Abstract
We reconsider the decomposition of the comparative statics effect of a factor price increase on (unconditional) factor demand into a substitution and a size (or level) effect. While for the own price effect the substitution effect and the size effect go into the same negative direction, the cross price effect cannot be signed unambiguously, in general. But for two cases of regularity, homotheticity and complementarity, the size effect is negative. We furthermore show by example that in both special cases the cross substitution effects are still ambiguous, but that under complementarity the unconditional effect is always negative. Hence, if the cross substitution effect happens to be positive, it is dominated by the negative size effect in this case. We further show by example that without such regularity assumptions the cross price effect is ambiguous. Finally, we study the impact of a factor price increase on the cost, which can also increase or decrease.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Change history
02 December 2022
Missing Open Access funding information has been added in the Funding Note.
References
Allen, R.G.: Professor Slutsky’s theory of consumer’s choice. Rev. Econ. Stud. 3, 120–129 (1936)
Amir, R.: Sensitivity analysis of multisector optimal economic dynamics. J. Math. Econ. 25, 123–141 (1996)
Barten, A.P.: Evidence on the Slutsky conditions for demand equations. Rev. Econ. Stat. 49, 77–84 (1967)
Bierwag, G.O., Grove, M.A.: Slutsky equations for assets. J. Polit. Econ. 76, 114–127 (1968)
Bertoletti, P.: Elasticities of substitution and complementarity: a synthesis. J. Prod. Anal., 181–194 (2005)
Chipman, J.S., Lenfant, J.S.: Slutsky’s 1915 article: how it came to be found and interpreted. Hist. Polit. Econ. 34(3), 553–597 (2002)
Dooley, P.: Slutsky’s equation as Pareto’s solution. Hist. Polit. Econ. 15, 513–17 (1983)
Ellis, D.F.: A Slutsky equation for demand correspondences. Econometrica 44, 825–828 (1976)
Fischer, S.: Assets, contingent commodities, and the Slutsky equations. Econometrica 40, 371–385 (1972)
Kalman, P.J., Dusansky, R., Wickstrom, B.A.: On the major Slutsky properties when money is the sole medium of exchange. Int. Econ. Rev. 15, 718–728 (1974)
Laitinen, K., Theil, H.: The Antonelli matrix and the reciprocal Slutsky matrix. Econ. Lett. 3, 153–157 (1979)
Menezes, C.F., Wang, H.: Duality and the Slutsky income and substitution effects of increases in wage rate uncertainty. Oxf. Econ. Pap. 57, 545–557 (2005)
Milgrom, P., Shannon, C.: Monotone comparative statics. Econometrica 62, 157–180 (1994)
Mundlak, Y.: Elasticities of substitution and the theory of derived demand. Rev. Econ. Stud. 35, 225–236 (1968)
Pareto, V.: Considerazioni sui prinzipii fondamentali dell’ economia politica pura. Giornale degli Economisti, series (1892–1993)
Parry, I.W.H.: Pollution taxes and revenue recycling. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 29, 64–77 (1995)
Puu, T.: Les effect des substitution et d’espansion dans la théorie de la production. Revue d’Economie Politique 76, 57–91 (1966)
Sedaghat, H.: A variant of the Slutsky equation in a dynamical account based model. Econ. Lett. 50, 367–371 (1996)
Slutsky, E.E.: Sulla teoria del bilancio del consumatore. Giornale degli Economisti 51, 1–26 (1915)
Slutsky, E.E.: On the theory of the budget of the consumer. Translated by Olga Ragusa. In: Stigler, G.J., Boulding, K.E. (eds.) Readings in Price Theory, pp. 27–56. Irwin, Homewood (1952)
Takayama, A.: Mathematical Economics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1985)
Topkis, D.M.: Comparative statics of the firm. J. Econ. Theory 67, 370–401 (1995)
Topkis, D.M.: Supermodularity and Complementarity. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1998)
Varian, H.: Microeconomics Analysis, 3rd edn. Norton, New York (1992)
Weber, C.E.: More on Slutsky’s equation as Pareto’s solution. Hist. Polit. Econ. 31, 575–586 (1999)
Wirl, F.: Lessons from utility conservation programs. Energy J. 21, 87–108 (2000)
Acknowledgements
We thank Eric Arndt, Jan Krause, Hartmut Laue and Christian Seidl for valuable discussions and comments.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Johannes Bröcker (1950–2021): Deceased.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Bröcker, J., Requate, T. Substitution and size effect for factor demand revisited. Econ Theory Bull 10, 251–265 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40505-022-00229-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40505-022-00229-z
Keywords
- Slutsky equation
- (Conditional)Factor demand
- Comparative statics
- Substitution effect
- Size effect
- Level effect