Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Is the Flipped Classroom a Panacea for Medical Education?

  • Surgical Education (S. Tisherman, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Surgery Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

The purpose of this review is to describe the flipped classroom, its advantages and disadvantages, its use specifically in medical education, and directions for future research. The flipped classroom is an instructional model in which the traditional lecture is delivered in a video format before class. The in-class time is spent on active, inquiry-based learning facilitated by an instructor.

Recent Findings

The flipped classroom is rapidly gaining in interest and popularity, and being increasingly implemented in medical education at all levels. Despite its many theoretical advantages, there are a variety of pros and cons that educators should consider when adopting this methodology. Overall, research findings to date support use of the flipped classroom in regard to learner preference and satisfaction; however, further studies are needed to determine its true effect on learning outcomes.

Summary

The flipped classroom is a relatively new educational modality that can potentially promote learner-centered, self-directed, active learning. There is significant potential for educational researchers who wish to develop assessment tools capable of evaluating deeper learning, particularly within the flipped classroom framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Akçayır G, Akçayır M. The flipped classroom: a review of its advantages and challenges. Comput Educ. 2018;126:334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bergmann J, Sams A. Flip your classroom: reach every student in every class every day. Portland: International Society for Technology in Education; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Davies RS, Dean DL, Ball N. Flipping the classroom and instructional technology integration in a college-level information systems spreadsheet course. Educ Technol Res Dev. 2013;61(4):563–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Koohang A, Riley L, Smith T, Schreurs J. E-learning and constructivism: from theory to application. Interdiscip J E-Learn Learn Objects. 2009;5(1):91–109.

    Google Scholar 

  5. •• Moffett J. Twelve tips for “flipping” the classroom. Med Teach. 2015;37(4):331-6. This manuscript provides an excellent review of how to successfully implement a flipped classroom as well as pitfalls to avoid.

  6. McLaughlin JE, Roth MT, Glatt DM, Gharkholonarehe N, Davidson CA, Griffin LM, et al. The flipped classroom: a course redesign to foster learning and engagement in a health professions school. Acad Med: J Assoc Am Med Coll. 2014;89(2):236–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Baeten M, Struyven K, Dochy F. Student-centred teaching methods: can they optimise students’ approaches to learning in professional higher education? Stud Educ Eval. 2013;39(1):14–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sternberg R. Applying psychological theories to educational practice. Am Educ Res J. 2008;45(1):150–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Prince M. Does active learning work? A review of the research. J Eng Educ. 2004;93(3):223–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bishop JL, Verleger MA. The flipped classroom: a survey of the research. ASEE National Conference Proceedings, Atlanta; 2013.

  11. White PJ, Naidu S, Yuriev E, Short JL, McLaughlin JE, Larson IC. Student engagement with a flipped classroom teaching design affects pharmacology examination performance in a manner dependent on question type. Am J Pharm Educ. 2017;81(9):5931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tainter CR, Wong NL, Cudemus-Deseda GA, Bittner EA. The “flipped classroom” model for teaching in the intensive care unit: rationale, practical considerations, and an example of successful implementation. J Intens Care Med. 2017;32(3):187–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lewis CE, Chen DC, Relan A. Implementation of a flipped classroom approach to promote active learning in the third-year surgery clerkship. Am J Surg. 2018;215(2):298–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Freeman S, O’Connor E, Parks JW, Cunningham M, Hurley D, Haak D, et al. Prescribed active learning increases performance in introductory biology. CBE-Life Sci Educ. 2007;6(2):132–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. McKeachie WJ. Teaching and learning in the college classroom: a review of the research literature. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gordon M. Between constructivism and connectedness. J Teach Educ. 2008;59(4):322–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Heitz C, Prusakowski M, Willis G, Franck C. Does the concept of the “flipped classroom” extend to the emergency medicine clinical clerkship? West J Emerg Med. 2015;16(6):851–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hu R, Gao H, Ye Y, Ni Z, Jiang N, Jiang X. Effectiveness of flipped classrooms in Chinese baccalaureate nursing education: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Nurs Stud. 2018;79:94–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gillette C, Rudolph M, Kimble C, Rockich-Winston N, Smith L, Broedel-Zaugg K. A systematic review and meta analysis of student pharmacist outcomes comparing flipped classroom and lecture. Am J Pharm Educ. 2018;82(5):6898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. •• Chen F, Lui AM, Martinelli SM. A systematic review of the effectiveness of flipped classrooms in medical education. Medical education. 2017;51(6):585-97. This paper provides a comprehensive systematic review of the flipped classroom in medial education.

  21. Chokshi BD, Schumacher HK, Reese K, Bhansali P, Kern JR, Simmens SJ, et al. A “resident-as-teacher” curriculum using a flipped classroom approach: can a model designed for efficiency also be effective? Acad Med: J Assoc Am Med Coll. 2017;92(4):511–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. •• Martinelli SM, Chen F, DiLorenzo AN, Mayer DC, Fairbanks S, Moran K, et al. Results of a flipped classroom teaching approach in anesthesiology residents. J Grad Med Educ. 2017;9(4):485-90. This was a prospective, controlled, multi-institutional study of the flipped classroom for anesthesia residents. The paper provides a nice methodology that could be used as a model for those wanting to study the flipped classroom particularly in a residency setting.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Riddell J, Jhun P, Fung CC, Comes J, Sawtelle S, Tabatabai R, et al. Does the flipped classroom improve learning in graduate medical education? J Grad Med Educ. 2017;9(4):491–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Morton DA, Colbert-Getz JM. Measuring the impact of the flipped anatomy classroom: the importance of categorizing an assessment by Bloom’s taxonomy. Anat Sci Educ. 2017;10(2):170–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Chen KS, Monrouxe L, Lu YH, Jenq CC, Chang YJ, Chang YC, et al. Academic outcomes of flipped classroom learning: a meta-analysis. Med Educ. 2018;52:910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Prober CG, Heath C. Lecture halls without lectures—a proposal for medical education. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(18):1657–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Prober CG, Khan S. Medical education reimagined: a call to action. Acad Med: J Assoc Am Med Coll. 2013;88(10):1407–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Stuart J, Rutherford R. Medical student concentration during lectures. Lancet. 1978;312(8088):514–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Krathwohl DR. A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: an overview. Theory into Pract. 2002;41(4):212–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Trauma, General Surgery & Surgical Critical Care, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, BOX 956904, 72-256 CHS, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-6904, USA

    Catherine E. Lewis

Authors
  1. Catherine E. Lewis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catherine E. Lewis.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Catherine E. Lewis declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical collection on Surgical Education.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lewis, C.E. Is the Flipped Classroom a Panacea for Medical Education?. Curr Surg Rep 7, 9 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40137-019-0230-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40137-019-0230-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation