Skip to main content
Log in

Physio-Morphological Characterization of Interspecific Hybridization-Derived Hull-Less Seeded Lines for Fruit and Seed Traits in Pumpkin

  • FULL-LENGTH RESEARCH ARTICLE
  • Published:
Agricultural Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hull-less seed trait is readily available in Cucurbita pepo, but to enhance its yield in diverse climatic conditions transfer of this trait in another related species, viz. C. moschata, is highly desirable. Consequently, a set of total 33 hull-less seeded genotypes including 31 derived from interspecific hybridization between C. pepo (hull-less) and C. moschata (hulled), and two C. pepo genotypes were evaluated for various fruit and seed traits. Analysis of variance revealed significant variation among the genotypes for fruit (fruit weight, polar and equatorial diameter) and seed (seed length, width, thickness, number of seeds, and 100-seed weight) traits. An interspecific hybridization-derived genotype, viz. HL3643-6, was comparable to check C. pepo genotypes for most of the traits. All studied traits exhibited high heritability and genetic advance, with a significant positive correlation confirming their interrelationship. Principal component analysis indicated that the first two components contributed to 82.66% of the cumulative variance, with all eight traits contributing to PC1 and seed thickness along with hundred-seed weight being the major contributors to PC2. Overall, the investigation highlighted substantial variation in the interspecific derived lines and their potential for exploitation in improving the hull-less seed trait.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahmed I, Rohman MM, Hossain MA, Molla MR, Azam MG, Hasan MM, Gaber A, Albogami B, Hossain A (2022) A study on the phenotypic variation of 103 cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) landraces for the development of desirable cultivars suitable for the changing climate. Life 12:1235. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12081235

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Aruah BC, Uguru MI, Oyiga BC (2012) Genetic variability and inter-relationship among some Nigerian pumpkin accessions (Cucurbita spp.). Int J Plant Breed 6:34–41

    Google Scholar 

  3. Balkaya A, Özbakır M, Karaağaç O (2010) Pattern of variation for seed characteristics in Turkish populations of Cucurbita moschata Duch. African J Agric Res 5:1068–1076. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR.9000529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bhandari HR, Bhanu AN, Srivastava K, Singh MN, Shreya HA (2017) Assessment of genetic diversity in crop plants: an overview. Adv Plants Agric Res 7:279–286. https://doi.org/10.15406/apar.2017.07.00255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Darrudi R, Nazeri V, Soltani F, Shokrpour M, Ercolano MR (2018) Genetic diversity of Cucurbita pepo L. and Cucurbita moschata Duchesne accessions using fruit and seed quantitative traits. J Appl Res Med Aromat Plants 8:60–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmap.2017.11.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dhatt AS, Sharma M, Kaur B (2020) Advances in improvement of pumpkin and squashes. In: Gosal SS, Wani SH (eds) Accelerated plant breeding. Springer, Nature, Switzerland, pp 301–335. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47298-6_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. El-Adawy TA, Taha KM (2001) Characteristics and composition of watermelon, pumpkin, and paprika seed oils and flours. J Agric Food Chem 49:1253–1259. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf001117+

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ezin V, Gbemenou UH, Ahanchede A (2022) Characterization of cultivated pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata Duchesne) landraces for genotypic variance, heritability and agro-morphological traits. Saudi J Biol Sci 29:3661–3674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2022.02.057

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Gong L, Paris HS, Stift G, Pachner M, Vollmann J, Lelley T (2013) Genetic relationships and evolution in Cucurbita as viewed with simple sequence repeat polymorphisms: the centrality of C. okeechobeensis. Genet Resour Crop Evol 60:1531–1546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-012-9940-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Habib A, Biswas S, Siddique AH, Manirujjaman M, Uddin B, Hasan S, Khan MMH, Uddin M, Islam M, Hasan M, Rahman M, Asaduzzaman M, Rahman M, Khatun M, Islam MA, Rahman M (2015) Nutritional and lipid composition analysis of pumpkin seed (Cucurbita maxima L.). J Nutr Food Sci 5:374

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hosen M, Rafii MY, Mazlan N, Jusoh M, Oladosu Y, Chowdhury M (2021) Pumpkin (Cucurbita spp.): a crop to mitigate food and nutritional challenges. Horticulturae 7:352. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7100352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hussain A, Kausar T, Sehar S, Sarwar A, Ashraf AH, Jamil MA, Noreen S, Rafique A, Iftikhar K, Quddoos MY, Aslam J (2022) A Comprehensive review of functional ingredients, especially bioactive compounds present in pumpkin peel, flesh and seeds, and their health benefits. Food Chem Adv. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.focha.2022.100067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kaur B, Garcha KS, Sandhu JS, Sharma M, Dhatt AS (2023) Interspecific hybridization for transfer of hull-less seed trait from Cucurbita pepo to C. moschata. Sci Rep 13(1):4627. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-29935-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Kaur B, Garcha KS, Bhatia D, Khosa JS, Sharma M, Mittal A, Verma N, Dhatt AS (2022) Identification of single major QTL and candidate gene(s) governing hull-less seed trait in pumpkin. Front Plant Sci 13:948106. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.948106

