Skip to main content
Log in

Individualized Data Feedback and Documentation of Depth of Neuromuscular Blockade

  • Neuromuscular Blockade (CA Lien, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Anesthesiology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

The purpose of this review is to summarize the importance of monitoring neuromuscular blockade and techniques for the evaluation and documentation of the depth of neuromuscular blockade. It also discusses the most recent societal guidelines for monitoring neuromuscular blockade.

Recent Findings

In 2023, the American Society of Anesthesiologists task force presented practice guidelines that recommended quantitative monitoring at the adductor policies and a recovery of train-of-four ratio to 0.9 prior to extubation. Patients monitored utilizing quantitative monitoring had a lower incidence of residual neuromuscular blockade compared with patients assessed with qualitative monitoring. Despite multiple societies recently recommending quantitative monitoring of depth of neuromuscular blockade, anesthesiology provider use and documentation of this monitoring are imperfect. Studies evaluating the improvement of monitoring and documentation show that providing individual providers with feedback about their performance may improve their performance.

Summary

Continued improvement is needed for both the use of train-of-four monitoring and the documentation of that monitoring. Further studies to evaluate best practices and how to improve compliance are needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Griffith HR, Johnson GE. The use of curare in general anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 1942;3(4):418–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Nemes R, Renew J. Clinical practice guideline for the management of neuromuscular blockade: what are the recommendations in the USA and other countries? Curr Anesthesiol Rep. 2020;10:90–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brull SJ, Naguib M, Miller RD. Residual neuromuscular block: rediscovering the obvious. Anesthesia Analg. 2008;107:11–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Naguib M, Kopman AF, Lien CA, Hunter JM, Lopez A, Brull SJ. A survey of current management of neuromuscular block in the United States and Europe. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2010;111(1):110–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Thilen SR, Weigel WA, et al. American Society of Anesthesiologists practice guidelines for monitoring and antagonism of neuromuscular blockade: a report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Neuromuscular Blockade. Anesthesiology. 2023;138:13–41. Key manuscript summarizing recommendations for monitoring and antagonism of neuromuscular blockade. Of note, strong recommendation for quantitative monitoring.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Beecher HK, Todd DP. A study of the deaths associated with anesthesia and surgery: based on a study of 599, 548 anesthesias in ten institutions 1948–1952, inclusive. Annal Surg. 1954;140(1):2–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Thilen SR, Weigel WA. Neuromuscular blockade monitoring. Anesthesiol Clin. 2021 Sep;39(3):457–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Plaud B, Debaene B, Donati F, et al. Residual paralysis after emergence from anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2010;112(4):1013–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Asbahi M, Soto R. Qualitative neuromuscular monitoring: patterns of stimulation, site of monitoring, and accuracy in detecting residual neuromuscular blockade. Curr Anesthesiol Rep. 2018;8:130–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Iwasaki H, Nemes R, Brull SJ, et al. Quantitative neuromuscular monitoring: current devices, new technological advances, and use in clinical practice. Curr Anesthesiol Rep. 2018;8:134–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. David R, Bevan MB, M.R.C.P., F.F.A.R.C.S.; François Donati, M.D., Ph.D., F.R.C.P.C, Aaron F, Kopman MD. Reversal of neuromuscular blockade. Anesthesiology. 1992;77:785–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Brull SJ, Silverman DG. Visual and tactile assessment of neuromuscular fade. Anesthesia Analgesia. 1993;77(2):352–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Murphy GS, Brull SJ. Quantitative neuromuscular monitoring and postoperative outcomes: a narrative review. Anesthesiology. 2022;136:345–61. Key manuscript reviewing modern quantitative monitoring for neuromuscular blockade.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Murphy GS, Szokol JW, Avram MJ, Greenberg SB, Marymont JH, Vender JS, Gray J, Landry E, Gupta DK. Intraoperative acceleromyography monitoring reduces symptoms of muscle weakness and improves quality of recovery in the early postoperative period. Anesthesiology. 2011;115:946–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Murphy GS, Szokol JW, Marymont JH, Greenberg SB, Avram MJ, Vender JS, Nisman M. Intraoperative acceleromyographic monitoring reduces the risk of residual neuromuscular blockade and adverse respiratory events in the postanesthesia care unit. Anesthesiology. 2008;109:389–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Li G, Freundlich RE, Gupta RK, et al. Post operative pulmonary complications’ association with sugammadex vs neostigmine: a retrospective registry analysis. Anesthesiology. 2021;134:862–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Todd MM, Hindman BJ, King BJ. The implementation of quantitative electromyographic neuromuscular monitoring in an academic anesthesia department. Anes Analg. 2014;119(2):323–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fuchs-Buder T, Romero CS, et al. Peri-operative management of neuromuscular blockade: a guideline from the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care. Eur J Anesthesiol. 2023;40(2):82–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Checketts MR, Alladi R, et al. Recommendations for standards of monitoring during anesthesia and recovery 2015: association of anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland. Anaesthesia. 2016;71:85–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Klein AA, Meek T, Allcock E, et al. Recommendations for standards of monitoring during anaesthesia and recovery 2021: guideline from the Association of Anaesthetists. Anaesthesia. 2021;76(9):1212–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gloger AN, Nakonezny PA, Phelan HA. Use of tailored feedback improves accuracy of delirium documentation in the burn ICU: results of a performance improvement initiative. J Burn Care Res. 2020;41(2):299–305.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Prendergast E, Allen KY, et al. Targeted temperature management protocol in a pediatric intensive care unit: a quality improvement project. Crit Care Nurse. 2021;41(5):41–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. DeLeon S, Mothner B, Middleman A. Improving student documentation using a feedback tool. Clin Teach. 2018;15(1):48–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Greene NH, Norstedt PA, Nair BG, Souter KJ. Systematic postoperative nausea prophylaxis feedback improves clinical performance in anesthesiology residents. J Educ Peroper Med. 2015;17:E301.

    Google Scholar 

  25. O’Reilly-Shah VN, Easton GS, Jabaley CS, Lynde GC. Variable effectiveness of stepwise implementation of nudge-type interventions to improve provider compliance with intraoperative low tidal volume. Qual Saf 2018;27(12):1008–1018.

  26. Tollinche LE, Shi R, Hannum M, et al. The impact of real-time clinical alerts on the compliance of anesthesia documentation: a retrospective observational study. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2020;191:105399.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. • Forkin KT, Chiao SS, Naik BI, et al. Individualized data feedback improves anesthesiology residents’ documentation of depth of neuromuscular blockade before extubation. Anesth Analg. 2020;130:e49–53. Manuscript demonstrating one way to improve resident compliance with recommendations using data feedback.

  28. McCormick PJ, Yeoh CB, Hannum M, et al. Institution of monthly anesthesiology quality reports does not improve post operative complications despite improved metric compliance. J Med Syst. 2020;44(11):189.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Brull SJ, Naguib M, Kopman AF. Anesthesiology residents’ documentation of depth of neuromuscular blockade: a proposed refinement. Anesth Analg. 2020;130(4):e110–1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. McCormick PJ, Yeoh C, Vicario-Feliciano RM, et al. Improved compliance with anesthesia quality measures after implementation of automated monthly feedback. J Oncol Pract. 2019;15(6):e583–92.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edward C. Nemergut.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest 

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guillow, R., Nemergut, E.C. & Hollis, N. Individualized Data Feedback and Documentation of Depth of Neuromuscular Blockade. Curr Anesthesiol Rep 13, 257–261 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40140-023-00585-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40140-023-00585-x

Keywords

Navigation