Skip to main content
Log in

Grain Boundary Detection and Phase Segmentation of SEM Ferrite–Pearlite Microstructure Using SLIC and Skeletonization

  • Original Contribution
  • Published:
Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series D Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we report an efficient segmentation and grain boundary detection process using modern image processing operators like simple linear iterative clustering and skeletonization. Accurate phase segmentation is the major requirement for any phase identification and quantification operations. The proposed image processing methods have been experimented on the in-house generated 48 scanning electron microscopy (SEM) microstructures obtained from plain carbon steel samples containing 0.1, 0.22, 0.35 and 0.48 wt%C and have been subjected to both annealing and normalizing treatments. The microstructures for dataset have been captured in SEM using secondary electron mode over a wide range of magnification × 500–× 5000. The experimental results significantly validate the segmentation of ferrite and pearlite regions. Also, the grain boundary detection results appear to be plausibly effective in case of ferrite–ferrite and ferrite–pearlite boundaries. However, the grain boundary detection efficiency is found to be relatively poor in case of pearlite–pearlite boundary. The overall performance of the proposed image processing technique in context of ferrite–pearlite steel SEM images shows promising results in all circumstances of compositional range, heat treatment and magnification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The raw/processed data required to reproduce these findings cannot be shared at this time as the data also form part of an ongoing study.

References

  1. D.A. Linkens, Y.Y. Yang, M. Chen, M.F. Abbod, A comparative study of neural and fuzzy algorithms for prediction of properties in steel processing. IFAC Proc. 33, 283–288 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-6670(17)37007-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. P.J. García Nieto, E. García-Gonzalo, J.C. Álvarez Antón, V.M. González Suárez, R. Mayo Bayón, F. Mateos Martín, A comparison of several machine learning techniques for the centerline segregation prediction in continuous cast steel slabs and evaluation of its performance. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 330, 877–895 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2017.02.031

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. S. Krajewski, J. Nowacki, Dual-phase steels microstructure and properties consideration based on artificial intelligence techniques. Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng. 14, 278–286 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acme.2013.10.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. S.J. Lee, J.P. Yun, G. Koo, S.W. Kim, End-to-end recognition of slab identification numbers using a deep convolutional neural network. Knowl. Based Syst. 132, 1–10 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2017.06.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. B.L. DeCost, B. Lei, T. Francis, E.A. Holm, High throughput quantitative metallography for complex microstructures using deep learning: a case study in ultrahigh carbon steel. Microsc. Microanal. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1017/s1431927618015635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. F. Zhang, A. Ruimi, D.P. Field, Phase identification of dual-phase (DP980) steels by electron backscatter diffraction and nanoindentation techniques. Microsc. Microanal. 22, 99–107 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1017/s1431927615015779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. J.P. Papa, C.R. Pereira, V.H.C. De Albuquerque, C.C. Silva, A.X. Falcão, J.M.R.S. Tavares, Precipitates segmentation from scanning electron microscope images through machine learning techniques, in Lecture Notes Computer Science (LNCS) (Including Subseries Lecture Notes Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes Bioinformatics), vol. 6636 (2011), pp. 456–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21073-0_40

  8. J. Ling, M. Hutchinson, E. Antono, B. DeCost, E.A. Holm, B. Meredig, Building data-driven models with microstructural images: generalization and interpretability. Mater. Discov. 10, 19–28 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.md.2018.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. B.L. Decost, E.A. Holm, A computer vision approach for automated analysis and classification of microstructural image data. Comput. Mater. Sci. 110, 126–133 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2015.08.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. M.D. Hecht, B.A. Webler, Y.N. Picard, Digital image analysis to quantify carbide networks in ultrahigh carbon steels. Mater. Charact. 117, 134–143 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2016.04.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. A. Chowdhury, E. Kautz, B. Yener, D. Lewis, Image driven machine learning methods for microstructure recognition. Comput. Mater. Sci. 123, 176–187 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2016.05.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. S. Banerjee, S.K. Ghosh, S. Datta, S.K. Saha, Segmentation of dual phase steel micrograph: an automated approach. Meas. J. Int. Meas. Confed. 46, 2435–2440 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2013.04.057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. G.F. Vander Voort, Metallography: Principles and Practice, Metallography (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1985). https://doi.org/10.1016/0026-0800(85)90051-5

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. R. Achanta, A. Shaji, K. Smith, A. Lucchi, P. Fua, S. Sabine, Slic 6(2011), 1–8 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. E. Nhancement, A Comparative study of histogram equalization based image enhancement techniques for brightness preservation and contrast. Signal Image Process. Int. J. 4, 11–25 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  16. N. Otsu, A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 9(1), 62–66 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1979.4310076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. R.K. Pandey, S.S. Mathurkar, A review on morphological filter and its implementation. Int. J. Sci. Res. 6, 69–72 (2017). https://doi.org/10.21275/art20163953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. P. SrinivasaRao, M. Madhavi Latha, Generalized algorithm for two dimensional digital image skeletonization. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 95, 9–12 (2014). https://doi.org/10.5120/16565-6230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. H.K.D.H. Bhadeshia, Physical metallurgy of steels, in Physical Metallurgy, 5th edn., ed. by D.E. Laughlin, K. Hono (Newnes, London, 2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-444-53770-6.00021-6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. R.W. Cahn, P. Haasen, Physical Metallurgy, vol. 1 (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1996)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Subhas Ganguly.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gupta, S., Sarkar, J., Banerjee, A. et al. Grain Boundary Detection and Phase Segmentation of SEM Ferrite–Pearlite Microstructure Using SLIC and Skeletonization. J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. D 100, 203–210 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40033-019-00194-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40033-019-00194-1

Keywords

Navigation