Skip to main content

Temporal Discounting of Future Risks

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Consumer Perception of Product Risks and Benefits
  • 2538 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter discusses how temporal discounting might lead a consumer to choose a smaller, more immediate reward over a larger, delayed reward because the present value of the delayed reward is discounted. Time discounting models, such as exponential and hyperbolic pattern discounting, are useful in explaining people’s intertemporal preferences and choices. Neuroscience-based models combine the cognitive models with quantitative measures of temporal discounting and help clarify why a particular brain region may dominate choice behavior in one situation but not in others. Previous empirical research and our experimental results show evidence of domain differences and individual differences in temporal discounting. Temporal discounting models are useful in explaining individuals’ addictive and unhealthy behaviors. The concept of temporal discounting can be used to explain consumers’ daily decisions—such as saving for retirement, recycling, and purchasing environmentally friendly products—and has important marketing and policy implications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ainslie, G. (1975). Specious reward: A behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control. Psychological Bulletin, 82(4), 463–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreoni, J., & Sprenger, C. (2012). Estimating time preferences from convex budgets. American Economic Review, 102(7), 3333–3356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basu, K. (2011). Hyperbolic discounting and the sustainability of rotational savings arrangements. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 3(4), 143–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G., & Mulligan, C. (1997). The endogenous determination of time preference. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(3), 729–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, G. B., & Elstein, A. S. (1995). Valuing the future: Temporal discounting of health and money. Medical Decision Making, 15(4), 373–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Courtemanche, C., Heutel, G., & Mcalvanah, P. (2014). Impatience, incentives and obesity. Economic Journal, 125, 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P., & Maskin, E. (2005). Uncertainty and hyperbolic discounting. American Economic Review, 95(4), 1290–1299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G., & O’Donoghue, T. (2002). Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. Journal of Economic Literature, 40(2), 351–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, L., & Myerson, J. (2004). A discounting framework for choice with delayed and probabilistic rewards. Psychological Bulletin, 130(5), 769–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, M. (1972). On the concept of health capital and the demand for health. Journal of Political Economy, 80(2), 223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hakimi, S., & Hare, T. A. (2015). Enhanced neural responses to imagined primary rewards predict reduced monetary temporal discounting. Journal of Neuroscience, 35(38), 13103–13109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardisty, D. J., & Weber, E. U. (2009). Discounting future green: Money versus the environment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(3), 329–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, G. W., Lau, M. I., & Rutström, E. E. (2010). Individual discount rates and smoking: Evidence from a field experiment in Denmark. Journal of Health Economics, 29(5), 708–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendrickx, L., & Nicolaij, S. (2004). Temporal discounting and environmental risks: The role of ethical and loss-related concerns. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(4), 409–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laibson, D. (1997). Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(2), 443–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawless, L., Drichoutis, A. C., & Nayga Jr., R. M. (2013). Time preferences and health behaviour: A review. Agricultural and Food Economics, 1(17), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (1992). Anomalies in intertemporal choice: Evidence and an interpretation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(2), 573–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myerson, J., & Green, L. (1995). Discounting of delayed rewards: Models of individual choice. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 64(3), 263–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, T., & Hamilton, S. (2012). Obesity and hyperbolic discounting: An experimental analysis. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 37(2), 181–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roewer, I., Wiehler, A., & Peters, J. (2015). Nicotine deprivation, temporal discounting and choice consistency in heavy smokers. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 103(1), 62–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharff, R. L. (2009). Obesity and hyperbolic discounting: Evidence and implications. Journal of Consumer Policy, 32(1), 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharff, R. L., & Viscusi, W. K. (2011). Heterogeneous rates of time preference and the decision to smoke. Economic Inquiry, 49(4), 959–972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsukayama, E., & Duckworth, A. L. (2010). Domain-specific temporal discounting and temptation. Judgment and Decision Making, 5(2), 72–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bos, W., & McClure, S. M. (2013). Towards a general model of temporal discounting. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1(99), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bos, W., Rodriguez, C. A., Schweitzer, J. B., & McClure, S. M. (2014). Connectivity strength of dissociable striatal tracts predict individual differences in temporal discounting. Journal of Neuroscience, 34(31), 10298–10310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Pol, M., & Cairns, J. (2001). Estimating time preferences for health using discrete choice experiments. Social Science & Medicine, 52(9), 1459–1470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vuchinich, R. E., & Simpson, C. A. (1998). Hyperbolic temporal discounting in social drinkers and problem drinkers. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 6(3), 292–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weller, R. E., Cook, E. W., Avsar, K. B., & Cox, J. E. (2008). Obese women show greater delay discounting than healthy-weight women. Appetite, 51(3), 563–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chengyan Yue .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Yue, C., Wang, J. (2017). Temporal Discounting of Future Risks. In: Emilien, G., Weitkunat, R., Lüdicke, F. (eds) Consumer Perception of Product Risks and Benefits. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50530-5_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics