Abstract
Although assessments are a staple feature in education, student voices tend to be undervalued throughout the process. While students are a major stakeholder, this study adopted a mixed-methods strategy to examine the views of tertiary students on assessment types with regards to their preferences, self-rated performance and perceived effectiveness. Quantitative data were drawn from 434 students across 7 colleges and universities, while qualitative data were collected from 18 follow-up interviews. The results showed that both low-achievers and high-achievers favoured multiple-choice assessments because they believed their performance to be most effective. This preference was confirmed despite the fact that these students were habituated to written assessments in examinations or essays. Additionally, the students deemed oral presentations, whether individually or in groups, as unreliable, unfair and ineffective in assessing performance. Thus, this article seeks to highlight the importance of considering student needs when selecting the most appropriate form of assessment and when designing assessment tasks to enhance student learning.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akinsanya, C., & Williams, M. (2004). Concept mapping for meaningful learning. Nurse Education Today, 24(1), 41–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0260-6917(03)00120-5
Bedewy, D., & Gabriel, A. (2015). Examining perceptions of academic stress and its sources among university students: The perception of academic stress scale. Health Psychology Open, 2(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055102915596714
Bergner, J., Filzen, J. J., & Simkin, M. G. (2016). Why use multiple choice questions with excess information? Journal of Accounting Education, 34, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2015.11.008
Berry, R. (2011). Assessment trends in Hong Kong: Seeking to establish formative assessment in an examination culture. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 18(2), 199–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2010.527701
Birenbaum, M. (1994). Toward adaptive assessment—The student’s angle. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 20(2), 239–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-491X(94)90011-6
Birenbaum, M., & Feldman, R. A. (1998). Relationships between learning patterns and attitudes towards two assessment formats. Educational Research (windsor), 40(1), 90–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013188980400109
Boud, D., & Dochy, F. (2010). Assessment 2020. Seven propositions for assessment reform in higher education. University of Technology, Sydney. Retrieved April 10, 2022, from https://lirias.kuleuven.be/retrieve/379446
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Bridge, P. D., Musial, J., Frank, R., Roe, T., & Sawilowsky, S. (2003). Measurement practices: Methods for developing content-valid student examinations. Medical Teacher, 25(4), 414–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159031000100337
Carless, D. (2009). Trust, distrust and their impact on assessment reform. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(1), 79–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930801895786
Carney, M. B., Cavey, L., & Hughes, G. (2017). Assessing teacher attentiveness to student mathematical thinking: Validity claims and evidence. The Elementary School Journal, 118(2), 281–309. https://doi.org/10.1086/694269
Chapell, M. S., Blanding, Z. B., Silverstein, M. E., Takahashi, M., Newman, B., Gubi, A., & McCann, N. (2005). Test anxiety and academic performance in undergraduate and graduate students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 268–274. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.268
Chéron, M., Ademi, M., Kraft, F., & Löffler-Stastka, H. (2016). Case-based learning and multiple choice questioning methods favored by students. BMC Medical Education, 16(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0564-x
Dochy, F. J., & McDowell, L. (1997). Introduction: Assessment as a tool for learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 23(4), 279–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-491X(97)86211-6
Dolmans, D. H., Loyens, S. M., Marcq, H., & Gijbels, D. (2016). Deep and surface learning in problem-based learning: A review of the literature. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 21(5), 1087–1112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-015-9645-6
Durning, S. J., Dong, T., Ratcliffe, T., Schuwirth, L., Artino, A. R., Boulet, J. R., & Eva, K. (2016). Comparing open-book and closed-book examinations: A systematic review. Academic Medicine, 91(4), 583–599. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000977
Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). SAGE.
Forestier, K., & Crossley, M. (2015). International education policy transfer–borrowing both ways: the Hong Kong and England experience. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 45(5), 664–685. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2014.928508
George, D., & Mallery, M. (2011). SPSS for windows step by step: A simple guide and reference 18.0 update (11th ed.). Pearson.
Ghaith, G. (2003). Effects of the learning together model of cooperative learning on english as a Foreign language reading achievement, academic self-esteem, and feelings of school alienation. Bilingual Research Journal, 27(3), 451–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2003.10162603
Gibbs, G., & Simpson, C. (2004). Does your assessment support your students’ learning? Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 1(1), 1–30.
Gijbels, D., & Dochy, F. (2006). Students’ assessment preferences and approaches to learning: Can formative assessment make a difference? Educational Studies, 32(4), 399–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055690600850354
Ho, E. (2020). Online peer review of oral presentations. RELC Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220969280
Ho, E. (2021). Gongyeh: A CALL tool for peer evaluation and feedback on oral assessments. TESOL Journal, 12(3), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.592
Ho, E., & Ming, S. M. S. (2022). Responding to COVID-19: Teaching of EAP to non-native postgraduates of performing arts. In L. Kohnke (Ed.), Cases on teaching english for academic purposes (eap) during COVID-19: Insights from around the World (pp. 132–154). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-4148-0.ch006
Hofer, B. (2002). Motivation in the college classroom. In W. J. McKeachie (Ed.), McKeachie’s teaching tips: Strategies, research, and theory for college and university teachers (pp. 87–99). Houghton-Mifflin.
Holzinger, A., Lettner, S., Steiner-Hofbauer, V., & Capan Melser, M. (2020). How to assess? Perceptions and preferences of undergraduate medical students concerning traditional assessment methods. BMC Medical Education, 20(1), 312–312. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02239-6
Iannone, P., & Simpson, A. (2017). University students’ perceptions of summative assessment: The role of context. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 41(6), 785–801. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2016.1177172
Johnston, B., & Webber, S. (2003). Information literacy in higher education: A review and case study. Studies in Higher Education, 28(3), 335–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070309295
Kerby, D., & Romine, J. (2009). Develop oral presentation skills through accounting curriculum design and course-embedded assessment. Journal of Education for Business, 85(3), 172–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832320903252389
Kohler, G., Jennifer, G., Matthew, J., & Borchert, D. (2009). Dealing with the stress of college. Adult Education Quarterly, 59(3), 246–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713609331479
Kwan, J. (2019). Educational goals, assessment preferences and approaches to learning of MBA and MPA students in Singapore. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 2(1), 24–44. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2019.2.1.4
Leach, L., Neutze, G., & Zepke, N. (2001). Assessment and empowerment: Some critical questions. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 26(4), 293–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930120063457
Lee, I. (2015). Student teachers’ changing beliefs on a pre-service teacher education course in Hong Kong. In T. Wright & M. Beaumont (Eds.), Experiences of second language teacher education (pp. 15–41). Palgrave Macmillan.
Lee, J. (2019). Effects of linguistic and affective variables on middle school students’ writing performance in the context of English as a foreign language: An approach using structural equation modeling. Reading and Writing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-10007-2
McCombs, B. L. (1991). Motivation and lifelong learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(2), 117–127. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2602_4
Medland, E. (2016). Assessment in higher education: Drivers, barriers and directions for change in the UK. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(1), 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.982072
Mertens, D. M. (2015). Research and evaluation in education and psychology (4th ed.). SAGE.
Müller, S., Settmacher, U., Koch, I., & Dahmen, U. (2018). A pilot survey of student perceptions on the benefit of the OSCE and MCQ modalities. GMS Journal for Medical Education, 35(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3205/zma001197
Oaten, M., & Cheng, K. (2006). Improved self-control: The benefits of a regular program of academic study. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 28(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp2801_1
Park, J., Chung, S., An, H., Park, S., Lee, C., Kim, S. Y., Lee, J. D., & Kim, K. S. (2012). A structural model of stress, motivation, and academic performance in medical students. Psychiatry Investigation, 9(2), 143–149. https://doi.org/10.4306/pi.2012.9.2.143
Price, M., Carroll, J., O’Donovan, B., & Rust, C. (2011a). If I was going there I wouldn’t start from here: A critical commentary on current assessment practice. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(2), 479–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930903512883
Price, M., Handley, K., & Millar, J. (2011b). Feedback: Focusing attention on engagement. Studies in Higher Education, 36(8), 879–896. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2010.483513
Putwain, D. W. (2009). Assessment and examination stress in Key Stage 4. British Educational Research Journal, 35(3), 391–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920802044404
Putwain, D., Remedios, R., & Symes, W. (2016). The appraisal of fear appeals as threatening or challenging: Frequency of use, academic self-efficacy and subjective value. Educational Psychology, 36(9), 1670–1690. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2014.963028
Robotham, D., & Julian, C. (2006). Stress and the higher education student: A critical review of the literature. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 30(2), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098770600617513
Sabzevari, S., Abbaszade, A., & Borhani, F. (2013). The assessment methods and learning approaches in nursing students of Kerman University of Medical Sciences in Iran. Creative Education, 4(2), 160–164. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2013.42023
Sam, A. H., Hameed, S., Harris, J., & Meeran, K. (2016). Validity of very short answer versus single best answer questions for undergraduate assessment. BMC Medical Education, 16(1), 266–266. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0793-z
Schraml, K., Perski, A., Grossi, G., & Makower, I. (2012). Chronic stress and its consequences on subsequent academic achievement among adolescents. Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 2(1), 69–79. https://doi.org/10.5539/jedp.v2n1p69
Selvarajah, C., Chelliah, J., Meyer, D., Pio, E., & Anurit, P. (2010). The impact of social motivation on cooperative learning and assessment preferences. Journal of Management & Organization, 16(1), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.5172/jmo.16.1.113
Struyven, K., Dochy, F., & Janssens, S. (2005). Students’ perceptions about evaluation and assessment in higher education: A review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(4), 325–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930500099102
Struyven, K., Dochy, F., Janssens, S., Schelfhou, W., & Gielen, S. (2006). The overall effects of end-of-course assessment on student performance: A comparison between multiple choice testing, peer assessment, case-based assessment and portfolio assessment. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 32(3), 202–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2006.08.002
Tomas, C., & Jessop, T. (2019). Struggling and juggling: A comparison of student assessment loads across research and teaching-intensive universities. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463355
van de Watering, G., Gijbels, D., Dochy, F., & Van der Rijt, J. (2008). Students’ assessment preferences, perceptions of assessment and their relationships to study results. Higher Education, 56(6), 645–658. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9116-6
Watkins, C., Carnell, E., & Lodge, C. (2007). Effective learning in classrooms. SAGE Publications.
Funding
The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
There are no relevant financial or non-financial competing interests to report.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix 1
Appendix 1
Semi-structured Interview Guide.
-
1.
Can you recall and describe your previous learning experiences with reference to these eight assessment types?
-
2.
Among the eight assessment types, would you please indicate your preferences and why?
-
3.
Of the eight assessment types, which type(s) do you find useful and effective in measuring students’ performances? Why?
-
4.
How do different assessment methods affect your performances?
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Dang, B.Yy., Ho, E. & Tsang, A. Learner’s Assessment Preferences in Higher Education: A Comparison Study of High-Achievers and Low-Achievers. Asia-Pacific Edu Res 32, 595–604 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-022-00679-w
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-022-00679-w