Skip to main content
Log in

Design and Performance of Protective Water Barrier Pillars for Underground Coal Mines in India—A Review

  • Review Paper
  • Published:
Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series D Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A reliable design of protective water barrier pillars is critically essential for safe operation in underground mine workings. Different approaches are applied for the design of such barrier pillars, but none of them have ever evolved as a standard. This paper presents the outcome of a literature review covering various aspects of protective water barrier pillar design, including its hydro-mechanical modeling. Width/height (w/h) ratio, cover depth, water head, permeability, and discontinuities have been identified as the critical parameters influencing the performance of such protective pillars. For a given water head and the depth of cover, a lower w/h ratio of the pillar can result in an increased seepage from the pillars and inundation hazard in the worst condition. The review shows that in-depth research is required for an improved understanding of the mechanism of water flow and the failure of such pillars. This will not only help in assessing the adequacy of existing pillars but also in forming guidelines for the design of new protective pillars based on an updated knowledge base and improved understanding of the subject.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. B. Job, Inrushes at British collieries: 1851 to 1970. Colliery Guardian;(United Kingdom), 235(5):192–199. (1987)

  2. R.N. Singh, A.S. Atkins, Design considerations for mine workings under accumulations of water. Int. J. Mine Water 1(4), 35–56 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. B. Yao, H. Bai, B. Zhang, Numerical simulation on the risk of roof water inrush in Wuyang Coal Mine. Int. J. Min. Sci. Technol. 22(2), 273–277 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmst.2012.03.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. S. Yin, J. Zhang, D. Liu, A study of mine water inrushes by measurements of in situ stress and rock failures. Nat. Hazards 79(3), 1961–1979 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1941-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. M.D. Bunnell, Design and performance of a longwall coal mine water-barrier pillar. (2010) https://www.agapito.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Design-and-Performance-of-a-Longwall-Coal-Mine-Water-Barrier-Pillar.pdf

  6. Y. Luo, S.S. Peng, Y.Q. Zhang, Simulation of water seepage through and stability of coal mine barrier pillars. Trans.-Soc. Min. Metall. Explor. Inc. 310, 142–147 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  7. C. Louis, A study of groundwater flow in jointed rock and its influence on stability of rock mass. Imp. Coll. Rock Mech. Rep. 10, 49 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  8. C.E. Neuzil, How permeable are clays and shales? Water Resour. Res. 30(2), 145–150 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1029/93WR02930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. B.H.G. Brady, E. Brown, Rock Mechanics for underground mining: Third edition. (2006) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2116-9

  10. N. Barton, S. Bandis, K. Bakhtar, Strength, deformation and conductivity coupling of rock joints. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr. 22(3), 121–140 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(85)93227-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. R.N. Singh, S. Hibberd, R.J. Fawcett, Studies in the prediction of water inflows to longwall mine workings. Int. J. Mine Water 5(2), 29–45 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02551533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. W.C. Zhu, C.H. Wei, Numerical simulation on mining-induced water inrushes related to geologic structures using a damage-based hydromechanical model. Environ. Earth Sci. 62(1), 43–54 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. E.R. Likhachev, Dependence of Water Viscosity on Temperature and Pressure. Technical Physics, 48(4). (2003) https://doi.org/10.1134/1.1568496

  14. Zs Kesseru Water Barrier Pillars. IMWA proceedings 1982B:91-117 (1982)

  15. F. Wang, N. Liang, G. Li, Damage and failure evolution mechanism for coal pillar dams affected by water immersion in underground reservoirs. Geofluids (2019). https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/29856914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. G.S. Esterhuizen, Investigations into the effect of discontinuities on the strength of coal pillars. Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 97(2):57–61. (1997) https://hdl.handle.net/10520/AJA0038223X_2433

  17. F. Wang, C. Zhang, N. Liang, Gas permeability evolution mechanism and comprehensive gas drainage technology for thin coal seam mining. Energies 10(9), 1382 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3390/en10091382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. T.P. Medhurst, E.T. Brown, A study of the mechanical behaviour of coal for pillar design. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 35(8), 1087–1105 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-9062(98)00168-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Y. Zhou, G. Zhang, S. Wu, L. Zhang, The effect of flaw on rock mechanical properties under the Brazilian test. Kuwait Journal of Science, 45(2):94–103. (2018) https://journalskuwait.org/kjs/index.php/KJS/article/view/3442/266

  20. B.J. Madden, An investigation into the factors affecting the strength of pillars in South African coal mines (Doctoral dissertation). (1990) http://hdl.handle.net/10539/9056

  21. Z.T. Bieniawski, W.L. Van Heerden, The significance of in situ tests on large rock specimens. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr. 12(4), 101–113 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(75)90004-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Itasca, U. UDEC—Universal Distinct Element Code. Itasca Consulting Group Inc., Minneapolis. (2011) https://www.itascacg.com/software/udec

  23. E. Detournay, A.D. Cheng, Poroelastic response of a borehole in a non-hydrostatic stress field. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr. 25(3), 171–182 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(88)92299-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. J. Zhang, W.B. Standifird, J.C. Roegiers, Y. Zhang, Stress-dependent fluid flow and permeability in fractured media: from lab experiments to engineering applications. Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 40(1), 3–21 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-006-0103-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. E. Esterhuizen, C. Mark, M.M. Murphy, Numerical model calibration for simulating coal pillars, gob and overburden response. In Proceeding of the 29th international conference on ground control in mining, Morgantown, WV: 46–57. (2010) https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/mining%5C/UserFiles/works/pdfs/nmcfs.pdf

