Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An Exploratory Study on Singaporean Primary School Students’ Development in Chinese Writing

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study investigated the development of lexical diversity and syntactic complexity, two key indicators of writing quality, in Chinese second language (L2) writing. The Guiraud Index and T-unit length were used to measure lexical and syntactic growth through a cross-sectional design. Seven hundred and sixty-five narrative essays were collected from grade 3–6 students in Singapore’s primary schools. Statistical analyses showed a general upward trend in lexical and syntactic development over the 4 years. In line with a dynamic account, the lexical and syntactic components grew in a non-linear and non-parallel manner with both progress and regress during the process. Furthermore, a trade-off was found between more varied word use and longer sentences in the data, though it faded with grade level. While L2 subsystems tended to compete with each other at earlier stages of language learning, their interactions changed over time. Moreover, variations were observed not only across grade levels but also between learner groups at the same stage of learning. By extending a dynamic approach to writing development at early stages of Chinese learning, the study informs theory regarding the dynamics of L2 growth and has significant implications for the teaching of Chinese writing in the Singapore context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baba, K., & Nitta, R. (2014). Phase transitions in the development of writing fluency from a complex dynamic systems perspective. Language Learning, 64(1), 1–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulté, B., Housen, A., Pierrard, M., & van Daele, S. (2008). Investigating lexical proficiency development over time: The case of Dutch-speaking learners of French in Brussels. French Language Studies, 18, 277–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crossley, S. A., Salsbury, T., & McNamara, D. S. (2012). Predicting the proficiency level of language learners using lexical indices. Language Testing, 29(2), 240–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crossley, S. A., Salsbury, T., McNamara, D. S., & Jarvis, S. (2011). Predicting lexical proficiency in language learners using computational indices. Language Testing, 28(4), 561–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daller, H., & Xue, H. (2007). Lexical richness and the oral proficiency of Chinese EFL students. In H. Daller, J. Milton, & J. Treffers-Daller (Eds.), Modelling and assessing vocabulary knowledge (pp. 150–164). Cambridge: CUP.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • David, A. (2008). A developmental perspective on productive lexical knowledge in L2 oral interlanguage. French Language Studies, 18, 315–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Bot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M. (2007). A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism, Language and Cognition, 10, 7–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, L. Q. (2005). Bilingual education policy in Singapore: An analysis of its sociohistorical roots and current academic outcomes. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 8(1), 25–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engber, C. (1995). The relationship of lexical proficiency to the quality of ESL compositions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 4(2), 139–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, L., & Ginther, A. (2000). Using computer-tagged linguistic features to describe L2 writing differences. Journal of Second Language Writing, 9, 123–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, S., & DeNero, J. (2012). A class-based agreement model for generating accurately inflected translations. Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 1, 146–155.

  • Henry, K. (1996). Early L2 writing development: A study of autobiographical essays by university-level students of Russian. The Modern Language Journal, 80(3), 309–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, Y. (1993). Aspects of discourse structure in Mandarin Chinese. Liangton: Edwin Mellen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, K. W. (1970). Recent measures in syntactic development. In M. Lester (Ed.), Reading in applied transformational grammar (pp. 179–192). Nueva York: Holt, Rinehart and Wiston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishikawa, S. (1995). Objective measurement of low-proficiency EFL narrative writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 4(1), 51–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, W. (2012). Measurements of Development in L2 Written Production: The Case of L2 Chinese. Applied Linguistics, 34, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kobayashi, H., & Rinnert, C. (2013). L1/L2/L3 writing development: longitudinal case study of a Japanese multicompetent writer. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 4–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen-Freeman, D. (1983). Assessing global second language proficiency. In H. Seliger & M. Long (Eds.), Classroom oriented research in second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laufer, B., & Nation, P. (1995). Vocabulary size and use: lexical richness in L2 written production. Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 307–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leki, I., Cumming, A. H., & Silva, T. (2008). A synthesis of research on second language writing in English. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, X. (2011). A corpus-based evaluation of syntactic complexity measures as indices of college-level ESL writers’ language development. TESOL Quarterly, 45(1), 36–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2005). Second language research: Methodology and design. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortega, L. (2003). Syntactic complexity measures and their relationship to L2 proficiency: A research synthesis of college-level L2 writing. Applied Linguistics, 24, 492–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, R. R., Howard, K. M., & Deak, J. (2009). Heritage language learners in first-year foreign language courses: A report of general data across learner subtypes. Foreign Language Annals, 42(2), 250–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sasaki, M., & Hirose, K. (1996). Explanatory variables for EFL students’ expository writing. Language Learning, 46, 137–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegler, R. S. (2006). Microgenetic analyses of learning. In W. Damon, R. Lerner, D. Kuhn & R.S. Siegler (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol 2. Cognition, perception, and language (6th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

  • Siegler, R. S., & Svetina, M. (2002). A microgenetic/cross-sectional study of matrix completion: Comparing short-term and long-term change. Child Development, 3, 793–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skehan, P. (2009). Modeling second language development: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexis. Applied Linguistics, 30, 510–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spoelman, M., & Verspoor, M. (2010). Dynamic patterns in development of accuracy and complexity: A longitudinal case study in the acquisition of Finnish. Applied Linguistics, 31, 532–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szmrecsanyi, B. (2004). On operationalizing syntactic complexity. Jadt-04, 2, 1032–1039.

  • Treffers-Daller, J. (2013). Measuring lexical diversity among L2 learners of French: an exploration of the validity of D, MTLD and HD-D as measures of language ability. In S. Jarvis & M. Daller (Eds.), Vocabulary knowledge: Human ratings and automated measures (pp. 79–104). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • van Hout, R., & Vermeer, A. (2007). Comparing measures of lexical richness. In H. Daller, J. Milton, & J. Treffers Daller (Eds.), Modelling and assessing vocabulary knowledge (pp. 93–115). Cambridge: CUP.

  • Verspoor, M., Lowie, W., & van Dijk, M. (2008). Variability in second language development from a dynamic systems perspective. The Modern Language Journal, 92, 214–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verspoor, M., Schmid, M. S., & Xu, X. (2012). A dynamic usage based perspective on L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(3), 239–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe-Quintero, K., Inagaki, S., & Kim H.-Y. (1998). Second language development: Measures of fluency, accuracy & complexity. Hawaii: Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center, University of Hawaii Press.

  • Xia, F. (2000b). The part-of-speech tagging guidelines for the Penn Chinese Treebank (3.0). IRCS Report 00–07. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania.

  • Xue, N., Xia, F., Chiou, F.-D., & Palmer, M. (2005). The Penn Chinese Treebank: Phrase structure annotation of a large corpus. Natural Language Engineering, 11(2), 207–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, G. (2009). Lexical diversity in writing and speaking task performances. Applied Linguistics, 31(2), 236–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Applied Foreign Languages, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, 43 Section 4, Keelung Road, Taipei, 106, Taiwan

    Yufen Hsieh

Authors
  1. Yufen Hsieh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yufen Hsieh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hsieh, Y. An Exploratory Study on Singaporean Primary School Students’ Development in Chinese Writing. Asia-Pacific Edu Res 25, 541–548 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-016-0279-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-016-0279-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation