Skip to main content
Log in

Sonography in diagnosis of adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: a case–control study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Ultrasound Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Adhesive capsulitis (AC) of the shoulder has been a diagnosis of exclusion on sonography due to lack of specific diagnostic criteria. This study prospectively assesses the efficacy of sonography using multiple static and dynamic parameters for diagnosis of AC.

Materials and methods

Shoulder sonography was performed independently by two musculoskeletal radiologists on 90 subjects (60 symptomatic and 30 controls). All symptomatic subjects were subjected to an MRI. Based on clinical and MRI diagnosis, three groups were made: AC (n = 30), painful shoulders (PS) (n = 30), and control group (CL) (n = 30). The sonographic parameters studied were: coracohumeral ligament (CHL) thickness, increased soft tissue in rotator interval (static parameters) and restriction of abduction and external rotation on dynamic scanning. These were compared within the three groups and the accuracy of each parameter in isolation and in combination for diagnosis of AC was calculated.

Results

Sonographic visualisation of CHL (96.7%) and its mean thickness (1.2 mm) were highest in the AC group (p < 0.01). A cut-off value of 0.7 mm was found to be accurate (sensitivity 93.1%, specificity 94.4%) for diagnosing AC. Increased soft tissue in the rotator interval was seen in the AC group and had a high sensitivity of 86.2% and specificity of 92.8%. On dynamic scanning, restriction of external rotation was specific (sensitivity 86.2%, specificity 92.8%), whereas restriction in abduction was non-specific (specificity 6.7%). Inter-observer agreement was substantial for CHL visualisation (kappa 0.66). Overall, sonography, using multiple parameters, revealed a high sensitivity and specificity (100 and 87%, respectively) for diagnosis of AC of the shoulder.

Conclusion

Sonography revealed a high accuracy for diagnosing AC of the shoulder and in differentiating it from other causes of painful shoulder. It, thus, has the potential to be adopted as a preferred imaging modality.

Sommario

Scopo

La capsulite adesiva (AC) della spalla è una diagnosi ecografica di esclusione, per la mancanza di criteri diagnostici specifici. Questo studio valuta prospetticamente l’efficacia dell’ecografia, utilizzando multipli parametri statici e dinamici, per la diagnosi di capsulite adesiva.

Materiale e metodi

L’ecografia della spalla é stata effettuata indipendentemente da due radiologi muscoloscheletrici su 90 soggetti (60 sintomatici e 30 di controllo). Tutti i soggetti sintomatici sono stati sottoposti a risonanza magnetica (RM). Sulla base della diagnosi clinica e RM sono stati suddivisi tre gruppi: pazienti con capsulite adesiva (AC) (n = 30), con spalla dolorosa (PS) (n = 30) e gruppo di controllo (CL) (n = 30). I parametri ecografici studiati sono stati: lo spessore del legamento coracoomerale (CHL), l’aumento di tessuto molle nell’intervallo dei rotatori (parametri statici) e la diminuzione di abduzione e rotazione esterna nelle scansioni dinamiche. I risultati sono stati confrontati all’interno dei tre gruppi ed è stata calcolata l’accuratezza di ogni parametro, singolarmente e in combinazione per la diagnosi di AC.

Risultati

La visualizzazione ecografica del CHL (96,7%) e il suo spessore medio (1,2 mm) erano più alti nel gruppo AC (P < 0.01). Il valore di cutoff di 0,7 millimetri è stato considerato accurato (sensibilità del 93,1% e specificità del 94.4%) per la diagnosi di AC. L’aumento del tessuto molle nell’intervallo dei rotatori é stato osservato nel gruppo AC e aveva elevata sensibilità (86,2%) e specificità (92,8%). Con scansioni dinamiche, la limitazione della rotazione esterna era significativa (sensibilità 86,2%, specificità 92,8%), mentre la limitazione dell’’abduzione non lo era (specificità 6,7%). L’accordo inter-osservatori, nella visualizzazione del CHL è stato notevole (kappa 0,66). Utilizzando più parametri, nel complesso, l’ecografia ha rivelato elevata sensibilità e specificità (100% e 87% rispettivamente) nella diagnosi di capsulite adesiva della spalla.

Conclusione

L’ecografia ha rivelato un’elevata precisione nella diagnosi di capsulite adesiva della spalla, nonché nel differenziarla dalle altre cause di spalla dolorosa, pertanto ha le potenzialità per essere adottata come modalità di scelta tra le metodiche di imaging.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ewald A (2011) Adhesive capsulitis: a review. Am Fam Physician 83(4):417–422

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Brue S, Valentin A, Forssblad M, Werner S, Mikkelsen C, Cerulli G (2007) Idiopathic adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: a review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:1048–1054

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Draghi F, Scudeller L, Draghi AG, Bortolotto C (2015) Prevalence of subacromial-subdeltoid bursitis in shoulder pain: an ultrasonographic study. J Ultrasound 18(2):151–158. doi:10.1007/s40477-015-0167-0

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Della Valle V, Bassi EM, Calliada F (2015) Migration of calcium deposits into subacromial-subdeltoid bursa and into humeral head as a rare complication of calcifying tendinitis: sonography and imaging. J Ultrasound 18(3):259–263. doi:10.1007/s40477-015-0163-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Emig E, Schweitzer M, Karasick D, Lubowitz J (1995) Adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: MR diagnosis. AJR 164:1457–1459

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Connell D, Padmanabhan R, Buchbinder R (2002) Adhesive capsulitis: role of MR imaging in differential diagnosis. Eur Radiol 12:2100–2106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Carrillon Y, Noel E, Fantino O, Perrin-Fayolle O, Tran-Minh VA (1999) Magnetic resonance imaging findings in idiopathic adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder. Rev Rhum Engl Ed 66:201–206

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ryu KN, Lee SW, Rhee YG, Lim JH (1993) Adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder joint: usefulness of dynamic sonography. J Ultrasound Med 12:445–449

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Van Holsbeeck M, Vanderschueren J, Wohlend J Shoulder (1997) Sonography in adhesive capsulitis. In: 83rd annual meeting of the Radiological Society of North America, Chicago, USA

  10. Lee JC, Sykes C, Saifuddin A, Connell D (2005) Adhesive capsulitis: sonographic changes in the rotator cuff interval with arthroscopic correlation. Skelet Radiol 34:522–527

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Homsi C, Rodrigues MB, Silva JJ et al (2006) Ultrasound in adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: is assessment of the coracohumeral ligament a valuable diagnostic tool? Skelet Radiol 35:673–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rodeo SA, Hannafin JA, Tom J et al (1977) Immunolocalization of cytokines and their receptors in adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder. J Orthop Res 15:427–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee MH, Ahn JM, Muhle C et al (2003) Adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: diagnosis using magnetic resonance arthrography, with arthroscopic findings as the standard. J Comput Assist Tomogr 27:901

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Neer CS 2nd, Satterlee CC, Dalsey RM et al (1992) The anatomy and potential effects of contracture of the coracohumeral ligament. Clin Orthop 280:182–185

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anupama Tandon.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All author declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical standard

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from patients for publication of this report and images.

Funding

None.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tandon, A., Dewan, S., Bhatt, S. et al. Sonography in diagnosis of adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: a case–control study. J Ultrasound 20, 227–236 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-017-0262-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-017-0262-5

Keywords

Navigation