Skip to main content
Log in

Double fictitious background media formulation for the Helmholtz equation in inhomogeneous media

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes a BEM technique for acoustic problems in the frequency domain in inhomogeneous media. Since these problems are modeled by the Helmholtz equation with variable wave number, it is observed that the simple algebraic procedure to add and subtract a term in the original differential equation permits to reformulate the problem considering two terms: a fictitious background homogeneous medium related to an appropriate Green’s function and an additional reactive term that strongly influences the numerical solution. The influence of the reactive term in the numerical solution can be strongly reduced by introducing a new pressure unknown \(\hat{P}\) in the kernel of the domain integral (the reactive term integral). The introduction of the \(\hat{P}\) causes a break of symmetry between the original pressure unknown P and the new unknown pressure \(\hat{P}\). Through weighted residual sentences, it is shown that the error minimization acts in different form between the original unknown pressure P and the new unknown \(\hat{P}\), resulting in a considerable gain of accuracy. Numerical results presented here show that the proposed technique leads to meaningful superior accuracy compared to other alternatives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brebbia CA, Skerget P (1984) Diffusion–convection problems using boundary elements. Adv Water Resour 7(2):50–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Onishi K, Kuroki T, Tanaka M (1984) An application of a boundary element method to natural convection. Appl Math Model 8(6):383–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Takhteyev V, Brebbia CA (1990) Analytical integrations in boundary elements. Eng Anal Bound Elem 7(2):95–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brebbia CA (1988) Alternative ways of treating domain integrals in boundary elements. Dev Water Sci 36:129–138

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nardini D, Brebbia CA (1983) A new approach to free vibration analysis using boundary elements. Appl Math Model 7(3):157–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brebbia CA, Nardini D (1983) Dynamic analysis in solid mechanics by an alternative boundary element procedure. Int J Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 2(4):228–233

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nowak AJ, Brebbia CA (1989) The multiple-reciprocity method. A new approach for transforming BEM domain integrals to the boundary. Eng Anal Bound Elem 6(3):164–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kontoni DPN, Partridge PW, Brebbia CA (1991) The dual reciprocity boundary element method for the eigenvalue analysis of Helmholtz problems. Adv Eng Softw Workstn 13(1):2–16

    Google Scholar 

  9. Partridge PW, Brebbia CA, Wrobel LC (1992) The dual reciprocity boundary element method. Computational Mechanics Publications and Elsevier, London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Partridge PW (1994) Dual reciprocity BEM: local versus global approximation functions for diffusion, convection and other problems. Eng Anal Bound Elem 14(4):349–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Eldho TI, Vasudeva Rao B (1997) Simulation of two-dimensional contaminant transport with dual reciprocity boundary elements. Eng Anal Bound Elem 20(3):213–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Loeffler CF, Mansur WJ (2003) Quasi-dual reciprocity boundary-element method for incompressible flow: application to the diffusive–advective equation. Int J Numer Methods Eng 58(8):1167–1186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Marin L, Elliott L, Heggs PJ, Ingham DB, Lesnic D, Wen X (2006) Dual reciprocity boundary element method solution of the Cauchy problem for Helmholtz-type equations with variable coefficients. J Sound Vib 297(1–2):89–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dan ML, Loeffler CF, Mansur WJ (2012) A transformation of variables technique applicable to the boundary element method to simulate a special class of diffusive–advective potential problems. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 34(1):9–17

    Google Scholar 

  15. Barbosa JP, Loeffler CF, Lara LOC (2019) The direct interpolation boundary element technique applied to three-dimensional scalar free vibration problems. Eng Anal Bound Elem 108(1):295–300

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Loeffler CF, Cruz AL, Bulcão A (2015) Direct use of radial basis interpolation functions for modelling source terms with the boundary element method. Eng Anal Bound Elem 50:97–108

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Barcelos HM, Loeffler CF (2019) The direct interpolation boundary element method applied to smoothly inhomogeneous Laplace’s problems. Eng Anal Bound Elem 105(1):155–164

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Wrobel LC, DeFigueiredo DB (1991) A dual reciprocity boundary element formulation for convection–diffusion problems with variable velocity fields. Eng Anal Bound Elem 8(6):312–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Itagaki M (2000) Advanced dual reciprocity method based on polynomial source and its application to eigenvalue problem for nonuniform media. Eng Anal Bound Elem 24(2):169–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dan ML, Mansur WJ, Peters FC (2016) A BEM based methodology to solve inverse problems considering fictitious background media. Eng Anal Bound Elem 66(1):109–118

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Wu TW (2000) Boundary element acoustics: fundamentals and computer codes. WIT Press, Southampton, Boston

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Di Bartolo L, Dors C, Mansur WJ (2012) A new family of finite-difference schemes to solve the heterogeneous acoustic wave equation. Geophysics 77(5):T187–T199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Devaney AJ (1984) Geophysical diffraction tomography. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 22(1):3–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lo TW, Inderwiesen PL (1994) Fundamentals of seismic tomography. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Graham IG, Sauter SA (2020) Stability and finite element error analysis for the Helmholtz equation with variable coefficients. Math Comput 89(321):105–138

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Wylie CR (1966) Advanced engineering mathematics. McGraw-Hill, Tokyo

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Li X, Zhu T, Zhang M, Long G (2010) Seismic scalar wave equation with variable coefficients modeling by a new convolutional differentiator. Comput Phys Commun 181(11):1850–1858

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Jensen FB et al (2011) Computational ocean acoustics, modern acoustics and signal processing. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  29. Fu LY (2003) Numerical study of generalized Lippmann–Schwinger integral equation including surface topography. Geophysics 68(2):665–671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lippmann BA, Schwinger J (1950) Variational principles for scattering processes. I. Phys Rev 79(3):469–489

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Brebbia CA, Telles JCF, Wrobel LC (1984) boundary element techniques: theory and applications in engineering. Springer, Berlin and New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  32. Huang X, Jakobsen M, Eikrem KS, Nævdal G (2020) Target-oriented inversion of time-lapse seismic waveform data. Commun Comput Phys 28(1):249–275

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Malovichko M, Khokhlov N, Yavich N, Zhdanov M (2017) Approximate solutions of acoustic 3D integral equation and their application to seismic modeling and full-waveform inversion. J Comput Phys 346:318–339

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. Jakobsen M, Ursin B (2015) Full waveform inversion in the frequency domain using direct iterative T-matrix methods. J Geophys Eng 12(3):400–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Jakobsen M (2012) T-matrix approach to seismic forward modelling in the acoustic approximation. Stud Geophys Geod 56(1):1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Dan ML (2015) Uma Técnica do MEC para Solução de Problemas Diretos e Inversos Baseada na Consideração de Meios de Fundo Fictícios [A BEM technique to solve direct and inverse problems based on consideration of fictitious background media]. DSc thesis. Federal University of Rio de Janeiro

  37. Didenkulova I, Pelinovsky E, Soomere T (2008) Exact travelling wave solutions in strongly inhomogeneous media. Est J Eng 14(3):220–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Markcilei Lima Dan.

Additional information

Technical Editor: Samuel da Silva.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dan, M.L., Mansur, W.J. & Loeffler, C.F. Double fictitious background media formulation for the Helmholtz equation in inhomogeneous media. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 44, 63 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-022-03365-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-022-03365-6

Keywords

Navigation