Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Strategies to Increase Diversity in Surgical Residency

  • Diversity in the Surgical Profession (S Pitt, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Surgery Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Residency programs are now more than ever attuned to the need to create a more diverse surgical workforce and combat the structural barriers that may prevent entry and retention of trainees from diverse backgrounds. The following provides several evidence-based strategies programs can implement to achieve their diversity, equity, and inclusion goals.

Recent Findings

Strategies to increase diversity span the recruitment, selection, and ongoing support phases of the trainee lifecycle. Ensuring sufficient and accurate information on program websites and strategic recruitment strategies with schools graduating high percentages of underrepresented minorities can help ensure programs receive applications from a diverse cohort. De-emphasizing reliance on traditional selection strategies and tools known to promote inequity will also ensure that all applicants have an equal opportunity to enter the program. Finally, ongoing support mechanisms, such as fair and transparent data monitoring, mentoring, and continued education can ensure that the program provides an environment for all to thrive.

Summary

Programs seeking to enhance the diversity of their residency programs must consider their practices and policies from a recruitment, selection, and ongoing support standpoint. Unfortunately, there are no “quick fixes.” Creating a thriving culture for diversity, equity, and inclusion requires intentional focus and allotment of time and resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Schneider B. The people make the place. Personnel Psychol. 1987;40:437–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Devendorf SA, Highhouse S. Applicant-employee similarity and attraction to an employee. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2008;81:607–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Verquer ML, Beehr TA, Wagner SH. A meta-analysis of relations between person-organization fit and work attitudes. J Voc Behav. 2003;63:473–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Collins C, JC, Porras JI. Built to last: Successful habits of visionary companies. 1994; Harper Business: New York.

  5. O’Reilly CA, Chatman J, Caldwell DF. People and organizational culture: a profile comparison approach to assessing person-organization fit. Acad Manag J. 1991;34:487–516.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kristof-Brown AL, Zimmerman RD, Johnson EC. Consequences of individual’s fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. Person Psychol. 2005;58:281–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pulcrano M, Evans SR, Sosin M. Quality of life and burnout rates across surgical specialties: a systematic review. JAMA Surg. 2016;151:970–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cable DM, Edwards JR. Complementary and supplementary fit: a theoretical and empirical integration. J Appl Psychol. 2004;89:822–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cober RT, Brown DJ, Levy PE, Cober AB, Keeping LM. Organizational web sites: web site content and style as determinants of organizational attraction. Int J Select Assess. 2003;11:158–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Allen DG, Maho RV, Otondo RF. Web-based recruitment: effects of information, organizational brand, and attitudes toward a web site on applicant attraction. J Appl Psychol. 2007;92:1696–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Allen DF, Van Scotter JR, Otondo RF. Recruitment communication media: impact on prehire outcomes. Pers Psychol. 2004;57:143–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gatewood RD, Gowan MA, Lautenschlager GJ. Corporate image, recruitment image, and initial job choice decisions. Acad Manag Journal. 1993;36:414–27.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Barber AE, Roehling MV. Job postings and the decision to interview: a verbal protocol analysis. J Appl Psychol. 1993;78:845–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Avery DR, Hernandez M, Hebl MR. Who’s watching the race? Racial salience in recruitment advertising. J Appl Social Psychol. 2004;34:146–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jarman BT, Borgert AJ, Kallies KJ, Joshi AR, Smink DS, Sarosi GA, et al. Underrepresented minorities in general surgery residency: Analysis of interviewed applicants, residents, and core teaching faculty. J Am Coll Sug. 2020;231:54–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Avery DR. Reactions to diversity in recruitment advertising – are differences black and white? J Appl Psychol. 2003;88:672–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Walker HJ, Feild HS, Giles WF, Armenakis AA, Bernerth JB. Displaying employee testimonials on recruitment web sites: effects of communication media, employee race, and job seeker race on organizational attraction and information credibility. J Appl Psychol. 2009;94:1354–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cavanaugh KJ, Costa PE, Dunkin BJ, Gardner AK. Is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Association for Surgical Education meeting, Chicago, IL: Training program preferences among women and minorities; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Turban DB, Campion JE, Eyring AR. Factors related to job acceptance decisions of college recruits. J Voc Behav. 1995;47:193–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. McKay P, Avery DR. Warning! diversity recruitment could backfire. J Manag Inquiry. 2005;14:330–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. AAMC 2019 Facts. Enrollment, graduates, and MD-PhD Data. Accessed on August 15th, 2020 from https://www.aamc.org/data-reports/students-residents/interactive-data/2019-facts-enrollment-graduates-and-md-phd-data

  22. Edmond MB, Deschenes JL, Eckler M, Wenzel RP. Racial bias in using USMLE Step 1 scores to grant internal medicine residency interviews. Acad Med. 2001;76:1253–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Dawson B, Iwamoto CK, Ross LP, Nungester RJ, Swanson DB, Volle RL. Performance on the national board of medical examiners part 1 examination by men and women of different race and ethnicity. JAMA. 2004;272:674–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Prober CG, Kolars JC, First LR, Melnick DE. A plea to reassess the role of united states medical licensing examination step 1 scores in residency selection. Acad Med. 2016;91:12–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Barone MA, Filak AT, Jr, Johnson D., Skochelak S, Whelan, A. (2019).Summary Report and Preliminary Recommendations from the Invitational Conference on USMLE Scoring (InCUS), 2019: 11–12

  26. Karabel, J. (2006) The chosen: the hidden history of admission and exclusion at Harvard, Yale, and Princeton Mariner: Boston, MA.

  27. Hoffman A, Grant W, McCormick M, Jezewski E, Matemavi P, Langnas A. Gendered differences in letters of recommendation for transplant surgery fellowship applicants. J Surg Educ. 2019;76:427–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Madera JM, Hebl MR, Dial H, Martin R, Valian V. Raising doubt in letters of recommendation for academia: differences and their impact. J Bus Psychol. 2019;34:287–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wiesner WH, Cronshaw SF. A meta-analytic investigation of the impact of interview format and degree of structure on the validity of the employment interview. J Occup Psychol. 1988;61:275–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. McDaniel MA, Whetzel DL, Schmidt FL, Maurer SD. The validity of employment interviews: a comprehensive review and meta-analysis. J Appl Psychol. 1994;79:599–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Segrest Purkiss SL, Perrewe PL, Gillespie TL, Mayes BT, Ferris GR. Implicit sources of bias in employment interview judgments and decisions. Org Beh Hum Dec Proc. 2006;101:152–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kutcher EJ, Bragger JD. Selection interviews of overweight job applicants: Can structure reduce the bias? J Appl Social Psychol. 2004;34:1993–2022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hern HG, Alter HJ, Wills CP, Snoey ER, Simon BC. How prevalent are potentially illegal questions during residency interviews? Acad Med. 2013;88:1116–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Bragger JD, Kutcher E, Morgan J, Firth P. The effects of the structured interview on reducing biases against pregnant job applicants. Sex Roles. 2002;46:215–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. ∙∙Gardner AK, Cavanaugh KJ, Willis RE, Dunkin BJ. Can better selection tools help us achieve our diversity goals in postgraduate medical education? Comparing use of USMLE Step 1 scores and situational judgment tests at 7 surgical residencies. Acad Med. 2020;95:751–7. This article highlights how reliance on tools developed for the purposes of selection – versus those easily available in the application packet – can increase the diversity of candidates considered across multiple residency programs in the United States.

  36. Gardner AK, Dunkin BJ. Pursuing excellence: the power of selection science to provide meaningful data and enhance efficiency in selecting surgical trainees. Ann Surg. 2019;270:188–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Heiderscheit E, Schlick , Ellis , Cheung , Irizarry , Bilimoria , Hu . Experiences of LGBTQ residents in US general surgery programs. Presentation at the Association of Academic Surgeons annual meeting. February 6, 2020

  38. Osseo-Asare A, Balasuriya L, Huot SJ, Keene D, Berg D, Nunez-Smith M, et al. Minority resident physicians’ views on the role of race/ethnicity in their training experiences in the workplace. JAMA Netw Open. 2018;1:e182723–e182723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Shollen SL, Bland CJ, Finstad DA, et al. Organizational climate and family life: how these factors affect the status of women faculty at one medical school. Acad Med. 2009;84:87–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Peterson SL. Toward a theoretical model of employee turnover: A human resource development perspective. Hum Res Dev Review. 2004;3:209–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Thomas DA. The truth about mentoring minorities. Race matters Harv Bus Rev. 2001;79:98–107.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Yehia BR, Cronholm PF, Wilson N, Palmer SC, Sisson SD, Guilliames CE, et al. Mentorship and pursuit of academic medicine careers: A mixed methods study of residents from diverse backgrounds. BMC Med Educ. 2014;14:26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. ∙Roberts SE, Nehemiah A, Butler PD, Terhune K, Aarons CB. Mentoring residents underrepresented in medicine: strategies to ensure success. J Surg Educ. 2020;78(2):361–5. This article provides a framework and strategies for underrepresented minority trainees.

  44. Rodriguez JE, Campbell KM, Pololi LH. Addressing disparities in academic medicine: What of the minority tax? BMC Med Edu. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0290-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Roberts SE, Shea JA, Sellers M, Butler PD, Kelz RR. Pursing a career in academic surgery among African American medical students. Am J Surg. 2020;219:598–603.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. ∙Segarra VA, Blatch S, Boyce M, Carrero-Martinez F, Aguilera RJ, Leibowitz MJ, et al. Scientific societies advancing STEM workforce diversity: Lessons and outcomes from the minority affairs committee of the American Society for Cell Biology. J Microbio Biol Educ. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v21i1.1941This article illustrates the impact of discipline-specific programming by scientific societies in supporting the development of underrepresented minority trainees.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. SurgWise Consulting, Houston, TX, USA

    Paula C. Costa & Aimee K. Gardner

  2. Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX, 77030, USA

    Aimee K. Gardner

Authors
  1. Paula C. Costa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Aimee K. Gardner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aimee K. Gardner.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Aimee Gardner and Paula Costa both provide advice on selection and assessment to surgical training programs and organizations through SurgWise Consulting.

Research involved in human and animal rights

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical collection on Diversity in the Surgical Profession.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Costa, P.C., Gardner, A.K. Strategies to Increase Diversity in Surgical Residency. Curr Surg Rep 9, 11 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40137-021-00288-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40137-021-00288-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation