Abstract
The importance of integrating technologies into second/foreign language (L2) education has garnered increasing attention among scholars in the past decade. It has been exponentially highlighted that L2 educators need to become digitally literate to succeed in the digital world. However, research on the contribution of English as a foreign language (EFL) students’ digital literacy to their level of technostress and academic productivity has been left uncharted. To bridge the gap, this study used a quantitative research design via three validated questionnaires to examine whether Chinese EFL students’ digital literacy affects their technostress and academic productivity. To this end, a sample of 426 EFL students were invited to fill in an electronic survey. The results of this study, as obtained by structural equation modeling (SEM) and multiple regression, illustrated that EFL students’ digital literacy influenced both their technostress and academic productivity. It was also shown that digital literacy could respectively predict 77% and 61% of changes in students’ technostress and academic productivity. The study explains the results' implications for EFL educators and policy-makers, who can make more efforts to integrate technologies into L2 education. Finally, the limitations and future lines of research are presented.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
References
Afifi, T. D., Zamanzadeh, N., Harrison, K., & Acevedo Callejas, M. (2018). Wired: The impact of media and technology use on stress (cortisol) and inflammation (interleukin IL-6) in fast-paced families. Computers in Human Behavior, 81, 265–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.12.010
Bibi, H. J., Ayub, A., & Ismail, I. (2023). Impact of ICT on the progress and productivity of students at the university level. Journal of Social Sciences Review, 3(1), 270–282.
Brod, C. (1984). Technostress: The human cost of the computer revolution. Boston: Addison-Wesley.
Çakmak, F. (2019). Mobile learning and mobile-assisted language learning in focus. Language and Technology, 1(1), 30–48.
Clark, K., & Kalin, S. (1996). Technostressed out? How to cope in the digital age. Library Journal, 121(13), 30–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01130409
Dashtestani, R., & Hojatpanah, S. (2020). Digital literacy of EFL students in a junior high school in Iran: Voices of teachers, students, and Ministry Directors. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(4), 635–665. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1744664
Demerouti, E., Bakker, A., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. (2001). The job demands-resources model of Burnout. Journal of Applied. Psychology, 86, 499–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499
Derakhshan, A., & Fathi, J. (2023). Grit and foreign language enjoyment as predictors of EFL learners’ online engagement: The mediating role of online learning self-efficacy. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-023-00745-x
Derakhshan, A., Kruk, M., Mehdizadeh, M., & Pawlak, M. (2021a). Activity-induced boredom in online EFL classes. ELT Journal, 76(1), 58–68. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccab072
Derakhshan, A., Kruk, M., Mehdizadeh, M., & Pawlak, M. (2021b). Boredom in online classes in the Iranian EFL context: Sources and solutions. System. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102556
Derakhshan, A., Malmir, A., Pawlak, M., & Wang, Y. L. (2023). The use of interlanguage pragmatic learning strategies (IPLS) by L2 learners: The impact of age, gender, language learning experience, and L2 proficiency levels. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2022-0132.
Derakhshan, A., Wang, Y., & Ghiasvand, F. (2023). “I never make a permanent decision based on a temporary emotion”: Unveiling EFL teachers’ perspectives about emotions in assessment. Applied Linguistics Review. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2023-0089
Ding, L., & Hong, Z. (2023). On the relationship between pre-service teachers’sense of self-efficacy and emotions in the integration of technology in their teacher Developmental Programs. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-023-00758-6
Durriyah, T. L., & Zuhdi, M. (2018). Digital literacy with EFL student teachers: Exploring Indonesian student teachers’ initial perception about integrating digital technologies into a teaching unit. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 6(3), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.6n.3p.53
Estaji, M., & Ghiasvand, F. (2023). Tracing the developmental trajectories of EFL Teacher Assessment Identity (TAI) through web-based audio diaries. The Qualitative Report, 28(9), 2681–2715.
Ferrari, A. (2013). DIGCOMP: A framework for developing and understanding digital competence in Europe. Publications Office of the European Union.
Fischer, T., & Riedl, R. (2017). Technostress research: A nurturing ground for measurement pluralism? CAIS, 40, 375–401. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.04017
Fraillon, J., Ainley, J., Schulz, W., Duckworth, D., & Friedman, T. (2019). IEA international computer and information literacy study 2018 assessment framework. Cham: Springer Nature.
