Skip to main content
Log in

Manage cutaneous adverse effects induced by diabetes medications or devices by removing the offending agent and choosing appropriate treatment

  • Drug Reactions and Interactions
  • Published:
Drugs & Therapy Perspectives Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Numerous cutaneous adverse effects (CAEs) have been reported with glucose-lowering medications (e.g. insulin, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors and sulfonylureas) and medical devices (e.g. continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion and continuous glucose monitoring) used in the management of diabetes. Notable CAEs include angioedema, autoimmune blistering diseases, contact dermatitis, Stevens-Johnson syndrome and worsening blood glucose control. While some of CAEs are common and others rare, it is important for healthcare providers to be aware of the potential culprits and their associated CAEs, as well as effective methods to prevent and/or treat such effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. World Health Organization. Global report on diabetes. Geneva: WHO Press; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rosen J, Yosipovitch G. Skin manifestations of diabetes mellitus. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, et al., editors. Endotext. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jedlowski PM, Te CH, Segal RJ, et al. Cutaneous adverse effects of diabetes mellitus medications and medical devices: a review. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2019;20(1):97–114.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Deng N, Zhang X, Zhao F, et al. Prevalence of lipohypertrophy in insulin-treated diabetes patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Diabetes Investig. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdi.12742.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Al Ajlouni M, Abujbara M, Batieha A, et al. Prevalence of lipohypertrophy and associated risk factors in insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Int J Endocrinol Metab. 2015;13(2):e20776.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Gentile S, Strollo F, Della Corte T, et al. Insulin related lipodystrophic lesions and hypoglycemia: double standards? Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2018;12(5):813–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Renold AE, Winegrad AI, Martin DB. Diabetes mellitus and the adipose tissue [in French]. Helv Med Acta. 1957;24(4):322–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rosenbloom AL. Insulin injection lipoatrophy recidivus. Pediatr Diabetes. 2014;15(1):73–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim D, Baraniuk J. Delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction to the meta-cresol component of insulin. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2007;99(2):194–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gibbs JP, Fredrickson J, Barbee T, et al. Quantitative model of the relationship between dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibition and response: meta-analysis of alogliptin, saxagliptin, sitagliptin, and vildagliptin efficacy results. J Clin Pharmacol. 2012;52(10):1494–505.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Brown NJ, Byiers S, Carr D, et al. Dipeptidyl peptidase-IV inhibitor use associated with increased risk of ACE inhibitor-associated angioedema. Hypertension. 2009;54(3):516–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Stricklin SM, Stoecker WV, Rader RK, et al. Persistent edematous-plaque photosensitivity observed with sitagliptin phosphate (Januvia®). Dermatol Online J. 2012;18(2):9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yaffee HS. Stevens–Johnson syndrome caused by chlorpropamide. Report of a case. Arch Dermatol. 1960;82:636–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cheng JB, Anderson RC, Cruz PD Jr. Stevens–Johnson syndrome associated with glipizide therapy. Dermatitis. 2006;17(1):36–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ernst EJ, Egge JA. Celecoxib-induced erythema multiforme with glyburide cross-reactivity. Pharmacotherapy. 2002;22(5):637–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ozuguz P, Kacar SD, Ozuguz U, et al. Erythroderma secondary to gliclazide: a case report. Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2014;33(4):342–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fisher AA. Systemic contact dermatitis from Orinase and Diabinese in diabetics with para-amino hypersensitivity. Cutis. 1982;29(6):551–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Contreras-Steyls M, Vilchez-Marquez F, Mota A, et al. Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis induced by gliclazide: a case report. Int J Dermatol. 2013;52(12):1591–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Poszepczynska-Guigne E, Viguier M, Assier H, et al. Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis induced by drugs with low-digestive absorption: acarbose and nystatin [in French]. Ann Dermatol Venereol. 2003;130(4):439–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rigberg LA, Robinson MJ, Espiritu CR. Chlorpropamide-induced granulomas. A probable hypersensitivity reaction in liver and bone marrow. JAMA. 1976;235(4):409–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bukhalo M, Zeitouni NC, Cheney RT. Leukocytoclastic vasculitis induced by use of glyburide: a case of possible cross-reaction of a sulfonamide and a sulfonylurea. Cutis. 2003;71(3):235–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Franz CB, Massullo RE, Welton WA. Lichenoid drug eruption from chlorpropamide and tolazamide. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1990;22(1):128–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Noakes R. Lichenoid drug eruption as a result of the recently released sulfonylurea glimepiride. Australas J Dermatol. 2003;44(4):302–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hammami S, Ksouda K, Affes H, et al. Mucosal lichenoid drug reaction associated with glimepiride: a case report. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2015;19(12):2301–2.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Adams BB, Gadenne AS. Glipizide-induced pigmented purpuric dermatosis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1999;41(5 Pt 2):827–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rojas P, Sanchez L, Santos A, et al. Hypersensitivity to repaglinide. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2011;21(3):245–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ross P, Gray AR, Milburn J, et al. Insulin pump-associated adverse events are common, but not associated with glycemic control, socio-economic status, or pump/infusion set type. Acta Diabetol. 2016;53(6):991–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Pickup JC, Yemane N, Brackenridge A, et al. Nonmetabolic complications of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion: a patient survey. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2014;16(3):145–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Berg AK, Olsen BS, Thyssen JP, et al. High frequencies of dermatological complications in children using insulin pumps or sensors. Pediatr Diabetes. 2018;19(4):733–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Consortia

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The article was adapted from the American Journal of Clinical Dermatology 2019; 20(1): 97–114 by employees of Adis International Ltd./Springer Nature, who are responsible for the article content and declare no conflicts of interest.

Funding

The preparation of this review was not supported by any external funding.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Adis Medical Writers. Manage cutaneous adverse effects induced by diabetes medications or devices by removing the offending agent and choosing appropriate treatment. Drugs Ther Perspect 35, 557–562 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40267-019-00673-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40267-019-00673-1

Navigation