Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Small-Business Owner-Managers’ Perceptions of Business Ethics and CSR-Related Concepts

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent academic articles point to an increased vagueness and overlap in concepts related to business ethics and corporate responsibility. Further, the perception of these notions can differ in the small-business world from the original academic definitions. This article focuses on the cognition of small-business owner-managers. Given the impact of small-business owner–managers on their ventures, corporate responsibility and ethical issues can take a different route in SMEs. The small-business owner–manager is able to shape the corporate culture and to enact values other than profit. Adopting a cognitive perspective, we have identified how the small-business owner–manager makes sense of notions linked to corporate social responsibility (CSR) and business ethics. The concept of sensemaking has recently been applied to CSR (Basu and Pallazzo, 2008; Cramer et al., 2006). Applying a cognitive perspective to small-business owners may help in explaining specific phenomena found within small-business ownership. For this research, the Repertory Grid Technique (RGT) is used, a method that has not previously been widely applied in the business and society field.

Our findings to an extent invalidate the confusion in terminology found in the academic literature. Small-business owner–managers, pragmatically and rather clearly, differentiate among the various concepts related to corporate responsibility and business ethics but, at the same time, they recognise the interrelationships and interdependencies of these concepts. These findings contribute to a better understanding of how small-business owners think and integrate corporate responsibility and ethical issues into their decision-making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrahamson, E. (1996). Management fashion. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 254-285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abrahamson, E., & Eisenman, M. (2001). Why management scholars must intervene strategically in the management knowledge market. Human Relations, 54(1), 67-75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abrahamson, E., & Fairchild, G. (2001). Knowledge industries and idea entrepreneurs. In C. Schoonhoven, Bird & E. Romanelli (Eds.), The entrepreneurship dynamic: Origins of entrepreneurship and the evolution of industries (pp. 147-177). Stanford: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Afuah, A. (2001). Dynamic Boundaries of the Firm: Are Firms better off being vertically integrated in the Face of Technological Change? Academy of Management Journal 44(6), 1209-1226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aguilera, R., Williams, C., Conley, J., & Rupp, D. (2006). Corporate Governance and Social Responsibility: a comparative analysis of the UK and the US. Corporate Governance An International Review, 14(3), 147-158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I.: 1991, ‘The Theory of Planned Behavior’, Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes 50(2), 179–211.

  • Arthaud-Day, M. (2005). Transnational Corporate Responsibility: A Tri-Dimensional Approach to International CSR Research. Business Ethics Quarterly, 15(1), 1-22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Attarça, M. and T. Jacquot: 2005, La représentation de la Responsabilité Sociale des Entreprises: une confrontation entre les approches théoriques et les visions managériales Paper presented at the XIViéme Conférence Internationale de Management Stratégique, Angers.