Fu, J., & Wang, Y. (2022). Inspecting EFL Teachers’ academic literacy development in multilingual contexts: A global vision. Heliyon, 8(12), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12143
Gilster, P. (1997). Digital literacy. USA: Wiley and Computer Publishing.
Guo, Y., Wang, Y., & Ortega-Martín, J. (2023). The impact of blended learning-based scaffolding techniques on learners’ self-efficacy and willingness to communicate. Porta Linguarum, 40(2), 253–273.
Hague, C., & Payton, S. (2010). Digital literacy across the curriculum. Malaysia: Futurelab.
Hu, L., & Hemchua, S. (2023). Understanding the Effect of Professional Learning Community on EFL Teachers' Intercultural Teaching Competence. Language Related Research, 14(5), 245–283. https://doi.org/10.29252/LRR.14.5.10.
Hysenbegasi, A., Hass, S. L., & Rowland, C. R. (2005). The impact of depression on the academic productivity of university students. The Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics, 8(3), 145–151.
Jin, K. Y., Reichert, F., Cagasan, L. P., Jr., de La Torre, J., & Law, N. (2020). Measuring digital literacy across three age cohorts: Exploring test dimensionality and performance differences. Computers & Education, 157, 103968.
Joo, Y. J., Lim, K. Y., & Kim, N. H. (2016). The effects of secondary teachers’ technostress on the intention to use technology in South Korea. Computers and Education, 95, 114–122.
Khan, H., Gul, R., & Zeb, M. (2023). The effect of students’ cognitive and emotional engagement on students’ academic success and academic productivity. Journal of Social Sciences Review, 3(1), 322–334.
Komlayut, S., & Srivatanakul, T. (2017). Assessing digital literacy skills using a self-administered questionnaire. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 6(3), 74–85.
Korzynski, P., Rook, C., Florent-Treacy, E., & Kets de Vries, M. (2021). The impact of self-esteem, conscientiousness, and pseudo-personality on technostress. Internet Research, 31(1), 59–79. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-03-2020-0141
Krumsvik, R. J. (2008). Situated learning and teachers’ digital competence. Education and Information Technologies, 13(4), 279–290.
Kumar, R., Lal, R., Bansal, Y., & Sharma, S. K. (2013). Technostress in relation to job satisfaction and organisational commitment among IT professionals. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 3(12), 12–14.
Laspinas, L. M. (2015). Technostress: Trends and challenges in the 21st century knowledge management. European Scientific Journal, 11(2), 205–217.
Law, N., D. Woo, J. de la Torre, & G. Wong. (2018). A global framework of reference on digital literacy for indicator. UNESCO Institute for Statistics.
Lazarus, R. (1966). Psychological stress and the coping process. McGraw-Hill.
Liu, G. X., & Wang, Y. L. (2024). Modeling EFL teachers’intention to integrate informal digital learning of English (IDLE) into the classroom using the theory of planned behavior. System, 120, 103193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2023.103193.
Lotherington, H., & Jenson, J. (2011). Teaching multimodal and digital literacy in L2 settings: New literacies, new basics, and new pedagogies. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 226–246.
Martin, A., & Madigan, D. (2006). Digital literacies for learning. UK: Facet Publishing.
Meyer, K. A., & McNeal, L. (2011). How online faculty improve student learning productivity. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 15(3), 37–53.
Nami, F., & Vaezi, S. (2018). How ready are our students for technology-enhanced learning? Students at a university of technology respond. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30(3), 510–529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9181-5
Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? Computers & Education, 59(3), 1065–1078.
Nguyen, L. A. T., & Habók, A. (2022). Digital literacy of EFL students: An empirical study in Vietnamese universities. Libri, 72(1), 53–66.
Pan, Z. W. (2022). L2 grit and foreign language enjoyment: Arguments in light of control-value theory and its methodological cmpatibility. Language Related Research, 13(5), 325–357. https://doi.org/10.52547/LRR.13.5.13
Pan, Z., Wang, Y., & Derakhshan, A. (2023). Unpacking Chinese EFL Students’ academic engagement and psychological well-being: The roles of language teachers’ affective scaffolding. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 52(5), 1799–1819. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-023-09974-z
Penado Abilleira, M., Rodicio-García, M. L., Ríos-de-Deus, M. P., & Mosquera-González, M. J. (2020). Technostress in Spanish university students: Validation of a measurement scale. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.582317
Pertiwi, I., & Siti, R. R. (2022). Digital literacy in EFL learning: University students’ perspectives. JEES (journal of English Educators Society), 7(2), 197–204.
Qi, C. (2019). A double-edged sword? Exploring the impact of students’ academic usage of mobile devices on technostress and academic performance. Behaviour & Information Technology, 38(12), 1337–1354. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2019.1585476
Ragu-Nathan, T. S., Tarafdar, M., Ragu-Nathan, B. S., & Tu, Q. (2008). The consequences of technostress for end users in organizations: Conceptual development and validation. Information Systems Research, 19(4), 417–433. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1070.0165
Reagan, G. M. (1986). The concept of academic productivity. The Educational Forum, 50(1), 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131728509335735
Salanova, M., Llorens, S., & Cifre, E. (2013). The dark side of technologies: Technostress among users of information and communication technologies. International Journal of Psychology, 48, 422–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2012.680460
Shu, Q., Tu, Q., & Wang, K. (2011). The impact of computer self-efficacy and technology dependence on computer- related technostress: A social cognitive theory perspective. International Journal of Human Computer Interaction, 27(10), 923–939. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2011.555313
Son, J.-B., Park, S.-S., & Park, M. (2017). Digital literacy of language learners in two different contexts. The JALT CALL Journal, 13(2), 77–96.
Soroya, S. H., & Ameen, K. (2020). Subject-based reading behavior differences of young adults under emerging digital paradigm. Libri, 70(2), 169–179.
Sun, P. J., & Mei, B. (2022). Modeling preservice Chinese-as-a-second/foreign-language teachers’ adoption of educational technology: A technology acceptance perspective. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(4), 816–839. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1750430.
Tarafdar, M., & Stich, J. F. (2021). Virtual work, technology, and wellbeing. Sage.
Tarafdar, M., Tu, Q., Ragu-Nathan, B. S., & Ragu-Nathan, T. (2007). The impact of technostress on role stress and productivity. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(1), 301–328. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240109
Thompson, P. (2013). The digital natives as learners: Technology use patterns and approaches to learning. Computer and Education, 65, 12–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.022
Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Upadhyaya, P., & Vrinda. (2021). Impact of technostress on academic productivity of university students. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 1647–1664.
Wang, X., Tan, S. C., & Li, L. (2020). Measuring university students’ technostress in technology-enhanced learning: Scale development and validation. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(4), 96–112. https://doi.org/10.14742/AJET.5329
Wang, Y. (2023). Probing into the boredom of online instruction among Chinese English language teachers during the Covid-19 pandemic. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-04223-3
Wang, Y., Pan, Z. W., & Wang, M. Z. (2023a). The moderating effect of participation in online learning on EFL teachers’ teaching ability. Heliyon. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13890
Wang, Y. L., Wang, Y. X., Pan, Z. W., & Ortega-Martín, J. L. (2023b). The predicting role of EFL students’ achievement emotions and technological self-efficacy in their technology acceptance. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-023-00750-0
Wang, Y., Derakhshan, A., Pan, Z., & Ghiasvand, F. (2023c). Chinese EFL teachers’ writing assessment feedback literacy: A scale development and validation study. Assessing Writing, 56, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100726.
Wang, Y., & Hemchua, S. (2022). Can we learn about culture by EFL textbook images?: A semiotic approach perspective. Language Related Research, 13(3), 479–499. https://doi.org/10.52547/LRR.13.3.19.
Wu, H. W., Wang, Y. L., & Wang, Y. S. (2023). What do we know about L2 teachers’ emotion regulation? A bibliometric analysis of the pertinent literature. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.59400/fls.v5i3.2012
Zhi, R., Wang, Y. S., & Wang, Y. L. (2023). The role of emotional intelligence and self-efficacy in EFL teachers’ technology adoption. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-023-00782-6
Funding
This study is supported by the Social Science Fund Project of Liaoning Province in 2022: The Research of English Chinese Metaphorical Idioms Based on the Embodied-Cognitive Linguistics (Project No. L22AYY006).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Consent to Participate
Informed consent to participate was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Consent for Publication
Informed consent for publication was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, J. The Effect of Chinese EFL Students’ Digital Literacy on Their Technostress and Academic Productivity. Asia-Pacific Edu Res (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-023-00794-2
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-023-00794-2