Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cattle Recognition: A New Frontier in Visual Animal Biometrics Research

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section A: Physical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Visual animal biometrics is an emerging research field of computer vision, pattern recognition, and cognitive science. Recently, cattle recognition has played a significant role in understanding, controlling and the outbreak of critical diseases, vaccination, production management, traceability, and ownership assignment of a livestock animal. The traditional animal recognition methodologies, such as ear-tagging, freeze-branding, ear-tattoos, embedded microchips, ear tips or notches-based, and electrical-based marking approaches, have been applied to recognize individual livestock animal. However, standard animal recognition procedures are invasive. The performance of conventional methods is not good due to their vulnerability to losses, easy duplication, and fraud of embedded tag number. These are major security issues and challenges for the identification of cattle throughout the world. Visual animal biometric systems are gaining more proliferations due to widespread applications to recognize individual cattle based on their primary biometric muzzle point image characteristics. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive review of cattle recognition and tracking from non-biometric recognition approaches (classical animal recognition methods) to visual animal biometric systems using muzzle point image pattern along with measurements and interpretations based on current state-of-the-art methods. Moreover, this paper demonstrates the basic deployment of the animal biometric system to uniquely identify the animals using their biometric characteristics. This study can hopefully encourage new multidisciplinary researchers and scientists to provide excellent efforts for the designing and development of adequate algorithms for solving the classification and recognition problems. The literature review is followed by the presentation of references for more details, incorporating applications and current trends.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kühl HS, Burghardt T (2013) Animal biometrics: quantifying and detecting phenotypic appearance. Trends Ecol Evol 28(7):432–441

    Google Scholar 

  2. Duyck J, Finn C, Hutcheon A, Vera P, Salas J, Ravela S (2015) Sloop: a pattern retrieval engine for individual animal identification. Pattern Recogn 48(4):1059–1073

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kumar S, Tiwari S, Singh SK (2016) Face recognition of cattle: can it be done? Proc Natl Acad Sci India Sect A Phys Sci 86(2):137–148

    Google Scholar 

  4. Noviyanto A, Arymurthy AM (2016) Beef cattle identification based on muzzle pattern using a matching refinement technique in the sift method. Comput Electron Agric 99:77–84

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kumar S, Singh SK, Dutta T, Gupta HP (2016) Poster: a real-time cattle recognition system using wireless multimedia networks. In: Proceedings of the 14th annual international conference on mobile systems, applications, and services companion, Singapore, p 48

  6. Edwin A, Mary G (2016) Fuzzy noise extraction from muzzle images for cattle identification. Int J Res Educ Sci Methods (IJARESM) 4(7):367–371

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wardrope DD (2009) Problems with the use of ear tags in cattle. Vet Rec (United Kingdom) 37(26):675

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jarraya I, Wael O, Adel MA (2015) A preliminary investigation on horses recognition using facial texture features. In: Proceeding of IEEE international conference on systems, man, and cybernetics (SMC), pp 2803–2808

  9. Awad AI (2016) From classical methods to animal biometrics: a review on cattle identification and tracking. Comput Electron Agric 123:423–435

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kumar S, Singh SK, Datta T, Gupta HP (2016) A fast cattle recognition system using smart devices. In: Proceedings of the ACM conference on multimedia, pp 742–743

  11. Petersen WE (1922) The identification of the bovine by means of nose-prints. J Dairy Sci 5(3):249–258

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pennington JA (2012) Tattooing of cattle and goats, University of Arkansas, United States Department of Agriculture, and County Governments Cooperating

  13. Jain AK, Ross A, Prabhakar S (2004) An introduction to biometric recognition. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Video Technol 14(1):4–20

