Skip to main content
Log in

Reading and Study Habits of Medical Students on Clerkships and Performance Outcomes: a Multi-institutional Study

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Medical Science Educator Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To describe medical students’ reading habits and resources used during clinical clerkships, and to assess whether these are associated with performance outcomes.

Method

Authors administered a cross-sectional survey to medical students at 3 schools midway through the clerkship year. Closed and open-ended questions focused on resources used to read and learn during the most recent clerkship, time spent and purpose for using these resources, influencers on study habits, and barriers. A multiple regression model was used to predict performance outcomes.

Results

Overall response rate was 53% (158/293). Students spent most of their time studying for clerkship exams and rated question banks and board review books as most useful for exam preparation. Sixty-seven percent used textbooks (including pocket-size). For patient care, online databases and pocket-sized textbooks were rated most useful. The main barrier to reading was time. Eighty percent of students ranked classmates/senior students as most influential regarding recommended resources. Hours spent reading for exams was the only significant predictor of USMLE Step 2 scores related to study habits. The predominant advice offered to future students was to read.

Conclusions

These findings can help inform students and educational leadership about resources students use, how they use them, and links to performance outcomes, in an effort to guide them on maximizing learning on busy clerkships. With peers being most influential, it is important not only to provide time to help students build strong reading and study habits early, but also to guide them towards reliable resources, so they will recommend useful information to others.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data and Material

Deidentified survey response data available upon request.

Code Availability

Survey administered using Qualtrics.

References

  1. Liaison Committee on Medical Education: functions and structure of a medical school standards for accreditation of medical education programs leading to the MD degree. https://lcme.org/publications/ Accessed October 2020.

  2. Leff B, Harper GM. The reading habits of medicine clerks at one medical school: frequency, usefulness, and difficulties. Acad Med. 2006;81(5):489–94. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ACM.0000222273.90705.a6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Watling C, Driessen E, van der Vleuten CP, Vanstone M, Lingard L. Beyond individualism: professional culture and its influence on feedback. Med Educ. 2013;47(6):585–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2021.1891304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Robinson EJ, Einav S, Fox A. Reading to learn: prereaders’ and early readers’ trust in text as a source of knowledge. Dev Psychol. 2013;49(3):505–13. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cooper AL, Elnicki DM. Resource utilization patterns of third-year medical students. Clin Teach. 2011;8(1):43–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-498X.2010.00393.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. DeZee KJ, Durning S, Denton GD. Effect of electronic versus print format and different reading resources on knowledge acquisition in the third-year medicine clerkship. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, An International Journal. 2005;17(4):349–54. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328015tlm1704_7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fafard J, Snell L. Reading habits of house-staff: what, where and why. Med Teach. 1989;11(3–4):279–83. https://doi.org/10.3109/01421598909146413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lai CJ, Aagaard E, Brandenburg S, Nadkarni M, Wei HG, Baron R. Brief report: Multiprogram evaluation of reading habits of primary care internal medicine residents on ambulatory rotations. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21(5):486–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00432.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Johnson KH, Dayrit M, Bazargan M. The reading habits of family practice residents. Fam Med. 1997;29(7):488–91.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kim JJ, Kim DY, Kaji AH, et al. Reading habits of general surgery residents and association with american board of surgery in-training examination performance. JAMA Surg. 2015;150(9):882–9. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2015.1698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Clark C, Rumbold K. Reading for pleasure: a research overview. Natl Lit Trust. 2006;1–35. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0037910

  12. Mak HW, Fancourt D. Longitudinal associations between reading for pleasure and child maladjustment: Results from a propensity score matching analysis. Soc Sci Med. 2020;253:112971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Watson EM. The importance of leisure reading to health sciences students: results of a survey. Health Info Libr J. 2016;33(1):33–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/hir.12129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bulte C, Betts A, Garner K, Durning S. Student teaching: views of student near-peer teachers and learners. Med Teach. 2007;29(6):583–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590701583824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lockspeiser TM, O’Sullivan P, Teherani A, Muller J. Understanding the experience of being taught by peers: the value of social and cognitive congruence. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2008;13(3):361–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-006-9049-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wynter L, Burgess A, Kalman E, Heron JE, Bleasel J. Medical students: what educational resources are they using? BMC Med Educ. 2019;19:36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1462-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed substantially to the manuscript warranting authorship as per ICMJE guidelines, i.e., to the study conception/design or acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of the data, drafting/revising, providing final approval, and are ensuring accountability.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Terry Kind.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

This study was approved as exempt by the Institutional Review Boards at each participating institution, with The George Washington University Office of Human Research serving as the lead. Consent from participants was obtained electronically.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kind, T., Olvet, D.M., Farina, G. et al. Reading and Study Habits of Medical Students on Clerkships and Performance Outcomes: a Multi-institutional Study. Med.Sci.Educ. 31, 1957–1966 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-021-01409-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-021-01409-5

Keywords

Navigation