expectations, beliefs, and memories). Consequently, during CBT patients are trained to (1) identify the most recurrent maladaptive thoughts about pain and (2) recognize the connection between their thoughts and their emotional and behavioral responses. Next, they are trained to (3) challenge these maladaptive thoughts and change them to more functional ones that allow (4) the use of more effective coping strategies that reduce the emotional discomfort associated with pain [101].
Meta-analytic data from over a decade ago [97] suggests that CBT has small-to-medium, but robust and lasting effects on a wide range of pain-related symptoms, including pain intensity, functional status, sleep problems, depression, and catastrophizing (Hedges’ g between 0.33 and 0.47). These results are at least comparable to the effects of pharmacotherapy, but psychotherapy has an important advantage because of its safety [95] and long-lasting effects [96], which are visible in the brain of up to 6 months after treatment [102].
Treatment of fibromyalgia with new forms of CBT
While CBT has attracted the most psychological treatment research into FMS, research has also pointed to more behavioral approaches as sources of effective symptom management in this syndrome [96]. In this section, we will review the evidence for Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) and Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR), which are more modern and behaviorally focused forms of psychotherapeutic interventions.
Chronic pain and FMS can impose important challenges for the person’s sense of identity, causing some individuals to lose, on many occasions, the meaning of life by disconnecting him/her from valued activities [103, 104]. Most pain treatments aim to heal or control pain and other associated symptoms [105]. However, patients with FMS often find traditional treatments to be ineffective [106]. Therefore, some patients rely on strategies like activity avoidance to control pain, which can have a dramatic negative effect on their psychological and physical health, life goals, and ultimately their sense of identity [107].
Unlike many other treatments for chronic pain, including traditional CBT, ACT does not seek to heal or control the pain or other related symptoms [108]. With ACT, the main goal is to disconnect people from their fight against pain and other symptoms and connect them with their values and the means to achieve their goals. The focus, therefore, lies in helping patients acquire effective behavior patterns, guided by the goals and values that they consider most important. A new way of living with pain can be achieved by changing the way people experience their sensations, thoughts, and feelings without changing the actual sensations, thoughts, and feelings per se [109, 110]. Acceptance, cognitive defusion, committed action, mindfulness, self as an observer, and values have been suggested as the six processes underlying psychological flexibility (see Fig. 1). Within the ACT therapy model, patients are trained and encouraged to participate in positive behaviors, including these six processes, which are incorporated during the whole treatment process [111]. So far, treatment outcome evidence for ACT is similar to that obtained with CBT, in the form of small-to-moderate effects on pain levels, depression, anxiety, sleep quality, and health-related quality of life, but the reduced number of RCTs (n = 3) and the weakness of control conditions (i.e., generally waiting list or education groups) limits the reliability of findings [112].
MBSR taps into a core dimension of ACT, namely mindfulness (contact with the present moment), and trains individuals to sustain attention to sensory, cognitive, and affective internal events, recognize their transitory nature, and reduce judgment and reaction to these experiences [113, 114]. Results so far suggest that MBSR might be effective in reducing pain-related symptoms, including pain severity, catastrophizing, anxiety, depressed mood, and stress [115]. However, results have also indicated that these findings are modest in magnitude, especially when compared with active controls or pharmacotherapy, so its inclusion with multicomponent treatment protocols has been recommended [115]. As with ACT, the number of RCTs with MBSR is also limited and has included a reduced number of patients [112]. More quality research is needed to determine the extent to which isolated mindfulness programs or multicomponent interventions that integrate mindfulness techniques are effective forms of psychotherapy for persons with FMS.
Towards the sustainability of psychotherapy for fibromyalgia
Though psychotherapy is a cost-effective option for FMS, the costs of individual therapy in terms of economic expenditures and accessibility have led to the emergence of novel forms of psychotherapy, that is, internet-delivered psychological treatments [116]. Research on the effectiveness, acceptability, and safety of Internet-based psychotherapy is still scarce, and long-term effects are yet to be explored [96, 112, 117]. Meta-analytic data have provided preliminary support for the effectiveness of internet-based psychotherapy, with improvements in disability and negative mood, even when compared with active control groups [117]. These results are not only applicable to Internet-delivered CBT (iCBT), but also to other forms of therapy, such as internet-based exposure treatment [118] and internet-delivered ACT [119, 120].
Personalizing treatments for fibromyalgia
Tailored interventions seem to be particularly important for FMS [121]. Research has repeatedly revealed that patients with FMS do not form a homogeneous group and that different adaptation styles exist according to their psychological profile (e.g., emotional status, attributional styles, and coping patterns) [122, 123]. Therefore, treatment interventions should be geared towards the patient’s individual needs, with flexible adaptations throughout the therapy process, based on the patient progress, using measurement-based care with routine outcome monitoring [124].
Internet interventions can help in this attempt to personalize treatments in FMS. For example, a recent study proposed that the most effective interventions for this condition are those that consider the patient’s clinical severity status and the patient’s treatment preferences prior to the intervention [125]. For example, a stepped care model provides the least resource-intensive treatments first, and treatment is “stepped up” to more demanding interventions only when required according to the patient’s needs [126]. Internet psychological interventions could represent a first treatment option when patients experience mild impairment and only stepped up to more intensive and demanding interventions (e.g., group or individual therapy), if patients do not respond or clinical severity increases [127].
Final remarks in relation to psychotherapy for fibromyalgia
As reviewed previously, research supports the implementation of CBT and potentially newer forms psychotherapy, such as ACT, as first-line interventions for the management of a wide range of symptoms in FMS, especially as part of a multidisciplinary team approach. However, some barriers in research have been detected. First, the quality of some CBT trials FMS has been poor, especially in terms of safety assessment and weak control groups [95]. The problem of over-relying on face-to-face interventions and fixed treatment protocols that ignore the heterogeneity of FMS has also been discussed. It is important to define subgroups (i.e., clusters) based on symptomatology (e.g., severity of depression and anxiety, functioning levels, and avoidance of pain) and tailor treatments to these subgroups [96]. As a final note, we would like to encourage researchers and particularly clinicians to shift to alternative treatment designs that consider individual treatment effects, such as single case designs. While RCTs with well-balanced samples are important, they generally focus on average group effects, which ignore the effects of an intervention on the individual. Single case designs are becoming increasing popular in general chronic pain research [128, 129] and in FMS research [130], including internet psychological interventions [131].
The future of psychology in fibromyalgia
As we have reviewed in the previous sections, psychological interventions can provide significant benefit for those with FMS. However, there are many challenges, such as how to deal with the complexity of this syndrome, individualize treatment plans to best meet patient needs, identify processes of therapeutic change, and generally design treatments that produce the largest benefits for the most people with FMS [132••, 133].
Single, strong, reliable predictors of treatment outcome success have been difficult to identify in people with chronic pain [134]. This also appears to be the case in FMS, where highly complex multivariate models can perform reasonably well, but their clinical utility may be limited, and where simpler models do not seem adequate [135]. Similarly, familiar variables such as catastrophizing are shown to significantly predict some outcomes, but not all, and not typically with strong effects [136]. It may be that current treatment designs and group-based research methods are limited for identifying who will benefit and who will not [137].
People with FMS entail a highly heterogeneous group in terms of clinical presentation, underlying pathophysiology, and “behavioral pathology” [125]. Early attempts to study FMS subgroups, using the Multidimensional Pain Inventory, produced some success, showing first that patients attending interdisciplinary treatment for FMS can be classified into one of three empirically derived subtypes (“dysfunctional,” “interpersonally distressed,” or adaptive copers”) prior to treatment and that these groups show remarkably different responses to the same treatment intervention [138]. Most of those classed as dysfunctional prior to treatment were reclassed as adaptive copers after treatment, while most of those initially classed as interpersonally distressed remained so. Despite this positive example and how compelling it is to consider the notion of different treatments for different people, an early review looking at subgroup treatment responses concluded that there was limited evidence for subgroup effects, although the review only included studies published prior to August 2014 [139].
Another way to address heterogeneity in FMS is to design and test tailored treatments that focus on specific subgroups and/or customize treatment content for particular patient needs. In one example of this approach, patients with FMS and high levels of distress were recruited as “high risk” and were further assessed and identified as either pain avoidant or pain persistent and provided a tailored treatment accordingly [140]. Treatment effects were significant for all primary outcomes, including physical and psychological functioning, for the treatment conditions compared to a waitlist control condition. Within-group effects were large and results appeared clinically significant. Tailored treatments have also been demonstrated to be beneficial in patients with chronic pain and comorbid anxiety and/or depression [141].
Limitations in current attempts at treatment tailoring include an absence of studies that compare tailored treatments to untailored treatments. While tailored treatment also appears beneficial in CBT for anxiety and depression, for example, there is limited evidence that tailoring produces superior results to untailored treatments [142]. Another limitation in approaches to tailoring so far is that they typically use subtyping, simply creating small groups, and do not truly individualize as such. A question remains as to how to best assess cases and assign treatment components dynamically, on an ongoing basis, during treatment.
Recent studies of processes of change in FMS employ methods conventionally used in the wider field, including mediation analyses applied in RCT designs. In one example, session-to-session measures of psychological inflexibility, catastrophizing, and pain intensity were examined as potential mediators of treatment outcomes in pain interference in a trial of ACT versus applied relaxation [143]. It was found that psychological inflexibility mediated the effects of outcomes in ACT but not applied relaxation and neither catastrophizing nor pain mediated changes in either. Another study example involved an RCT of a positive affect intervention called “best possible selves” [144]. Here, it was found that depression mediated change in pain interference and positive and negative affect mediated changes in depression and quality of life. An argument leveled against the conventional approach to identifying processes of change via mediation analysis is that it is probably too coarse and unlikely to successfully identify processes that are multivariate, bidirectional, and highly individual [133].
In summary, the questions relevant in guiding future directions in FMS, to paraphrase well known previous advice, can be summarized as who benefits, from what methods, and how does that happen [145]. It has been recommended that future directions in research should pursue methods to reveal individual patient treatment needs, deliver treatments designed specifically to meet these needs, and do this based on evidence-based processes of therapeutic change [132••, 137]. An identified limitation in current studies addressing the questions raised here is that they are probably not individualized enough, adhering to subtypes rather than individual people, employing group designs, and collecting data from limited time points. Truly individual, intensive, longitudinal study designs are recommended for future studies of psychological treatment for FMS.
Notes
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are considered the gold standard for scientific evidence. They provide a structured synthesis of the evidence about measures or treatments for use with specific patient populations but are less useful when the objective is to synthesize broader concepts as here. A systematic search of electronic databases was not carried out because was considered as unnecessary for the purpose of the present work. This commissioned narrative review sought to summarize the importance of psychological factors and the role of psychologists in the assessment and treatment of fibromyalgia. The present approach is therefore narrative in style, by contrast with the classical systematic review of the literature. This is an intentionally, comprehensive narrative review, aimed at a general audience interested in the role of psychologists in the management of fibromyalgia.
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
Häuser W, Ablin J, Fitzcharles MA, Littlejohn G, Luciano JV, Usui C, Walitt B. Fibromyalgia. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2015;1:15022. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2015.22.
Marques AP, Santo ASDE, Berssaneti AA, Matsutani LA, Yuan SLK. Prevalence of fibromyalgia: literature review update. Rev Bras Reumatol Engl Ed. 2017;57(4):356–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbre.2017.01.005.
Leadley RM, Armstrong N, Lee YC, Allen A, Kleijnen J. Chronic diseases in the European Union: the prevalence and health cost implications of chronic pain. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2012;26(4):310–25. https://doi.org/10.3109/15360288.2012.736933.
Løge-Hagen JS, Sæle A, Juhl C, Bech P, Stenager E, Mellentin AI. Prevalence of depressive disorder among patients with fibromyalgia: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2019;245:1098–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2018.12.001.
Kudlow PA, Rosenblat JD, Weissman CR, Cha DS, Kakar R, McIntyre RS, Sharma V. Prevalence of fibromyalgia and co-morbid bipolar disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2015;188:134–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2015.08.030.
Kleykamp BA, Ferguson MC, McNicol E, Bixho I, Arnold LM, Edwards RR, Fillingim R, Grol-Prokopczyk H, Turk DC, Dworkin RH. The prevalence of psychiatric and chronic pain comorbidities in fibromyalgia: an ACTTION systematic review. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2021;51(1):166–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2020.10.006.
• Migliorini F, Maffulli N, Eschweiler J, Knobe M, Tingart M, Colarossi G. Pharmacological management of fibromyalgia: a Bayesian network meta-analysis. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2022;15(2):205–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512433.2022.2044792. Recent network meta-analysis with fine-grained methodology that analysed the efficacy and adverse effects of several drugs for the management of FMS. Pregabalin and duloxetine obtained greater improvements in functional status and quality of life, along with the lowest rate of adverse events leading to study discontinuation.
Colomer-Carbonell A, Sanabria-Mazo JP, Hernández-Negrín H, Borràs X, Suso-Ribera C, García-Palacios A, Muchart J, Munuera J, D’Amico F, Maes M, Younger JW, Feliu-Soler A, Rozadilla-Sacanell A, Luciano JV. Study protocol for a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled phase III trial examining the add-on efficacy, cost-utility and neurobiological effects of low-dose naltrexone (LDN) in patients with fibromyalgia (INNOVA study). BMJ Open. 2022;12(1):e055351. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055351.
Haugmark T, Hagen KB, Smedslund G, Zangi HA. Mindfulness- and acceptance-based interventions for patients with fibromyalgia - a systematic review and meta-analyses. PLoS One. 2019;14(9):e0221897. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221897.
Bernardy K, Klose P, Welsch P, Häuser W. Efficacy, acceptability and safety of Internet-delivered psychological therapies for fibromyalgia syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur J Pain. 2019;23(1):3–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1284.
•• Cabral CMN, Miyamoto GC, Franco KFM, Bosmans JE. Economic evaluations of educational, physical, and psychological treatments for fibromyalgia: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Pain. 2021;162(9):2331–45. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002233. Systematic review focused on economic evaluations of educational, physical, and psychological treatments for FMS. Data analysis indicated that psychological treatments were dominant over other interventions and control conditions. No robust conclusions could be obtained for the cost-utility of physical exercise.
• Samami E, Shahhosseini Z, Elyasi F. The effect of psychological interventions on the quality of life in women with fibromyalgia: a systematic review. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2021;28(3):503–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10880-021-09794-0. This study systematically reviewed the effects of psychological treatments on the quality of life in women with FMS. Except in 4 out of 16 studies, there was evidence of improvement in the quality of life and symptoms reported by women with FMS.
Kundakci B, Kaur J, Goh SL, Hall M, Doherty M, Zhang W, Abhishek A. Efficacy of nonpharmacological interventions for individual features of fibromyalgia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Pain. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002500.
Martinez-Calderon J, Flores-Cortes M, Morales-Asencio JM, Luque-Suarez A. Intervention therapies to reduce pain-related fear in fibromyalgia syndrome: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Pain Med. 2021;22(2):481–98. https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnaa331.
Saracoglu I, Akin E, Aydin Dincer GB. Efficacy of adding pain neuroscience education to a multimodal treatment in fibromyalgia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Rheum Dis. 2022;25(4):394–404. https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-185X.14293.
Pérez-Aranda A, Andrés-Rodríguez L, Feliu-Soler A, Núñez C, Stephan-Otto C, Pastor-Mira MA, López-Roig S, Peñacoba C, Calandre EP, Slim M, Salgueiro M, Feixas G, Luciano JV. Clustering a large Spanish sample of patients with fibromyalgia using the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire-Revised: differences in clinical outcomes, economic costs, inflammatory markers, and gray matter volumes. Pain. 2019;160(4):908–21. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001468. PMID: 30586023.
Pérez-Aranda A, Feliu-Soler A, Mist SD, Jones KD, López-Del-Hoyo Y, Oliván-Arévalo R, Kratz A, Williams DA, Luciano JV. Subgrouping a large U.S. sample of patients with fibromyalgia using the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire-Revised. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;18(1):247. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18010247.
Llàdser AN, Montesó-Curto P, López C, Rosselló L, Lear S, Toussaint L, Casadó-Martín LC. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation treatments for patients with fibromyalgia a systematic review. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2022;58(1):76–84. https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.21.06432-7.
Williams DA, Kratz AL. Patient-reported outcomes and fibromyalgia. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2016;42(2):317–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rdc.2016.01.009.
Virués-Ortega J, Haynes S. Functional analysis in behavior therapy: behavioral foundations and clinical application. Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2005;5:567–87.
Cagnie B, Coppieters I, Denecker S, Six J, Danneels L, Meeus M. Central sensitization in fibromyalgia? A systematic review on structural and functional brain MRI. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2014;44(1):68–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2014.01.001.
Andrés-Rodríguez L, Borràs X, Feliu-Soler A, Pérez-Aranda A, Angarita-Osorio N, Moreno-Peral P, Montero-Marin J, García-Campayo J, Carvalho AF, Maes M, Luciano JV. Peripheral immune aberrations in fibromyalgia: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression. Brain Behav Immun. 2020;87:881–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2019.12.020.
Kumbhare D, Hassan S, Diep D, Duarte FCK, Hung J, Damodara S, West DWD, Selvaganapathy PR. Potential role of blood biomarkers in patients with fibromyalgia: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Pain. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002510.
Yavne Y, Amital D, Watad A, Tiosano S, Amital H. A systematic review of precipitating physical and psychological traumatic events in the development of fibromyalgia. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2018;48(1):121–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2017.12.011.
• Creed F. A review of the incidence and risk factors for fibromyalgia and chronic widespread pain in population-based studies. Pain. 2020;161(6):1169–76. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001819. This study reviewed 37 population-based studies. The incidence of FMS was highest in participants with pre-existing painful conditions and somewhat raised in the medically ill. Difficulties during childhood, adverse lifestyles, pre-existing medical conditions, regional or other pain disorders, sleep problems, somatic symptoms, negative health perception, and depression, emerged as risk factors for FMS and widespread pain.
• Kaleycheva N, Cullen AE, Evans R, Harris T, Nicholson T, Chalder T. The role of lifetime stressors in adult fibromyalgia: systematic review and meta-analysis of case-control studies. Psychol Med. 2021;51(2):177–93. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291720004547. Meta-analysis of 19 studies centred on lifetime stressors for FMS. Physical abuse, emotional abuse, sexual abuse, total abuse, and medical trauma, we significant lifetime stressors associated with FMS.
Salaffi F, Sarzi-Puttini P, Ciapetti A, Atzeni F. Assessment instruments for patients with fibromyalgia: properties, applications and interpretation. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2009;27(5 Suppl 56):S92-105.
Häuser W, Jones G. Psychological therapies for chronic widespread pain and fibromyalgia syndrome. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2019;33(3):101416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.berh.2019.05.001.
Sullivan MJ, Bishop SR, Pivik J. The pain catastrophizing scale: development and validation. Psychol Assess. 1995;7:524.
Rodero B, García-Campayo J, Casanueva B, del Hoyo YL, Serrano-Blanco A, Luciano JV. Validation of the Spanish version of the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ) for the assessment of acceptance in fibromyalgia. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010;8:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-8-37.
Nicholas MK. The pain self-efficacy questionnaire: taking pain into account. Eur J Pain. 2007;11:153–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.12.008.
Rasmussen MU, Rydahl-Hansen S, Amris K, Danneskiold Samsøe B, Mortensen EL. The adaptation of a Danish version of the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire: reliability and construct validity in a population of patients with fibromyalgia in Denmark. Scand J Caring Sci. 2016;30:202–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.12232.
Fernández Cabrera T, Medina Anzano S, Herrera Sánchez IM, Rueda Méndez S, Fernández Del Olmo A. Construcción y validación de una escala de autoeficacia para la actividad física. Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2011;85:405–17.
López-Roig S, Pastor-Mira M-Á, Núñez R, Nardi A, Ivorra S, León E, et al. Assessing self-efficacy for physical activity and walking exercise in women with fibromyalgia. Pain Manag Nurs. 2021;22:571–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2021.05.007.
Sullivan MJL, Adams H, Horan S, Maher D, Boland D, Gross R. The role of perceived injustice in the experience of chronic pain and disability: scale development and validation. J Occup Rehabil. 2008;18:249–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-008-9140-5.
Rodero B, Luciano JV, Montero-Marín J, Casanueva B, Palacin JC, Gili M, et al. Perceived injustice in fibromyalgia: psychometric characteristics of the Injustice Experience Questionnaire and relationship with pain catastrophising and pain acceptance. J Psychosom Res. 2012;73:86–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2012.05.011.
Kratz AL, Schilling SG, Goesling J, Williams DA. Development and initial validation of a brief self-report measure of cognitive dysfunction in fibromyalgia. J Pain. 2015;16:527–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2015.02.008.
Kori SH, Miller RP, Todd DD. Kinesiophobia: a new view of chronic pain behavior. Pain Manag. 1990;3:35–43.
Burwinkle T, Robinson JP, Turk DC. Fear of movement: factor structure of the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome. J Pain. 2005;6:384–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2005.01.355.
Karsdorp PA, Vlaeyen JWS. Goals matter: Both achievement and pain-avoidance goals are associated with pain severity and disability in patients with low back and upper extremity pain. Pain. 2011;152:1382–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2011.02.018.
Pastor-Mira M-A, López-Roig S, Martínez-Zaragoza F, León E, Abad E, Lledó A, et al. Goal preferences, affect, activity patterns and health outcomes in women with fibromyalgia. Front Psychol. 2019; 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01912
Garnefski N, Kraaij V, Spinhoven P. Negative life events, cognitive emotion regulation and emotional problems. Pers Individ Dif. 2001;30:1311–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00113-6.
Feliu-Soler A, Reche-Camba E, Borràs X, Pérez-Aranda A, Andrés-Rodríguez L, Peñarrubia-María MT, et al. Psychometric Properties of the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ) in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome. Front Psychol. 2017; 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02075
Romano JM, Jensen MP, Turner JA. The chronic pain coping inventory-42: reliability and validity. Pain. 2003;104:65–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3959(02)00466-9.
Garcia-Campayo J, Pascual A, Alda M, Ramirez MTG. Coping with fibromialgia: usefulness of the Chronic Pain Coping Inventory-42. Pain. 2007;132:S68–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2007.02.013.
