Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Management of atherogenic dyslipidemia according to current treatment guidelines: DESPEGA study in real clinical practice

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Drugs & Therapy Perspectives Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Studies in patients with dyslipidemia have revealed that, despite guideline recommendations, treatment remains unchanged even when therapeutic goals are not achieved.

Objective

Our objective was to determine the degree to which primary care (PC) and specialty care (SC) physicians adhere to clinical guidelines for the management of atherogenic dyslipidemia (AD).

Methods

This was an observational, descriptive, cross-sectional study. Physicians working in the Spanish Health System completed an electronic questionnaire comprising 24 items organized into three blocks: clinical guidelines, adherence to clinical guidelines, and other issues in the management of AD. The questions were formulated with closed polytomous or categorized responses. Adherence to guidelines, in terms of treatment, was assessed according to physicians’ responses to six patient profiles. Absolute and relative frequencies (qualitative variables), central tendency and dispersion (quantitative variables) were calculated.

Results

In total, 980 physicians (88.5% PC) participated in the study; 77.3% used guidelines in their routine clinical practice, with the most used being the Spanish SEMERGEN (73.8%) and the European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society guidelines (41.2%). A total of 83% adhered to guideline recommendations in more than four of the six profiles proposed, 26.2% adhered to the SEMERGEN definition of AD, 66.6% combined all lipoprotein ratios to diagnose AD, and > 60% used non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) to diagnose patients with AD at high cardiovascular risk. In total, 99.0% prescribed a fibrate to reduce triglyceride levels, 47.4% to increase HDL-C levels and 40.2% to reduce small, dense low-density lipoprotein cholesterol particles.

Conclusion

Since adherence to clinical guidelines improves both the quality of care and health outcomes, greater adherence to and satisfaction with clinical guidelines for the management of AD may contribute to improvements in and optimization of the management of patients with AD in the Spanish health system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Millan Nuñez-Cortés J, Pedro-Botet Montoya J, Pintó Sala X. Dislipidemia aterogénica y riesgo residual. Estado de la cuestión en 2014. Clin Investig Arterioscler. 2014;26:287–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rodríguez Á, Núñez-Cortés JM, Blasco Valle MPEF. Guía clínica para la detección, diagnóstico y tratamiento de la dislipemia aterogénica en atención primaria. 2013. http://www.se-arteriosclerosis.org/assets/dislipemia-aterogénica.pdf. Accessed June 2018.

  3. Barter P, Gotto AM, LaRosa JC, et al. HDL cholesterol, very low levels of LDL cholesterol, and cardiovascular events. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(13):1301–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Buring JE, Mora S, Sacks FM, et al. Fasting compared with nonfasting triglycerides and risk of cardiovascular events in women. JAMA. 2015;298(3):309–16.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lau DCW, Yan H, Dhillon B. Metabolic syndrome: a marker of patients at high cardiovascular risk. Can J Cardiol. 2006;22(Suppl B):85B–90B.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Millán J, Hernández-Mijares A, Ascaso JF, et al. La auténtica dimensión del colesterol-no-HDL: colesterol aterogénico. Clin Investig Arterioscler. 2016;28:265–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sánchez-Chaparro M, González-Santos P, Valdivieso-Felices P, et al. Prevalencia de dislipidemiaaterogénica en población laboral Española. Grupo de Estudio “ICARIA”. 18a Reunión Nacional de la Sociedad Española de Hipertensión, Liga Española para la Lucha contra la Hipertensión Arterial. Valencia, 6 al 8 de Marzo, 2013.

  8. Ascaso JF, Millán J, Hernández-Mijares A, et al. Documento de consenso sobre el manejo de la dislipemia aterogénica de la Sociedad Española de Arteriosclerosis. Clin Investig Arterioscler. 2017;29:86–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pedro-Botet J, Millán J, Brea Á, et al. Decálogo de recomendaciones clínicas en dislipidemia aterogénica. Clin Investig Arterioscler. 2014;26:38–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Reiner Z, Catapano AL, De Backer G, et al. ESC/EAS guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: the Task Force for the management of dyslipidaemias of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS). Eur Heart J. 2011;32(14):1769–818.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Catapano AL, Graham I, De Backer G, et al. 2016 ESC/EAS guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(39):2999–3058.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chapman MJ, Redfern JS, McGovern ME, et al. Niacin and fibrates in atherogenic dyslipidemia: pharmacotherapy to reduce cardiovascular risk. Pharmacol Ther. 2010;126:314–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Moutzouri E, Kei A, Elisaf MS, et al. Management of dyslipidemias with fibrates, alone and in combination with statins: role of delayed-release fenofibric acid. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2010;6:525–39.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Shepherd J, Barter P, Carmena R, et al. Effect of lowering LDL cholesterol substantially below currently recommended levels in patients with coronary heart disease and diabetes: the Treating to New Targets (TNT) study. Diabetes Care. 2006;29:1220–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Deedwania P, Barter P, Carmena R, et al. Reduction of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in patients with coronary heart disease and metabolic syndrome: analysis of the Treating to New Targets study. Lancet. 2006;368:919–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kotseva K, Wood D, De Backer G, et al. EUROASPIRE III: management of cardiovascular risk factors in asymptomatic high-risk patients in general practice: cross-sectional survey in 12 European countries. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2010;17(5):530–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pearson TA, Laurora I, Chu H, et al. The Lipid Treatment Assessment Project (L-TAP): a multicenter survey to evaluate the percentages of dyslipidemic patients receiving lipid-lowering therapy and achieving low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(4):459–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fonarow GC, French WJ, Parsons LS, et al. Use of lipid-lowering medications at discharge in patients with acute myocardial infarction : data from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 3. Circulation. 2001;103:38–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Goldberg KC, Melnyk SD, Simel DL. Overcoming inertia: improvement in achieving target low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Am J Manag Care. 2007;13:530–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Primatesta P, Poulter NR. Lipid concentrations and the use of lipid lowering drugs: evidence from a national cross sectional survey. BMJ. 2000;321:1322–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Martínez-Hernández A, Aguilar-Leñero M, Mengíbar MR, et al. Prevención secundaria de cardiopatía isquémica a nivel lipídico en atención primaria Aragón. Estudio PRECIAR. Rev Esp Salud Pública. 2001;75:143–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Banegas JR, Vegazo O, Serrano P, et al. The gap between dyslipidemia control perceived by physicians and objective control patterns in Spain. Atherosclerosis. 2017;188(2):420–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lázaro P, Murga N, Aguilar D, et al. Inercia terapéutica en el manejo extrahospitalario de la dislipemia en pacientes con cardiopatía isquémica. Estudio Inercia. Rev Española Cardiol. 2010;63:1428–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ministerio de Sanidad, Política Social e Igualdad. Informe sobre oferta y necesidad de especialistas médicos en España. 2010–2025. 2011. Accessed Nov 2016.

