Abstract
Introduction
Azelnidipine is one of the newer Calcium Channel Blockers (CCB) approved in China, Japan, and India. Some studies have found that the blood pressure-lowering effect of azelnidipine is more than amlodipine, and others found the effect similar.
Aim
This meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of azelnidipine in managing hypertensive patients by lowering Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP), Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP), and Heart Rate (HR) as compared to amlodipine.
Methods
PubMed/MEDLINE, Google Scholar, PROQUEST, and International Clinical Trial Registry Platform (ICTRP) were searched for published articles to evaluate the clinical efficacy of azelnidipine in the management of hypertension patients. Data were extracted from the selected 11 randomized clinical trials (RCTs). The risk of bias 2 (RoB2) tool was used for the quality assessment of the included studies, and the random-effects model was used to estimate the effect size.
Results
There were no statistically significant differences in the reduction of SBP (Mean Difference, MD: − 1.07; 95% CI: − 4.10, 1.95, p-value: 0.49) and DBP (MD: 0.27; 95% CI: − 2.66, 3.20, p-value: 0.86) between both the drugs. In terms of HR reduction, there was a statistically significant difference (MD: − 3.63; 95% CI: − 5.27, − 2.00, p-value: < 0.0001) between both drugs. Egger’s test excluded any publication bias for the included studies (p = 0.21). Meta-regression excluded the effect of the duration of treatment on outcome parameters.
Conclusion
Though no significant difference between azelnidipine and amlodipine was found, in terms of reduction in SBP and DBP, azelnidipine reduced heart rate significantly compared to amlodipine.
PROSPERO Registration
CRD42023390361.
Similar content being viewed by others
Change history
08 October 2023
ESM Update
References
Fuchs FD, Whelton PK. High blood pressure and cardiovascular disease. Hypertension. 2020;75:285–92.
Hypertension [Internet]. World Heart Federation. https://world-heart-federation.org/what-we-do/hypertension/ [cited 2023 Jan 7].
Tocci G, Battistoni A, Passerini J, Musumeci MB, Francia P, Ferrucci A, Volpe M. Calcium channel blockers and hypertension. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2015;20:121–30.
Vukadinović D, Scholz SS, Messerli FH, Weber MA, Williams B, Böhm M, Mahfoud F. Peripheral edema and headache associated with amlodipine treatment: a meta-analysis of randomized, placebo-controlled trials. J Hypertens. 2019;37:2093–103.
Chen BL, Zhang YZ, Luo JQ, Zhang W. Clinical use of azelnidipine in the treatment of hypertension in Chinese patients. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2015;11:309–18.
Wellington K, Scott LJ. Azelnidipine. Drugs. 2003;63:2613–21.
CDSCO. Recommendations of the SEC [Internet]; 2020. https://www.cdsco.gov.in/opencms/resources/UploadCDSCOWeb/2018/UploadCommitteeFiles/73rdSECCardiovascular%20&%20Renal6fe20.pdf [cited 2022 Dec 24].
Shokoji T, Fujisawa Y, Kiyomoto H, Rahman M, Sun GP, Fan YY, Kimura S, Kohno M, Abe Y, Nishiyama A. Effects of a new calcium channel blocker, azelnidipine, on systemic hemodynamics and renal sympathetic nerve activity in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Hypertens Res. 2005;28:1017–23.
Nakamoto M, Ohya Y, Sakima A, Yamazato M, Takishita S. Azelnidipine attenuates cardiovascular and sympathetic responses to air-jet stress in genetically hypertensive rats. Hypertens Res. 2007;30:359–66.
Nakamura T, Sugaya T, Kawagoe Y, Suzuki T, Ueda Y, Koide H, Inoue T, Node K. Azelnidipine reduces urinary protein excretion and urinary liver-type fatty acid binding protein in patients with hypertensive chronic kidney disease. Am J Med Sci. 2007;333:321–6.
Takenaka T, Seto T, Okayama M, Kojima E, Nodaira Y, Sueyoshi K, Kikuta T, Watanabe Y, Inoue T, Takane H, Ohno Y, Suzuki H. Long-term effects of calcium antagonists on augmentation index in hypertensive patients with chronic kidney disease: a randomized controlled study. Am J Nephrol. 2012;35:416–23.
Zhao X, Wu F, Jia S, Qu P, Li H, Zhao X, Cao B, Lin Y, Wang M. Azelnidipine and amlodipine: a comparison of their effects and safety in a randomized double-blinded clinical trial in Chinese essential hypertensive patients. Clin Exp Hypertens. 2010;32:372–6.
Yamagishi T. Efficacy of azelnidipine on home blood pressure and pulse rate in patients with essential hypertension: comparison with amlodipine. Hypertens Res. 2006;29:767–73.
Tawaramoto K, Kaneto H, Hashiramoto M, Kawasaki F, Tatsumi F, Shimoda M, Kamei S, Matsuki M, Mune T, Kaku K. Azelnidipine, but not amlodipine, reduces urinary albumin excretion and carotid atherosclerosis in subjects with type 2 diabetes: blood pressure control with olmesartan and azelnidipine in Type 2 diabetes (BOAT2 study). Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2015;7:80.
Motoki H, Koyama J, Izawa A, Tomita T, Miyashita Y, Takahashi M, Ikeda U. Impact of azelnidipine and amlodipine on left ventricular mass and longitudinal function in hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy. Echocardiography. 2014;31:1230–8.
Kuramoto K, Ichikawa S, Hirai A, Kanada S, Nakachi T, Ogihara T. Azelnidipine and amlodipine: a comparison of their pharmacokinetics and effects on ambulatory blood pressure. Hypertens Res. 2003;26:201–8.
Kojima T, Miyauchi K, Yokoyama T, Yokoyama K, Kurata T, Suwa S, Kawamura M, Tamura H, Okazaki S, Inoue K, Fujiwara Y, Sumiyoshi M, Tanimoto K, Nakazato Y, Yamagami S, Hiro T, Komiyama N, Daida H. Azelnidipine and amlodipine anti-coronary atherosclerosis trial in hypertensive patients undergoing coronary intervention by serial volumetric intravascular ultrasound analysis in Juntendo University (ALPS-J). Circ J. 2011;75:1071–9.
Inomata J, Murai H, Kaneko S, Hamaoka T, Ikeda T, Kobayashi D, Usui S, Furusho H, Sugiyama Y, Takata S, Takamura M. Differential effects of azelnidipine and amlodipine on sympathetic nerve activity in patients with primary hypertension. J Hypertens. 2014;32:1898–904.
Fukao K, Shimada K, Hiki M, Kiyanagi T, Hirose K, Kume A, Ohsaka H, Matsumori R, Kurata T, Miyazaki T, Daida H. Effects of calcium channel blockers on glucose tolerance, inflammatory state, and circulating progenitor cells in non-diabetic patients with essential hypertension: a comparative study between azelnidipine and amlodipine on glucose tolerance and endothelial function—a crossover trial (AGENT). Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2011;10:1–12.
Eguchi K, Tomizawa H, Ishikawa J, Hoshide S, Fukuda T, Numao T, Shimada K, Kario K. Effects of new calcium channel blocker, azelnidipine, and amlodipine on baroreflex sensitivity and ambulatory blood pressure. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2007;49:394–400.
An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews [Internet]. Equator Network; 2020. https://www.equator-network.org [cited 2022 Dec 24].
PROSPERO [Internet]. University of York. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ [cited 2023 Jan 17].
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions | Cochrane Training [Internet]. https://training.cochrane.org/handbook [cited 2022 Dec 24].
RoB 2: A revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials | Cochrane Bias [Internet]. https://methods.cochrane.org/bias/resources/rob-2-revised-cochrane-risk-bias-tool-randomized-trials [cited 2022 Dec 24].
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions | Cochrane Training [Internet]. https://training.cochrane.org/handbook#how-to-cite [cited 2023 Aug 20].
Xiao Y, Hu G. The effects of azelnidipine and amlodipine in treatment of mild to moderate hypertension: a systematic review. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2017;10:11273–81.
Shinomiya K, Mizushige K, Fukunaga M, Masugata H, Ohmori K, Kohno M, Senda S. Antioxidant effect of a new calcium antagonist, azelnidipine, in cultured human arterial endothelial cells. J Int Med Res. 2004;32:170–5.
Sofy AA, Abdelsattar AT, Mohammed OM, Shareef MA, Alamodi AA, Nso N, Payton M, Masoud AT. Amlodipine compared with benidipine in the management of hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis. High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2020;27(6):527–37.
Ram CVS. Therapeutic usefulness of a novel calcium channel blocker azelnidipine in the treatment of hypertension: a narrative review. Cardiol Ther. 2022;11:473–89.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None to declare.
Ethical approval
We took approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee before conducting this study. Reference Number: T/IM-NF/Pharm/22/141.
Funding
None to declare.
Availability of data
All data of this work are available through contacting the corresponding author.
Author contributions
Debkumar Pal: Concept and design, Literature Search, Study selection and data collection, Data extraction and management, and drafting of the manuscript, Final approval of the manuscript. Shampa Maji: Literature Search, Study selection and data collection, Data Analysis and interpretation of data, Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content, Final approval of the manuscript. Rituparna Maiti: Study selection and data collection, data extraction and management, Data Analysis and interpretation of data, Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content, Final approval of the manuscript.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Pal, D., Maji, S. & Maiti, R. Efficacy and Safety of Azelnidipine as an Antihypertensive Compared to Amlodipine: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev 30, 401–410 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40292-023-00601-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40292-023-00601-5