Skip to main content
Log in

Observed Structured Teaching Experiences (OSTEs) in a Students as Teachers Course

  • Innovation
  • Published:
Medical Science Educator Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Teaching is an important competency in graduate medical education (GME). Many residency programs have implemented curricula to develop residents’ teaching skills and observed structured teaching experiences (OSTEs) have been used to assess these skills. There is an increasing focus on building teaching skills earlier in the medical education continuum, however, there is limited literature on assessing medical students’ teaching skills. The authors developed an OSTE for medical students enrolled in a students-as-teachers course to address this gap and provide formative feedback on teaching skills.

Materials and Methods

OSTEs were conducted for fourth-year medical students (M4s) enrolled in a Students as Teachers Advanced Elective at a US medical school. An M4 observed a first-year medical student (M1) during a simulated encounter with a standardized patient. The M4 gave feedback and a chalk talk. A physician observer assessed the M4’s teaching using the modified Stanford Faculty Development Program (SFDP) questionnaire. The M1s and M4s also completed the SFDP. The M4 completed pre- and post-OSTE self-efficacy surveys (score range 6-30) and a post-OSTE acceptability survey.

Results

All (30/30) M4s completed the OSTE. The SFDP identified common teaching strengths and areas for growth. ANOVA tests demonstrated significant differences between the mean (SD) scores from physician assessors, M1s, and M4s [4.56 (0.63) vs. 4.87 (0.35) vs. 4.08 (0.74), p<0.001]. There was a statistically significant difference in mean (SD) self-efficacy scores pre- and post-OSTE [18.72 (3.39) vs. 23.83 (3.26), p<0.001]. All M4s (30/30) somewhat or strongly agreed with all three OSTE acceptability questions.

Lessons Learned

The authors successfully conducted an OSTE in an M4 advanced elective. The OSTE was highly acceptable to participants, and M4s demonstrated improved teaching self-efficacy. Further research should explore the validity of the OSTE to measure medical students’ teaching skills and the long-term impact of developing teaching skills in medical school.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Deidentified data is available from the authors on request.

References

  1. McKeon BA, Ricciotti HA, Sandora TJ, et al. A consensus guideline to support resident-as-teacher programs and enhance the culture of teaching and learning. J Grad Med Educ. 2019;11(3):313–8. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-18-00612.1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Smith CC, Newman LR, Huang GC. Those who teach, can do: characterizing the relationship between teaching and clinical skills in a residency program. J Grad Med Educ. 2018;10(4):459–63. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-18-00039.1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Zackoff MW, Real FJ, DeBlasio D, et al. Objective assessment of resident teaching competency through a longitudinal, clinically integrated, resident-as-teacher curriculum. Acad Pediatr. 2019;19(6):698–702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2019.01.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Trowbridge RL, Snydman LK, Skolfield J, Hafler J, Bing-You RG. A systematic review of the use and effectiveness of the Objective Structured Teaching Encounter. Med Teach. 2011;33(11):893–903. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2011.577463.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jhaveri VV, Currier PF, Johnson JH. Bridging the gap between do one and teach one: impact of a procedural objective structured teaching encounter on resident procedural teaching proficiency. Med Sci Educ. 2020;30(2):905–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-020-00972-7. Published 2020 May 6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Jones N, Milanes L, Banales V, Price I, Gomez I, Hughes S. Difficult interpersonal encounters with medical students and residents: Two Objective Standardized Teaching Encounters. MedEdPORTAL. 2017;13:10640. Published 2017 Oct 11. https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10640.

  7. Bahar RC, O’Shea AW, Li ES, et al. The pipeline starts in medical school: characterizing clinician-educator training programs for U.S. medical students. Med Educ Online. 2022;27(1):2096841. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2022.2096841.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Mintz M, Southern DA, Ghali WA, Ma IW. Validation of the 25-item Stanford Faculty Development Program Tool on clinical teaching effectiveness. Teach Learn Med. 2015;27(2):174–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2015.1011645.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, Elliott V, Fernandez M, O’Neal L, McLeod L, Delacqua G, Delacqua F, Kirby J, Duda SN, REDCap Consortium. The REDCap consortium: building an international community of software partners. J Biomed Inform. 2019;95:103208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Rosenzveig A, Raiche I, Fung BSC, Gawad N. Self-assessment in general Surgery applicants: an insight into interview performance. J Surg Res. 2022;273:155–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2021.12.031.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This case used in the OSTE was originally written and developed by Hannah G. Kay, MD and Jill Braddock-Watson, MA-CCC-SLP. The authors wish to thank Jill Braddock-Watson and the Center for Experiential Learning and Assessment (CELA) at Vanderbilt University Medical Center for assistance with case simulation design and implementation.

Funding

No funds, grants, or other support was received.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kendra P. Parekh.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This study was deemed to be exempt by the Vanderbilt IRB (##210874).

Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mahoney, M.R., Gayoso, M.E., Belsky, N.A. et al. Observed Structured Teaching Experiences (OSTEs) in a Students as Teachers Course. Med.Sci.Educ. 34, 13–18 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-023-01952-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-023-01952-3

Keywords

Navigation