Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of Dual Therapy Perindopril/Amlodipine in the Management of Hypertension. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

  • Review article
  • Published:
High Blood Pressure & Cardiovascular Prevention Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Hypertension represent the commonest cause of death in 2017. Hypertension is classified into two types which are primary or essential hypertension and secondary hypertension. The perindopril–amlodipine combination showed a significant effect in reduction of the elevated BP and the cardiovascular complications.

Aim

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a fixed-dose single-pill combination of perindopril–amlodipine in hypertensive patients.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Medline, SCOPUS, and Web of Science for relevant clinical trials. Quality appraisal was evaluated according to GRADE and we assessed the risk of bias using Cochrane’s risk of bias tool. We included the following outcomes: systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, pulse pressure, mean blood pressure, heart rate, cough, dizziness, headache, and peripheral edema. We performed the analysis of homogeneous data under the fixed-effects model, while analysis of heterogeneous data was analyzed under the random-effects model. We conducted a meta-regression according to the dose.

Results

We included ten clinical trials. The pooled analysis showed that there was a significant reduction of the systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, pulse plessure, mean blood pressure, and heart rate after the the perindopril–amlodipine combination (MD = 18.96 [14.32, 23.60], P < 0.0001), (MD = 11.90 [8.45, 15.35], P < 0.0001), (MD = 8.44 [6.91, 9.97], P = 0.0001), (MD = 13.07 [5.86, 20.29], P = 0.0004), and (MD = 2.93 [0.89, 4.96], P = 0.005), respectively. The results of the meta-regression revealed that the efficacy is increased by increasing the dose (P < 0.001)

Conclusion

The use of the perindopril–amlodipine combination had a significant effect on the reduction of SBP, DBP, mean blood pressure, pulse pressure, and HR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data will be available to any researcher who contact the corresponding author.

References

  1. Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, Casey DE, Collins KJ, Dennison Himmelfarb C, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on clinical Pr. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71:e127–248.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Erratum: Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of Di. Lancet. 2019.

  3. Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W, Rosei EA, Azizi M, Burnier M, et al. 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. Kardiol Pol. 2019;77:71–159.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Oparil S, Acelajado MC, Bakris GL, Berlowitz DR, Cífková R, Dominiczak AF et al. Hypertension. Nat Rev Dis Prim. 2018;18014. Available from: http://www.nature.com/articles/nrdp201814

  5. Fagard R, Brguljan J, Staessen J, Thijs L, Derom C, Thomis M, et al. Heritability of conventional an ambulatory blood pressures: a study in twins. Hypertension. 1995;26:919–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Streeten DHP, Anderson GH. Secondary hypertension. Drugs. 1992;43:805–19.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hosseinnezhad A, Black RM, Aeddula NR, Adhikari D, Trivedi N. Glucagon-induced pheochromocytoma crisis. Endocr Pract. 2011;17:e51–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Biswas S, Dastidar DG, Roy KS, Pal SK, Biswas TK, Ganguly SB. Complications of hypertension as encountered by primary care physician. J Indian Med Assoc. 2003;101:257–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. James PA, Oparil S, Carter BL, Cushman WC, Dennison-Himmelfarb C, Handler J, et al. 2014 Evidence-based guideline for the management of high blood pressure in adults. JAMA. 2014;311:507.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Leape L, Berwick D, Clancy C, Conway J, Gluck P, Guest J, et al. Transforming healthcare: a safety imperative. Qual Saf Heal Care. 2009;18:424–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Turnbull F. Effects of different blood pressure-lowering regimens on major cardiovascular events in individuals with and without diabetes mellitus. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:1410.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Turnbull F, Neal B, Algert C, Chalmers J, Woodward M, MacMahon S, et al. Effects of different blood-pressure-lowering regimens on major cardiovascular events: results of prospectively-designed overviews of randomised trials. Lancet. 2003;362:1527–35.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wald DS, Law M, Morris JK, Bestwick JP, Wald NJ. Combination therapy versus monotherapy in reducing blood pressure: meta-analysis on 11,000 participants from 42 trials. Am J Med. 2009;122:290–300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Law MR, Wald NJ, Morris JK, Jordan RE. Value of low dose combination treatment with blood pressure lowering drugs: Analysis of 354 randomised trials. Br Med J. 2003;326:1427.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dimmitt SB, Stampfer HG. Low drug doses may improve outcomes in chronic disease. Med J Aust. 2009;191:511–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dahlöf B, Sever PS, Poulter NR, Wedel H, Beevers DG, Caulfield M, et al. Prevention of cardiovascular events with an antihypertensive regimen of amlodipine adding perindopril as required versus atenolol adding bendroflumethiazide as required, in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial-Blood Pressure Lowering Arm (ASCOT-B). Lancet. 2005;366:895–906.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bangalore S, Kamalakkannan G, Parkar S, Messerli FH. Fixed-dose combinations improve medication compliance: a meta-analysis. Am J Med. 2007;120:713–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hamrahian SM. Medication non-adherence: a major cause of resistant hypertension. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2020;22:133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-020-01400-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hurst M, Jarvis B. Perindopril: an updated review of its use in hypertension. Drugs. 2001;61:867–96. https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-200161060-00020.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Fares H, DiNicolantonio JJ, O’Keefe JH, Lavie CJ. Amlodipine in hypertension: a first-line agent with efficacy for improving blood pressure and patient outcomes. Open Heart. 2016;3: e000473. https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2016-000473.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Taylor SH. Usefulness of amlodipine for angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol. 1994;73:A28–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gradman AH, Cutler NR, Davis PJ, Robbins JA, Weiss RJ, Wood BC. Combined enalapril and felodipine extended release (ER) for systemic hypertension. Am J Cardiol. 1997;79:431–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Antes G, Atkins D, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Rev Esp Nutr Humana Diet. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Katz A. Microsoft Excel 2010. Style (DeKalb, IL). 2010.

  25. Clarivate EndNote | Available from: https://endnote.com/.

  26. Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ et al. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. 2019.

  27. Ojji DB, Mayosi B, Francis V, Badri M, Cornelius V, Smythe W, et al. Comparison of dual therapies for lowering blood pressure in black Africans. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:2429–39. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1901113.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Mancia G, Asmar R, Amodeo C, Mourad J-J, Taddei S, Gamba MAA, et al. Comparison of single-pill strategies first line in hypertension. J Hypertens. 2015;33:401–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Laurent S, Parati G, Chazova I, Sirenko Y, Erglis A, Laucevicius A, et al. Randomized evaluation of a novel, fixed-dose combination of perindopril 3.5 mg/amlodipine 2.5 mg as a first-step treatment in hypertension. J Hypertens. 2015;33:653–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Hu D, Sun Y, Liao Y, Huang J, Zhao R, Yang K. Efficacy and safety of fixed-dose perindopril arginine/amlodipine in hypertensive patients not adequately controlled with amlodipine 5 mg or perindopril tert-butylamine 4 mg monotherapy. Cardiology. 2016;134:1–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Elliott WJ, Whitmore J, Feldstein JD, Bakris GL. Efficacy and safety of perindopril arginine + amlodipine in hypertension. J Am Soc Hypertens. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jash.2015.01.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Visco V, Finelli R, Pascale AV, Giannotti R, Fabbricatore D, Ragosa N, et al. Larger blood pressure reduction by fixed-dose compared to free dose combination therapy of ACE inhibitor and calcium antagonist in hypertensive patients. Transl Med. 2017;16:17–23.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sobngwi E, Mfeukeu-Kuate L, Kouam M, Tankeu AT, Nganou-Gnindjio CN, Hamadou B, et al. Short-term effects of perindopril-amlodipine vs perindopril-indapamide on blood pressure control in sub-Saharan type 2 diabetic individuals newly diagnosed for hypertension: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial. J Clin Hypertens. 2019;21:1002–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/jch.13557.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Redon J, Pichler G. Comparative study of the efficacy of olmesartan/amlodipine vs. perindopril/amlodipine in peripheral blood pressure after missed dose in type 2 diabetes. J Hypertens. 2016;34:359–67.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Ramirez AJ, Sanchez MJ, Sanchez RA. Diabetic patients with essential hypertension treated with amlodipine. J Hypertens. 2019;37:636–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Poulter NR, Dolan E, Gupta AK, O’Brien E, Whitehouse A, Sever PS. Efficacy and safety of incremental dosing of a new single-pill formulation of perindopril and amlodipine in the management of hypertension. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2019;19:313–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40256-018-00314-4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Jamerson KA, Nwose O, Jean-Louis L, Schofield L, Purkayastha D, Baron M. Initial angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/calcium channel blocker combination therapy achieves superior blood pressure control compared with calcium channel blocker monotherapy in patients with stage 2 hypertension. Am J Hypertens. 2004;17:495–501.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Philipp T, Glazer RD, Wernsing M, Yen J. Initial combination therapy with amlodipine/valsartan compared with monotherapy in the treatment of hypertension. J Am Soc Hypertens. 2011;5:417–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Chrysant SG, Melino M, Karki S, Lee J, Heyrman R. The combination of olmesartan medoxomil and amlodipine besylate in controlling high blood pressure: COACH, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 8-week factorial efficacy and safety study. Clin Ther. 2008;30:587–604.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Littlejohn TW, Majul CR, Olvera R, Seeber M, Kobe M, Guthrie R, et al. Results of treatment with telmisartan-amlodipine in hypertensive patients. J Clin Hypertens. 2009;11:207–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Brown MJ, McInnes GT, Papst CC, Zhang J, MacDonald TM. Aliskiren and the calcium channel blocker amlodipine combination as an initial treatment strategy for hypertension control (ACCELERATE): a randomised, parallel-group trial. Lancet. 2011;377:312–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Packard KA, Wurdeman RL, Arouni AJ. ACE inhibitor-induced bronchial reactivity in patients with respiratory dysfunction. Ann Pharmacother. 2002;36:1058–67.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Mancia G, Fagard R, Narkiewicz K, Redon J, Zanchetti A, Böhm M, et al. 2013 ESH/ESC guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the task force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2013;34:2159–219.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Hackam DG, Khan NA, Hemmelgarn BR, Rabkin SW, Touyz RM, Campbell NRC, et al. The 2010 Canadian hypertension education program recommendations for the management of hypertension: part 2—therapy. Can J Cardiol. 2010;26:249–58.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL, et al. Seventh report of the joint national committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure. Hypertension. 2003;42:1206–52. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.HYP.0000107251.49515.c2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Sofy AA, Abdelsattar AT, Mohammed OM, Shareef MA, Alamodi AA, Nso N, et al. Amlodipine compared with benidipine in the management of hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis. High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2020;27:527–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40292-020-00412-y.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Habboush S, Sofy AA, Masoud AT, Cherfaoui O, Farhat AM, Abdelsattar AT, et al. Efficacy of single-pill, triple antihypertensive therapy in patients with uncontrolled hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis. High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2022;29:245–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40292-022-00511-y.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Mourad J-J, Waeber B, Zannad F, Laville M, Duru G, Andrjak M. Comparison of different therapeutic strategies in hypertension. J Hypertens. 2004;22:2379–86.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Correction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57:2125. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0735109711013246

  50. van Vark LC, Bertrand M, Akkerhuis KM, Brugts JJ, Fox K, Mourad J-J, et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors reduce mortality in hypertension: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors involving 158 998 patients. Eur Heart J. 2012;33:2088–97. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehs075.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Schünemann HJ, Higgins JPT, Vist GE, Glasziou P, Akl EA, Skoetz N, et al. Completing ‘Summary of findings’ tables and grading the certainty of the evidence. In: Higgins JPT, et al., editors. Cochrane Handb. Syst. Rev. Interv. Boca Raton: Wiley; 2019. p. 375–402.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Islam Shawky Kamel.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

All authors declare that there are no confict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethical approvals were required for this manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mostafa, S., Shabana, H., Khalil, F. et al. Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of Dual Therapy Perindopril/Amlodipine in the Management of Hypertension. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev 29, 565–576 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40292-022-00544-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40292-022-00544-3

Keywords

Navigation