Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Training Surgeons in the Current US Healthcare System: A Review of Recent Changes in Resident Education

  • Surgical Education (S. Tisherman, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Surgery Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

This review highlights research focusing on the quality of surgical education within the current constraints of healthcare delivery in the United States.

Recent Findings

The Flexibility in Duty Hour Requirements for Surgical Trainees (FIRST) trial has provided the first evidence from a randomized controlled trial regarding duty hour regulations. Results of the FIRST trial were instrumental in the 2017 ACGME Common Core Requirement changes that allow for more flexibility in clinical hours to encourage professionalism and accommodate both patient care and educational opportunities. Research focusing on resident autonomy has highlighted multiple factors necessary to ensure appropriate graduated levels of responsibility during training. Lastly, competency-based education provides a structured format to ensure minimum standards of performance in all graduates.

Summary

More flexible hours, increasing autonomy, and competency-based evaluations may help improve confidence and competence of surgery residency graduates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Resident Duty Hours in the Learning and Working Environment: Comparison of 2003 and 2011 Standards http://www.acgme.org/Portals/0/PDFs/dh-ComparisonTable2003v2011.pdf.

  2. • Elfenbein DM. Confidence Crisis Among General Surgery Residents: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Discourse Analysis. JAMA surgery. 2016;151(12):1166–75. Systematic review of 15 studies measuring confidence or readiness to enter practice in general surgery residents, with the majority of studies identifying a lack of confidence among graduates.

  3. • George BC, Bohnen JD, Williams RG, Meyerson SL, Schuller MC, Clark MJ, et al. Readiness of US General Surgery Residents for Independent Practice. Ann Surg. 2017;266(4):582–94. Prospective multi-institutional trial using the SIMPL mobile application found that the majority of chief residents were unable to perform core general surgery procedures with minimal guidance, indicating a lack of readiness to enter practice.

  4. Patel M, Bhullar JS, Subhas G, Mittal V. Present status of autonomy in surgical residency—a Program Director’s Perspective. Am Surg. 2015;81(8):786–90.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Damewood RB, Blair PG, Park YS, Lupi LK, Newman RW, Sachdeva AK. “Taking training to the next level”: The American College of Surgeons Committee on Residency Training Survey. J Surg Educ. 2017;. doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.07.008.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mullen MG, Salerno EP, Michaels AD, Hedrick TL, Sohn MW, Smith PW, et al. Declining operative experience for junior-level residents: is this an unintended consequence of minimally invasive surgery? J Surg Educ. 2016;73(4):609–15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Klingensmith ME, Cogbill TH, Luchette F, Biester T, Samonte K, Jones A, et al. Factors influencing the decision of surgery residency graduates to pursue general surgery practice versus fellowship. Ann Surg. 2015;262(3):449–55; discussion 54-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Drake FT, Aarabi S, Garland BT, Huntington CR, McAteer JP, Richards MK, et al. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Surgery Resident Operative Logs: The Last Quarter Century. Ann Surg. 2017;265(5):923–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Philibert I, Nasca T, Brigham T, Shapiro J. Duty-hour limits and patient care and resident outcomes: can high-quality studies offer insight into complex relationships? Annu Rev Med. 2013;64:467–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rajaram R, Chung JW, Jones AT, Cohen ME, Dahlke AR, Ko CY, et al. Association of the 2011 ACGME resident duty hour reform with general surgery patient outcomes and with resident examination performance. JAMA. 2014;312(22):2374–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Patel MS, Volpp KG, Small DS, Hill AS, Even-Shoshan O, Rosenbaum L, et al. Association of the 2011 ACGME resident duty hour reforms with mortality and readmissions among hospitalized Medicare patients. JAMA. 2014;312(22):2364–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Ahmed N, Devitt KS, Keshet I, Spicer J, Imrie K, Feldman L, et al. A systematic review of the effects of resident duty hour restrictions in surgery: impact on resident wellness, training, and patient outcomes. Ann Surg. 2014;259(6):1041–53.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Rajaram R, Saadat L, Chung J, Dahlke A, Yang AD, Odell DD, et al. Impact of the 2011 ACGME resident duty hour reform on hospital patient experience and processes-of-care. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016;25(12):962–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bilimoria KY, Hoyt DB, Lewis F. Making the case for investigating flexibility in duty hour limits for surgical residents. JAMA Surg. 2015;150(6):503–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bilimoria KY, Chung JW, Hedges LV, Dahlke AR, Love R, Cohen ME, et al. Development of the flexibility in duty hour requirements for surgical trainees (FIRST) trial protocol: a national cluster-randomized trial of resident duty hour policies. JAMA Surg. 2016;151(3):273–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. •• Bilimoria KY, Chung JW, Hedges LV, Dahlke AR, Love R, Cohen ME, et al. National Cluster-Randomized Trial of Duty-Hour Flexibility in Surgical Training. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(8):713–7. A randomized controlled trial demonstrating no difference in patient outcomes and improved resident perceptions of patient safety, operative and educational opportunities with flexible duty hours as compared to 2011 standard ACGME duty hour regulations.

  17. Dahlke AR, Quinn CM, Chung JW, Bilimoria KY. Surgical residents’ work hours and well-being in year 2 of the FIRST trial. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(2):192–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bilimoria KY, Quinn CM, Dahlke AR, Kelz RR, Shea JA, Rajaram R, et al. Use and underlying reasons for duty hour flexibility in the flexibility in duty hour requirements for surgical trainees (FIRST) trial. J Am Coll Surg. 2017;224(2):118–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yang AD, Chung JW, Dahlke AR, Biester T, Quinn CM, Matulewicz RS, et al. Differences in resident perceptions by postgraduate year of duty hour policies: an analysis from the flexibility in duty hour requirements for surgical trainees (FIRST) trial. J Am Coll Surg. 2017;224(2):103–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Blay E Jr, Hewitt DB, Chung JW, Biester T, Fiore JF, Dahlke AR, et al. Association between flexible duty hour policies and general surgery resident examination performance: a flexibility in duty hour requirements for surgical trainees (FIRST) trial analysis. J Am Coll Surg. 2017;224(2):137–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. •• ACGME. 2017. Common Program Requirements http://acgme.org/Portals/0/PFAssets/ProgramRequirements/CPRs_2017-07-01.pdf. Significant changes to the requirements include more flexible work hours within the 80-hour limit and increased emphasis on patient safety, quality improvement, and well-being of both residents and faculty.

  22. ACGME. 2011. Common Program Requirements. https://www.acgme.org/Portals/0/PDFs/Common_Program_Requirements_07012011[2].pdf.

  23. ACGME. 2017. Program Requirements for Graduate Medical Education in General Surgery. http://acgme.org/Portals/0/PFAssets/ProgramRequirements/440_general_surgery_2017-07-01.pdf?ver=2017-05-25-084853-043.

  24. Training Requirements: The American Board of Surgery. 2017. www.absurgery.org/default.jsp?certgsqe_training.

  25. •• ACGME Defined Category Minimum Numbers: General Surgery. 2017. https://www.acgme.org/Portals/0/UPDATED_DEFINED_CATEGORY_MINIMUM_NUMBERS_EFFECTIVE_ACADEMIC_YEAR_2017-2018_GENERAL_SURGERY.pdf. Significant changes to the general surgery program requirements include faculty development in resident education and increased overall and specific case number requirements in defined categories.

  26. George BC, Teitelbaum EN, Meyerson SL, Schuller MC, DaRosa DA, Petrusa ER, et al. Reliability, validity, and feasibility of the Zwisch scale for the assessment of intraoperative performance. J Surg Educ. 2014;71(6):e90–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bohnen JD, George BC, Williams RG, Schuller MC, DaRosa DA, Torbeck L, et al. The feasibility of real-time intraoperative performance assessment with SIMPL (system for improving and measuring procedural learning): early experience from a Multi-Institutional Trial. J Surg Educ. 2016;73(6):e118–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Fryer JP, Teitelbaum EN, George BC, Schuller MC, Meyerson SL, Theodorou CM, et al. Effect of ongoing assessment of resident operative autonomy on the operating room environment. J Surg Educ. 2017;. doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.11.018.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sandhu G, Nikolian VC, Magas CP, Stansfield RB, Sutzko DC, Prabhu K, et al. OpTrust: validity of a tool assessing intraoperative entrustment behaviors. Ann Surg. 2017;. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000002235.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Cooney CM, Redett RJ 3rd, Dorafshar AH, Zarrabi B, Lifchez SD. Integrating the NAS Milestones and handheld technology to improve residency training and assessment. J Surg Educ. 2014;71(1):39–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Rekman J, Gofton W, Dudek N, Gofton T, Hamstra SJ. Entrustability scales: outlining their usefulness for competency-based clinical assessment. Acad Med. 2016;91(2):186–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Chen XP, Sullivan AM, Alseidi A, Kwakye G, Smink DS. Assessing residents’ readiness for OR autonomy: a qualitative descriptive study of expert surgical teachers’ best practices. J Surg Educ. 2017;. doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.06.034.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Perone JA, Fankhauser GT, Adhikari D, Mehta HB, Woods MB, Tyler DS, et al. It depends on your perspective: resident satisfaction with operative experience. Am J Surg. 2017;213(2):253–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Teman NR, Gauger PG, Mullan PB, Tarpley JL, Minter RM. Entrustment of general surgery residents in the operating room: factors contributing to provision of resident autonomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;219(4):778–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Torbeck L, Wilson A, Choi J, Dunnington GL. Identification of behaviors and techniques for promoting autonomy in the operating room. Surgery. 2015;158(4):1102–10 discussion 10-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Meyerson SL, Sternbach JM, Zwischenberger JB, Bender EM. The effect of gender on resident autonomy in the operating room. J Surg Educ. 2017;. doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.06.014.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Sandhu G, Magas CP, Robinson AB, Scally CP, Minter RM. Progressive entrustment to achieve resident autonomy in the operating room: a national qualitative study with general surgery faculty and residents. Ann Surg. 2017;265(6):1134–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Young KA, Lane SM, Widger JE, Neuhaus NM, Dove JT, Fluck M, et al. Characterizing the relationship between surgical resident and faculty perceptions of autonomy in the operating room. J Surg Educ. 2017;. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2017.08.046.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Kim SC, Fisher JG, Delman KA, Hinman JM, Srinivasan JK. Cadaver-based simulation increases resident confidence, initial exposure to fundamental techniques, and may augment operative autonomy. J Surg Educ. 2016;73(6):e33–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. D’Angelo AL, Cohen ER, Kwan C, Laufer S, Greenberg C, Greenberg J, et al. Use of decision-based simulations to assess resident readiness for operative independence. Am J Surg. 2015;209(1):132–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Cook MR, Deal SB, Scott JM, Moren AM, Kiraly LN. Teaching communication and supporting autonomy with a team-based operative simulator. Am J Surg. 2016;212(3):552–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Holmboe ES, Yamazaki K, Edgar L, Conforti L, Yaghmour N, Miller RS, et al. Reflections on the first 2 years of milestone implementation. J Grad Med Educ. 2015;7(3):506–11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. • The general surgery milestone project. J Grad Med Educ. 2014;6(1 Suppl 1):320–8. The ACGME created competency-based evaluations for residents, which evaluate residents on multiple milestones encompassing patient care, medical knowledge, systems-based practice, practice-based learning and improvement, professionalism, and interpersonal and communication skills.

