Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Development of Medical Student Competence: Tracking Its Trajectory Over Time

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Medical Science Educator Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Developmental theories recognize that there is a progression of competence over time. However, despite growing interest in the developmental trajectories of medical students, little research exists that longitudinally documents their gains across domains. Our goal was to track students’ perceived competence over time and to identify different patterns across competencies.

Method

At the end of each of their four academic years, four successive cohorts of Harvard Medical School (HMS) students were surveyed to indicate how much they had learned in each of 28 areas. Nineteen items mapped onto the six competency areas defined by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) and competency cluster scores were calculated for each.

Results

Medical knowledge, patient care, and systems-based practice increased significantly each year from the prior year’s baseline, with the other competencies demonstrating less consistent patterns of growth. At the end of year 1, interpersonal skills, problem-based learning and improvement, and professionalism were rated highest. By the end of year 4, interpersonal skills remained the most highly rated, and systems-based practice, which grew considerably from years 1 to 4, was still rated lowest.

Conclusions

Medical education results in a progressive trajectory of overall competence, with increases, some small and some large, found for every domain for every year. However, the six domains start from differing baselines and progress at different rates over students’ undergraduate careers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lowry BN, Vansaghi LM, Rigler SK, Stites SW. Applying the milestones in an internal medicine residency program curriculum: a foundation for outcome-based learner assessment under the next accreditation system. Acad Med. 2013;88:1665–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. AAgaard E, Kane GC, Conforti L, Hood S, Caverzagie KJ, Smith C, et al. Early feedback on the use of the internal medicine milestones in assessment of resident performance. J Grad Med Educ. 2013;5:433–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lurie SJ. History and practice of competency-based assessment. Med Educ. 2012;46:49–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Carraccio CL, Englander R. From Flexner to competencies: reflections on a decade and the journey ahead. Acad Med. 2013;88:1067–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ten Cate O, Billett S. Competency-based medical education: origins, perspectives and potentialities. Med Educ. 2014;48:325–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hauer KE, Kohlwes K, Cornett P, Hollander H, Ten Cate O, Ranji SR, et al. Identifying entrustable professional activities in internal medicine training. J Grad Med Educ. 2013;5:54–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Teherani A, Chen HC. The next steps in competency-based medical education: milestones, entrustable professional activities and observable practice activities. J Gen Intern Med. 2014;29:1090–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. van Loon KA, Driessen EW, Teunissen PW, Scheele F. Experiences with EPAs, potential benefits and pitfalls. Med Teach. 2014;36:698–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Handfield-Jones R, Mann K, Challis M, Hobma S, Klass D, McManus I, et al. Linking assessment to learning: a new route to quality assurance in medical practice. Med Educ. 2002;36:949–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Newton BW, Barber L, Clardy J, Cleveland E, O’Sullivan P. Is there hardening of the heart during medical school? Acad Med. 2008;83:244–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Krupat E, Pelletier S, Alexander EK, Hirsh D, Ogur B, Schwartzstein R. Can changes in the principal clinical year prevent the erosion of students’ patient-centered beliefs? Acad Med. 2009;84:582–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Freeman A, Van der Vleuten C, Nouns Z, Ricketts C. Progress testing internationally. Med Teach. 2010;32:451–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Schuwirth LW, van der Vleuten CP. The use of progress testing. Perspect Med Educ. 2012;1:24–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Makoul G, Winter RJ. The student perception survey: a tool for assessing medical school curricula. Acad Med. 1997;72:410–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Makoul G, Curry RH, Thompson JA. Gauging the outcomes of change in a new medical curriculum: students’ perceptions of progress toward educational goals. Acad Med. 2000;75:S102–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Accreditation Council on General Medical Education. Core competencies definitions. http://www.gahec.org/CME/Liasions/0%29ACGME%20Core%20Competencies%20Definitions.htm. Accessed 2 Sept 2015.

  17. Teunissen PW, Stapel DA, Scheele F, Scherpbier AJ, Boor K, van Diemen-Steenvoorde JA, et al. The influence of context on residents’ evaluations: effects of priming on clinical judgment and affect. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2009;14:23–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yeates P, Cardell J, Byrne G, Eva KW. Relatively speaking: contrast effects influence assessors’ scores and narrative feedback. Med Educ. 2015;49:909–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ma HK, Min C, Neville A, Eva K. How good is good? Students and assessors’ perceptions of qualitative markers of performance. Teach Learn Med. 2013;25:15–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tweed M, Thompson-Fawcett M, Wilkinson T. Decision-making bias in assessment: the effect of aggregating objective information and anecdote. Med Teach. 2013;35:832–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Blanch-Hartigan D. Medical students’ self-assessment of performance: results from three meta-analyses. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;84:3–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Groves RM, Peytcheva E. The impact of nonresponse rates on nonresponse bias: a meta-analysis. Public Opin Q. 2008;72:167–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Davern M. Nonresponse rates are a problematic indicator of nonresponse bias in survey research. Health Serv Res. 2013;48:905–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Johnson TP, Wislar JS. Response rates and nonresponse errors in surveys. JAMA. 2012;307:1805–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edward Krupat.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Krupat, E., Pelletier, S.R. The Development of Medical Student Competence: Tracking Its Trajectory Over Time. Med.Sci.Educ. 26, 61–67 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-015-0190-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-015-0190-y

Keywords

Navigation