  • Balduck, A.-L., Van Rossem, A., & Buelens, M. (2010). Identifying competencies of volunteer board members of community sports clubs. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 39(2), 213-235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, M., L. (2007). Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility Academy of Management Review,, 32(3), 794-816.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R.: 1998, Cognitive Mechanisms in Entrepreneurship: Why and When Entrepreneurs Think Differently than Other People. Journal of Business Venturing 13, 275–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barr, P., S. (1998). Adapting to unfamiliar environmental events: A look at the evolution of interpretation and its role in strategic change. Organization Science, 9(6), 644-669.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basu, K. and G. Pallazzo: 2008, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: A Process Model of Sensemaking’, Academy of Management Journal 33(1), 122–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaver, G. (2002). Small Business, Entrepreneurship and Enterprise Development. Harlow: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Begley, T. (1995). Using Founder Status, Age of Firm, and Company Growth Rate as the Basis for Distinguishing Entrepreneurs from Managers and Smaller Businesses. Journal of Business Venturing, 10, 249-263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Begley, T., M., & Boyd, D., P. (1987). Psychological Characteristics Associated with Performance in Entrepreneurial Firms and Smaller Businesses Journal of Business Venturing, 2(1), 79-93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beltratti, A. (2005). The Complementarity between Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility. Geneva Papers on Risk & Insurance, 30(3), 373-386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendixen, M., & Thomas, A. (2000). Perceived qualities of a “good” chairman: A challenge for corporate governance in South Africa. South African Journal of Business Management, 31(2), 65-75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berglund, J., & Werr, A. (2000). The invincible character of management consulting rhetoric: How one blends incommensurates while keeping them apart. Organization, 7(4), 633-655.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bijmolt, T. H. A. and M. Wedel: 1995, ‘The Effects of Alternative Methods of Collecting Similarity Data for Multidimensional Scaling’, International Journal of Research in Marketing 12, 361–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boal, K., B., & Newman, P. (1985). The cognitive structure of Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of management, 11(3), 71-82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bood, R., P. (1998). Charting organizational learning: A comparison of multiple mapping techniques. In C. Eden & J. C. Spender (Eds.), Managerial and organizational cognition : Theory, methods and research (pp. 201-230). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucar, B., Glas, M., & Hisrich, R., D. (2003). Ethics and entrepreneurs: An international comparative study. Journal of Business Venturing 18(2), 261-281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucar, B., & Hisrich, R. (2001). Ethics of Business Managers vs. Entrepreneurs vs. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 6(1), 59-82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buelens, M. (2002). Management Shock. Tielt: Lannoo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busenitz, L., & Barney, J. (1997). Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in organizations: Biases and heuristics in strategic decision-making. Journal of Business Venturing, 12(1), 9-30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cacioppe, R., Forster, N., & Fox, M. (2008). A Survey of Managers’ Perceptions of Corporate Ethics and Social Responsibility and Actions may Affect Companies’ Success. Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 681-7000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calori, R., Johnson, G., & Sarnin, P. (1992). French and British top managers’ understanding of the structure and dynamics of their industries: A cognitive analysis and comparison. British Journal of Management, 3(1), 61-78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carland, J., Hoy, F., Boulton, W., & Carland, J.-A. (1984). Differentiating Entrepreneurs from Small Business Owners: A Conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 354-359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. (1991). The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39-48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A., & Buchholtz, A. (2006). Business and society: Ethics and stakeholder management. Mason: Thompson Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson, M. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92-117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commissie-Corporate-Governance: 2009, The Belgian Code on Corporate Governance. Retrieved 2 October, 2009, from http://www.corporategovernancecommittee.be/library/documents/final%20code/CorporateGovUKCode2009.pdf.

  • Conley, & Williams. (2005). Engage, embed, embellish: Theory versus practice in the Corporate Social Responsibility Movement. The Journal of Corporation Law, 31(1), 1-39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, A., C., & Hmieleski, K., M. (2007). The conflicting cognitions of corporating entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship, Theory and Practice, 31(1), 103-121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cossette, P., & Audet, M. (1992). Mapping of an idiosyncratic schema. Journal of Management Studies, 29(3), 325-347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramer, J., A. van der Heijden and J. Jonker: 2006, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: Making Sense Through Thinking and Acting’, Business Ethics A European Review 15(4), 380–389.

  • Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2004). Business Ethics: A European Perspective. Oxford: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • d’Amboise, G., & Muldowney, M. (1988). Management theory for small business: Attempts and requirements. Academy of Management Review,, 13(2), 226-250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daft, R., L., & Weick, K., E. (1984). Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 284-295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, K., Johnson, G., & de Chernatony, L. (1994). Differences in Managerial Cognitions of Competition. British Journal of Management, 5(2), 21-29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, T., K. (2003). Managerial Perceptions and the Essence of the Managerial World: What is an Interloper Business Executive to Make of the Academic-Researcher Perceptions of Managers. British Journal of Management, 14(1), 23-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Bakker, F., Groenewegen, P., & Den Hond, F. (2005). A bibliometric analysis of 30 years of research on corporate social responsibility and corporate social performance. Business and Society, 44(3), 283-317.