  44. Drolet BC, Marwaha JS, Wasey A, Pallant A. Program director perceptions of the general surgery milestones project. J Surg Educ. 2017;. doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.02.012.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Watson RS, Borgert AJ, O’Heron CT, Kallies KJ, Sidwell RA, Mellinger JD, et al. A multicenter prospective comparison of the accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Milestones: Clinical Competency Committee vs. Resident Self-Assessment. J Surg Educ. 2017;. doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.06.009.

    Google Scholar 

  46. • Gardner AK, Scott DJ, Choti MA, Mansour JC. Developing a comprehensive resident education evaluation system in the era of milestone assessment. J Surg Educ. 2015;72(4):618–24. Pragmatic description of a single institution’s comprehensive structure to map available resident performance data to ACGME milestones.

  47. Ten Cate O. Nuts and bolts of entrustable professional activities. J Grad Med Educ. 2013;5(1):157–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Lomis K, Amiel JM, Ryan MS, Esposito K, Green M, Stagnaro-Green A, et al. Implementing an entrustable professional activities framework in undergraduate medical education: early lessons from the AAMC Core Entrustable Professional Activities for Entering Residency Pilot. Acad Med. 2017;92(6):765–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Brown DR, Warren JB, Hyderi A, Drusin RE, Moeller J, Rosenfeld M, et al. Finding a path to entrustment in undergraduate medical education: a progress report from the AAMC Core Entrustable Professional Activities for Entering Residency entrustment concept group. Acad Med. 2017;92(6):774–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. McBride CL, Rosenthal RJ, Brethauer S, DeMaria E, Kelly JJ, Morton JM, et al. Constructing a competency-based bariatric surgery fellowship training curriculum. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017;13(3):437–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. •• Ferguson PC, Kraemer W, Nousiainen M, Safir O, Sonnadara R, Alman B, et al. Three-year experience with an innovative, modular competency-based curriculum for orthopaedic training. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95(21):e166. Description of the University of Toronto Orthopedic Surgery residency program’s completely competency-based curriculum.

  52. Dwyer T, Wadey V, Archibald D, Kraemer W, Shantz JS, Townley J, et al. Cognitive and psychomotor entrustable professional activities: can simulators help assess competency in trainees? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016;474(4):926–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Nousiainen MT, McQueen SA, Ferguson P, Alman B, Kraemer W, Safir O, et al. Simulation for Teaching orthopaedic residents in a competency-based curriculum: do the benefits justify the increased costs? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016;474(4):935–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Lockyer J, Carraccio C, Chan MK, Hart D, Smee S, Touchie C, et al. Core principles of assessment in competency-based medical education. Med Teach. 2017;39(6):609–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Smith N, Harnett J, Furey A. Evaluating the reliability of surgical assessment methods in an orthopedic residency program. Can J Surg. 2015;58(5):299–304.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Ferguson PC, Caverzagie KJ, Nousiainen MT, Snell L, Collaborators I. Changing the culture of medical training: an important step toward the implementation of competency-based medical education. Med Teach. 2017;39(6):599–602.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Caverzagie KJ, Nousiainen MT, Ferguson PC, Ten Cate O, Ross S, Harris KA, et al. Overarching challenges to the implementation of competency-based medical education. Med Teach. 2017;39(6):588–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Nousiainen MT, Caverzagie KJ, Ferguson PC, Frank JR, Collaborators I. Implementing competency-based medical education: what changes in curricular structure and processes are needed? Med Teach. 2017;39(6):594–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Holmboe ES, Sherbino J, Englander R, Snell L, Frank JR, Collaborators I. A call to action: the controversy of and rationale for competency-based medical education. Med Teach. 2017;39(6):574–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR, 97239, USA

    Heather E. Hoops, Erin Maynard & Karen J. Brasel

Authors
  1. Heather E. Hoops
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Erin Maynard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Karen J. Brasel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karen J. Brasel.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical collection on Surgical Education.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hoops, H.E., Maynard, E. & Brasel, K.J. Training Surgeons in the Current US Healthcare System: A Review of Recent Changes in Resident Education. Curr Surg Rep 5, 32 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40137-017-0195-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40137-017-0195-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation