Abstract
This paper examines the performance and determinants of fund flows to index exchange traded funds (ETFs) and index mutual funds in India that track either S&P BSE SENSEX or CNX Nifty. We empirically show that index mutual funds track their underlying better than index ETFs. We further contribute to the literature using a panel regression analysis of funds and find that ETFs with lower expense ratio and large asset base attract more funds. Age of fund is not an important factor driving fund flows to ETFs, but it is the newer index mutual funds that attract more funds than the existing ones. The study provides evidence that investors neither take cognizance of the past performance nor the past returns of their benchmark returns of index mutual funds and ETFs. The study also finds that expense ratio is a major factor that attracts investments and fund managers would do well to reduce the expense ratio and the factors driving fund flows to index mutual funds vary depending on the underlying benchmark index. The findings of the study have policy implications, as they clearly identify the distinctive factors that drive fund flows to ETFs and index mutual funds.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Source: AMFI Monthly Report—September 2014.
Source: AMFI–Association of Mutual Funds of India.
Source: CII—PwC—Report—Indian Mutual Fund Industry—Challenging the status quo, setting the growth path.
Source: EY Report January 2014—Global ETF Survey—A new era of growth and innovation.
Source: CII—PwC—Report 2014—“Indian mutual fund industry: Challenging the status quo, setting the growth path”.
ETFs were predominantly passive in nature, but of late, active ETFs are also making their presence felt. ETFs in developed markets started following active style of investment strategy to enhance the investors’ returns. The first active ETF, namely, Bear Stearns Current Yield ETF made its debut in 2008. At present, there are around 127 active ETFs in the world and some of the actively managed ETFs, namely, Pimco Enchanced Short Maturity Strategy (MINT), Pimco Total Return (BOND) and First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure (EMLP) have AUM of $3.5B, $2.3B and $1.2B, respectively (source etf.com—July 2015 report). However, in India, only passive ETFs exist as of now
References
Ackert LF, Tian YS (2000) Arbitrage and valuation in the market for standard and poor’s depositary receipts. Financ Manag 29(3):71–87
Ackert LF, Tian YS (2008) Arbitrage, liquidity and the valuation of exchange traded funds. J Financ Mark 17(5):331–362
Agapova A (2011) Conventional mutual index funds versus exchange traded funds. J Financ Mark 14(2):323–343
Association of Mutual Funds in India (AMFI). http://www.amfi.com
Blume M, Edelen R (2004) S&P 500 indexers, tracking error and liquidity: a complex answer to profiting. J Portf Manag 30(3):37–46
Chiang W (1998) Optimizing performance. Indexing for maximum investment results. GPCo Publishers, Chicago
Christoffersen SEK, Keim DB, Musto DK (2007) Valuable information and costly liquidity: evidence from individual mutual fund trades. McGill University and University of Pennsylvania working paper
Cooper JM, Gulen H, Rau PR (2005) Changing names with style: mutual fund name changes and their effects on fund flows. J Financ 60(6):2825–2858
DeFusco AR, Ivanov IS, Karels VG (2011) The exchange traded funds’ pricing deviation: analysis and forecasts. J Econ Financ 35(2):181–197
Elton EJ, Gruber Comer G, Li K (2002) Spiders: where are the bugs? J Bus 75(3):453–472
Engle R, Sarkar D (2006) Premiums-discounts and exchange traded funds. J Deriv 13(4):27–45
ETFGI—Global Research and Consultancy firm. http://www.etfgi.com
Frino A, Gallagher DR (2001) Tracking S&P 500 index funds. J Portf Manag 28(I):44–55
Gallagher DR, Seagara R (2006) The performance and trading characteristics of exchange traded funds. J Invest Strat 1(2):49–60
Gastineau G (2004) The benchmark index ETF performance problem. J Portf Manag 30(2):96–103
Greene JT, Hodges CW (2002) The dilution impact of daily fund flows on open-end mutual funds. J Financ Econ 65(1):131–158
Guercio DD, Tkac PA (2002) The determinants of the flow of funds of managed portfolios: mutual funds vs. pension funds. J Financ Quant Anal 37(2):523–557
Haga R, Lindset S (2012) Understanding bull and bear ETFs. Eur J Financ 18(2):149–165
Ivanov SI (2013) The influence of ETFs on the price discovery of gold, silver and oil. J Econ Financ 37(3):453–462
Kostovetsky L (2003) Index mutual funds and exchange traded funds. J Portf Manag 29(4):80–92
Pope PF, Yadav PK (1994) Discovering errors in tracking error. J Portf Manag 20(2):27–32
Poterba JM, Shoven JB (2002) Exchange traded funds: a new investment option for taxable investors. Am Econ Rev 92(2):422–427
Prasanna KP (2012) Performance of exchange traded funds in India. Int J Bus Manag 7(23):122–141
Rompotis GG (2005) An empirical comparing investigation on exchange traded funds and index funds performance. Available at SSRN 903110
Shin S, Soydemir G (2010) Exchange-traded funds, persistence in tracking errors and information dissemination. J Multinatl Financ Manag 20(4):214–234
Sirri ER, Tufano P (1998) Costly search and mutual fund flows. J Financ 53(5):1589–1622
Svetina M (2010) Exchange traded funds: performance and competition. J Appl Financ 20(2):130–145
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Narend, S., Thenmozhi, M. What drives fund flows to index ETFs and mutual funds? A panel analysis of funds in India. Decision 43, 17–30 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40622-016-0124-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40622-016-0124-6