    Google Scholar 

  • De George, R., T.. (1987). The Status of Business Ethics: Past and Future. Journal of Business Ethics, 6(2), 201-212.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Wilde, J.: 2007, January 30, Bedrijven: Bedenkingen bij de MVO-hype. De Tijd, p. 11.

  • Denison, D., Lief, C., & Ward, J. (2004). Culture in Family-Owned Enterprises: Recognizing and Leveraging Unique Strengths. Family Business Review, 17(1), 61-70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T.: 2002, ‘The Stakeholder Revolution and the Clarkson Principles’, Business Ethics Quarterly 12(2), 107–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65-91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunfee, T., W., & Donaldson, T. (1995). Contractarian business ethics: Current status and next steps Business Ethics Quarterly, 5(2), 173-186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, W., N., & Ginsberg, A. (1986). A socio-cognitive network approach to organizational analysis. Human Relations, 39(11), 950-976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, W., G., Jr. (1988). Culture and continuity in family firms. Family Business Review, 1(1), 37-50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterby-Smith, M. (1980). The design, analysis and interpretation of repertory grids. Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 13, 3-24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterby-Smith, M., Thorpe, R., & Holman, D. (1996). Using repertory grids in management. Journal of European industrial Training, 20(3), 3-30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard-Harribey, L. (2006). Corporate social responsibility as a new paradigm in the European policy: how CSR comes to legitimate the European regulation process. Corporate Governance, 6(4), 358-368.

    Google Scholar 

  • EC: 2001, Green Paper- Promoting a European Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility – COM 366 (European Commission, Luxembourg).

  • Eden, C. (1992). On the nature of cognitive maps. Journal of Management Studies, 29(3), 261-265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden, C., & Ackermann, F. (1998). Analysing and comparing idiographic causal maps. In C. Eden & J. C. Spender (Eds.), Managerial and organizational cognition: Theory, methods and research (pp. 192-209). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden, C., & Spender, J., C. (1998). Managerial and organizational cognition : Theory, methods and research. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egels, N. (2005). Sorting out the mess, A Review of Definitions of Ethical Issues in Business. Center for Business in Society, GRI, Göteborg University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J. (2006). Governance for Sustainability. Corporate Governance An International Review, 14(6), 522-529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, L., A., & Schroth, R., J.. (2002). How companies lie – Why Enron is just the tip of the iceberg: Nicholas Brealey Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enderle, G. (2004). Global Competition and corporate responsibilities of small and medium-sized enterprises. Business Ethics: A European Review, 13(1), 50-63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein: 1987, ‘The Corporate Social Policy Process: Beyond Business Ethics, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Corporate Social Responsiveness’, California Management Review 29(3), 99-114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fassin, Y. (2005). The Reasons behind Non-ethical Behaviour in Business and Entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics, 60, 265-279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fassin, Y. and A. Van Rossem: 2009, ‘Corporate Governance in the CSR and Ethics Debate: Sensemaking of Experts and CEOs about Social Issues in Management’, Corporate Governance: An International Review 17(5), 573–593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell, O. (2004). Business ethics and customer stakeholders. Academy of Management Executive, 18(2), 126-129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fincham, R. (1995). Business Process Reengineering and the comodification of managerial knowledge. Journal of Marketing Management, 11(7), 707-719.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fineman, S. (2001). Fashioning the environment. Organization, 8(1), 17-31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiol, M., & Huff, S. (1992). Maps for managers: Where are we? Where do we go from here? Journal of Management Studies, 29(3), 267-285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, J. (2004). Social Responsibility and Ethics: Clarifying the Concepts. Journal of Business Ethics, 52, 391-400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S., T., & Taylor, S., E. (1991). Social cognition. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, D. (1999). Cognitive approaches to new ventures creation. International Journal of Management Reviews, 1(4), 415-439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fransella, F., Bell, R., & Bannister, D. (2004). A manual for Repertory Grid Technique (2nd edition ed.). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, E., & Reed, D. (1994). Stockholders and Stakeholders: A New Perspective on Corporate Governance. California Management Review, 25(3), 88-106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallo, M. (2004). The family business and its social responsibilities. Family Business Review, 17(2), 135-147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garriga, E., & Melé, D. (2004). Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1/2), 51-71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasorek, D. (2003). Ethics beyond corporate governance. Pharmaceutical Executive, 23(3), 98-104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, K. (2000). The Moral Basis of Stakeholder Theory. Journal of Business Ethics,, 26(3), 245-257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, J., & Whittle, S. (1992). Management by panacea: Accounting for transience. The Journal of Management Studies, 30(2), 281-295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsberg, A. (1989). Construing the business portfolio: A cognitive model for diversification. The Journal of Management Studies, 26(4), 417-439.

    Google Scholar 

  • GreenBiz.com: 2003, SME Key.

  • Grice, J. W.: 2002, ‘Idiogrid: Software for the Management and Analysis of Repertory Grids’, Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers 34(3), 338–341.

  • Grice, J. W.: 2003, Idiogrid Manual Version 2.2: Idiographic Analysis with Repertory Grids (Oklahoma).

  • Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., & Black, W. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis (5 th. Edition ed.). Upper Saddle River (New Jersey): Prentice Hall International, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, A., & Nordqvist, M. (2008). Professional management in family businesses: Toward an extended understanding. Family Business Review, 21(1), 51-69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannafey, F. (2003). Entrepreneurship and Ethics: A Literature Review. Journal of Business Ethics, 46, 99-110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, U., Bode, M., & Moosmayer, D. (2004). Stakeholder Theory between General and Contextual Approaches – A German View. Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik, 5(3), 312-318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, G. R., D. Iacobucci and B. J. Calder: 2001, Using network analysis to understand brands. Advances in Consumer Research, 29, 397-405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendry, J. (2001). Missing the target normative stakeholder and the corporate governance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 11(1), 159-176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, T., E., Rholes, W., S., & Jones, C. R. (1977). Category Accessibility and Impression Formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13(2), 141-154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgkinson, G. (2005). Images of the competitive space. Houndmills: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, J., Hoelscher, M., & Sorenson, R. (2006). Achieving sustained competitive advantage: A family capital theory. Family Business Review, 19(2), 135-145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huczynski, A., A. (1993). Explaining the succession of management fads. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 4(2), 443-463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huff, S., A. (1990). Mapping strategic thought. In S. Huff, A. (Ed.), Mapping strategic thought (pp. 11-47). Chichester: Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isabella, L., A., & Waddock, S., A. (1994). Top management team certainty: Environmental assessments, teamwork, and performance implications. Journal of Management, 20(4), 835-859.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamali, D., Safieddine, A., & Rabbath, M. (2008). Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility Synergies and Interrelationships. Corporate Governance An International Review,, 16(5), 443-459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janckowicz, D. (2003). The easy guide to repertory grids. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, M. (1998). Theory and practice of comparing causal maps. In C. Eden & J. C. Spender (Eds.), Managerial and organizational cognition : Theory, methods and research (pp. 231-249). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyner, B., & Payne, D. (2002). Evolution and Implementation: A Study of Values, Business Ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 41, 297-311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaish, S., & Gilad, b. (1991). Characteristics of opportunities search of entrepreneurs versus executives: Sources, interests, general alertness. Journal of Business Venturing, 6, 45-61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, G.: 1955, ‘The Psychology of Personal Constructs’, Volume one: A theory of Personality (Norton, New York).

  • Kiesler, S., & Sproull, L. (1982). Managerial responses to changing environments: Perspectives on problem sensing from social cognition. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27(4), 548-570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, S., & Kellermanns, F. (2008). Understanding the noneconomic-motivated behaviour in family firms: An introduction. Family Business Review, 21(2), 121-125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korzybski, A. (1933). Science and Sanity : An Introduction to Non-Aristotelian Systems and General Semantics. Forth Worth, TX: Institute of General Semantics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, N., F. (2007). What Lies Beneath? The Experiential Essence of Entrepreneurial Thinking. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 31(1), 123-138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lea, D. (2004). The imperfect nature of corporate responsibilities to stakeholders. Business Ethics Quarterly, 14(2), 201-217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leach, C., Freshwater, K., Aldridge, J., & Sunderland, J. (2001). Analysis of repertory grids in clinical practice. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 40(3), 225-248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longenecker, J., G., McKinney, J., A., & Moore, C., W. (1989). Ethics in Small Business. Journal of Small Business Management, 27(1), 27-41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longenecker, J., Moore, C., & Petty, W. (1996). Small Business Management, An Entrepreneurial Emphasis (10 th. ed.). Cincinatti: South-Western College Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luetkenhorst, W. (2004). Corporate Social Responsibility and the Development Agenda – The Case for Actively involving Small and Medium Enterprises. Intereconomics, 39(3), 157-168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y. (2006). Global Dimensions of Corporate Governance. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, D., & Littler, D. (2000). Repertory grid technique: An interpretative research framework. European Journal of Marketing, 37(4), 816-833.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matten, D., Crane, A., & Chapple, W. (2003). Behind the mask: Revealing the true face of corporate citizenship. Journal of Business Ethics 45(1/2), 109-120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “Explicit” CSR: A Conceptual Framework for a comparative Understanding of Corporate Social Responsibility. Academy of Management Review,, 93(2), 404-426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazza, C., & Alvarez, J. (2000). Haute couture and pret-à-porter: The popular press and the diffusion of management practices. Organization Studies, 21(3), 567-590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metzler, A., E., Gorden, H., & Neimeyer, G., J. (2002). The effect of repertory grid scale size and rating direction on structural measures of differentiation. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 15(2), 95-107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. (1996). Otherhood: The promulgation and transmission of ideas in the modern organization everyone. In B. Czarniawska & G. Sevon (Eds.), Translating organizational change (pp. 241-253). Berlin: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R., Busenitz, L., Lant, T., McDougall, P., Morse, E., & Brock Smith, J. (2004). The Distinctive and Inclusive Domain of Entrepreneurial Cognition Research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(6), 505-518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R., Busenitz, L., W., Bird, B., Caglio, C. M., McMullen, J., S., Morse, E., A., et al. (2007). The central Question in entrepreneurial cognition research 2007. Entrepreneurship, Theory and Practice, 31(1), 1-25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R., Smith, B., J., Morse, E., A., Seawright, K., W., Peredo, A. M., & Mckenzie, B. (2002). Are entrepreneurial cognitions universal? Assessing entrepreneurial cognitions across cultures. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 26(4), 9-33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, M., Schindehutte, M., Walton, J., & Allen, J. (2002). The Ethical Context of Entrepreneurship: Proposing and Testing a development Framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 40(4), 331-361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morsing, M., & Schultz, M. (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility: Stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies. Business Ethics : A European Review, 15(4), 323-338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murillo, D., & Lozano, J. (2006). SMEs and CSR: An Approach to CSR in their own words. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(3), 227-240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neimeyer, G. (2002). Towards reflexive scrutiny in repertory grid methodology. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 15(2), 89-95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neron, P.-Y., & Norman, W. (2008). Citizenship, INC.: Do We Really Want Businesses to Be Good Corporate Citizens?. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(1), 1-26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, S., Robertson, M., & Swan, J. A. (2001). Management fads and fashions. Organization, 8(1), 5-15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, S., Swan, J. A., & Galliers, R. D. (2000). A knowledge-focused perspective on the diffusion and adoption of complex information technologies: the BPR example. Information Systems Journal, 10(3), 239-250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, N. (2008). Evolutionary psychology and family business: A new synthesis for theory, research, and practice. Family Business Review, 21(1), 103-118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolini, D. (1999). Comparing methods for mapping organizational cognition. Organization Studies, 20(5), 833-860.