  26. A. Jaiswal, B.K. Shrivastva, Numerical simulation of coal pillar strength. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 46(4), 779–788 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2008.11.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. L. Chen, X. Feng, W. Xie, W. Zeng, Z. Zheng, Using a fluid–solid coupled numerical simulation to determine a suitable size for barrier pillars when mining shallow coal seams beneath an unconsolidated, confined aquifer. Mine Water Environ. 36(1), 67–77 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10230-016-0404-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Z.T. Li, Q.M. Li, H. Zhang, Integrated physical detection technology in complicated surface subsidence area of mining area. Kuwait Journal of Science, 47(1):86–96. (2020) https://journalskuwait.org/kjs/index.php/KJS/article/view/5864/364

  29. U.B. Nisar et al., Groundwater investigations in the Hattar industrial estate and its vicinity, Haripur district, Pakistan: an integrated approach. Kuwait J. Sci. 48(1), 106–115 (2021). https://doi.org/10.48129/kjs.v48i1.7820

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. F.S. Kendorski, Effect of high-extraction coal mining on surface and ground waters. In Proceedings, 12th international conference on ground control in mining. (1993)

  31. K.J. McCoy, J.J. Donovan, B.R. Leavitt, Estimation of hydraulic conductivity of coal mine barriers, pittsburgh coal, northern west virginia, 1992. Proceedings America Society of Mining and Reclamation:1218–1226. (2004)

  32. A. Galav, R. Kumar, G.S.P. Singh, S.K. Sharma, Numerical Simulation of Water Flow Through a Protective Barrier Pillar in Underground Coal Mines. In 5th ISRM Young Scholars' Symposium on Rock Mechanics and International Symposium on Rock Engineering for Innovative Future. International Society for Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering. (2019) https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341029781_Numerical_Simulation_of_Water_Flow_through_a_Protective_Barrier_Pillar_in_Underground_Coal_Mines

  33. M.N. Das, Influence of width/height ratio on post-failure behaviour of coal. Int. J. Min. Geol. Eng. 4, 79–87 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01553759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. B.A. Poulsen et al., Strength reduction on saturation of coal and coal measures rocks with implications for coal pillar strength. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 71, 41–52 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2014.06.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Z.F. Liu, T.H. Kang, W. Lu, L. Gao, Experiment on water injection affected to mechanics features of coal body. Coal Sci. Technol. 38(1), 17–19 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  36. H.F. Guo Research of Coal and Rock Damage Weakening Under the Action of Water Pressure [Ph.D. thesis]. Xi'an University of Science and Technology. (2010)

  37. DGMS Directorate General of Mines Safety Circulars, Technical Circular No. 2, India. (1993)

  38. DGMS Directorate General of Mines Safety Circulars, Technical Circular No. 5, India. (2003)

  39. DGMS Directorate General of Mines Safety Circulars, Technical Circular No. 4, India. (2005)

  40. DGMS Directorate General of Mines Safety Circulars, Technical Circular No. 6, India. (2006)

  41. K. Whitworth, Review of the Diglake Colliery Disaster in Respect of the Proposed Great Oak Surface Mining. staffordshire.gov.uk (Report). WYG Engineering. (2013)

  42. Annual Report of the Golden School of Mines for:60. (1889) https://historicjeffco.files.wordpress.com/2014/12/2004hjbloemwhiteash.pdf

  43. Report of the Inspectors of Coal Mines of the Anthracite Coal Regions of Pennsylvania:150–152. (1891)

  44. Report of the Inspectors of Coal Mines of the Anthracite Coal Regions of Pennsylvania:248–250. (1892)

  45. Report of the Inspectors of Coal Mines of the Anthracite Coal Regions of Pennsylvania (11):235–239. (1898)

  46. Mine Inspector Report Redding Colliery. Link: http://www.scottishmining.co.uk/240.html (1923)

  47. Report Montagu colliery inrush Link: (1925) https://www.nmrs.org.uk/mines-map/accidents-disasters/northumberland/montagu-colliery-inrush-scotswood-1925/

  48. V.S. Vutukuri, R.N. Singh, Mine inundation-case histories. Mine Water Environ. 14(1), 107–130 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02914857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. A.K. Dash, R.M. Bhattacharjee, P.S. Paul, Lessons learnt from Indian inundation disasters: an analysis of case studies. Int. J Disaster Risk Reduct. 20, 93–102 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.10.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. DGMS Directorate General of Mines Safety, The Coal Mines Regulations (CMR), India. (2017)

  51. M.D. Ingraham, S.J. Bauer, K.A. Issen, T.A. Dewers, Evolution of permeability and biot coefficient at high mean stresses in high porosity sandstone. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 96, 1–10 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2017.04.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors of this paper are grateful for the library service rendered by the Indian Institute of Technology (Banaras Hindu University), Varanasi, for this work. The authors express their gratitude to all the mines for their assistance. The author’s opinions and conclusions are of their own, and not necessarily of the organization they serve.

Funding

No.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The conceptual framework and design of the paper were prepared by the second author. The first author conducted the literature search and data analysis and prepared the initial draft of the manuscript. The third author reviewed the work and offered suggestions for improvements. All authors have given their approval for the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. S. P. Singh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Galav, A., Singh, G.S.P. & Sharma, S.K. Design and Performance of Protective Water Barrier Pillars for Underground Coal Mines in India—A Review. J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. D 102, 539–547 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40033-021-00286-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40033-021-00286-x

Keywords

Navigation