Skip to main content
Log in

The Relationship Between Distributed Leadership and Teacher Efficacy in China: The Mediation of Satisfaction and Trust

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study explored the relationship between distributed leadership and teachers’ sense of self-efficacy, with a focus on the mediating roles of job satisfaction and trust in the principal in the context of mainland China. Five hundred and seventy elementary school teachers in South China participated in a survey. The results show that distributed leadership has indirect effects on teachers’ self-efficacy, and that these effects are significantly mediated by job satisfaction and trust in the principal. The results highlight the importance of distributed leadership and trust in the principal in the Chinese context. Implications for the improvement of leadership practices are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryk, A., & Schneider, B. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, C., Sammons, P., Leithwood, K., Hopkins, D., Gu, Q., Brown, E., et al. (2011). School leadership and student outcomes: Building and sustaining success. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2001). The role of trust in organizational settings. Organization Science, 12(4), 450–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dou, D., Devos, G., & Valcke, M. (2017). The relationships between school autonomy gap, principal leadership, teachers’ job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 45(6), 959–977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hairon, S., & Goh, J. W. (2015). Pursuing the elusive construct of distributed leadership: Is the search over? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 43(5), 693–718.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallinger, P. (2011). Leadership for learning: Lessons from 40 years of empirical research. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(2), 125–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallinger, P., Liu, S., & Piyaman, P. (2017). Does principal leadership make a difference in teacher professional learning? A comparative study China and Thailand. Compare,. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2017.1407237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A. (2008). Distributed leadership: According to the evidence. Journal of Educational Administration, 46(2), 172–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A. (2013). Distributed leadership: Friend or foe? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 41(5), 545–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A. (2014). Distributed leadership matters. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76(4), 408–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heck, R. H., & Hallinger, P. (2009). Assessing the contribution of distributed leadership to school improvement and growth in math achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 46(3), 659–689.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, C. L., & Au, W. T. (2006). Teaching satisfaction scale measuring job satisfaction of teachers. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(1), 172–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoftede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulpia, H., Devos, G., & Rosseel, Y. (2009). The relationship between the perception of distributed leadership in secondary schools and teachers' and teacher leaders' job satisfaction and organizational commitment. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 20(3), 291–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulpia, H., Devos, G., & Van Keer, H. (2011). The relation between school leadership from a distributed perspective and teachers’ organizational commitment examining the source of the leadership function. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47(5), 728–771.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klassen, R. M., & Chiu, M. M. (2010). Effects on teachers' self-efficacy and job satisfaction: Teacher gender, years of experience, and job stress. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 741–756.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K., & Beatty, B. (2008). Leading with teacher emotions in mind. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K., Mascall, B., & Strauss, T. (2009). Distributed leadership according to the evidence. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K., Patten, S., & Jantzi, D. (2010). Testing a conception of how school leadership influences student learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(5), 671–706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, L., Hallinger, P., & Walker, A. (2015). Exploring the mediating effects of trust on principal leadership and teacher professional learning in Hong Kong primary schools. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 44(1), 20–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, S., Hallinger, P., & Feng, D. (2016). Supporting the professional learning of teachers in China: Does principal leadership make a difference? Teaching and Teacher Education, 59, 79–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, S., Xu, X., Grant, L., Strong, J., & Fang, Z. (2017). Professional standards and performance evaluation for principals in China: A policy analysis of the development of principal standards. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 45(2), 238–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., Bellibas, M. S., & Printy, S. (2018). How school context and educator characteristics predict distributed leadership: A hierarchical structural equation model with 2013 TALIS data. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(3), 401–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louis, K., Dretzke, B., & Wahlstrom, K. (2010). How does leadership affect student achievement? Results from a national US survey. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 21(3), 315–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mascall, B., Leithwood, K., Straus, T., & Sacks, R. (2008). The relationship between distributed leadership and teachers' academic optimism. Journal of Educational Administration, 46(2), 214–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, H. E. (2012). Principal–teacher interactions how affective relationships shape principal and teacher attitudes. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(1), 39–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qian, H., Walker, A., & Yang, X. (2017). Building and leading a learning culture among teachers: A case study of a Shanghai primary school. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 45(1), 101–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber, J. B., Stage, F. K., King, J., Nora, A., & Barlow, E. A. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 323–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2011). Teacher job satisfaction and motivation to leave the teaching profession: Relations with school context, feeling of belonging, and emotional exhaustion. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(6), 1029–1038.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smylie, M., Mayrowetz, D., Murphy, J., & Louis, K. S. (2007). Trust and the development of distributed leadership. Journal of School Leadership, 17(4), 469–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spillane, J. P. (2006). Distributed leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, A., & Xia, J. (2018). Teacher-perceived distributed leadership, teacher self-efficacy and job satisfaction: A multilevel SEM approach using the 2013 TALIS data. International Journal of Educational Research, 92, 86–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tian, M., Risku, M., & Collin, K. (2016). A meta-analysis of distributed leadership from 2002 to 2013: Theory development, empirical evidence and future research focus. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 44(1), 146–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tschannen-Moran, M. (2014). Trust matters: Leadership for successful schools (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tschannen-Moran, M., & Gareis, C. R. (2015). Faculty trust in the principal: An essential ingredient in high-performing schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 53(1), 66–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783–805.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Maele, D., & Van Houtte, M. (2012). The role of teacher and faculty trust in forming teachers' job satisfaction: Do years of experience make a difference? Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(6), 879–889.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Maele, D., Forsyth, P. B., & Van Houtte, M. (2014). Trust and school life: The role of trust for learning, teaching, leading, and bridging. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahlstrom, K. L., & Louis, K. S. (2008). How teachers experience principal leadership: The roles of professional community, trust, efficacy, and shared responsibility. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(4), 458–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, A., & Qian, H. (2018). Exploring the mysteries of school success in Shanghai. ECNU Review of Education, 1(1), 119–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, A., Hu, R., & Qian, H. (2012). Principal leadership in China: An initial review. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 23(4), 369–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, L. N. (2003). Changing roles and shifting authority of principals in China: A mixed role of manager and clan leader. Education and Society, 21(2), 37–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, H., & Zheng, X. (2018). Facilitating professional learning communities in China: Do leadership practices and faculty trust matter? Teaching and Teacher Education, 76, 140–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zee, M., & Koomen, H. M. (2016). Teacher self-efficacy and its effects on classroom processes, student academic adjustment, and teacher well-being: A synthesis of 40 years of research. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 981–1015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, Q., Li, L., Chen, H., & Loeb, S. (2017). What aspects of principal leadership are most highly correlated with school outcomes in China? Educational Administration Quarterly, 53(3), 409–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, X., Yin, H., & Li, Z. (2018). Exploring the relationship between instructional leadership, professional learning communities and teacher self-efficacy in China. Educational Management Administration & Leadership,. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143218764176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was supported by Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (SWU1809677), and Humanity and Social Science Youth Foundation Under Ministry of Education of China (19YJC880131).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuan Liu.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zheng, X., Yin, H. & Liu, Y. The Relationship Between Distributed Leadership and Teacher Efficacy in China: The Mediation of Satisfaction and Trust. Asia-Pacific Edu Res 28, 509–518 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-019-00451-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-019-00451-7

Keywords

Navigation