Skip to main content
Log in

Influencing factors on fatigue strength of welded thin plates based on structural stress assessment

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Welding in the World Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

New lightweight structures in shipbuilding aim at plate thicknesses below 5 mm in combination with welding processes characterised by low heat-input, i.e. laser and laser-hybrid welding. In the European research project BESST—“Breakthrough in European Ship and Ship Building Technologies”, an extensive fatigue test programme was carried out for butt- and fillet-welded specimens, which were manufactured by conventional arc, laser and laser-hybrid welding processes. Plate thicknesses down to 3–4 mm were included. The test programme covered also the different production quality including various levels of misalignments. Utilising the extensive fatigue test results, the present paper aims to identify the factors that influence fatigue strength based on the structural stress approach. Secondary bending stresses due to misalignments are directly considered in the structural stress. Different methods of stress determination are applied, such as the through-thickness linearization, surface stress extrapolation, Haibach’s approach and Xiao and Yamada’s approach. Special attention is given to quality aspects such as undercuts. Based on the results, the suitability of the different structural stress approaches to the fatigue assessment of thin-plated joints in particular are discussed with special consideration of the various welding processes and quality aspects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Eggert L, Fricke W, Paetzold H (2012) Fatigue strength of thin-plated block joints with typical shipbuilding imperfections. Weld World 56(11/12):119–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lillemäe I, Lammi H, Molter L, Remes H (2012) Fatigue strength of welded butt joints in thin and slender specimens. Int J Fatigue 44:98–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. ISO 5817 (2003) Welding—fusion-welded joints in steel, nickel, titanium and their alloys (beam welding excluded)—quality levels for imperfections

  4. ISO 13919–1(1996) Welding—electron and laser-beam welded joints—guidance on quality levels for imperfections—part 1: steel

  5. Radaj D, Sonsino CM, Fricke W (2006) Fatigue assessment of welded joints by local approaches. Woodhead Publ, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Hobbacher A (2009) Recommendations for fatigue design of welded joints and components. Welding Research Council Bulletin 520, New York

  7. Fricke W (2012) IIW recommendations for the fatigue assessment of welded structures by notch stress analysis. Woodhead Publ, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Niemi E, Fricke W, Maddox SJ (2006) Fatigue analysis of welded components—designer’s guide to the hot-spot stress approach. Woodhead Publ, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Lotsberg I, Landet E (2005) Fatigue capacity of side longitudinals in floating structures. Mar Struct 18(1):25–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Haibach E (1968) Die Schwingfestigkeit von Schweißverbindungen aus der Sicht einer örtlichen Beanspruchungsmessung (The fatigue strength of welded joints considered on the basis of a local stress measurement), LBF-Bericht FB-77, Darmstadt, Fraunhofer-Inst. für Betriebsfestigkeit

  11. Xiao ZG, Yamada K (2004) A method of determining geometric stress for fatigue strength evaluation of steel welded joints. Int J Fatigue 26:1277–1293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Poutiainen I, Tanskanen P, Marquis G (2004) Finite element methods for structural hot spot stress determination—a comparison of procedures. Int J Fatigue 26:1147–1157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fricke W, Kahl A (2005) Comparison of different structural stress approaches for fatigue assessment of welded ship structures. Mar Struct 18:473–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fricke W, Bollero A, Chirica I, Garbatov Y, Jancart F, Kahl A, Remes H, Rizzo CM, von Selle H, Urban A, Wei L (2008) Round robin study on structural hot-spot and effective notch stress analysis. Ships Ocean Struct 3:335–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fricke W, Feltz O (2013) Consideration of influence factors between small-scale specimens and large components on the fatigue strength of thin-plated block joints in shipbuilding. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 36(12):1223–1231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fricke W, Remes H, Feltz O, Lillemäe I, Tchuindjang D, Reinert T, Nevierov A, Sichermann W, Brinkmann M, Kontkanen T, Bohlmann B, Molter L (2013) Fatigue strength of laser-welded thin plate ship structures based on nominal and structural hot-spot stress approach. Proc. of 4th Int. Conf. on Marine Structures (MARSTRUCT’2013). Guedes Soares C, Romanoff J (Eds). Taylor & Francis, London. pp 249–254

Download references

Acknowledgments

The fatigue tests leading to the presented results have received funding from the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007–2013) under grant agreement n° 233980. The analysis of the fatigue test results is funded also by the Finnish Academy of Science under grant agreement n° 261286. All the financial support is gratefully appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heikki Remes.

Additional information

Doc. IIW-2485, recommended for publication by Commission XIII “Fatigue of Welded Components and Structures”.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Remes, H., Fricke, W. Influencing factors on fatigue strength of welded thin plates based on structural stress assessment. Weld World 58, 915–923 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40194-014-0170-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40194-014-0170-7

Keywords

Navigation