Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

On the constitutive modeling of a powder metallurgy nanoquasicrystalline Al93Fe3Cr2Ti2 alloy at elevated temperatures

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The flow behavior of nanoquasicrystalline \(\hbox {Al}_{93}\hbox {Fe}_{3}\hbox {Cr}_{2}\hbox {Ti}_{2}\) alloy at different strain rates and elevated temperatures was represented by the Johnson–Cook model, a modified Johnson–Cook model, a newly modified Johnson–Cook model, and a modified Zerilli–Armstrong model. A comparative study on the capability of the four models to accurately predict the flow stress of the alloy at hot deformations is made using standard statistical parameters correlation coefficient (R) and average absolute relative error (AARE). The results show that the newly modified Johnson–Cook model provides predicted stresses that agree very well with the experimental stresses at the tested domain of strain rates and temperatures, with R = 0.979 and AARE = 7.78%. The modified Zerilli–Armstrong model might predict the flow stress of the alloy but at some of the tested domain of strain rates and temperatures, with R = 0.951 and AARE =  9.13%. The Johnson–Cook model and the modified Johnson–Cook model are found to be inadequate to predict the flow stress of the alloy with R of 0.924 and 0.935 and AARE of 12.72% and 10.73%, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chlup Z, Todd I, Garcia Escorial A, Lieblich M, Chlupova A, O’Dwyer J (2003) Bulk nanostructured aluminium alloy Al93Fe3Cr2Ti2: processing and characterisation. In: THERMEC’2003. Materials science forum, vol. 426. Scientific.Net, Switzerland, pp 2417–2422

  2. Todd I, Chlup Z, O’Dwyer JG, Lieblich M, Garci’a-Escorial A (2004) The influence of processing variables on the structure and mechanical properties of nano-quasicrystalline reinforced aluminium alloys. Mater Sci Eng A 375:1235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Escorial AG, Cremaschi V, Natale E, Lieblich M (2007) Thermal evolution of nanoquasicrystalline \(\text{Al}_{93}\text{Fe}_3\text{Cr}_2\text{Ti}_2\) alloy. J Alloys Compd 434:215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Inoue A, Kimura H (2000) High-strength aluminum alloys containing nanoquasicrystalline particles. Mater Sci Eng A 286(1):1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pedrazzini S, Galano M, Audebert F, Smith G (2017) Elevated temperature mechanical behaviour of nanoquasicrystalline \(\text{Al}_{93}\text{Fe}_3\text{Cr}_2\text{Ti}_2\) alloy and composites. Mater Sci Eng A 705:352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang C, Zhao G, Chen H, Guan Y, Kou F (2012) Numerical simulation and metal flow analysis of hot extrusion process for a complex hollow aluminum profile. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 60(1):101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bastani AF, Aukrust T, Brandal S (2011) Optimisation of flow balance and isothermal extrusion of aluminium using finite-element simulations. J Mater Process Technol 211(4):650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Parvizian F, Kayser T, Hortig C, Svendsen B (2009) Thermomechanical modeling and simulation of aluminum alloy behavior during extrusion and cooling. J Mater Process Technol 209(2):876

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Gagliardi F, Citrea T, Ambrogio G, Filice L (2014) Influence of the process setup on the microstructure and mechanical properties evolution in porthole die extrusion. Mater Des 60:274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yu J, Zhao G, Chen L (2016) Analysis of longitudinal weld seam defects and investigation of solid-state bonding criteria in porthole die extrusion process of aluminum alloy profiles. J Mater Proc Technol 237:31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yu J, Zhao G, Cui W, Zhang C, Chen L (2017) Microstructural evolution and mechanical properties of welding seams in aluminum alloy profiles extruded by a porthole die under different billet heating temperatures and extrusion speeds. J Mater Proc Technol 247:214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhou J, Wang B, Huang M (2014) Two constitutive descriptions of boron steel 22MnB5 at high temperature. Mater Des 63:738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mandal S, Rakesh V, Sivaprasad P, Venugopal S, Kasiviswanathan K (2009) Constitutive equations to predict high temperature flow stress in a Ti-modified austenitic stainless steel. Mater Sci Eng A 500(1):114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wei G, Peng X, Hadadzadeh A, Mahmoodkhani Y, Xie W, Yang Y, Wells MA (2015) Constitutive modeling of Mg–9Li–3Al–2Sr–2Y at elevated temperatures. Mech Mater 89:241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Johnson GR, Cook WH (1983) In: Proceedings of the 7th international symposium on ballistics, vol 21, The Netherlands, pp 541–547

  16. Zerilli FJ, Armstrong RW (1987) Dislocation-mechanics-based constitutive relations for material dynamics calculations. J Appl Phys 61(5):1816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang H, Wen W, Cui H, Xu Y (2009) A modified Zerilli–Armstrong model for alloy IC10 over a wide range of temperatures and strain rates. Mater Sci Eng A 527(1):328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Samantaray D, Mandal S, Bhaduri A (2009) A comparative study on Johnson Cook, modified Zerilli–Armstrong and Arrhenius-type constitutive models to predict elevated temperature flow behaviour in modified 9Cr–1Mo steel. Comput Mater Sci 47(2):568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen L, Zhao G, Yu J (2015) Hot deformation behavior and constitutive modeling of homogenized 6026 aluminum alloy. Mater Des 74:25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang J, Zhao G, Chen L, Li J (2016) A comparative study of several constitutive models for powder metallurgy tungsten at elevated temperature. Mater Des 90:91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhao Y, Sun J, Li J, Yan Y, Wang P (2017) A comparative study on Johnson–Cook and modified Johnson–Cook constitutive material model to predict the dynamic behavior laser additive manufacturing fecr alloy. J Alloys Compd 723:179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lin Y, Chen XM, Liu G (2010) A modified Johnson–Cook model for tensile behaviors of typical high-strength alloy steel. Mater Sci Eng A 527(26):6980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Shokry A (2017) A modified Johnson–Cook model for flow behavior of alloy 800H at intermediate strain rates and high temperatures. J Mater Eng Perform 26(12):5723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Samantaray D, Mandal S, Borah U, Bhaduri A, Sivaprasad P (2009) A thermo-viscoplastic constitutive model to predict elevated-temperature flow behaviour in a titanium-modified austenitic stainless steel. Mater Sci Eng A 526(1):1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Pedrazzini S, Galano M, Audebert F, Collins D, Hofmann F, Abbey B, Korsunsky A, Lieblich M, Escorial AG, Smith G (2016) Strengthening mechanisms in an Al–Fe–Cr–Ti nano-quasicrystalline alloy and composites. Mater Sci Eng A 672:175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Shokry A, Ståhle P (2015) A methodology for using Kalman filter to determine material parameters from uncertain measurements. Mater Discov 2:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Li HY, Li YH, Wang XF, Liu JJ, Wu Y (2013) A comparative study on modified Johnson Cook, modified Zerilli–Armstrong and Arrhenius-type constitutive models to predict the hot deformation behavior in 28CrMnMov steel. Mater Des 49:493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Trimble D, O’Donnell GE (2015) Constitutive modelling for elevated temperature flow behaviour of AA7075. Mater Des 76:150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Phaniraj MP, Lahiri AK (2003) The applicability of neural network model to predict flow stress for carbon steels. J Mater Process Technol 141(2):219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Srinivasulu S, Jain A (2006) A comparative analysis of training methods for artificial neural network rainfall–runoff models. Appl Soft Comput 6(3):295

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Fayoum University, Fayoum, 63514, Egypt

    Abdallah Shokry

Authors
  1. Abdallah Shokry
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdallah Shokry.

Additional information

Technical Editor: Paulo de Tarso Rocha de Mendonça, Ph.D.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shokry, A. On the constitutive modeling of a powder metallurgy nanoquasicrystalline Al93Fe3Cr2Ti2 alloy at elevated temperatures. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 41, 118 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-019-1617-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-019-1617-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation