Abstract
The corporate brand is a valuable intangible asset composed of several associations including corporate social responsibility (CSR). This research effort aims to ascertain the usefulness of CSR by answering the research question: What is the strength of corporate brand associations of CSR in the perspective of the general public? The qualitative research tool of brand concept map (BCM) has been used to prepare consensus BCM for three large corporate brands that the general public in India associates strongly with CSR viz. TATA, ITC and Infosys. Data has been collected from 50 respondents. The structural features of the BCM have been analysed and their reliability has been assessed. This research makes a methodological contribution to the ongoing debate on usefulness of CSR by using the qualitative tool of BCM and by adopting the general public perspective. This study reveals that the corporate brand associations of CSR are not a highly integrated set of associations having a high possibility of activation. Rather, CSR has a limited number of dimensions in the perception of the general public and CSR associations are at best only secondary associations and not primary associations. The findings of this research can help to manage the corporate brand image. While allocating money between CSR and non-CSR activities, the larger allocations should be made for non-CSR activities that will help to develop the size of the corporate brand and the associated product and service brands. The ethical stances of the organisation should be highlighted and ethical stewards should be nurtured.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aaker DA (1991) Managing brand equity. Macmillan, New York
Aaker DA (2004) Leveraging the corporate brand. Calif Manag Rev 46(3):6–18
Aldag RJ (2013) No CPR for CSR: a call to abandon search for the “holy grail”. Ind Organ Psychol 6(4):372–376
Aquinis H, Glavas A (2012) What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: a review and research agenda. J Manag 38(4):932–968
Balmer JMT (2012) Corporate brand management imperatives: custodianship, credibility and calibration. Calif Manag Rev 54(3):6–33
Berenes G, Van Riel CBM, Van Bruggen GH (2005) Corporate associations and consumer product responses: the moderating role of corporate brand dominance. J Mark 69(3):35–48
Boal KB, Peery N (1985) The cognitive structure of corporate social responsibility. J Manag 11(3):71–82
Brown TJ, Dacin PA (1997) The company and the product: corporate associations and consumer product responses. J Mark 61:68–84
Brown TJ, Dacin PA, Prat MG, David A (2006) Identity, intended image, construed image and reputation: an interdisciplinary framework and suggested terminology. J Acad Mark Sci 34(2):99–106
Brunk K (2010) Exploring origins of ethical company/brand perceptions—a consumer perspective of corporate ethics. J Bus Res 63:255–262
Caldwell C, Hayes LA, Bernal P, Karri R (2008) Ethical stewardship—implications for leadership and trust. J Bus Ethics 78(1–2):153–164
Carroll AB, Shabana KM (2010) The business case for corporate social responsibility: a review of concepts, research and practice. Int J Manag Rev 12(1):85–105
Collins AM, Loftus EF (1975) A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychol Rev 82(6):407
Dawkins J (2004) Corporate responsibility: the communication challenge. J Commun Manag 9(2):108–119
Du S, Bhattacharya CB, Sen S (2010) Maximizing business returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR): the role of CSR communication. Int J Manag Rev. doi:10.1111/J.1468-2370.2009.00276.x
Economic Times (2013) http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/marketstats/Pid-50.pageno-2. Sort by-current year Rank.sortorder-asc.year-2013.cms (Accessed 11 May 2015)
Fassin Y, Van Rossen A, Buelens M (2011) Small business owner-managers’ perceptions of business ethics and CSR-related concepts. J Bus Ethics 98(3):425–453
Fassin Y, Wemer A, Van Rossen A, Signon S, Garriga E, Woltzien HV, Schlierer HJ (2015) CSR and related terms in SME owner manager’s mental models in six European countries: national context matters. J Bus Ethics 128(2):433–456
French A, Smith G (2013) Measuring brand association strength: a consumer based brand equity approach. Eur J Mark 47(8):1356–1367
Frynas JG, Stephens S (2014) Political corporate social responsibility reviewing theories and setting new agendas. Int J Manag Rev. doi:10.1111/ijmr12049
Grohmann B, Bodur HO (2014) Brand social responsibility: conceptualization, measurement and outcomes. J Bus Ethics. doi:10.1007/510551-014-2279-4
Handelman JM, Arnold SJ (1999) The role of marketing actions with a social dimension: appeals to the institutional environment. J Mark 63:33–48
Henderson GR, Iacobucci D, Calder BJ (2002) Using network analysis to understand brands. Adv Consum Res 29(1):397–405
Hockerts K (2007) Managerial perceptions of the business case for corporate social responsibility CSR and business in society, Working Paper No. 03-2007, CBS Working Paper Series. CBS Centre for Corporate Social Responsibility
Hoeffler S, Keller KL (2002) Building brand equity through corporate societal marketing. J Public Policy Mark 21(1):78–89
Huang CC, Yen SW, Liu CY, Huang PC (2014) The relationship among corporate social responsibility, service quality, corporate image and purchase intention. Int J Organ Innov 6(3):68–84
Ilicic J, Webster CM (2015) Consumer values of corporate and celebrity brand associations. Qual Mark Res 18(2):164–187
James D (2005) Guilty through association: brand association transfer to brand alliances. J Consum Mark 22(1):14–24
John DR, Loken B, Kim KO, Monga AB (2006) Brand concept maps: a methodology for identifying brand association networks. J Mark Res 43(4):549–563
Joiner C (1998) Concept mapping in marketing: a research tool for uncovering consumers’ knowledge structure associations. In: Alba J, Hutchinson JW (eds) NA—advances in consumer research, vol 25. Association for Consumer Research, Provo, pp 311–322. http://acrwebsite.org/volumes/7890/volumes/v25/NA-25 (Accessed 26 June 2015)
Keller KL (1993) Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. J Mark 57:1–22
Keller KL (2003) Brand synthesis: the multidimensionality of brand knowledge. J Consum Res 29:595–600
Keller KL, Lehmann DR (2006) Brands and branding research findings future priorities. Mark Sci 25(6):740–759
Keller KL, Parameswaran MG, Jacob I (2011) Strategic brand management: building, measuring and managing brand equity, 3rd edn. Pearson, Delhi, p 56
KLD Research and Analytics, Inc (2003) KLD ratings data: inclusive social rating criteria. https://datalib.library.ualberta.ca/data/KLDRating (Accessed 26 Jan 2015)
Krishnamurthy BV, Jalanwalla DD (2012) ITC and sustainability. http://www.academia.edu/1546382 (Accessed 30 April 2015)
Lee MDP (2008) A review of the theories of corporate social responsibility: its evolutionary path and the road ahead. Int J Manag Rev 10(1):53–73
Maignan I, Ferrell OC (2004) Corporate social responsibility and marketing: an integrative framework. J Acad Mark Sci 32(1):3–19
Malhotra NK, Dash S (2012) Marketing research: an applied orientation. Pearson, Delhi
Mann BJS, Ghuman MK (2014) Scale development and validation for measuring corporate brand associations. J Brand Manag 21(1):43–62
Mehta V (2014) Editor unplugged: media, magnates, netas and me. Viking, Penguin Books, Gurgaon, pp 51–65
Melo T, Galan JI (2011) Effects of corporate social responsibility on brand value. J Brand Manag 18(6):423–437
Miles MB, Huberman AM (1994) Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks
Okada EM, Reibstein DJ (1998) When !@#? (bad stuff) happens… effects of related and unrelated positive associations on the influence of negative secondary associations. Adv Consum Res 25(1):349–356
Schmitka O, Sattler H, Zenker S (2012) Advanced brand concept maps: a new approach for evaluating the favorability of brand association networks. Int J Res Mark 29(3):265–274
Schmitt B (2012) The consumer psychology of brands. J Consum Psychol 22:7–17
Schumpeter (2015) The business of business. The Economist, March 21, 2015, p 55
Schwaiger M (2004) Components and parameters of corporate reputation—an empirical study. Schmalenbach Bus Rev 56:46–71
Shamma HM (2012) Toward a comprehensive understanding of corporate reputation: concept, measurement and implications. Int J Bus Manag 7(16):151–168
Shamma HM, Hasan SS (2009) Customer and non-customer perspectives for examining corporate reputation. J Product Brand Manag 18(5):326–337
Singh A, Verma P (2014) From philanthropy to mandatory CSR: a journey towards mandatory corporate social responsibility in India. Eur J Bus Manag 6(14):146–152
Srinivas Raju S (2005) Is ‘IT’ all for land? Outlook Magazine, Nov 7, 2005
Stuart HJ (2013) Positioning the corporate brand as sustainable: leadership de rigueur. J Brand Manag 20(9):793–799
Teichert TA, Schöntag K (2010) Exploring consumer knowledge structures using associative network analysis. Psychol Mark 27(4):369–398
Tsang EW (2014) Generalizing from research findings: the merits of case studies. Int J Manag Rev 16(4):369–383
Urde M (2013) The corporate brand identity matrix. J Brand Manag 20(9):742–761
Wallström A, Karlsson T, Sangari ES (2008) Building a corporate brand. the internal brand building process in swedish service firms. Brand Manag 16(1):40–50
Warlop L, Ratneshwar S, Van Osselaer SM (2005) Distinctive brand cues and memory for product consumption experiences. Int J Res Mark 22(1):27–44
Balmer JMT (2010) Explicating corporate brands and their management: reflections and directions from 1995. J Brand Manag 18:180–196
Yoo B, Donthu N, Lee S (2000) An examination of selected marketing mix elements and brand equity. J Acad Mark Sci 28(2):195–211
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bawa, A., Saha, A. Strength of corporate social responsibility as a corporate brand association: general public perspective. Decision 43, 313–332 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40622-016-0125-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40622-016-0125-5