Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Model Curriculum for Developing Teaching Competencies in Future Medical Educators

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Medical Science Educator Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Advanced Teaching in Gross Anatomy elective course is designed to help second-year students pursuing an anatomy master’s degree to develop expertise in teaching. A key innovation allows student educators (SEs) to develop core teaching competencies in an authentic classroom setting by offering the elective concurrently with a first-year graduate course in gross anatomy. Each curricular component targets one or more teaching competencies: content knowledge, learner-centeredness, interpersonal and communication skills, professionalism and role modeling, practice-based reflection, and systems-based practice. Readings, seminars, and interactive and application-based activities such as the development and delivery of a regional anatomy lecture with associated learning objectives and assessment tool, creation and delivery of an active learning review, and production of a teaching philosophy statement are used to introduce and apply evidence-based educational strategies, while also situating future educators within the larger systems of anatomy and medical education today. Iterative multi-source feedback and deliberate practice skills are modeled and applied throughout the elective. From 2014 to 2016, 11 SEs completed the elective; 82% returned pre- and post-course surveys. Self-reported confidence in eight educational skills significantly increased after the course (p < 0.01), demonstrating the educational impact of the elective. Data collected from teaching evaluations indicate the high quality of the lectures and active learning reviews by the SEs. The curriculum model could be easily adapted to train future educators at different levels of their career (i.e., master’s, doctoral, post-doctoral) across all sub-fields of anatomical sciences and other basic medical sciences. Widespread adoption of this model curriculum in science graduate program would expand the educational training available to future medical educators and over time, improve the quality of medical education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Leung W-C. Competency based medical training: review. BMJ. 2002;325(7366):693–5. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.325.7366.693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Frank JR, Snell LS, Ten Cate O, Holmboe ES, Carraccio C, Swing SR, et al. Competency-based medical education: theory to practice. Med Teach. 2010;32(8):638–45. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2010.501190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Srinivasan M, Li S-TT, Meyers FJ, Pratt DD, Collins JB, Braddock C, et al. “Teaching as a competency”: competencies for medical educators. Acad Med. 2011;86(10):1211–20. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31822c5b9a.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Steinert Y, Mann K, Anderson B, Barnett BM, Centeno A, Naismith L, et al. A systematic review of faculty development initiatives designed to enhance teaching effectiveness: a 10-year update: BEME guide no. 40. Med Teach. 2016;38(8):769–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2016.1181851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Teikan A, Harris I. Preparing health professions education leaders worldwide: a description of masters-level programs. Med Teach. 2012;34(1):52–8. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2011.599895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Steinert Y. Faculty development: on becoming a medical educator. Med Teach. 2010;34(1):74–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fitzgerald JT, Burkhardt JC, Kasten SJ, Mullan PB, Santen SA, Sheets KJ, et al. Assessment challenges in competency-based education: a case study in health professions education. Med Teach. 2016;38(5):482–90. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2015.1047754.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cutting MF, Saks NS. Twelve tips for utilizing principles of learning to support medical education. Med Teach. 2012;34(1):20–4. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2011.558143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Harden RM, Laidlaw JM, Be FAIR. To students: four principles that lead to more effective learning. Med Teach. 2013;35(1):27–31. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.732717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Roediger HL, Butler AC. The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention. Trends Cogn Sci. 2011;15(1):20–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.09.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Miller GE. The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Acad Med. 1990;65(9):S63–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199009000-00045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nicol DJ, Macfarlane-Dick D. Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Stud High Educ. 2006;31(2):199–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ericsson KA. Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. Acad Med. 2004;79(10):S70–81. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200410001-00022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Aronson L. Twelve tips for teaching reflection at all levels of medical education. Med Teach. 2001;33:200–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kearns KD, Sullivan CS. Resources and practices to help graduate students and postdoctoral fellows write statements of teaching philosophy. Adv Physiol Educ. 2011;35(2):136–45. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00123.2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kirkpatrick DL, Kirkpatrick JD, editors. Evaluating training programs: the four levels, 3rd edition. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Harden RM, Crosby JRAMEE. Education guide no. 20: the good teacher is more than a lecturer—the twelve roles of the teacher. Med Teach. 2000;22(4):334–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Sincere thanks to the master’s students who have participated in the elective since 2014, and to the Modern Human Anatomy program for supporting the creation of this course offering. Thank you to the reviewers who provided thoughtful suggestions that have improved this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Danielle F. Royer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Online Resource 1

(DOCX 45 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Royer, D.F. A Model Curriculum for Developing Teaching Competencies in Future Medical Educators. Med.Sci.Educ. 28, 89–100 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-017-0511-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-017-0511-4

Keywords

Navigation