Skip to main content
Log in

Nonlinear vibro-acoustic analysis of a double-panel structure with an enclosure cavity

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An analytical study on the nonlinear vibro-acoustic behaviors of a double-panel structure with an acoustic cavity under harmonic excitation is presented. The flexible panels are modeled by the von-Karman plate theory. The solution of the corresponding nonlinear equations is obtained using the Galerkin method in conjunction with the multiple scales method (MMS). Primary, subharmonic and superharmonic resonances are then stated, and the frequency responses of different harmonics are obtained by MMS. The effects of excitation level and damping coefficient as well as the cavity depth on the frequency responses are investigated. According to the results jump phenomena is observed for primary and superharmonic resonance cases. Also, with increase in cavity depth, the steady state amplitude of the vibration increases in the sub harmonic resonance cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

c :

Depth of acoustic enclosure

c a :

Sound speed

\(c_{d1}, c_{d2}\) :

Structural damping coefficient

\(D_{1}, D_{2}\) :

Bending stiffness of the panels

\(E_{1}, E_{2}\) :

Young’s modulus of elasticity

\(h_{1}, h_{2}\) :

Thickness of the panels

p :

Pressure inside the cavity

p r :

Radiated sound pressure

P :

Mechanical or acoustic excitation

\(W_{1}, W_{2}\) :

Deflection of the flexible plates

\(\varphi\) :

Incident elevation angle

\(\varphi_{1}, \varphi_{2}\) :

Airy stress function

\(\rho_{1}, \rho_{2}\) :

Density of the panels

\(\upsilon_{1} ,\upsilon_{2}\) :

Poisson's ratio

σ :

Detuning parameter

\( \Omega \) :

Excitation frequency

\(\omega_{1} ,\omega_{2}\) :

Natural frequency

\( \theta \) :

Azimuth angle

References

  1. Roussos LA (1984) Noise transmission loss of a rectangular plate in an infinite baffle. J Acoust Soc Am 75:1–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sgard FC, Atalla N, Nicolas J (2000) A numerical model for the low frequency diffuse field sound transmission loss of double-wall sound barriers with elastic porous linings. J Acoust Soc Am 108:2865–2872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tadeu AJB, Mateus DMR (2001) Sound transmission through single, double and triple glazing. Experimental evaluation. Appl Acoust 62:307–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yairia M, Sakagami K, Sakagami E, Morimoto M, Minemura A, Andow K (2002) Sound radiation from a double-leaf elastic plate with a point force excitation: effect of an interior panel on the structure-borne sound radiation. Appl Acoust 63:737–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Carneal JP, Fuller CR (2004) An analytical and experimental investigation of active structural acoustic control of noise transmission through double panel systems. J Sound Vib 272:749–771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cheng L, Li YY, Gao JX (2005) Energy transmission in a mechanically-linked double-wall structure coupled to an acoustic enclosure. J Acoust Soc Am 117:2742–2751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Li YY, Cheng L (2006) Energy transmission through a double-wall structure with an acoustic enclosure: rotational effect of mechanical links. Appl Acoust 67:185–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang J, Lub TJ, Woodhouse J, Langley RS, Evans J (2005) Sound transmission through lightweight double-leaf partitions: theoretical modelling. J Sound Vib 286:817–847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pellicier A, Trompette N (2007) A review of analytical methods, based on the wave approach, to compute partitions transmission loss. Appl Acoust 68:1192–1212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Xin FX, Lu TJ, Chen CQ (2008) Vibroacoustic behavior of clamp mounted double-panel partition with enclosure air cavity. J Acoust Soc Am 124:3604–3612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Xin FX, Lu TJ, Chen CQ (2009) External mean flow influence on noise transmission through double-leaf aeroelastic plates. AIAA J 47:1939–1951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Doutresa O, Atalla N (2010) Acoustic contributions of a sound absorbing blanket placed in a double panel structure: absorption versus transmission. J Acoust Soc Am 128:664–671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Xin FX, Lu TJ, Chen CQ (2010) Sound transmission through simply supported finite double-panel partitions with enclosed air cavity. J Vib Acoust 132:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Desai DA (2013) Simulation and experimental validation of vibro-acoustic transmission through a passive automotive door mount system. WIT Trans Built Environ 129:239–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Shi SX, Jin GY, Liu ZG (2014) Vibro-acoustic behaviors of an elastically restrained double-panel structure with an acoustic cavity of arbitrary boundary impedance. Appl Acoust 76:431–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tan WH, Ripin ZM (2016) Optimization of double-layered micro-perforated panels with vibro-acoustic effect. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 38:745–760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tonga Y, Weia W, Fana J, Wang B (2019) Acoustic scattering from a cylindrical shell with double internal rigid plates. Acoust Phys 65:7–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gubaidullina AA, Pyatkova AV (2018) Specificities of acoustic streaming in cylindrical cavity with increasing nonlinearity of the process. Acoust Phys 64:18–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Blinkova YuA, Blinkovab AYu, Evdokimovab EV, Mogilevich LI (2018) Mathematical modeling of nonlinear waves in an elastic cylindrical shell surrounded by an elastic medium and containing a viscous incompressible liquid. Acoust Phys 64:274–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee YY (2012) Analysis of the nonlinear structural-acoustic resonant frequencies of a rectangular tube with a flexible end using harmonic balance and homotopy perturbation methods. Abstr Appl Anal 2012:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sadri M, Younesian D (2013) Nonlinear harmonic vibration analysis of a plate–cavity system. J Nonlinear Dyn 74:1267–1279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sadri M, Younesian D (2014) Nonlinear free vibration analysis of a plate–cavity system. Thin Wall Struct 74:191–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee Y (2016) Free vibration analysis of a nonlinear panel coupled with extended cavity using the multi-level residue harmonic balance method. Thin-Walled Struct 98:332–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lee Y (2018) Nonlinear structure-extended cavity interaction simulation using a new version of harmonic balance method. PLoS ONE 13:1–25

    Google Scholar 

  25. Anvariyeh FS, Jalili MM, Fotuhi AR (2019) Nonlinear vibration analysis of a circular plate–cavity system. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 41:41–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lee Y (2020) Free vibration analysis of nonlinear structural-acoustic system with non-rigid boundaries using the elliptic integral approach. Mathematics 8:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lee Y (2021) Frequency-amplitude relationship of a nonlinear symmetric panel absorber mounted on a flexible wall. Symmetry 13:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lee Y (2022) Modified elliptic integral approach for the forced vibration and sound transmission analysis of a nonlinear panel backed by a partitioned cavity. Mathematics 10:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang K, Pan J, Lin TR, Guo H, Zhang B (2023) Vibro-acoustic response of ribbed-panel-cavity systems due to an internal sound source excitation. J Vib Control 5:1–17

    Google Scholar 

  30. Reddy JN (2007) Theory and analysis of elastic plates and shells, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  31. Nayfeh AH, Pai PF (2004) Linear and nonlinear structural mechanics, 1st edn. Wiley, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kinseler LE, Fery AR, Coppens AB, Sanders JV (2000) Fundamentals of acoustic. Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  33. Nayfeh AH, Mook D (1979) Nonlinear oscillations. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Mahdi Jalili.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors certify that they have NO affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest, or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Additional information

Technical Editor: Adriano Todorovic Fabro.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Coefficients of Eqs. (15) and (16)

$$ P_{1} \left( t \right) = {\text{Re}} \left[ {\frac{{ - B_{1} }}{{A_{2} B_{2} - A_{1} B_{1} }}\mathop \int \limits_{0}^{a} \mathop \int \limits_{0}^{b} 2p_{i} \exp \left( {j\Omega t - jk_{0} x\sin \varphi \cos \theta - jk_{0} y\sin \theta \sin \varphi } \right)\sin \frac{m\pi x}{a}\cos \frac{n\pi y}{b}dxdy} \right] = P_{01} \cos \Omega t $$
(42)
$$ P_{2} \left( t \right) = {\text{Re}} \left[ {\frac{{B_{2} }}{{A_{2} B_{2} - A_{1} B_{1} }}\mathop \int \limits_{0}^{a} \mathop \int \limits_{0}^{b} 2p_{i} \exp \left( {j\Omega t - jk_{0} x\sin \varphi \cos \theta - jk_{0} y\sin \theta \sin \varphi } \right)\sin \frac{\pi x}{a}\cos \frac{\pi y}{b}dxdy} \right] = P_{02} \cos \Omega t $$
(43)
$$ \lambda_{1}^{4} = \frac{{B_{1} \overline{\lambda }_{1}^{4} }}{{A_{1} B_{1} - A_{2} B_{2} }} $$
(44)
$$ \lambda_{2}^{4} = \frac{{A_{1} \overline{\lambda }_{2}^{4} }}{{A_{1} B_{1} - A_{2} B_{2} }} $$
(45)
$$ \alpha_{1} = \frac{{B_{1} - A_{2} }}{{A_{2} B_{2} - A_{1} B_{1} }}\mu $$
(46)
$$ \alpha_{2} = \frac{{A_{2} \overline{\lambda }_{2}^{4} }}{{A_{2} B_{2} - A_{1} B_{1} }} $$
(47)
$$ \alpha_{3} = \frac{{A_{1} - B_{2} }}{{A_{2} B_{2} - A_{1} B_{1} }}\mu $$
(48)
$$ \alpha_{4} = \frac{{B_{2} \overline{\lambda }_{1}^{4} }}{{A_{2} B_{2} - A_{1} B_{1} }} $$
(49)

where

$$ A_{1} = 1 + \frac{{\rho_{1} \cosh k_{022} c}}{{k_{022} \sinh k_{022} c}} $$
(50)
$$ A_{2} = - \frac{{\rho_{2} }}{{k_{022} \sinh k_{022} c}} $$
(51)
$$ B_{1} = 1 + \frac{{\rho_{2} \cosh k_{022} c}}{{k_{022} \sinh k_{022} c}} $$
(52)
$$ B_{2} = - \frac{{\rho_{1} }}{{k_{022} \sinh k_{022} c}} $$
(53)

and

$$ \overline{\lambda }_{1}^{4} = \frac{{\rho_{1} h_{1} \hat{\omega }_{1}^{2} }}{{D_{1} }} $$
(54)
$$ \overline{\lambda }_{2}^{4} = \frac{{\rho_{2} h_{2} \hat{\omega }_{2}^{2} }}{{D_{2} }} $$
(55)

in which

$$ \hat{\omega }_{1} = \pi^{2} \left[ {\left( \frac{1}{a} \right)^{2} + \left( \frac{1}{b} \right)^{2} } \right]\left( {\frac{{D_{1} }}{{\rho_{1} h_{1} }}} \right)^{2} $$
(56)
$$ \hat{\omega }_{2} = \pi^{2} \left[ {\left( \frac{1}{a} \right)^{2} + \left( \frac{1}{b} \right)^{2} } \right]\left( {\frac{{D_{2} }}{{\rho_{2} h_{2} }}} \right)^{2} $$
(57)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Anvariyeh, F.S., Jalili, M.M. & Fotuhi, A.R. Nonlinear vibro-acoustic analysis of a double-panel structure with an enclosure cavity. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 46, 23 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-023-04594-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-023-04594-z

Keywords

Navigation