Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Temporal Discounting and Marketing Variables: Effects of Product Prices and Brand Informational Reinforcement

  • BEHAVIORAL ECONOMICS IN CONSUMER BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS
  • Published:
The Behavior Analyst Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

By integrating the temporal discounting perspective, according to which the value of rewards is progressively discounted as a function of delay, and the Behavioral Perspective Model (BPM), according to which the purchase of products can produce utilitarian (directly obtained from use) and informational (social, mediated by others) reinforcing and punitive consequences, the present research investigated: 1) if temporal discounting would be better described by an exponential or a hyperbolic function; 2) if differently priced products would differ with respect to temporal discounting rates; and 3) if brands offering different levels of informational reinforcement would differ with respect to temporal discounting rates. In a first phase of the research, 73 undergraduate students evaluated brands of cell phone, tablet and TV set, in order to rank each brand according to the informational reinforcement level they offered. In a second phase, during an online purchasing simulation of these products, 51 students were asked to state how much they were willing to pay in order to anticipate product delivery, which was free after 21 days. Results indicated that the hyperbolic function fitted the data significantly better than the exponential function for two of the products, that products with higher prices showed lower temporal discounting rates than products with lower prices, and that brands associated with higher informational reinforcement showed higher temporal discounting rates. These findings suggest that there are complex interactive patterns of temporal discounting within- and between-products and that temporal discounting framework has great potential to inform research in consumer behavior and marketing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Another procedural decision was the elimination of data from one of the 51 participants that filled in Questionnaire 2 because he or she attributed delivery fees equal to zero to all products in all delays.

  2. All these results, concerning the values of k across products and brands, remain unchanged when Equation 1 (exponential) is used.