Esteve R, Ramírez-Maestre C, Peters ML, Serrano-Ibáñez ER, Ruíz-Párraga GT, López-Martínez AE. Development and initial validation of the Activity Patterns Scale in patients with chronic pain. J Pain. 2016;17:451–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2015.12.009.
López-Roig S, Peñacoba C, Martínez-Zaragoza F, Abad E, Catalá P, Suso-Ribera C, et al. The Activity Patterns Scale: an analysis of its construct validity in women with fibromyalgia. Clin J Pain. 2021;37:887–97. https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000000980.
Wicksell RK, Lekander M, Sorjonen K, Olsson GL. The Psychological Inflexibility in Pain Scale (PIPS) - statistical properties and model fit of an instrument to assess change processes in pain related disability. Eur J Pain. 2010;14(771):e1-771.e14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpain.2009.11.015.
Rodero B, Pereira JP, Pérez-Yus MC, Casanueva B, Serrano-Blanco A, da Cunha Rodrigues, Ribeiro MJ, et al. Validation of a Spanish version of the psychological inflexibility in pain scale (PIPS) and an evaluation of its relation with acceptance of pain and mindfulness in sample of persons with fibromyalgia. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013;11:62. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-11-62.
Vowles KE, McCracken LM, McLeod C, Eccleston C. The Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire: confirmatory factor analysis and identification of patient subgroups. Pain. 2008;140:284–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2008.08.012.
Rodero B, García-Campayo J, Casanueva B, del Hoyo YL, Serrano-Blanco A, Luciano JV. Validation of the Spanish version of the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ) for the assessment of acceptance in fibromyalgia. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010;8:37. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-8-37.
Brown KW, Ryan RM. The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003;84:822–48. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822.
Cebolla A, Luciano JV, DeMarzo MP, Navarro-Gil M, Campayo JG. Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the mindful attention awareness scale (MAAS) in patients with fibromyalgia. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013;11:6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-11-6.
Gillanders DT, Bolderston H, Bond FW, Dempster M, Flaxman PE, Campbell L, et al. The development and initial validation of the Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire. Behav Ther. 2014;45:83–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2013.09.001.
Luque-Reca O, Gillanders D, Catala P, Peñacoba C. Psychometric properties of the Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire in females with fibromyalgia. Curr Psychol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02214-4.
Edwards RR, Bingham CO, Bathon J, Haythornthwaite JA. Catastrophizing and pain in arthritis, fibromyalgia, and other rheumatic diseases. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;55:325–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.21865.
Sullivan MJL, Thorn B, Haythornthwaite JA, Keefe F, Martin M, Bradley LA, et al. Theoretical perspectives on the relation between catastrophizing and pain. Clin J Pain. 2001;17:52–64. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002508-200103000-00008.
Gilliam WP, Craner JR, Morrison EJ, Sperry JA. The mediating effects of the different dimensions of pain catastrophizing on outcomes in an interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation program. Clin J Pain. 2017;33:443–51. https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000000419.
Miles CL, Pincus T, Carnes D, Taylor SJC, Underwood M. Measuring pain self-efficacy. Clin J Pain. 2011;27:461–70. https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0b013e318208c8a2.
Vergeld V, Utesch T. Pain-related self-efficacy among people with back pain. Clin J Pain. 2020;36:480–94. https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000000818.
Bandura A, O’Leary A, Taylor CB, Gauthier J, Gossard D. Perceived self-efficacy and pain control: opioid and nonopioid mechanisms. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987;53:563–71. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.3.563.
Beal CC, Stuifbergen AK, Brown A. Predictors of a health promoting lifestyle in women with fibromyalgia syndrome. Psychol Health Med. 2009;14:343–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548500902730093.
Andrade A, Dominski FH, Sieczkowska SM. What we already know about the effects of exercise in patients with fibromyalgia: an umbrella review. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2020;50:1465–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2020.02.003.
Sullivan MJL, Davidson N, Garfinkel B, Siriapaipant N, Scott W. Perceived injustice is associated with heightened pain behavior and disability in individuals with whiplash injuries. Psychol Inj Law. 2009;2:238–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-009-9055-2.
Ferrari R, Russell AS. Perceived injustice in fibromyalgia and rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rheumatol. 2014;33:1501–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-014-2552-z.
Arnold LM, Crofford LJ, Mease PJ, Burgess SM, Palmer SC, Abetz L, et al. Patient perspectives on the impact of fibromyalgia. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;73:114–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2008.06.005.
Tesio V, Torta DME, Colonna F, Leombruni P, Ghiggia A, Fusaro E, et al. Are fibromyalgia patients cognitively impaired? Objective and subjective neuropsychological evidence. Arthritis Care Res. 2015;67:143–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.22403.
Gelonch O, Garolera M, Valls J, Rosselló L, Pifarré J. Executive function in fibromyalgia: comparing subjective and objective measures. Compr Psychiatry. 2016;66:113–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2016.01.002.
Vlaeyen JWS, Crombez G. Fear of movement/(re)injury, avoidance and pain disability in chronic low back pain patients. Man Ther. 1999;4:187–95. https://doi.org/10.1054/math.1999.0199.
Nijs J, Roussel N, Van Oosterwijck J, De Kooning M, Ickmans K, Struyf F, et al. Fear of movement and avoidance behaviour toward physical activity in chronic-fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia: state of the art and implications for clinical practice. Clin Rheumatol. 2013;32:1121–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-013-2277-4.
Lundberg M, Grimby-Ekman A, Verbunt J, Simmonds MJ. Pain-related fear: a critical review of the related measures. Pain Res Treat. 2011;2011:1–26. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/494196.
Racine M, Galán S, de la Vega R, Tomé Pires C, Solé E, Nielson WR, et al. Pain-related activity management patterns and function in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome. Clin J Pain. 2018;34:122–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000000526.