    Google Scholar 

  14. Karu K, Jain AK (1996) Fingerprint classification. Pattern Recogn 29(3):389–404

    Google Scholar 

  15. Johnston AM, Edwards DS (1996) Welfare implications of identification of cattle by ear tags. Vet Rec 138(25):612–614

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lahiri, M, Chayant T, Rosemary W, Daniel IR, Berger-Wolf TY (2006) Biometric animal databases from field photographs: Identification of individual zebra in the wild. In: Proceedings of the 1st ACM international conference on multimedia retrieval, p 6

  17. Hiby L, Lovell P (1990) Computer-aided matching of natural markings: a prototype system for grey seals. In: Report of the International Whaling Commission, pp 57–61

  18. Hiby L, Phil L, Patil N, Samba KN, Gopalaswamy AM, Karanth KU (2009) A tiger cannot change its stripes: using a three-dimensional model to match images of living tigers and tiger skins. Biol Let 5(3):383–386

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kelly Marcella J (2001) Computer-aided photograph matching in studies using individual identification: an example from Serengeti cheetahs. J Mammal 82:440–449

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hadad El, Hagar M, Hamdi AM, Farid AM (2015) Bovines muzzle classification based on machine learning techniques. Procedia Comput Sci 65:864–871

    Google Scholar 

  21. Minagawa H, Fujimura T, Ichiyanagi M, Tanaka K, Fangquan M (2002) Identification of beef cattle by analyzing images of their muzzle patterns lifted on paper, In AFITA 2002: Asian agricultural information technology & management. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Asian conference for information technology in agriculture, pp. 596–600

  22. Barry B, Barron UG, McDonnell K, Butler F, Ward S (2008) Using muzzle pattern recognition as a biometric approach for cattle identification. Trans ASABE 50(3):1073–1080

    Google Scholar 

  23. SallyA Mizroch, Harkness S (2003) A test of computer-assisted matching using the North Pacific humpback whale, Megaptera novaeangliae, tail flukes photograph collection. Mar Fish Rev 65:25–37

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jain A, Maltoni D, Maio D, Wayman J (2005) Biometric systems: technology, design and performance evaluation. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  25. Barron Ursula G, Butler F, McDonnell K, Ward S (2009) The end of the identity crisis? Advances in biometric markers for animal identification. Ir Vet J 62(3):204–208

    Google Scholar 

  26. Burghardt T, Calic J (2006) Real-time face detection and tracking of animals. In: Proceedings of 8th IEEE seminar on neural network applications in electrical engineering, pp 27–32

  27. Geers R, Puers B, Goedseels V, Wouters P (1997) Electronic identification, monitoring and tracking of animals. CAB International, Oxford, pp 25–38

    Google Scholar 

  28. Vlad M, Parvulet RA, Vlad MS (2012) A survey of livestock identification systems. In: Proceedings of 13th WSEAS international conference on automation and information (ICAI), pp 165–170

  29. Kumar S, Singh SK (2015) Feature selection and recognition of face by using hybrid chaotic PSO-BFO and appearance-based recognition algorithm. Int J Nat Comput Res (IJNCR) 5(3):26–53

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wang Z, Fu Z, Chen Wei HuJ (2010) A RFID-based traceability system for cattle breeding in China. Proc Int Conf Comput Appl Syst Model (ICCASM) 2:V2–V567

    Google Scholar 

  31. Allen A, Golden BL, Taylor M, Skuce R (2008) Evaluation of retinal imaging technology for the biometric identification of bovine animals in Northern Ireland. Livest Sci 116(1):42–52

    Google Scholar 

  32. Tillett RD, Onyango CM, Marchant JA (1997) Using model-based image processing to track animal movements. Comput Electron Agric 17(2):249–261

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kumar S, Tiwari S, Singh SK (2015) Face recognition for cattle. In: Proceeding of 3rd IEEE international conference on image information processing (ICIIP), pp 65–72

  34. Rusk CP, Blomeke CC, Mark Balschweid, Elliot SJ, Dan Baker (2012) An evaluation of retinal imaging technology for 4-H beef and sheep identification. J Ext 44(5):1–33

    Google Scholar 

  35. Shadduck JA, Golden BL (2002) Retinal imaging in secure identification and source verification of livestock. In: Proceedings ID/INFO Expo 2002, National Institute for Animal Agriculture

  36. Barron UG, Corkery Barry B, Butler F, McDonnell K, Ward S (2002) Assessment of retinal recognition technology as a biometric method for sheep identification. Comput Electron Agric 60(2):156–166

    Google Scholar 

  37. Adell N, Puig P, Rojas-Olivares A, Gerard Caja, Sergi Carné, Ahmed Salama (2012) A bivariate model for retinal image identification in lambs. Comput Electron Agric 87:108–112

    Google Scholar 

  38. Awad AI, Zawbaa HM, Mahmoud Hossam A, Nabi EH, Fayed Rabie Hassan, Hassanien AE (2013) A robust cattle identification scheme using muzzle print images. In: Proceedings of IEEE federated conference on computer science and information systems (FedCSIS), pp 529–534

  39. Gaber T, Tharwat A, Hassanien AE, Snasel V (2016) Biometric cattle identification approach based on Weber’s Local Descriptor and AdaBoost classifier. Comput Electron Agric 122:55–66

    Google Scholar 

  40. Lowe DG (1999) Object recognition from local scale-invariant features. In: Proceedings of the 7th IEEE international conference on computer vision, vol 2, pp 1150–1157

  41. Baranov AS, Graml R, Pirchner F, Schmid DO (1993) Breed differences and intra-breed genetic variability of a dermatoglyphic pattern of cattle. J Anim Breed Genet 110(1–6):385–395

    Google Scholar 

  42. Mishra S, Tomer OS, Kalm E (1995) Muzzle dermatoglypics: a new method to identify bovines. Asian Livestock (FAO)

  43. Kumar S, Singh SK (2014) Biometric recognition for pet animal. J Softw Eng Appl 7(5):470–482

    Google Scholar 

  44. Daugman J (2009) How iris recognition works. In: The essential guide to image processing. Academic Press, pp 715–739

  45. Kumar S, Singh SK (2016) Feature selection and recognition of muzzle point image pattern of cattle by using hybrid chaos bfo and pso algorithms. In: Advances in Chaos theory and intelligent control. Springer, Cham, pp 719–751

    Google Scholar 

  46. Bay H, Ess A, Tuytelaars T, Van Gool L (2008) Speeded-up robust features (SURF). Comput Vis Image Underst 110(3):346–359

    Google Scholar 

  47. Turk Matthew A, Pentland AP (1991) Face recognition using eigenfaces. In: Proceedings of IEEE computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 586–591

  48. Tharwat A, Gaber T, Hassanien AE (2014) Cattle identification based on muzzle images using Gabor features and SVM classifier. In: Proceedings of international conference on advanced machine learning technologies and applications, pp 236–247

  49. Cai C, Li J (2013) Cattle face recognition using local binary pattern descriptor. In: Proceeding of IEEE, annual summit and conference on signal and information processing association (APSIPA), Asia-Pacific, pp 1–4

  50. Mishra S, Dubey A, Khune V (2011) Muzzle print characteristics of pure bred Sahiwal. Indian Vet J 88(12):20–21

    Google Scholar 

  51. Ahonen T, Hadid A, Pietikainen M (2006) Face description with local binary patterns: application to face recognition. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 28:2037–2041

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  52. Kim HT, Ikeda Y, Choi HL (2005) The identification of Japanese black cattle by their faces. Asian-Aust J Anim Sci 18(6):868–872

    Google Scholar 

  53. Noviyanto A, Arymurthy AM (2012) Automatic cattle identification based on muzzle photo using speed-up robust features approach. In Proceedings of the 3rd European conference of computer science (ECCS), vol 110, p 114

  54. Arslan AC, Akar M, Alagöz F (2014) 3D cow identification in cattle farms. In: Proceedings of IEEE signal processing and communications applications conference (SIU), pp 1347–1350

  55. Mahmoud HA, Hadad HM (2015) An automatic cattle muzzle print classification system using multiclass support vector machine. Int J Image Min 1(1):126–140

    Google Scholar 

  56. El-Henawy I, El Bakry HM, El Hadad HM (2016) Cattle identification using segmentation-based fractal texture analysis and artificial neural networks. Int J Electron Inf Eng 4(2):82–93

    Google Scholar 

  57. Weeks PJ, O’Neill MA, Gaston KJ, Gauld ID (1999) Automating insect identification: exploring the limitations of a prototype system. J Appl Entomol 123:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  58. Kumar S, Singh SK (2016) Hybrid BFO and PSO swarm intelligence approach for biometric feature optimization. Int J Swarm Intell Res (IJSIR) 7(2):36–62

    Google Scholar 

  59. Belhumeur PN, Hespanha JP, Kriegman DJ (1997) Eigenfaces vs. fisher faces: recognition using class specific linear projection. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 19(7):711–720

    Google Scholar 

  60. Bartlett MS, Movellan JR, Sejnowski TJ (2002) Face recognition by independent component analysis. IEEE Trans Neural Networks 13(6):1450–1464

    Google Scholar 

  61. Kumar S, Singh SK (2016) Monitoring of pet animal in smart cities using animal biometrics. Future Gener Comput Syst 83:553–563

    Google Scholar 

  62. Kumar S, Singh SK (2017) Automatic identification of cattle using muzzle point pattern: a hybrid feature extraction and classification paradigm. Multimed Tools Appl 76(24):26551–26580

    Google Scholar 

  63. Kumar S, Singh SK (2016) Visual animal biometrics: survey. IET Biom 6(3):139–156

    Google Scholar 

  64. Shanahan C, Kernan B, Ayalew G, McDonnell K, Butler F, Ward S (2009) A framework for beef traceability from farm to slaughter using global standards: an Irish perspective. J Comput Electron Agric 66(1):62–69

    Google Scholar 

  65. Worapan K, Anuwat W, Udom C, Sarattha K, Thanandon I (2018) Automatic cattle identification based on fusion of texture features extracted from muzzle images. In: Proceeding of IEEE international conference on industrial technology (ICIT), pp 1484–1489

  66. Kumar Santosh, Amit Pandey K, Satwik Sai Ram, Kumar Sunil, Singh Sanjay Kumar, Singh Amit Kumar, Mohan Anand (2018) Deep learning framework for recognition of cattle using muzzle point image pattern. Measurement 116:1–17

    Google Scholar 

  67. Kumar S, Singh SK, Singh RS, Singh AK, Tiwari S (2017) Real-time cattle recognition using animal biometrics. J Real-Time Image Process 13(3):505–526

    Google Scholar 

  68. Loos A, Ernst A (2013) An automated chimpanzee identification system using face detection and recognition. EURASIP J Video Process 2013(1):49

    Google Scholar 

  69. Kumar S, Singh SK, Singh AK (2017) Muzzle point pattern-based techniques for individual cattle identification. IET Image Process 11:805–814

    Google Scholar 

  70. Kumar S, Singh SK, Singh AK, Tiwari S, Singh RS (2018) Privacy preserving security using biometrics in cloud computing. Multimed Tools Appl 77(9):11017–11039

    Google Scholar 

  71. Kumar S, Singh SK (2016) Visual animal biometrics: a survey. IET Biom 6(3):139–156

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Dr.SPM IIIT, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh, 493661, India

    Santosh Kumar

  2. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (Banaras Hindu University (B.H.U), Varanasi, 221005, India

    Sanjay Kumar Singh

Authors
  1. Santosh Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sanjay Kumar Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Santosh Kumar.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, S., Singh, S.K. Cattle Recognition: A New Frontier in Visual Animal Biometrics Research. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., India, Sect. A Phys. Sci. 90, 689–708 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40010-019-00610-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40010-019-00610-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation