Skip to main content
Log in

Temperature-Dependent Material Property Databases for Marine Steels—Part 2: HSLA-65

  • Technical Article
  • Published:
Integrating Materials and Manufacturing Innovation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Integrated Computational Materials Engineering (ICME)-based tools and techniques have been identified as the best path forward for distortion mitigation in thin-plate steel construction at shipyards. ICME tools require temperature-dependent material properties—including specific heat, thermal conductivity, coefficient of thermal expansion, elastic modulus, yield strength, flow stress, and microstructural evolution—to achieve accurate computational results for distortion and residual stress. However, the required temperature-dependent material property databases of US Navy-relevant steels are not available in the literature. Therefore, a comprehensive testing plan for some of the most common marine steels used in the construction of US Naval vessels was completed. This testing plan included DH36, HSLA-65, HSLA-80, HSLA-100, HY-80, and HY-100 steel with a nominal thickness of 4.76 mm (3/16-in.). This report is the second part of a seven-part series detailing the pedigreed steel data. The first six reports will report the material properties for each of the individual steel grades, whereas the final report will compare and contrast the measured steel properties across all six steels. This report will focus specifically on the data associated with HSLA-65 steel.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28
Fig. 29
Fig. 30
Fig. 31
Fig. 32
Fig. 33
Fig. 34
Fig. 35
Fig. 36
Fig. 37
Fig. 38
Fig. 39
Fig. 40
Fig. 41
Fig. 42

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Andersen LF (2000) Residual stresses and deformations in steel structures. Doctoral thesis. Department of Naval Architecture and Offshore Engineering, University of Denmark

  2. MIL-S-22698C. Military specification: steel plate, shapes, and bars, weldable ordinary strength and higher strength: structural. 29 June 1988.

  3. ASTM A945/M-16 (2016) Standard specification for high-strength low-alloy structural steel plate with low carbon and restricted sulfur for improved weldability, formability, and toughness. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA

  4. NAVSEA Technical Publication T9074-BD-GIB-010/0300 Rev. 2. Base materials for critical applications: requirements for low alloy steel plate, forgings, castings, shapes, bars, and heats of HY-80/100/130 and HSLA-80/100. 18 December 2012.

  5. Bechetti DH, Semple JK, Zhang W, Fisher CR (2020) Temperature-dependent material property database for marine steels—part 1: DH36. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 9:257–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fisher CR, Semple JK, Bechetti DH, Zhang W (2021) Temperature-dependent material database: HSLA-65. 26 April 2021. https://doi.org/10.13011/m3-kpkw-0v08.

  7. ASTM E417–17 (2017) Standard test method for analysis of carbon and low-alloy steel by spark atomic emission spectrometry. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA

  8. Eisler GR, Fuerschbach PW (1997) SOAR: an extensible suite of codes for weld analysis and optimal weld schedules. In: Seventh international conference on computer technology in welding, San Francisco, CA

  9. ASTM E1461-13 (2013) Standard test method for thermal diffusivity by the flash method. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA

  10. ASTM E1269-11 (2018) Standard test method for determining specific heat capacity by differential scanning calorimetry. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA

  11. ASTM A370-18 (2018) Standard test methods and definitions for mechanical testing of steel products. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA

  12. ASTM E21-17 (2017) Standard test methods for elevated temperature tension tests of metallic materials. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA

  13. Huang TD, Harbison M, Scholler S, Rucker H, Hu J, Dong P, Collette M, Chung H, Groden M, Zhang W, Semple J, Kirchain R, Roth R, Bustamante M, Yang Y, Dull R, Gooroochurn Y, Doroudian M, Fisher CF, Sinfield M, Kihl D, Gonzalez A (2016) Robust distortion control methods and implementation for construction of lightweight metallic structures. In: SNAME transactions

  14. Hehemann RF, Kinsman KR, Aaronson HI (1972) A debate on the bainite reaction. Metall Trans 3:1077–1094

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Aaronson HI, Spanos G, Reynolds WT (2002) A progress report on the definitions of bainite. Scripta Mater 47(3):139–144

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Aaronson HI, Enomoto M, Lee JK (2010) Mechanisms of diffusional phase transformations in metals and alloys. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  17. Easterling K (1992) Introduction to the physical metallurgy of welding, 2nd edn. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  18. Na S-H, Seol J-B, Jafari M, Park C-G (2017) A correlative approach for identifying complex phases by electron backscatter diffraction and transmission electron microscopy. Appl Microsc 47(1):43–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Das S, Ghosh A, Chatterjee S, Rao PR (2003) Microstructural characterization of controlled forged HSLA-80 steel by transmission electron microscopy. Mater Charact 50(4–5):305–315

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Fonda RW, Spanos G (2000) Microstructural evolution in ultra-low-carbon steel weldments—part I: controlled thermal cycling and continuous cooling transformation diagram of the weld metal. Metall Mater Trans A 31:2145–2153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fonda RW, Spanos G, Vandermeer RA (1994) Observations of plate martensite in a low carbon steel. Scr Metall Mater 31(6):683–688

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Yurioka N, Oshita S, Tamehiro H (1983) Determination of necessary preheating temperature in steel welding. Welding J 52(6):147-s-153-s

    Google Scholar 

  23. Valencia J, Papesch C (2005) Thermophysical properties characterization of HSLA-65 rolled plate. Concurrent Technologies Corporation

    Google Scholar 

  24. Valencia J, Papesch C (2007) Thermophysical properties and high temperature tensile properties of HSLA-65 steel plate. Concurrent Technologies Corporation

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rasband WS (1997–2018) "ImageJ," U. S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/

  26. ASTM E1382-97 (2015) Standard test methods for determining average grain size using semiautomatic and automatic image analysis. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA

  27. Heinze C, Pittner A, Rethmeiri M, Babu SS (2013) Dependency of martensite start temperature on prior austenite grain size and its influence on welding-induced residual stress. Comput Mater Sci 69:251–260

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Shome M, Mohanty ON (2006) Continuous cooling transformation diagrams applicable to the heat-affected zone of HSLA-80 and HSLA-100 steels. Metall Mater Trans A 37A:2159–2169

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Taljat B, Radhakrishnan B, Zacharia T (1998) Numerical analysis of GTA welding process with emphasis on post-solidification phase transformation effects on residual stress. Mater Sci Eng A A246:45–54

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Yue X, Lippold JC, Alexandrox BT, Babu SS (2012) Continuous cooling transformatoin behavior in the CGHAZ of naval steels. Weld J 91(3):67–75

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mohanty RR, Fonstein N, Girina O (2011) Effect of heating rate on the austenite formation in low-carbon high-strength steels annealed in the intercricial region. Metall Mater Trans A 42A(12):3680–3690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Oliveira FLG, Andrade MS, Cota AB (2007) Kinetics of austenite formation during continuous heating in a low carbon steel. Mater Charact 58:256–261

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Apple CA, Krauss G (1972) The effect of heating rate on the martensite to austenite transformation in Fe–Ni–C alloys. Acta Mater 20:849–856

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Andersson JO, Herlander T, Hoglund L, Shi PF, Sundman B (2002) Thermo-Calc & DICTRA, computational tools for materials science. Calphad 26:92–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Bainite Committee of The Iron & Steel Institute of Japan (1992) Atlas for bainitic microstructures. Vol. 1: Continuous-cooled microstructures of low carbon HSLA steels. The Iron & Steel Institute of Japan

    Google Scholar 

  36. Bhadeshia HKDH, Honeycombe RWK (2006) Steels: microstructure and properties, 3rd edn. Butterwoth-Heinemann, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  37. Sinha AK (1989) Ferrous physical metallurgy. Butterworth Publishers, Stoneham

    Google Scholar 

  38. Thewlis G (2004) Classification and quantification of microstructures in steels. Mater Sci Technol 20:143–160

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. International Institute of Welding (1985) Compendium of weld metal microstructures and properties: submerged-arc welds in ferritic steel. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  40. Krauss G (2015) Steels: processing, structure, and performance. ASM International, Materials Park

    Book  Google Scholar 

  41. Peet M (2014) Prediction of martensite start temperature. Mater Sci Technol 31(11):1370–1375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Kang S, Yoon S, Lee S-J (2014) Prediction of bainite start temperature in alloy steels with difference grain sizes. ISIJ Int 54(4):997–999

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Capdevilla C, Caballero FG, Garcia de Andres C (2002) Determination of Ms temperature in steels: a Bayesian neural network model. ISIJ Int 42:894–902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Kirkaldy JS, Venugopalan D (1984) Phase transformations in ferrous alloys. In: Phase transformations in ferrous alloys: proceedings of an international conference, Philadelphia, PA

  45. Stormvinter A, Borgenstam A, Agren J (2012) Thermodynamically based prediction of the martensite start temperature for commercial steels. Metall Mater Trans A 43(10):3870–3879

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Gulapura Hanumantharaju A (2018) Thermodynamic modelling of martensite start temperature in commercial steels. KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  47. Sampath K (2006) An understanding of HSLA-65 plate steels. J Mater Eng Perform 15(1):32–40

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. ASTM E111-17 (2017) Standard test method for Young's modulus, tangent modulus, and chord modulus. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA

  49. E. 1993-1-1 (2005) Eurocode 3: design of steel structures—part 1-1: general rules and rules for buildings

  50. E. 1993-1-2 (2005) Eurocode 3: design of steel structures—Part 1-2: general rules - structural fire design

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work was funded by the Office of Naval Research (ONR) and the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD), in support of the Lightweight Innovations for Tomorrow (LIFT) Institute’s program entitled, Robust Distortion Control Methods and Implementation for Construction of Lightweight Metallic Structures. The authors would like to thank Huntington Ingalls Industries—Ingalls Shipbuilding for supplying the steel material tested for this program, as well as all team members who worked on the LIFT Joining-R1-3 program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles R. Fisher.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Semple, J.K., Bechetti, D.H., Zhang, W. et al. Temperature-Dependent Material Property Databases for Marine Steels—Part 2: HSLA-65. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 11, 13–40 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40192-021-00246-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40192-021-00246-z

Keywords

Navigation