Skip to main content
Log in

Twenty Clinically Pertinent Factors/Observations for Percutaneous Absorption in Humans

  • Review Article
  • Published:
American Journal of Clinical Dermatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

At least 20 clinically relevant factors affect percutaneous absorption of drugs and chemicals: relevant physico-chemical properties, vehicle/formulation, drug exposure conditions (dose, duration, surface area, exposure frequency), skin appendages (hair follicles, glands) as sub-anatomical pathways, skin application sites (regional variation in penetration), population variability (premature, infants, and aged), skin surface conditions (hydration, temperature, pH), skin health and integrity (trauma, skin diseases), substantivity and binding to different skin components, systemic distribution and systemic toxicity, stratum corneum exfoliation, washing-off and washing-in, rubbing/massaging, transfer to others (human to human and hard surface to human), volatility, metabolic biotransformation/cutaneous metabolism, photochemical transformation and photosensitivity, excretion pharmacokinetics, lateral spread, and chemical method of determining percutaneous absorption.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wester RC, Maibach HI. Cutaneous pharmacokinetics: 10 steps to percutaneous absorption. Drug Metab Rev. 1983;14(2):169–205.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ngo MA, Maibach HI. Chapter 6: 15 factors of percutaneous penetration of pesticides. In: Knaak JB, Timchalk C, Tornero-Velez R, editors. Parameters for pesticide QSAR and PBPK/PD models for human risk assessment. ACS Symposium Series. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society; 2012. p. 67–86.

  3. Hui X, Lamel S, Qiao P, Maibach HI. Isolated human/animal stratum corneum as a partial model for 15 steps in percutaneous absorption: emphasizing decontamination, part I. J Appl Toxicol. 2013;33:157–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hui X, Lamel S, Qiao P, Maibach HI. Isolated human and animal stratum corneum as a partial model for the 15 steps in percutaneous absorption: emphasizing decontamination, part II. J Appl Toxicol. 2013;33:173–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Li BS, Ngo MA, Maibach HI. Clinical relevance of complex factors of percutaneous penetration in man. Curr Top Pharmacol. 2017;21:85–107.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Keurentjes AJ, Maibach HI. Percutaneous penetration of drugs applied in transdermal delivery systems: an in vivo based approach for evaluating computer generated penetration models. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2019;18:104428.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Burton ME, Schentag JJ, Shaw LM, Evans WE. Applied pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics: principles of therapeutic drug monitoring. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Marechal Y. The water molecule in (bio)macromolecules. In: The hydrogen bond and the water molecule: the physics and chemistry of water, aqueous and bio media. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2007. p. 249–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-044451957-3.50011-1.

  9. Wester RC, Noonan PK, Maibach HI. Frequency of application on percutaneous absorption of hydrocortisone. Arch Dermatol. 1977;113:620–2.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Berardesca E, Mariano M, Cameli N. Biophysical properties of ethnic skin. In: Vashi NA, Maibach HI, editors. Dermatoanthropology of ethnic skin and hair. Cham: Springer Nature, Springer International Publishing AG; 2017.

  11. Berardesca E, Maibach HI. Racial differences in sodium lauryl sulfate induced cutaneous irritation: black and white. Contact Dermatitis. 1988;18:65–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Berardesca E, Maibach HI. Sodium-lauryl-sulfate-induced cutaneous irritation. Comparison of white and Hispanic subjects. Contact Dermat. 1988;19:136–40.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Roskos KV, Maibach HI, Guy RH. The effect of aging on percutaneous absorption in man. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1989;17(6):617–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hoath SB, Maibach HI. Neonatal skin: structure and function. 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sidbury R, Darmstadt GL. Chapter 2: Microbiology. In: Hoath SB, Maibach HI, editors. Neonatal skin: structure and function. 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2003. p. 31.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nikolovski J, Stamatas GN, Kollias N, et al. Barrier function and water-holding and transport properties of infant stratum corneum are different from adult and continue to develop through the first year of life. J Invest Dermatol. 2008;128:1728–36.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Oranges T, Dini V, Romanelli M. Skin physiology of the neonate and infant: clinical implications. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2015;4(10):587–95.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Hoeger PH, Enzmann CC. Skin physiology of the neonate and young infant: a prospective study of functional skin parameters during early infancy. Pediatr Dermatol. 2002;19:256–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Visscher MO, Chatterjee R, Munson KA, et al. Changes in diapered and non-diapered infant skin over the first month of life. Pediatr Dermatol. 2000;17:45–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Saijo S, Tagami HJ. Dry skin of newborn infants: functional analysis of the stratum corneum. Pediatr Dermatol. 1991;8:155–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Brayer C, Micheau P, Bony C, et al. Neonatal accidental burn by isopropyl alcohol [in French]. Arch Pediatr. 2004;11(8):932–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. DeBellonia RR, Marcus S, Shih R, et al. Curanderismo: consequences of folk medicine. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2008;24(4):228–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. George AJ. Toxicity of boric acid through skin and mucous membranes. Food Cosmet Toxicol. 1965;3:99–101.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Martin-Bouyer G, Toga M, Lebreton R, et al. Outbreak of accidental hexachlorophene poisoning in France. Lancet. 1982;319(8263):91–5.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mullick FG. Hexachlorophene toxicity—human experience at the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology. Pediatrics. 1973;51(2):395–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Li BS, Cary JH, Maibach HI. Should we instruct patients to rub topical agents into skin? The evidence. J Dermatolog Treat. 2018;19:1–5.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Evans NJ, Rutter N, Hadgraft J, et al. Percutaneous administration of theophylline in the preterm infant. J Pediatr. 1985;107(2):307–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhai H, Maibach HI. Effects of skin occlusion on percutaneous absorption: an overview. Skin Pharmacol Appl Skin Physiol. 2001;14(1):1–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Shomaker TS, Zhang J, Ashburn MA. A pilot study assessing the impact of heat on the transdermal delivery of testosterone. J Clin Pharmacol. 2001;41(6):677–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Aly R, Shirley C, Cunico B, Maibach HI. Effect of prolonged occlusion on the microbial flora, pH, carbon dioxide and transepidermal water loss on human skin. J Invest Dermatol. 1978;71(6):378–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Gattu S, Maibach HI. Modest but increased penetration through damaged skin: an overview of the in vivo human model. Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2011;24(1):2–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Gattu S, Maibach HI. Enhanced absorption through damaged skin: an overview of the in vitro human model. Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2010;23:171–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Morgan CJ, Renwick AG, Friedmann PS. The role of stratum corneum and dermal microvascular perfusion in penetration and tissue levels of water-soluble drugs investigated by microdialysis. Br J Dermatol. 2003;148:434–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Jakasa I, Verberk MM, Bunge AL, et al. Increased permeability for polyethylene glycols through skin compromised by sodium lauryl sulfate. Exp Dermatol. 2006;15:801–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Jacob SE. Percutaneous absorption risks in atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol. 2017;177:11–2.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Halling-Overgaard AS, Kezic S, Jakasa I, et al. Skin absorption through atopic dermatitis skin: a systematic review. Br J Dermatol. 2017;177(1):84–106.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Garcia OP, Hansen SH, Shah VP, et al. Impact of adult atopic dermatitis on topical drug absorption: assessment by cutaneous microdialysis and tape stripping. Acta Derm Venereol. 2009;89:33–8.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Tauber M, Balica S, Hsu CY, et al. Staphylococcus aureus density on lesional and nonlesional skin is strongly associated with disease severity in atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016;137:1272.e1–1274.e3.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Jakasa I, de Jongh CM, Verberk MM, et al. Percutaneous penetration of sodium lauryl sulfate is increased in uninvolved skin of patients with atopic dermatitis compared with control subjects. Br J Dermatol. 2006;155:104–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Jakasa I, Verbek MM, Esposito M, et al. Altered penetration of polyethylene glycols into uninvolved skin of atopic dermatitis patients. J Invest Dermatol. 2007;127:129–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Hata M, Tokura Y, Takigawa M, et al. Assessment of epidermal barrier function by photoacoustic spectrometry in relation to its importance in the pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis. Lab Invest. 2002;82:1451–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Mochizuki J, Tadaki H, Takami S, et al. Evaluation of out-in skin transparency using a colorimeter and food dye in patients with atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol. 2009;160:972–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Alikhan FS, Maibach HI. Topical absorption and systemic toxicity. Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2011;30(3):175–86.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Lewis PR, Phillips TG, Sassani JW. Topical therapies for glaucoma: what family physicians need to know. Am Fam Phys. 1999;59:1871–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Goldberg I, Moloney G, McCluskey P. Topical ophthalmic medications: what potential for systemic side effects and interactions with other medications? Med J Aust. 2008;189:356–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Rubin Z. Ophthalmic sulfonamide-induced Stevens–Johnson syndrome. Arch Dermatol. 1977;113:235–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Raschke R, Arnold-Capell PA, Richeson R, et al. Refractory hypoglycemia secondary to topical salicylate intoxication. Arch Intern Med. 1991;151:591–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Zheng Y, Vieille-Petit A, Chodoutard S, Maibach HI. Dislodgeable stratum corneum exfoliation: role in percutaneous penetration? Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2011;30(3):198–204.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Zhu H, Maibach HI. Skin decontamination. Heidelberg: Springer; 2019 (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Rodriguez J, Maibach HI. Percutaneous penetration and pharmacodynamics: wash-in and wash-off of sunscreen and insect repellent. J Dermatolog Treat. 2016;27:11.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Moody RP. The safety of diethyltoluamide insect repellents [letter]. JAMA. 1989;262:28–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Moody RP, Benoit FM, Riedel R, Ritter L. Dermal absorption of the insect repellent DEET (N, N-diethyl-m-toluamide) in rats and monkeys: effect of anatomical site and multiple exposure. J Toxicol Environ Health. 1989;26:137–47.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Lademann J, Patzelt A, Schanzer S, et al. In vivo laser scanning microscopic investigation of the decontamination of hazardous substances from the human skin. Laser Phys Lett. 2010;7:884–8.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Trauer S, Richter H, Kuntsche J, et al. Influence of massage and occlusion on the ex vivo skin penetration of rigid liposomes and invasomes. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2014;86:301–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Phuong C, Maibach HI. Effect of massage on percutaneous penetration and skin decontamination: man and animal. Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2016;35(2):153–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Delamour E, Miksa S, Lutz D, Guy C. How to prove ‘rub-resistant’ sun protection. Cosmetics & Toiletries Science Applied. 2016. https://www.cosmeticsandtoiletries.com/testing/efficacyclaims/How-to-Prove-Rub-resistant-Sun-Protection-373779591.html. Accessed 12 Mar 2019.

  57. Franklin SF, Geffner ME. Precocious puberty secondary to topical testosterone exposure. J Pediatr Endocr Metab. 2003;16:107–10.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Wester RC, Hui X, Maibach HI. In vivo human transfer of topical bioactive drug between individuals: estradiol. J Invest Dermatol. 2006;126:2190–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Linck M. Screens detect all: mom, dad, kids, newborns all test positive for meth. Sioux City J. 2003. https://siouxcityjournal.com/news/screens-detect-all-mom-dad-kids-newborns-all-test-postive/article_5c9a48cf-4855-5308-ba83-c11bf1b44239.html. Accessed 13 Mar 2019.

  60. Dmochowski RR, Newman DK, Sand PK, et al. Pharmacokinetics of oxybutynin chloride topical gel. Clin Drug Investig. 2011;31(8):559–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Isnardo D, Vidal J, Panyella D, Vilaplana J. Nickel transfer by fingers. Actas Dermosifiliogr (English Edition). 2015;106(5):e22–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adengl.2015.04.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Salocks CB, Hui X, Lamel S, et al. Dermal exposure to methamphetamine hydrochloride contaminated residential surfaces: surface pH values, volatility, and in vitro human skin. Food Chem Toxicol. 2012;50(12):4426–40.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Rouse NC, Maibach HI. The effect of volatility on percutaneous absorption. J Dermatol Treat. 2016;27(1):5–10.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Bruze M. Thoughts on how to improve the quality of multicentre patch test studies. Contact Dermatitis. 2016;74:168–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Gilpin SJ, Hui X, Maibach HI. Volatility of fragrance chemicals: patch testing implications. Dermatitis. 2009;20(40):200–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Kasting GB, Miller MA. Kinetics of finite dose absorption through skin 2: volatile compounds. J Pharm Sci. 2006;95:268–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Norris EJ, Coats JR. Current and future repellent technologies: the potential of spatial repellents and their place in mosquito-borne disease control. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14(2):124–68.

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Kawada H, Temu EA, Minjas JN, et al. Field evaluation of field repellency of metofluthrin impregnated latticework plastic strips against Aedes aegypti (L.) and analysis of environmental factors affecting its efficacy in My Tho City, Tien Giang, Vietnam. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006;75:1153–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Kazem S, Linssen EC, Gibbs S. Skin metabolism phase I and phase II enzymes in native and reconstructed human skin: a short review. Drug Discov Today. 2019;24(9):1899–910.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Bando H, Mohri S, Yamashita F, et al. Effects of skin metabolism on percutaneous penetration of lipophilic drugs. J Pharm Sci. 1997;86(6):759–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Vieille-Petit A, Blickenstaff N, Coman G, Maibach H. Metrics and clinical relevance of percutaneous penetration and lateral spreading. Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2015;28:57–64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Jacobi U, Schanzer S, Weigmann H-J, et al. Pathways of lateral spreading. Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2011;24:231–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Feldman RJ, Maibach HI. Absorption of some organic compounds through the skin in man. J Invest Dermatol. 1970;54:399–404.

    Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • Dragicevic N, Maibach HI, editors. Percutaneous penetration enhancers chemical methods in penetration enhancement. Berlin: Springer; 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47039-8.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Berardesca E, Leveque J-L, Maibach HI, editors. Ethnic skin and hair. 1st ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2019 (ISBN: 978-0-3673-8999-4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berardesca E, Leveque J-L, Maibach HI, editors. Ethnic skin and hair. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2006 (ISBN: 978-0-8493-3088-9).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

RML had the idea to provide a practical and clinically relevant version of MAN and HIM pivotal paper on 15 steps of percutaneous absorption—for practitioners—and in the process expanded the discussion to 20 factors, with contribution from HIM; RML performed the literature search, with additional sources from HIM vast experience; RML drafted the work; HIM critically revised the work at multiple timepoints, RML critically revised the work several times, and MAN critically revised the work twice.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rebecca M. Law.

Ethics declarations

Funding

There were no sources of funding for this review.

Conflict of interest

Rebecca M. Law, Mai A. Ngo, and Howard I. Maibach have no conflicts of interest relating to this review.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Law, R.M., Ngo, M.A. & Maibach, H.I. Twenty Clinically Pertinent Factors/Observations for Percutaneous Absorption in Humans. Am J Clin Dermatol 21, 85–95 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40257-019-00480-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40257-019-00480-4

Navigation