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Lê S, Josse J, Husson F (2008) FactoMineR: an R package for multivariate analysis. J Stat Software 25(1):1–18. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v025.i01

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee HY, Jang S, Yu CR, Kang BC, Chin JH, Song K (2021) Population structure and genetic diversity of Cucurbita moschata based on Genome-Wide High-Quality SNPs. Plants 10:56. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10010056

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lelley T, Loy JB, Murkovic M (2010) Breeding oil seed pumpkins. In: Vollmann J, Rajcan I (eds) Handbook of plant breeding, vol 4. Oil crops Springer, New York, pp 469–492

    Google Scholar 

  18. Liu C, Ge Y, Wang DJ, Li X, Yang XX, Cui CS, Qu SP (2013) Morphological and molecular diversity in a germplasm collection of seed pumpkin. Sci Hortic 154:8–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2013.02.015

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Loy JB (2004) Morpho-physiological aspects of productivity and quality in squash and pumpkins (Cucurbita spp.). CRC Crit Rev Plant Sci 23:337–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352680490490733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lyu X, Shi L, Zhao M, Li Z, Liao N, Meng Y, Ma Y, Zhou Y, Xue Q, Hu Z, Yang J (2022) A natural mutation of the NST1 gene arrests secondary cell wall biosynthesis in the seed coat of a hull-less pumpkin accession. Hortic Res 9:136. https://doi.org/10.1093/hr/uhac136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Manivannan N (2014) TNAUSTAT-Statistical package. Retrived from https://sites.google.com/site/tnaustat

  22. Meru G, Fu Y, Shrestha S, Michael VNE, Dorval M, Mainviel R (2022) Genomic position and markers associated with the hull-less seed trait in pumpkin. Plants 11:1238. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11091238

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Nee M (1990) The domestication of cucurbita (Cucurbitaceae). Econ Bot 44:56–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Noirot M, Hamon S, Anthony F (1996) The principal component scoring: a new method of constituting a core collection using quantitative data. Genet Resour Crop Evol 43:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00126934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Paris HS (2016) Genetic resources of pumpkins and squash Cucurbita spp. In: Grumet R, Katzir N, Garcia-Mas J (eds) Genetics and Genomics of Cucurbitaceae. Springer, Cham, pp 111–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/7397_2016_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Robinson RW, Decker-Walters DS (1997) Evolution and exploitation. In: Atherton J (ed) Cucurbits. CAB International, Oxon, UK, pp 23–77

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sivasubramanian S, Madhavamenon P (1973) Genotypic and phenotypic variability in rice. Madras Agric J 60:1093–1096

    Google Scholar 

  28. Swarup S, Cargill EJ, Crosby K, Flagel L, Kniskern J, Glenn KC (2021) Genetic diversity is indispensable for plant breeding to improve crops. Crop Sci 61:839–852. https://doi.org/10.1002/csc2.20377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wei T, Simko V, Levy M, Xie Y, Jin Y, Zemla J (2017) Package ‘corrplot.’ Statistician 56:e24

    Google Scholar 

  30. Yadegari M, Ansari MH (2017) Study of multivariate analysis of quantitative traits in Iranian pumpkin lines. Genetika 49:425–433. https://doi.org/10.2298/GENSR1702425Y

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge DST-SERB, CII, and Mr. Avtar Singh Dhindsa, Proprietor of Beauscape Farms for providing financial support though Prime Minister’s Fellowship for Doctoral Research to Karmvir Singh Garcha.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

ASD, MS, and JSK contributed to conceptualization and designing of the research work; KSG, NV, and BK contributed to execution of field experiments and data collection; KSG, NV, BK, MS, JSK, and ASD contributed to analysis of data, interpretation and preparation of manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ajmer Singh Dhatt.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 4567 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Garcha, K.S., Verma, N., Kaur, B. et al. Physio-Morphological Characterization of Interspecific Hybridization-Derived Hull-Less Seeded Lines for Fruit and Seed Traits in Pumpkin. Agric Res (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-024-00712-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-024-00712-y

Keywords

Navigation