    Google Scholar 

  • Painter-Morland, M. (2006). Triple bottom-line reporting as social grammar: integrating corporate social responsibility and corporate codes of conduct. Business Ethics : A European Review, 15(4), 352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pater, A., & van Lierop, L. (2006). Sense and sensitivity: the roles of organisation and stakeholders in managing corporate social responsibility. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(4), 339-351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrini, F., Russo, A., & Tencati, A. (2007). CSR Strategies of SMEs and Large Firms. Evidence from Italy. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(3), 285-300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porac, J., & Thomas, H. (1990). Taxonomic mental models in competitor definition. Academy of Management Review, 15(2), 224-240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porac, J., Thomas, H., & Baden-Fuller. (1989). Competitive groups as Cognitive communities: The case of the Scottish Knitwear Industry. Journal of Management Studies, 15(4), 397-416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M., & Kramer, M. (2006). Strategy & Society – The Link between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78-92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potts, S., & Maluszewski, I. (2004). Ethics and Corporate Governance. Corporate Governance An International Review, 12(2), 177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, J.: 1997, ‘Personal Ethics and Business Ethics: The Ethical Attitudes of Owner/Managers of Small Business’, Journal of Business Ethics 16(2), 119–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, J., R. G. Owens and G. J. Neimeyer, 2002. Using Examples in Repertory Grids: The Influences on Construct Elicitation. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 15(2), 121–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reger, R., K. (1990a). Managerial thought structures and competitive positioning. In S. Huff, A. (Ed.), Mapping strategic thought (pp. 71-88). Chichester: Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reger, R., K. (1990b). The repertory grid technique for eliciting the content and structure of cognitive constructive systems. In S. Huff, A. (Ed.), Mapping strategic thought (pp. 301-309). Chichester: Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reger, R., K., & Huff, S., A. (1993). Strategic groups: A cognitive perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 14(2), 103-123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reger, R., K., & Palmer, T., B. (1996). Managerial Categorization of Competitors: Using Old Maps to Navigate New Environments. Organization Science, 7(1), 22-40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rijksoverheid: 2003, De Nederlandse corporate governance code: Beginselen van deugdelijk bestuur en best practice bepalingen. Retrieved 2 October, 2009, from http://corpgov.nl/page/downloads/CODE%20DEF%20COMPLEET%20II.pdf.

  • Rudolph, P. (2005). Don’t obsess about CR and governance – corporate culture is what counts. Corporate Responsibility Management, 2(1), 16-19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russo, A. and A. Tencati: 2009, Formal vs. Informal CSR Strategies. Evidence from Italian Mico, Small, Medium-Sized and Large Firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(1), 339–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rynes, S., Giluk, T., & Brown, K. (2007). The Very Separate World of Academic and Practitioner Periodicals in Human Resources Management: Implications for Evidence-Based Management. Academy of Management Journal, 50(5), 987-1008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacconi, L. (2006). A Social Contract Account for CSR as an Extended Model of Corporate Governance (I): Rational Bargaining and Justification. Journal of Business Ethics, 68, 259-281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sackmann, S., A. (1992). Cultures and subcultures: An analysis of organizational knowledge. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(1), 140-161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarbrough, H. (2003). The role of intermediary groups in shaping management fashion: The case of knowledge management. International Studies of Management & Organization, 32(4), 94-106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, A. and G. Palazzo: 2007, `Toward a Political Conception of Corporate Responsibility: Business and Society Seen from a Habermasian Perspective', Academy of Management Review 32(4), 1096–1120

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlegelmilch, B., & Pollach, I. (2005). The Perils and Opportunities of Communicating Corporate Ethics. Journal of Marketing Management, 21, 267-290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, S. C. and R. Angelmar: 1993, ‘Cognition in Organizational Analysis: Who's Minding the Store?’, Organization Studies 14(3), 347–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, M., & Carroll, A. (2008). Integrating and unifying competing frameworks. The search for a common core in the business and society Field. Business and Society, 47(2), 148-186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S., & Stuart, T. (2002). Organizational endowments and the performance of university strat-ups. Management Science, 48(1), 154-170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. (1947). Administrative behaviour: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organizations. New York: Mcmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, L. (1999). Does size matter? The state of the art in small business ethics. Business Ethics: A European Review, 8(3), 163-174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spender, J.-C. (1996). Making knowledge. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 45-62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starbuck, W., H., Greve, A., & Hedberg, B. (1978). Responding to crisis: Theory and the experience of European business. Journal of Business Administration, 9(2), 111-197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staurer, R., Langer, M., Konrad, A., & Martinuzzi, A. (2005). Corporations, Stakeholders and Sustainable Development: A Theoretical Exploration of Business-Society Relations. Journal of Business Ethics, 61, 263-281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubbart, C., I. (1989). Managerial cognition: the missing link in strategic management research. Journal of Management Studies, 26, 352-347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubbart, C. I., & Ramaprasad, A. (1990). Comments on empirical articles and recommendations for future research. In A. Huff, S. (Ed.), Mapping strategic thought (pp. 251-288). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturdy, A. (2004). The adoption of management ideas and practices: Theoretical perspectives and possibilities. Management Learning, 35(2), 155-179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundaram, A. and A. Inkpen: 2004, `Stakeholder Theory and ``The Corporate Objective Revisited'': A Reply', Organization Science 15(3), 370–371

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutcliffe, K., M. (1994). What executives notice: Accurate perceptions in management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1360-1378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swan, J. (1997). Using cognitive mapping in management research: Decisions about technical innovation. British Journal of Management, 8(2), 183-198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, F., B., & Hunter, G., M. (2002). The Repertory Grid Technique: A method for the study of cognition in Information Systems. MIS Quarterly, 26(1), 39-57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolliver, R., & Neimeyer, G., J. (2002). The effects of construct examples on the content and structure of personal construct system. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 15(2), 127-138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L., & Weaver, G. (2003). Managing Ethics in Business Organizations. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • UK-Government: 2002, The Combined Code: Principles of Good Governance and Code of Best Practice. Retrieved 2 October, 2009, from http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/ukla/lr_comcode3.pdf.

  • Valor, C. (2005). Corporate social responsibility and corporate citizenship: Towards corporate accountability. Business & Society Review, 110(2), 191-212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Berghe, L., & Louche, C. (2005). The link between corporate governance and corporate social responsibility in insurance. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance, 30(3), 425-442.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Marrewijk, M. (2003). Concepts and Definitions of CSR and Corporate Sustainability: Between Agency and Communion. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(2/3), 95-110.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Oosterhout, J. (2008). Transcending the confines of economic and political organization? The Misguided Metaphor of Corporate Citizenship. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(1), 35-42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbeke, L.: 2007, 23 February, Duurzaam Ondernemen ook een rationele reactie. De Tijd.

  • Vogel, D. (1991). Business Ethics: New Perspectives on Old Problems. California Management Review, 33(4), 101-117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vyakarnam, S., Bailey, A., Myers, A., & Burnett, D. (1997). Towards an understanding of ethical behaviour in small firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(15), 1625-1636.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S. (2004). Parallel Universes: Companies, Academics, and the Progress of Corporate Citizenship. Business and Society, 24(1), 32-39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, J. (1994). Managerial and organizational cognition: Notes form a trip down memory lane. Organization Science, 6(3), 280-321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waring, P., & Edwards, T. (2008). Socially Responsible Investments: Explaining its Uneven Development and Human Resources Consequences. Corporate Governance An International Review, 16(3), 135-145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K., E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, D., Colbert, B., & Freeman, E. (2003). Focusing on Value: Reconciling Corporate Social Responsibility, Sustainability and a Stakeholder Approach in a Network World. Journal of General Management, 28(3), 1-23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieland, J. (2001). The Ethics of Governance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 11(1), 73-87.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ghent University, Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School, Ghent, Belgium

    Yves Fassin & Marc Buelens

  2. Hogeschool Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium

    Annick Van Rossem

Authors
  1. Yves Fassin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Annick Van Rossem
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Marc Buelens
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yves Fassin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fassin, Y., Van Rossem, A. & Buelens, M. Small-Business Owner-Managers’ Perceptions of Business Ethics and CSR-Related Concepts. J Bus Ethics 98, 425–453 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0586-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0586-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation