Skip to main content
Log in

Atelocollagen Scaffold Enhances Cartilage Regeneration in Osteochondral Defects: A Study in Rabbits

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine Aims and scope

Abstract

Background:

To enhance articular cartilage healing, microfractures (Mfx) and bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) are commonly used, and some form of scaffold is often used together to increase its efficacy. Herein, we compared the efficacy of atelocollagen scaffold to that of collagen scaffold when used with Mfx or BMAC on osteochondral defect of animal.

Methods:

This experiment was designed in two stages, and therapeutic effects of Mfx and BMAC were respectively evaluated when used with atelocollagen or collagen scaffold. Femoral condyle defects were artificially created in male New Zealand White rabbits, and in each stage, 12 rabbits were randomly allocated into three treatment groups: test group with additional atelocollagen scaffold, the positive control group with collagen scaffold, and the negative control group. Then, for 12 weeks, macroscopic and histological evaluations were performed.

Results:

At 12 weeks, defects in the test group were fully regenerated with normal cartilage-like tissue, and were well integrated with the surrounding cartilage at both stages experiment, whereas defects in the control groups were not fully filled with regenerated tissue, and the tissue appeared as fibrous tissue. Histologically, the regenerated tissue in the test group showed a statistically significant improvement compared to the positive and negative control groups, achieving a similar structure as normal articular cartilage.

Conclusion:

The results showed that implantation of the atelocollagen scaffold enhanced cartilage regeneration following osteochondral defects in rabbits. This suggests that the atelocollagen scaffold can be used with Mfx or BMAC for effective regeneration of osteochondral defects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data presented in this study are available on request from all the authors.

References

  1. Gilbert JE. Current treatment options for the restoration of articular cartilage. Am J Knee Surg. 1998;11:42–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. McNickle AG, Provencher MT, Cole BJ. Overview of existing cartilage repair technology. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2008;16:196–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Stoddart MJ, Grad S, Eglin D, Alini M. Cells and biomaterials in cartilage tissue engineering. Regen Med. 2009;4:81–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Goldring MB, Otero M, Tsuchimochi K, Ijiri K, Li Y. Defining the roles of inflammatory and anabolic cytokines in cartilage metabolism. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008;67:iii75–82.

  5. Rodrigo JJ. Improvement of full-thickness chondral defect healing in the human knee after debridement and microfracture using continuous passive motion. Am J Knee Surg. 1994;7:109–16.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Knutsen G, Drogset JO, Engebretsen L, Grøntvedt T, Isaksen V, Ludvigsen TC, et al. A randomized trial comparing autologous chondrocyte implantation with microfracture: findings at five years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:2105–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kreuz PC, Steinwachs MR, Erggelet C, Krause SJ, Konrad G, Uhl M, et al. Results after microfracture of full-thickness chondral defects in different compartments in the knee. Osteoarthr Cartilage. 2006;14:1119–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Park YB, Ha CW, Rhim JH, Lee HJ. Stem cell therapy for articular cartilage repair: review of the entity of cell populations used and the result of the clinical application of each entity. Am J Sports Med. 2018;46:2540–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jäger M, Jelinek EM, Wess KM, Scharfstädt A, Jacobson M, Kevy SV, et al. Bone marrow concentrate: a novel strategy for bone defect treatment. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther. 2009;4:34–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wakitani S, Saito T, Caplan AI. Myogenic cells derived from rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells exposed to 5-azacytidine. Muscle Nerve. 1995;18:1417–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fortier LA, Nixon AJ, Williams J, Cable CS. Isolation and chondrocytic differentiation of equine bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Am J Vet Res. 1998;59:1182–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen FH, Tuan RS. Mesenchymal stem cells in arthritic diseases. Arthritis Res Ther. 2008;10:223.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Wilke MM, Nydam DV, Nixon AJ. Enhanced early chondrogenesis in articular defects following arthroscopic mesenchymal stem cell implantation in an equine model. J Orthop Res. 2007;25:913–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. O’Driscoll SW, Keeley FW, Salter RB. Durability of regenerated articular cartilage produced by free autogenous periosteal grafts in major full-thickness defects in joint surfaces under the influence of continuous passive motion. A follow-up report at one year. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988;70:595–606.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. O’Driscoll SW, Keeley FW, Salter RB. The chondrogenic potential of free autogenous periosteal grafts for biological resurfacing of major full-thickness defects in joint surfaces under the influence of continuous passive motion. An experimental investigation in the rabbit. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986;68:1017–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pineda S, Pollack A, Stevenson S, Goldberg V, Caplan A. A semiquantitative scale for histologic grading of articular cartilage repair. Acta Anat. 1992;143:335–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rutgers M, van Pelt MJ, Dhert WJ, Creemers LB, Saris DB. Evaluation of histological scoring systems for tissue-engineered, repaired and osteoarthritic cartilage. Osteoarthr Cartilage. 2010;18:12–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wakitani S, Goto T, Pineda SJ, Young RG, Mansour JM, Caplan AI, et al. Mesenchymal cell-based repair of large, full-thickness defects of articular cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994;76:579–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Madry H, Gao L, Eichler H, Orth P, Cucchiarini M. Bone marrow aspirate concentrate-enhanced marrow stimulation of chondral defects. Stem Cells Int. 2017;2017:1609685.

  20. Yang HS, La WG, Bhang SH, Kim HJ, Im GI, Lee H, et al. Hyaline cartilage regeneration by combined therapy of microfracture and long-term bone morphogenetic protein-2 delivery. Tissue Eng Part A. 2011;17:1809–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu XN, Yang CJ, Kim JE, Du ZW, Ren M, Zhang W, et al. Enhanced tendon-to-bone healing of chronic rotator cuff tears by bone marrow aspirate concentrate in a rabbit model. Clin Orthop Surg. 2018;10:99–110.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Fortier LA, Potter HG, Rickey EJ, Schnabel LV, Foo LF, Chong LR, et al. Concentrated bone marrow aspirate improves full-thickness cartilage repair compared with microfracture in the equine model. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:1927–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kuo AC, Rodrigo JJ, Reddi AH, Curtiss S, Grotkopp E, Chiu M. Microfracture and bone morphogenetic protein 7 (BMP-7) synergistically stimulate articular cartilage repair. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2006;14:1126–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ji-Chul Yoo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical statement

This study was approved by the ethics committee (Cellontech Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee [IACUC]) for animal experimentation and followed all institutional guidelines for the care and treatment of experimental animals (IACUC No. SC-IACUC-19-002/SC-IACUC-21-002).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yoo, JC., Kim, M.S., Sohn, S. et al. Atelocollagen Scaffold Enhances Cartilage Regeneration in Osteochondral Defects: A Study in Rabbits. Tissue Eng Regen Med 21, 329–339 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13770-023-00589-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13770-023-00589-y

Keywords

Navigation