Écija C, Luque-Reca O, Suso-Ribera C, Catala P, Peñacoba C. Associations of cognitive fusion and pain catastrophizing with fibromyalgia impact through fatigue, pain severity, and depression: an exploratory study using structural equation modeling. J Clin Med. 2020;9:1763. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9061763.
Crombez G, Eccleston C, Van Damme S, Vlaeyen JWS, Karoly P. Fear-avoidance model of chronic pain. Clin J Pain. 2012;28:475–83. https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0b013e3182385392.
van Middendorp H, Lumley MA, Jacobs JWG, van Doornen LJP, Bijlsma JWJ, Geenen R. Emotions and emotional approach and avoidance strategies in fibromyalgia. J Psychosom Res. 2008;64:159–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2007.08.009.
Thompson RA. Emotion Regulation: A theme in search of definition. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1994;59:25. https://doi.org/10.2307/1166137.
Velasco Furlong L, Zautra A, Peñacoba Puente C, López-López A, Barjola VP. Cognitive-affective assets and vulnerabilities: two factors influencing adaptation to Fibromyalgia. Psychol Health. 2010;25:197–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870440802074656.
Naragon-Gainey K, McMahon TP, Chacko TP. The structure of common emotion regulation strategies: a meta-analytic examination. Psychol Bull. 2017;143:384–427. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000093.
Lazarus RS. Toward better research on stress and coping. Am Psychol. 2000;55:665–73. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.6.665.
Davis MC, Zautra AJ, Smith BW. Chronic pain, stress, and the dynamics of affective differentiation. J Pers. 2004;72:1133–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2004.00293.x.
van Houdenhove B, Egle UT. Fibromyalgia: a stress disorder? Psychother Psychosom. 2004;73:267–75. https://doi.org/10.1159/000078843.
Netter P, Hennig J. The fibromyalgia syndrome as a manifestation of neuroticism? Rheumatol. 1998;57:S105–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003930050248.
Racine M, Sánchez-Rodríguez E, de la Vega R, Galán S, Solé E, Jensen MP, et al. Pain-related activity management patterns as predictors of treatment outcomes in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome. Pain Med. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnz259.
Andrews NE, Strong J, Meredith PJ. Activity pacing, avoidance, endurance, and associations with patient functioning in chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93:2109-2121.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2012.05.029.
Cane D, Nielson WR, McCarthy M, Mazmanian D. Pain-related activity patterns. Clin J Pain. 2013;29:435–42. https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0b013e31825e452f.
McCracken LM, Morley S. The psychological flexibility model: a basis for integration and progress in psychological approaches to chronic pain management. J Pain. 2014;15:221–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2013.10.014.
Ecija C, Catala P, Lopez-Gomez I, Bedmar D, Peñacoba C. What does the psychological flexibility model contribute to the relationship between depression and disability in chronic pain? The role of cognitive fusion and pain acceptance. Clin Nurs Res. 2022;31:217–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/10547738211034307.
Yu L, Norton S, McCracken LM. Change in “Self-as-Context” (“Perspective-Taking”) occurs in acceptance and commitment therapy for people with chronic pain and is associated with improved functioning. J Pain. 2017;18:664–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2017.01.005.
Van Damme S, Kindermans H. A Self-Regulation perspective on avoidance and persistence behavior in chronic pain. Clin J Pain. 2015;31:115–22. https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000000096.
Carvalho SA, Pinto-Gouveia J, Gillanders D, Castilho P. Pain and depressive symptoms: exploring cognitive fusion and self-compassion in a moderated mediation model. J Psychol. 2019;153:173–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2018.1507990.
Serrat M, Sanabria-Mazo JP, Almirall M, Musté M, Feliu-Soler A, Méndez-Ulrich JL, et al. Effectiveness of a multicomponent treatment based on pain neuroscience education, therapeutic exercise, cognitive behavioral therapy, and mindfulness in patients with fibromyalgia (FIBROWALK study): a randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther. 2021;101(12):pzab200. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzab200.
Kashdan TB, Rottenberg J. Psychological flexibility as a fundamental aspect of health. Clin Psychol Rev. 2010;30:865–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.03.001.
McCracken LM, Vowles KE, Eccleston C. Acceptance of chronic pain: component analysis and a revised assessment method. Pain. 2004;107:159–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2003.10.012.
Thieme K, Mathys M, Turk DC. Evidenced-based guidelines on the treatment of fibromyalgia patients: are they consistent and if not, why not? Have effective psychological treatments been overlooked? J Pain. 2017;18(7):747–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2016.12.006.
Macfarlane GJ, Kronisch C, Dean LE, Atzeni F, Häuser W, Fluß E, et al. EULAR revised recommendations for the management of fibromyalgia. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76(2):318–28.
Bernardy K, Klose P, Busch AJ, Choy EHS, Häuser W. Cognitive behavioural therapies for fibromyalgia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;2013(9):CD009796.
Glombiewski JA, Sawyer AT, Gutermann J, Koenig K, Rief W, Hofmann SG. Psychological treatments for fibromyalgia : a meta-analysis. Pain. 2010;151(2):280–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2010.06.011.
Aman MM, Jason Yong R, Kaye AD, Urman RD. Evidence-based non-pharmacological therapies for fibromyalgia. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2018;22(5):33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-018-0688-2.
Skinner M, Wilson HD, Turk DC. Cognitive-behavioral perspective and cognitive-behavioral therapy for people with chronic pain: distinctions, outcomes, and innovations. J Cogn Psychother. 2012;26(2):93–113. https://doi.org/10.1891/0889-8391.26.2.93.
Gatchel R, Peng Y, Peters M, Fuchs P, Turk DC. The biopsychosocial approach to chronic pain: scientific advances and future directions. Psychol Bull. 2007;133(4):581–624. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.4.581.
Ehde DM, Dillworth TM, Turner JA. Cognitive-behavioral therapy for individuals with chronic pain: efficacy, innovations, and directions for research. Am Psychol. 2014;69(2):153–66. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035747.
Lazaridou A, Kim J, Cahalan CM, Loggia ML, Franceschelli O, Berna C, et al. Effects of cognitive-behavioral Therapy (CBT) on brain connectivity supporting catastrophizing in fibromyalgia. Clin J Pain. 2016;33(3):215–21. https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000000422.
Risdon A, Eccleston C, Crombez G, McCracken L. How can we learn to live with pain? A Q-methodological analysis of the diverse understandings of acceptance of chronic pain. Soc Sci Med. 2003;56(2):375–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00043-6.
Suso-Ribera C, Yakobov E, Carriere JS, Garcia-Palacios A. The impact of chronic pain on patients and spouses: consequences on occupational status, distribution of household chores and care-giving burden. Eur J Pain. 2020;24(9):1730–40. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1616.
Turk DC, Wilson HD, Cahana A. Treatment of chronic non-cancer pain. Lancet. 2011;377(9784):2226–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60402-9.
Deyo RA, Mirza SK, Turner JA, Martin BI. Overtreating chronic back pain: time to back off? J Am Board Fam Med. 2009;22(1):62–8. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2009.01.080102.
Vasudevan S. Multidisciplinary management of chronic pain. Riverport, Ln: Springer International Publishing AG; 2015.
Graham CD, Gouick J, Krahé C, Gillanders D. A systematic review of the use of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) in chronic disease and long-term conditions. Clin Psychol Rev. 2016;46:46–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2016.04.009.
McCracken LM, Vowles KE. Acceptance and commitment therapy and mindfulness for chronic pain: model, process, and progress. Am Psychol. 2014;69(2):178–87. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035623.
Scott W, McCracken LM. Psychological flexibility, acceptance and commitment therapy, and chronic pain. Curr Opin Psychol. 2015;2:91–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2014.12.013.
Vowles KE, McCracken LM. Comparing the role of psychological flexibility and traditional pain management coping strategies in chronic pain treatment outcomes. Behav Res Ther. 2010;48(2):141–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2009.09.011.
Haugmark T, Hagen KB, Smedslund G, Zangi HA. Mindfulness- and acceptance-based interventions for patients with fibromyalgia - a systematic review and meta-analyses. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(9):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221897.
Rosenzweig S, Greeson JM, Reibel DK, Green JS, Jasser SA, Beasley D. Mindfulness-based stress reduction for chronic pain conditions variation in treatment outcomes and role of home meditation practice. J Psychosom Res. 2010;68(1):29–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.03.010.
De Vibe M, Bjørndal A, Fattah S, Dyrdal G, Halland E, Tanner-Smith E. Mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) for improving health quality of life and social functioning in adults. Campbell Syst Rev. 2012;8(1):1–127. https://doi.org/10.4073/csr.2012.3.
Adler-Neal AL, Zeidan F. Mindfulness meditation for fibromyalgia: mechanistic and clinical considerations. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2017;19(9):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11926-017-0686-0.
Mehta S, Peynenburg VA, Hadjistavropoulos HD. Internet-delivered cognitive behaviour therapy for chronic health conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Behav Med. 2019;42(2):169–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-018-9984-x.
Bernardy K, Klose P, Welsch P, Häuser W. Efficacy, acceptability and safety of Internet-delivered psychological therapies for fibromyalgia syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur J Pain. 2019;23(1):3–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1284.
Hedman-Lagerlöf M, Hedman-Lagerlöf E, Axelsson E, Ljótsson B, Engelbrektsson J, Hultkrantz S, et al. Internet-based exposure therapy for fibromyalgia. Clin J Pain. 2018;34(6):532–42. https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000000566.
Simister HD, Tkachuk GA, Shay BL, Vincent N, Pear JJ, Skrabek RQ. Randomized controlled trial of online acceptance and commitment therapy for fibromyalgia. J Pain. 2018;19(7):741–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2018.02.004.
Ljótsson B, Atterlöf E, Lagerlöf M, Andersson E, Jernelöv S, Hedman E, et al. Internet-delivered acceptance and values-based exposure treatment for fibromyalgia: a pilot study. Cogn Behav Ther. 2014;43(2):93–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2013.846401.
Häuser W, Ablin J, Perrot S, Fitzcharles M-A. Management of fibromyalgia practical guides from recent evidence-based guidelines. Polish Arch Intern Med. 2017;127(1):47–56. https://doi.org/10.20452/pamw.3877.
Rubio Fidel L, García-Palacios A, Herrero R, Molinari G, Suso-Ribera C. Coping and beliefs as predictors of functioning and psychological adjustment in fibromyalgia subgroups. Pain Res Manag. 2022;2022:1066192. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1066192.
Angarita-Osorio N, Pérez-Aranda A, Feliu-Soler A, Andrés-Rodríguez L, Borràs X, Suso-Ribera C, et al. Patients with fibromyalgia reporting severe pain but low impact of the syndrome: clinical and pain-related cognitive features. Pain Pract. 2020;20(3):255–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.12847.
Gual-Montolio P, Martínez-Borba V, Bretón-López JM, Osma J, Suso-Ribera C. How are information and communication technologies supporting routine outcome monitoring and measurement-based care in psychotherapy? A systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(9):3170. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093170.
Häuser W, Perrot S, Clauw DJ, Fitzcharles M-A. Unravelling fibromyalgia—steps toward individualized management. J Pain. 2018;19(2):125–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2017.08.009.
Meuldijk D, Wuthrich VM. Stepped-care treatment of anxiety and depression in older adults: a narrative review. Aust J Rural Health. 2019;27(4):275–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajr.12524.
Worm-Smeitink M, Janse A, van Dam A, Evers A, van der Vaart R, Wensing M, et al. Internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy in stepped care for chronic fatigue syndrome: randomized noninferiority trial. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(3):e11276. https://doi.org/10.2196/11276.
Bontinck J, Den Hollander M, Kaas AL, De Jong JR, Timmers I. Individual patterns and temporal trajectories of changes in fear and pain during exposure in vivo: a multiple single-case experimental design in patients with chronic pain. J Clin Med. 2022;11(5):1360. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11051360.
Simons LE, Vlaeyen JWS, Declercq L, Smith AM, Beebe J, Hogan M, et al. Avoid or engage? Outcomes of graded exposure in youth with chronic pain using a sequential replicated single-case randomized design. Pain. 2020;161(3):520–31. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001735.
Gómez-Pérez MC, García-Palacios A, Castilla D, Zaragozá I, Suso-Ribera C. Brief acceptance and commitment therapy for fibromyalgia feasibility and effectiveness of a replicated single-case design. Pain Res Manag. 2020;2020:7897268. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7897268.
Norman-Nott N, Wilks CR, Hesam-Shariati N, Schroeder J, Suh J, Czerwinski M, et al. The No Worries Trial: efficacy of online dialectical behaviour therapy skills training for chronic pain (iDBT-Pain) using a single case experimental design. J Pain. 2022;23(4):558–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2021.10.003.
•• Hayes SC, Hofmann SG, Stanton CE, Carpenter JK, Sanford BT, Curtiss JE, Ciarrochi J. The role of the individual in the coming era of process-based therapy. Behav Res Ther. 2019;117:40–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2018.10.005. Ground breaking manuscript that opens a new era in psychological treatment. The main notion is to surpass the limitations of “protocols for syndromes” approach. The focus is on individual needs and change processes. An integration of idiographic and nomothetic approaches is proposed.
Hofmann SG, Curtiss JE, Hayes SC. Beyond linear mediation: toward a dynamic network approach to study treatment processes. Clin Psychol Rev. 2020;76:101824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101824.
Gilpin HR, Keyes A, Stahl DR, Greig R, McCracken LM. Predictors of treatment outcome in contextual cognitive and behavioral therapies for chronic pain: a systematic review. J Pain. 2017;18(10):1153–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2017.04.003.
Moen VP, Tveter AT, Herbert RD, Hagen KB. Development and external validation of a prediction model for patient-relevant outcomes in patients with chronic widespread pain and fibromyalgia. Eur J Pain. 2022;26(5):1123–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1937.
Angst F, Lehmann S, Sandor PS, Benz T. Catastrophizing as a prognostic factor for pain and physical function in the multidisciplinary rehabilitation of fibromyalgia and low back pain. Eur J Pain. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1983.
McCracken LM. Necessary components of psychological treatment for chronic pain: more packages for groups or process-based therapy for individuals? Eur J Pain. 2020;24(6):1001–2. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1568.
Turk DC, Okifuji A, Sinclair JD, Starz TW. Differential responses by psychosocial subgroups of fibromyalgia syndrome patients to an interdisciplinary treatment. Arthritis Care Res. 1998;11(5):397–404.
Forte ML, Butler M, Andrade KE, Vincent A, Schousboe JT, Kane RL. Treatments for fibromyalgia in adult subgroups. Comparative effectiveness review no. 148. (Prepared by the Minnesota Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290–2012–00016-I.)AHRQ Publication No. 15-EHC006-EF. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; January 2015. https://www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/reports/final.cfm.www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/reports/final.cfm
Van Koulil S, van Lankveld W, Kraaimaat FW, van Helmond T, Vedeer A, van Hoorn H, Donders R, de Jong AJL, Haverman JF, Korff K, van Riel PLCM, Cats HA, Evers AWM. Tailored cognitive-behavioral therapy and exercise training for high-risk patients with fibromyalgia. Arthritis Care Res. 2010;62(10):1377–85. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.20268.
Buhrman M, Syk M, Burvall O, Hartig T, Gordh T, Andersson G. Individualized guided internet-delivered cognitive-behavior therapy for chronic pain patients with comorbid depression and anxiety: a randomized controlled trial. Clin J Pain. 2015;31(6):504–16. https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000000176.
Păsărelu CR, Andersson G, Bergman Nordgren L, Dobrean A. Internet-delivered transdiagnostic and tailored cognitive behavioral therapy for anxiety and depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Cogn Behav Ther. 2017;46(1):1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2016.1231219.
Kemani MK, Hesser H, Olsson GL, Lekander M, Wicksell RK. Processes of change in acceptance and commitment therapy and applied relaxation for long-standing pain. Eur J Pain. 2016;20(4):521–31.
Molinari G, Miragall M, Enrique Á, Botella C, Baños RM, García-Palacios A. How and for whom does a positive affect intervention work in fibromyalgia: an analysis of mediators and moderators. Eur J Pain. 2020;24(1):248–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1481.
Paul GL. Strategy of outcome research in psychotherapy. J Consult Psychol. 1967;31(2):109–18.
Funding
Open Access Funding provided by Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Juan V. Luciano, Randy Neblett, Cecilia Peñacoba, Carlos Suso-Ribera, and Lance M. McCracken declare no conflicts of interest.
Human and animal rights and informed consent.
This article does not contain any studies with human and animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Pain in Rheumatology.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Luciano, J.V., Neblett, R., Peñacoba, C. et al. The Contribution of the Psychologist in the Assessment and Treatment of Fibromyalgia. Curr Treat Options in Rheum 9, 11–31 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40674-023-00200-4
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40674-023-00200-4