  25. Alfonso F, Bermejo J, Segovia J. Guías Europeas de Práctica Clínica en Revista Española de Cardiología. ¿Hacia una completa «globalización» de la asistencia cardiovascular? Rev Española Cardiol. 2004;57:1000–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Woolf SH, Grol R, Hutchinson A, et al. Clinical guidelines: potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical guidelines. BMJ. 1999;318:527–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Constantino-Casas P, Viniegra-Osorio A, Medécigo-Micete C, et al. El potencial de las guías de práctica clínica para mejorar la calidad de la atención. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2009;47:103–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Vashitz G, Meyer J, Parmet Y, et al. Physician adherence to the dyslipidemia guidelines is as challenging an issue as patient adherence. Fam Pract. 2011;28:524–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. McKinlay JB, Link CL, Freund KM, et al. Sources of variation in physician adherence with clinical guidelines: results from a factorial experiment. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22:289–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Kenefick H, Lee J, Fleishman V. Improving physician adherence to clinical practice guidelines: barriers and strategies for change. Cambridge: New England Healthcare Institute (NEHI); 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Soutelo J, Graffigna M, Honfi M, et al. Índice triglicéridos/HDL-colesterol: en una población de adolescentes sin factores de riesgo cardiovascular. Arch Latinoam Nutr. 2012;62:167–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Pallarés-Carratalá V, Esteban-Giner MJ, Giner-Galvañ V. Overview of guidelines for the management of dyslipidemia: EU perspectives. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2016;12:357–69.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Cabana MD, Davis MM. Improving physician adherence to cholesterol management guidelines. Manag Care. 2002;11:18–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Pallazola V, Hla D, Arvanitis M, et al. Major dyslipidemia guidelines and their discrepancies: a need for consensus. 2008. http://www.acc.org, Accessed June 2018.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the physicians who participated in this study. They also acknowledge Mariona Lería (Medical Department Head/Product Safety & Risk Management) and Outcomes’10 for support with the study coordination.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain

    Jesús Núñez-Cortés

  2. Medical Affairs at Mylan, C/ General Aranaz nº 86, 28027, Madrid, Spain

    Patricia Rodríguez-Fortúnez, Malena Melogno-Klinkas, Marta Rodríguez de Miguel & Maria Luisa Orera-Peña

  3. Outcomes’10, Castellón, Spain

    Susana Aceituno

Authors
  1. Jesús Núñez-Cortés
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Patricia Rodríguez-Fortúnez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Malena Melogno-Klinkas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Marta Rodríguez de Miguel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Susana Aceituno
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Maria Luisa Orera-Peña
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Malena Melogno-Klinkas.

Ethics declarations

Data confidentiality

Data confidentiality of all participants was respected at all times. Information about the identity of the participants was considered confidential for all intents and purposes and was stored and handled in accordance with Organic Law 15/1999 of 13 December 1999 on the Protection of Personal Data.

Informed consent

All study participants received adequate information and agreed to participate before inclusion.

Funding

This study was sponsored by BGP Product Operations S.L (Mylan).

Conflict of interest

JMNC has no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this article. PRF, MMK, MRM and MLOP work at BGP Product Operations S.L (Mylan). SA works for an independent research organization (Outcomes’10, S.L.), which has received fees for contributions to the development and coordination of the project and to the writing of this manuscript.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 30 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Núñez-Cortés, J., Rodríguez-Fortúnez, P., Melogno-Klinkas, M. et al. Management of atherogenic dyslipidemia according to current treatment guidelines: DESPEGA study in real clinical practice. Drugs Ther Perspect 35, 192–199 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40267-019-00605-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40267-019-00605-z

Search

Navigation