Skip to main content
Log in

The Effectiveness of a Specific Foundation Year 1 Induction Programme in Improving Confidence for Newly Qualified Doctors in the UK

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Medical Science Educator Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Despite the completion of 5 or 6 years of undergraduate study, the transition to a newly qualified foundation year 1 doctor (FY1) in the UK has been recognised as challenging. We created a specific FY1 Induction Programme and aimed to evaluate its effectiveness on perceived confidence and preparedness for newly qualified doctors by assessing their responses to surveys before and after the delivery of the course.

Methods

Pre- and post-course surveys were administered at the start and end of the course, respectively. All questions were subjective and used a 5-point Likert scale (1, not at all confident, to 5, definitely confident) to assess perceived confidence in a range of questions before and after the course.

Results

A total of 35 participants completed the pre-course survey and 41 completed the post-course survey. For all questions, there was a statistically significant increase in confidence ratings. All 41 participants completing the post-course questionnaire responded ‘yes’ to feeling more confident to be an FY1 after completing the programme compared to before (100%).

Conclusions

Our study, along with previously published work, has shown a repeatable positive effect with implementation of transition courses for newly qualified doctors. Future research in this area could focus on more large-scale standardised learning events incorporated by different trusts prior to commencement as an FY1, to see if the positive effects found in our study are translatable across other regions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Goldacre MJ, Lambert T, Evans J, Turner G. Preregistration house officers’ views on whether their experience at medical school prepared them well for their jobs: national questionnaire survey. BMJ. 2003;326(7397):1011–2. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.326.7397.1011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Monrouxe LV, Grundy L, Mann M, John Z, Panagoulas E, Bullock A, et al. How prepared are UK medical graduates for practice? A rapid review of the literature 2009–2014. BMJ Open. 2017;7(1): e013656. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. General Medical Council. Be prepared: are new doctors safe to practise? 2014.

  4. Illing J, Morrow G, Kergon C, Burford B, Spencer J, Peile E, et al. How prepared are medical graduates to begin practice? A comparison of three diverse UK medical schools. London: GMC; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tallentire VR, Smith SE, Wylde K, Cameron HS. Are medical graduates ready to face the challenges of foundation training? Postgrad Med J. 2011;87(1031):590–5. https://doi.org/10.1136/pgmj.2010.115659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. General Medical Council. The State of Medical Education and Practice in the UK. 2019.

  7. Jen MH, Bottle A, Majeed A, Bell D, Aylin P. Early in-hospital mortality following trainee doctors’ first day at work. PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e7103. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dornan T, Ashcroft D, Heathfield H, Lewis P, Miles J, Taylor D, et al. An in depth investigation into cause of prescribing errors by foundation trainees in relation to their medical education. EQUIP study. London: GMC; 2009.

  9. Kennedy MB, Haq I, Ferns G, Williams SE, Okorie M. The role of undergraduate teaching, learning and a national prescribing safety assessment in preparation for practical prescribing: UK medical students’ perspective. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2019;85(10):2390–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.14058.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cullinan S, O’Mahony D, Byrne S. Use of an e-learning educational module to better equip doctors to prescribe for older patients: a randomised controlled trial. Drugs Aging. 2017;34:367–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-017-0451-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Teagle A, George M, Gainsborough N, Haq I, Okorie M. Preparing medical students for clinical practice: easing the transition. Perspect Med Educ. 2017;6:277–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-017-0352-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Beedham W, Wanigasooriya K, Layton GR, Taing Chan L, Darr A, Mittapalli D. The effectiveness of a foundation year 1 doctor preparation course for final year medical students. J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2021;8:2382120520984184. https://doi.org/10.1177/2382120520984184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Blencowe NS, Van Hamel C, Bethune R, Aspinall R. ‘From scared to prepared’: targeted structured induction training during the transition from medical school to foundation doctor. Perspect Med Educ. 2015;4(2):90–2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-015-0168-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Benè KL, Bergus G. When learners become teachers: a review of peer teaching in medical student education. Fam Med. 2014;46(10):783–7.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge the following people at the Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust; Debra Baker for her assistance with course organisation and the other faculty members (Professor Helen Steed, Miss Nuha Yassin, Dr Michael Norrel, Dr Swetha Byravan, Dr Emily Fox, Dr Priya Sarkar, Dr Elizabeth Bentley, Dr Bethany Gorman, Dr Milad Baburi and Dr Sonika Sethi) for their time in teaching on the programme.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

KKG, NB and KJ were involved in conceptualisation and in designing the programme. KKG and NB facilitated organisation and delivery of the programme including survey design and distribution as well as formal analysis of the data. KKG was involved in writing the original draft. All authors reviewed, edited and authorised the manuscript prior to submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Keshav Kumar Gupta.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

Our study was authorised by the trust research and development team (Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust) who advised that ethical approval was not required.

Consent to Participate

Results were anonymised and no participant identifiable information was stored.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 19 kb)

Supplementary file2 (DOCX 14 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gupta, K.K., Bhamra, N. & Jolly, K. The Effectiveness of a Specific Foundation Year 1 Induction Programme in Improving Confidence for Newly Qualified Doctors in the UK. Med.Sci.Educ. 32, 1073–1076 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-022-01616-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-022-01616-8

Keywords

Navigation