References

  • Baker, F., Johnson, M. W., & Bickel, W. K. (2003). Delay discounting in current and never-before cigarette smokers: similarities and differences across commodity, sign, and magnitude. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112(3), 382–392.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bickel, W. K., & Marsch, L. A. (2001). Toward a behavioral economic understanding of drug dependence: delay discounting processes. Addiction, 96(1), 73–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, G. B. (1996). Temporal discounting and utility for health and money. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(3), 771–791.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, G. B., & Eistein, A. S. (1995). Valuing the future: temporal discounting of health and money. Medical Decision Making, 15, 373–386.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, G. B., & Winquist, J. R. (1998). The magnitude effect: temporal discount rates and restaurant tips. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5(1), 119–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, L. H., Salvy, S. J., Carr, K. A., Dearing, K. K., & Bickel, W. K. (2010). Food reinforcement, delay discounting and obesity. Physiology and Behavior, 100(5), 438–445.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Estle, S. J., Green, L., Myerson, J., & Holt, D. D. (2006). Differential effects of amount on temporal and probability discounting of gains and losses. Memory & Cognition, 34(4), 914–928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foxall, G. R. (1990). Consumer psychology in behavioral perspective. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foxall, G. R. (1998). Radical behaviorist interpretation: generating and evaluating an account of consumer behavior. The Behavior Analyst, 21(2), 321–354.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Foxall, G. R. (2010). Invitation to consumer behavior analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 30(2), 92–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foxall, G. R., Oliveira-Castro, J. M., & Schrezenmaier, T. C. (2004). The behavioral economics of consumer brand choice: patterns of reinforcement and utility maximization. Behavioural Processes, 66(3), 235–260.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Foxall, G. R., Oliveira-Castro, J. M., James, V. K., Yani-de-Soriano, M. M., & Sigurdsson, V. (2006a). Consumer behavior analysis and social marketing: the case of environmental conservation. Behavior and social issues, 15, 101–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foxall, G. R., Oliveira-Castro, J. M., James, V. K., & Schrezenmaier, T. C. (2006b). Consumer behavior analysis: the case of brand choice. Revista Psicologia: Organizações e Trabalho, 6(1), 50–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, L., & Myerson, J. (2004). A discounting framework for choice with delayed and probabilistic rewards. Psychological Bulletin, 130(5), 769–792.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Green, L., Myerson, J., & McFadden, E. (1997). Rate of temporal discounting decreases with amount of reward. Memory & Cognition, 25(5), 715–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hantula, D. A., & Bryant, K. (2005). Delay discounting determines delivery fees in an e-commerce simulation: a behavioral economic perspective. Psychology and Marketing, 22(2), 153–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardisty, D. J., Thompson, K. F., Krantz, D. H., & Weber, E. U. (2013). How to measure time preferences: an experimental comparison of three methods. Judgment and Decision making, 8(3), 236–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, D. D., Green, L., Myerson, J., & Estle, S. J. (2008). Preference reversals with losses. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(1), 89–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. W., & Bickel, W. K. (2002). Within-subject comparison of real and hypothetical money rewards in delay discounting. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 77(2), 129–146.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kagel, J. H., Battalio, R. C., & Green, L. (1995). Economic choice theory: an experimental analysis of animal behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, K. N., Petry, N. M., & Bickel, W. K. (1999). Heroin addicts have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than non-drug-using controls. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128(1), 78–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locey, M. L., Jones, B. A., & Rachlin, H. (2011). Real and hypothetical rewards in social discounting. Judgment and Decision making, 6(6), 552–564.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Madden, G. J., Petry, N. M., Badger, G. J., & Bickel, W. K. (1997). Impulsive and self-control choices in opioid-dependent patients and non-drug-using control participants: drug and monetary rewards. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 5(3), 256–262.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, S. H., & Wilson, V. B. (2010). The subjective value of delayed and probabilistic outcomes: outcome size matters for gains but not for losses. Behavioural Processes, 83(1), 36–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Odum, A. L., Madden, G. J., & Bickel, W. K. (2002). Discounting of delayed health gains and losses by current, never- and ex-smokers of cigarettes. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 4(3), 295–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira-Castro, J. M. (2003). Effects of base price upon search behavior of consumers in a supermarket: an operant analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology, 24(5), 637–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira-Castro, J. M. (2013). Comments on Foxall’s ‘intentionality, symbol and situation in the interpretation of consumer choice’. Marketing Theory, 13(1), 129–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira-Castro, J. M., Foxall, G. R., James, V. K., Pohl, R. H. B. F., Dias, M. B., & Chang, S. W. (2008a). Consumer-based brand equity and brand performance. The Service Industries Journal, 28(4), 445–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira-Castro, J. M., Foxall, G. R., & James, V. K. (2008b). Individual differences in price responsiveness within and across food brands. The Service Industries Journal, 28(6), 733–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira-Castro, J. M., Foxall, G. R., & Wells, V. K. (2010). Consumer brand choice: money allocation as a function of brand reinforcing attributes. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 30(2), 161–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira-Castro, J. M., Foxall, G. R., Yan, J., & Wells, V. K. (2011). A behavioral-economic analysis of the essential value of brands. Behavioural Processes, 87(1), 106–114.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ostaszewski, P., & Karzel, K. (2002). Discounting of delayed and probabilistic losses of different amounts. European Psychologist, 7(4), 295–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostaszewski, P., Green, L., & Myerson, J. (1998). Effects of inflation on the subjective value of delayed and probabilistic rewards. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5(2), 324–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pohl, R. H. B. F., & Oliveira-Castro, J. M. (2008). Efeitos do nível de benefício informativo das marcas sobre a duração do comportamento de procura [effects of the informational benefit level of brands on the duration of search behavior]. RAC-Eletrônica, 2(3), 449–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rachlin, H. (2016). Social cooperation and self-control. Managerial and Decision Economics, 37(4–5), 249–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rachlin, H., Raineri, A., & Cross, D. (1991). Subjective probability and delay. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 55(2), 233–244.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rajala, A. K., & Hantula, D. A. (2000). Towards a behavioral ecology of consumption: delay reduction effects on foraging in a simulated online mall. Managerial and Decision Economics, 21, 145–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, B., Richards, J. B., Horn, K., & Karraker, K. (2004). Delay discounting and probability discounting as related to cigarette smoking status in adults. Behavioural Processes, 65(1), 35–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. L., & Hantula, D. A. (2008). Methodological considerations in the study of delay discounting in intertemporal choice: a comparison of tasks and modes. Behavior Research Methods, 40(4), 940–953.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, R. (1981). Some empirical evidence on dynamic inconsistency. Economic Letters, 8, 201–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weatherly, J. N., Derenne, A., & Terrell, H. K. (2011). Testing the reliability of delay discounting of ten commodities using the fill-in-the-blank method. The Psychological Record, 61, 113–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weller, R. E., Cook, E. W., Avsar, K. B., & Cox, J. E. (2008). Obese women show greater delay discounting than healthy-weight women. Appetite, 51(3), 563–569.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Jorge M. Oliveira-Castro received a research grant from CNPq (National Council for Scientific and Technological Development, Brazil). Rafaela S. Marques received a student stipend from Capes (Brazilian Federal Agency for Support and Evaluation of Graduate Education) during the development of this research. The authors gratefully acknowledge these sources of financial support and both declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Instituto de Psicologia, Universidade de Brasília, Campus Universitário Darcy Ribeiro, ICC-Sul, Brasília, DF, 70 910-900, Brazil

    Jorge M . Oliveira-Castro & Rafaela S. Marques

Authors
  1. Jorge M . Oliveira-Castro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rafaela S. Marques
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jorge M . Oliveira-Castro.

Ethics declarations

The research protocols described in this paper were reviewed by the responsible committee on such research and the participants signed individual informed consents.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oliveira-Castro, J.M..., Marques, R.S. Temporal Discounting and Marketing Variables: Effects of Product Prices and Brand Informational Reinforcement. BEHAV ANALYST 40, 475–492 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-017-0109-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-017-0109-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation