Abstract
Cultural perspectives of neuropsychology proposes that test instruments reflect cultural values held by different societies. However, there is a lack of studies that tests such assumptions, making this relationship unclear. This is a first study to examine whether different cultural values would uniquely predict the performances of neuropsychological tests. Cultural values were defined using Hofstede’s framework of cultural values, and we included neuropsychological measures commonly found in clinical practice. Two hundred and four healthy participants of diverse ethnic backgrounds were included in the study. Five neuropsychological measures were used covering working memory, attention, verbal fluency, verbal memory, and processing speeds. The Cultural Values Scale measured five dimensions of Hofstede’s cultural values. Hierarchical regressions revealed that higher long-term-orientation predicted the better performance on Digit Span Backwards and phonetic fluency. This suggests that values of perseverance or future planning may manifests on tests of working memory and executive functions. Whereas higher uncertainty avoidance predicted lower performance on Digit Span Backwards. Lower tolerance toward ambiguity during testing procedures could have resulted in anxiety, thus affect working memory processes. These results suggest that long-term-orientation and uncertainty avoidance could be associated with processes within executive functions, especially if these are subjected to verbal assessments. Future studies should confirm these findings with other neuropsychological measures and recruit a wider range of clinical and non-clinical populations. Limitations of the study are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Not applicable.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Alloway, T. P., Gathercole, S. E., & Pickering, S. J. (2006). Verbal and visuo-spatial short-term and working memory in children: Are they separable? Child Development, 77, 1698–1716.
Alloway, T. P., Gathercole, S. E., Willis, C., & Adams, A. M. (2004). A structural analysis of working memory and related cognitive skills in early childhood. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 87, 85–106.
Arbuthnott, K., & Frank, J. (2000). Trail making test, part B as a measure of executive control: Validation using a set-switching paradigm. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 22(4), 518–528.
Ardila, A. (2005). Cultural values underlying psychometric cognitive testing. Neuropsychology Review, 15(4), 185–195.
Betancourt, H., & López, S. R. (1993). The study of culture, ethnicity, and race in American psychology. American Psychologist, 48(6), 629.
Boone, K. B., & Lu, P. (2000). Gender effects in neuropsychological assessment. In E. Fletcher-Janzen, T. Strickland, & C. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural neuropsychology. Springer Science.
Boyd, K. K. (1996). Power imbalances and therapy. Focus (San Francisco, Calif.), 11(9), 1–4.
British Psychological Society. (2018). Code of ethics and conduct. Retrieved from https://www.bps.org.uk/sites/bps.org.uk/files/Policy/Policy%20-%20Files/BPS%20Code%20of%20Ethics%20and%20Conduct%20%28Updated%20July%202018%29.pdf
Deligkaris, P., Panagopoulou, E., Montgomery, A. J., & Masoura, E. (2014). Job burnout and cognitive functioning: A systematic review. Work & Stress, 28(2), 107–123.
Dorenkamp, M. A., & Vik, P. (2018). Neuropsychological assessment anxiety: A systematic review. Practice Innovations, 3(3), 192–211.
Faria, C. D. A., Alves, H. V. D., & Charchat-Fichman, H. (2015). The most frequently used tests for assessing executive functions in aging. Dementia & Neuropsychologia, 9, 149–155.
Figlio, D., Giuliano, P., Özek, U., & Sapienza, P. (2019). Long-term orientation and educational performance. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 11(4), 272–309.
Furnham, A., Hosoe, T., & Tang, T. (2001). Male hubris and female humility? A cross-cultural study of ratings of self, parental, and sibling multiple intelligence in America, Britain, and Japan. Intelligence, 30, 101–115.
Helms, J. E. (1992). Why is there no study of cultural equivalence in standardized cognitive ability testing? American Psychologists, 47(9), 1083–1101.
Hinson, J. M., Jameson, T. L., & Whitney, P. (2003). Impulsive decision making and working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(2), 298.
Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 2307–919.
Jahoda, A., Selkirk, M., Trower, P., Pert, C., Kroese, B. S., Dagnan, D., & Burford, B. (2009). The balance of power in therapeutic interactions with individuals who have intellectual disabilities. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 48(1), 63–77.
Kühnen, U., Hannover, B., & Schubert, B. (2001). The semantic–procedural interface model of the self: The role of self-knowledge for context-dependent versus context-independent modes of thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 397.
Leong, C. H., & Ward, C. (2006). Cultural values and attitudes toward immigrants and multiculturalism: The case of the Eurobarometer survey on racism and xenophobia. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 30(6), 799–810.
Luo, L., Luk, G., & Bialystok, E. (2010). Effect of language proficiency and executive control on verbal fluency performance in bilinguals. Cognition, 114(1), 29–41.
MacDonald, J. A., Sandry, J., & Rice, S. (2012). Self-construal priming affects speed of retrieval from short-term memory. PLoS ONE, 7(11), e50007.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224.
Melikyan, Z. A., Agranovich, A. V., & Puente, A. E. (2019). Fairness in psychological testing. In G. Goldstein, D. Allen, & J. Deluca (Eds.), Handbook of psychological assessment (pp. 551–572). Academic Press.
Morris, R., & Ward, G. (Eds.). (2004). The cognitive psychology of planning. Psychology Press.
Nell, V. (2000). Cross-cultural neuropsychological assessment: Theory and practice. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Nguyen, H. T., Quandt, S. A., Grzywacz, J. G., Chen, H., Galván, L., Kitner-Triolo, M. H., & Arcury, T. A. (2012). Stress and cognitive function in Latino farmworkers. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 55(8), 707–713.
Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108(2), 291.
O’Bryant, S. E., O’Jile, J. R., & McCaffrey, R. J. (2004). Reporting of demographic variables in neuropsychological research: Trends in the current literature. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 18(2), 229–233.
Puente, A. E., & Puente, A. N. (2013). Assessment of neuropsychological functioning. In K. F. Geisinger, B. A. Bracken, J. F. Carlson, J.-I. C. Hansen, N. R. Kuncel, S. P. Reise, & M. C. Rodriguez (Eds.), APA handbooks in psychology. APA handbook of testing and assessment in psychology, vol. 2. Testing and assessment in clinical and counselling psychology (pp. 133–152). American Psychological Association.
Razani, J., Burciaga, J., Madore, M., & Wong, J. (2007). Effects of acculturation on tests of attention and information processing in an ethnically diverse group. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 22(3), 333–341.
Rees, P., Wohland, P., Norman, P., & Boden, P. (2012). Ethnic population projections for the UK, 2001–2051. Journal of Population Research, 29(1), 45–89.
Reynolds, C. R. (1997). Forward and backward memory span should not be combined for clinical analysis. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 12(1), 29–40.
Rivera Mindt, M., Byrd, D., Saez, P., & Manly, J. (2010). Increasing culturally competent neuropsychological services for ethnic minority populations: A call to action. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 24(3), 429–453.
Romero, H. R., Lageman, S. K., Kamath, V., Irani, F., Sim, A., Suarez, P., et al. (2009). Challenges in the neuropsychological assessment of ethnic minorities: Summit proceedings. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23(5), 761–779.
Schwartz, S. H. (2012). An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 2307–919.
Strauss, E., Sherman, E. M. S., & Spreen, O. (2006). A compendium of neuropsychological tests: Administration, norms, and commentary (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Tan, Y. W., & Burgess, G. H. (2020). Multidimensional effects of acculturation at the construct or index level of seven broad neuropsychological skills. Culture and Brain, 8, 27–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40167-018-0075-1.
Tan, Y. W., Burgess, G. H., & Green, R. J. (2020). The effects of acculturation on neuropsychological test performance: A systematic literature review. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 35(3), 541–571.
Thames, A. D., Hinkin, C. H., Byrd, D. A., Bilder, R. M., Duff, K. J., Mindt, M. R., Arentoft, A., & Streiff, V. (2013). Effects of stereotype threat, perceived discrimination, and examiner race on neuropsychological performance: Simple as black and white? Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 19(5), 583–593.
Whiteside, D. M., Kealey, T., Semla, M., Luu, H., Rice, L., Basso, M. R., & Roper, B. (2016). Verbal fluency: Language or executive function measure?.s Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 23(1), 29–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2015.1004574.
Yoo, B., Donthu, N., & Lenartowicz, T. (2011). Measuring Hofstede’s five dimensions of cultural values at the individual level: Development and validation of CVSCALE. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 23(3–4), 193–210.
Funding
The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict/competing interest.
Consent to participate
Informed consent was obtained from participants of the study.
Consent to publish
Participants provided consent for findings to be used for publication purposes.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Digit span forwards | TMT-A | TMT-B | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β | R2 | p | β | R2 | p | β | R2 | p | |
Stage 1 | .03 | .03 | .02 | .10 | .01 | .11 | |||
Age | − .05 | .04 | .35 | .01 | .50 | .07 | |||
EFL | .37 | .26 | .01 | 1.00 | − 3.23 | .40 | |||
Gender | − .05 | .89 | − .62 | .76 | .86 | .82 | |||
Residency status | .25 | .45 | − 2.34 | .24 | − 6.10 | .12 | |||
Stage 2 | .06 | .06 | .01 | .22 | .02 | .15 | |||
Age | − .03 | .17 | .41 | .01 | .44 | .14 | |||
EFL | .38 | .26 | − .54 | .79 | − 5.14 | .20 | |||
Gender | − .47 | .19 | − .67 | .76 | 3.61 | .40 | |||
Residency status | .02 | .96 | − 2.50 | .22 | − 5.32 | .18 | |||
Power | − .06 | .11 | − .29 | .17 | − .26 | .52 | |||
UN | − .02 | .56 | .13 | .57 | .80 | .09 | |||
CO | .04 | .10 | − .03 | .83 | .08 | .76 | |||
Mas | .07 | .04 | .04 | .84 | − .57 | .13 | |||
LTO | .08 | .05 | .25 | .32 | − .22 | .66 |
RAVLT-trials | RAVLT-delay | WAIS-coding | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β | R2 | p | β | R2 | p | β | R2 | p | |
Stage 1 | .01 | .78 | .02 | .25 | .04 | .04 | |||
Age | .04 | .67 | .03 | .25 | − .60 | .01 | |||
EFL | − .46 | .71 | − .50 | .20 | − 7.24 | .02 | |||
Gender | − 1.37 | .28 | .06 | .88 | − 1.47 | .63 | |||
Residency status | − .19 | .88 | − .09 | .81 | 2.67 | .38 | |||
Stage 2 | .07 | .09 | .05 | .21 | .08 | .04 | |||
Age | .13 | .17 | .04 | .15 | − .51 | .03 | |||
EFL | − .02 | .99 | − .38 | .35 | − 6.03 | .06 | |||
Gender | − 1.67 | .23 | .22 | .61 | − 2.36 | .49 | |||
Residency status | − .39 | .76 | − .03 | .94 | 2.55 | .42 | |||
Power | − .11 | .41 | − .04 | .32 | .37 | .25 | |||
UN | − .46 | .00 | − .07 | .16 | − .91 | .01 | |||
CO | .11 | .21 | .01 | .59 | .00 | 1.00 | |||
Mas | − .02 | .84 | − .02 | .52 | .02 | .95 | |||
LTO | .28 | .08 | − .01 | .79 | .37 | .33 |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tan, Y.W., Green, R.J. & Goh, S.K.Y. The relationship between five cultural values and neuropsychological test performances in an ethnically diverse group in the UK. Cult. Brain 10, 140–154 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40167-021-00105-w
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40167-021-00105-w