Abstract
This study focused on the appearance of the most commonly used artificial sweeteners (acesulfame K, cyclamate, saccharin, and sucralose) in waste and discharged water and the evaluation of their possible negative effects on the water ecosystem. Samples of raw and treated wastewater were collected at the inflow and outflow of the Wastewater Treatment Plant in Brno-Modřice (Czech Republic). The target compounds were isolated by solid phase extraction and determined by liquid chromatography with mass spectrometric detection. The ecotoxicity of target compounds expressed as the ErC20, LC20, and EC20 values was evaluated by a battery of tests using representatives of producers and consumers in the water ecosystem as testing organisms (Lemna minor, Thamnocephalus platyurus, and Daphnia magna). The results proved that the acute toxicity of individual artificial sweeteners does not pose a significant risk to the aquatic ecosystem. The compound showing the highest concentration in raw wastewater (in the range of tens of µg L−1) and negligible removal during the wastewater treatment process was sucralose, but its ecotoxicity was the lowest of the ASs studied. The highest ecotoxicity showed saccharin, but its removal in a wastewater treatment plant was almost complete. However, additional studies are needed to evaluate the chronic toxicity of ASs and also possible synergistic or antagonistic effects in ASs mixtures.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and material
All data are available either in publication or in Supporting Information.
References
Arbelaez P, Borrull F, Pocurull E, Marce RM (2015) Determination of high-intensity sweeteners in river water and wastewater by solid-phase extraction and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 1393:106–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2015.03.035
Bornemann V, Werness SC, Buslinger L, Schiffman SS (2018) Intestinal metabolism and bioaccumulation of sucralose in adipose tissue in the rat. J Toxicol Env Health Part A 81:913–923. https://doi.org/10.1080/15287394.2018.1502560
Brorström-Lundén E et al. (2008) Measurements of sucralose in the Swedish screening program 2007. IVL Swedish environmental research institute, Stockholm
Buerge IJ, Buser H-R, Kahle M, Müller MD, Poiger T (2009) Ubiquitous occurrence of the artificial sweetener acesulfame in the aquatic environment: an ideal chemical marker of domestic wastewater in groundwater. Environ Sci Technol 43:4381–4385. https://doi.org/10.1021/es900126x
Buerge IJ, Keller M, Buser HR, Muller MD, Poiger T (2011) Saccharin and other artificial sweeteners in soils: estimated inputs from agriculture and households, degradation, and leaching to groundwater. Environ Sci Technol 45:615–621. https://doi.org/10.1021/es1031272
Calabrese EJ, Baldwin LA (2001) The frequency of U-shaped dose responses in the toxicological literature. Toxicol Sci 62:330–338
Calabrese EJ, Baldwin LA (2002) Defining hormesis. Hum Exp Toxicol 21:91–97. https://doi.org/10.1191/0960327102ht217oa
Calabrese EJ, Blain R (2005) The occurrence of hormetic dose responses in the toxicological literature, the hormesis database: an overview. Toxicol Appl Pharm 202:289–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2004.06.023
Clauss K, Jensen H (1973) Oxathiazinone dioxides - new group of sweetening agents. Angew Chem-Int Edit 12:869–876. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.197308691
Ens W, Senner F, Gygax B, Schlotterbeck G (2014) Development, validation, and application of a novel LC-MS/MS trace analysis method for the simultaneous quantification of seven iodinated X-ray contrast media and three artificial sweeteners in surface, ground, and drinking water. Anal Bioanal Chem 406:2789–2798. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-014-7712-0
Euromonitor international (2017) where do sugar and sweeteners stand today. https://blog.euromonitor.com/?s=Where+Do+Sugar+and+Sweeteners+Stand+Today. Accessed 29.3.2020
Fahlberg C, Remsen I (1879) Ueber die oxydation des orthotoluolsulfamids. Ber Dtsch Chem Ges 12:469–473. https://doi.org/10.1002/cber.187901201135
Gan ZW, Sun HW, Feng BT, Wang RN, Zhang YW (2013) Occurrence of seven artificial sweeteners in the aquatic environment and precipitation of Tianjin, China. Water Res 47:4928–4937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2013.05.038
Hjorth M, Hansen JH, Camus L (2010) Short-term effects of sucralose on Calanus finmarchicus and Calanus glacialis in Disko Bay, Greenland. Chem Ecol 26:385–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/02757540.2010.504672
Hough L, Emsley J (1986) The shape of sweeteners to come. New Sci 110:48–52
Hu HW et al (2016) Effects of artificial sweeteners on metal bioconcentration and toxicity on a green algae Scenedesmus obliquus. Chemosphere 150:285–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.02.043
Huggett DB, Stoddard KI (2011) Effects of the artificial sweetener sucralose on Daphnia magna and Americamysis bahia survival, growth and reproduction. Food Chem Toxicol 49:2575–2579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2011.06.073
Chemical economics handbook (2017) High-intensity sweetener market both sweet and sour as western consumers shun artificial sweeteners, but demand remains strong in Asia. https://news.ihsmarkit.com/prviewer/release_only/slug/country-industry-forecasting-media-high-intensity-sweetener-market-both-sweet-and-sour. Accessed 29.3.2020 2020
ISO (2005) Water quality - Determination of the toxic effect of water constituents on duckweed (Lemna minor) - Duckweed growth inhibition test. ISO 20079:2005, Switzerland
ISO (2011) Water quality - Determination of the acute toxicity to Thamnocephalus platyurus (Crustacea, Anostraca). ISO 14380:2011, Switzerland
ISO (2012) Water quality — Determination of the inhibition of the mobility of Daphnia magna Straus (Cladocera, Crustacea) — Acute toxicity test vol ISO 6341:2012. International Organisation for Standardisation, Switzerland
Kefford BJ, Zalizniak L, Warne MSJ, Nugegoda D (2008) Is the integration of hormesis and essentiality into ecotoxicology now opening Pandora’s Box? Environ Pollut 151:516–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2007.04.019
Kobeticova K, Mocova KA, Mrhalkova L, Petrova G (2018) Effects of artificial sweeteners on lemna minor. Czech J Food Sci 36:386–391. https://doi.org/10.17221/413/2016-cjfs
Kokotou MG, Asimakopoulos AG, Thomaidis NS (2012) Artificial sweeteners as emerging pollutants in the environment: analytical methodologies and environmental impact. Anal Methods-UK 4:3057–3070. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2ay05950a
Lawrence JF (2003) Cyclamates. In: Caballero B (ed) Encyclopedia of food sciences and nutrition (Second Edition). Academic Press, Oxford, pp 1712–1714. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-227055-X/00318-7
Lillicrap A, Langford K, Tollefsen KE (2011) Bioconcentration of the intense sweetener sucralose in a multitrophic battery of aquatic organisms. Environ Toxicol Chem 30:673–681. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.433
Lin H, Oturan N, Wu J, Sharma VK, Zhang H, Oturan MA (2017) Removal of artificial sweetener aspartame from aqueous media by electrochemical advanced oxidation processes. Chemosphere 167:220–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.09.143
Luo JY et al (2019) Review on the determination and distribution patterns of a widespread contaminant artificial sweetener in the environment. Environ Sci Pollut R 26:19078–19096. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05261-4
Ma L et al (2017) Mass loading of typical artificial sweeteners in a pig farm and their dissipation and uptake by plants in neighboring farmland. Sci Total Environ 605–606:735–744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.027
Mayer DG, Kemper FH (1991) Acesulfame K. Marcel Dekker Inc, New York-Basel-Hong Kong
Mazur RH, Schlatter JM, Goldkamp AH (1969) Structure-taste relationships of some dipeptides. J Am Chem Soc 91:2684–2691. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01038a046
Mead RN, Morgan JB, Avery GB, Kieber RJ, Kirk AM, Skrabal SA, Willey JD (2009) Occurrence of the artificial sweetener sucralose in coastal and marine waters of the United States. Mar Chem 116:13–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2009.09.005
OECD (2004) Test No. 202: Daphnia sp. Acute immobilisation test. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264069947-en
OECD (2006) Test No. 221: Lemna sp. Growth inhibition test. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264016194-en
Ordóñez EY, Quintana JB, Rodil R, Cela R (2012) Determination of artificial sweeteners in water samples by solid-phase extraction and liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 1256:197–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2012.07.073
Renwick AG (1985) The disposition of saccharin in animals and man - A review. Food Chem Toxicol 23:429–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-6915(85)90136-x
Renwick AG (1986) The metabolism of intense sweeteners. Xenobiotica 16:1057–1071. https://doi.org/10.3109/00498258609038983
Renwick AG, Thompson JP, O’Shaughnessy M, Walter EJ (2004) The metabolism of cyclamate to cyclohexylamine in humans during long-term administration. Toxicol Appl Pharm 196:367–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2004.01.013
Sang Z, Jiang Y, Tsoi Y-K, Leung KS-Y (2014) Evaluating the environmental impact of artificial sweeteners: A study of their distributions, photodegradation and toxicities. Water Res 52:260–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2013.11.002
Scheurer M, Brauch H-J, Lange FT (2009) Analysis and occurrence of seven artificial sweeteners in German waste water and surface water and in soil aquifer treatment (SAT). Anal Bioanal Chem 394:1585–1594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-009-2881-y
Soh L, Connors KA, Brooks BW, Zimmerman J (2011) Fate of Sucralose through Environmental and Water Treatment Processes and Impact on Plant Indicator Species. Environ Sci Technol 45:1363–1369. https://doi.org/10.1021/es102719d
Stolte S, Steudte S, Schebb NH, Willenberg I, Stepnowski P (2013) Ecotoxicity of artificial sweeteners and stevioside. Environ Int 60:123–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2013.08.010
Subedi B, Kannan K (2014) Fate of artificial sweeteners in wastewater treatment plants in New York State, USA. Environ Sci Technol 48:13668–13674. https://doi.org/10.1021/es504769c
Sylvetsky AC, Rother KI (2016) Trends in the consumption of low-calorie sweeteners. Physiol Behav 164:446–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.03.030
Tollefsen KE, Nizzetto L, Huggett DB (2012) Presence, fate and effects of the intense sweetener sucralose in the aquatic environment. Sci Tot Environ 438:510–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.08.060
Van Stempvoort DR, Roy JW, Brown SJ, Bickerton G (2011) Artificial sweeteners as potential tracers in groundwater in urban environments. J Hydrol 401:126–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.02.013
Wiklund A-KE, Breitholtz M, Bengtsson B-E, Adolfsson-Erici M (2012) Sucralose – An ecotoxicological challenger? Chemosphere 86:50–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.08.049
Yin K, Li F, Wang Y, He Q, Deng Y, Chen S, Liu C (2017) Oxidative transformation of artificial sweetener acesulfame by permanganate: reaction kinetics, transformation products and pathways, and ecotoxicity. J Hazard Mater 330:52–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.02.012
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the grant No. FCH-S-21-7398 from the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Editorial responsibility: Maryam Shabani.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kerberová, V., Zlámalová Gargošová, H. & Čáslavský, J. Occurrence and ecotoxicity of selected artificial sweeteners in the Brno city waste water. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 19, 9055–9066 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-021-03771-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-021-03771-8