Abstract
Spent caustic wastewater from petrochemical industries is a complex concoction of various pollutants, not only making it a threat to the environment, but also very difficult to treat using conventional treatment processes. In this study, electrocoagulation with iron electrodes was investigated as an option for the removal of sulfide from synthetic spent caustic. The pH of the treatment (3–12), the electrode distance (1–4 cm), the treatment duration (15–60 min), and the current density (1.4–20.8 mA/cm2) were varied, and their contribution to sulfide removal percent was investigated. The results showed that as current density increased to 7.4 mA/cm2 there was a pronounced increase in sulfide removal. Beyond that, increasing the current density slightly improved removal results. Interestingly, it was also observed that with process times above 30 min and a voltage of 20 V, the initial pH had no impact on removal percentage. After the parametric study of contributing factors, response surface methodology was used for further scrutiny and optimization. Under optimum conditions of electrode distance = 3 cm, voltage = 11 V, and treatment duration of 30 min, a sulfide removal of nearly 93% was obtained which showed the effectiveness of the proposed electrocoagulation process.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abdel-Gawad SA, Baraka AM, Omran KA, Mokhtar MM (2012) Removal of some pesticides from the simulated waste water by electrocoagulation method using iron electrodes. Int J Electrochem Sci 7:6654–6665
Akkaya GK, Erkan HS, Sekman E, Top S, Karaman H, Bilgili MS et al (2019) Modeling and optimizing Fenton and electro-Fenton processes for dairy wastewater treatment using response surface methodology. Int J Environ Sci Technol 16:2343–2358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-1846-0
Arena F, Di Chio R, Gumina B, Spadaro L, Trunfio G (2015) Recent advances on wet air oxidation catalysts for treatment of industrial wastewaters. Inorganica Chim Acta 431:101–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ica.2014.12.017
Ben Hariz I, Halleb A, Adhoum N, Monser L (2013) Treatment of petroleum refinery sulfidic spent caustic wastes by electrocoagulation. Sep Purif Technol 107:150–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2013.01.051
Caliari PC, Pacheco MJ, Ciríaco LF, Lopes AMC (2017) Anodic oxidation of sulfide to sulfate: effect of the current density on the process kinetics. J Braz Chem Soc 28:557–566
Caliari PC, Pacheco MJ, Ciríaco L, Lopes A (2019) Tannery wastewater: organic load and sulfide removal dynamics by electrochemical oxidation at different anode materials. Environ Technol Innov. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2019.100345
Chow H, Pham ALT (2019) Effective removal of silica and sulfide from oil sands thermal in situ produced water by electrocoagulation. J Hazard Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.120880
Darvishmotevalli M, Zarei A, Moradnia M et al (2019) Optimization of saline wastewater treatment using electrochemical oxidation process: prediction by RSM method. MethodsX 6:1101–1113
de Graaff M, Bijmans MFM, Abbas B, Euverink GJW, Muyzer G, Janssen AJH (2011) Biological treatment of refinery spent caustics under halo-alkaline conditions. Bioresour Technol 102:7257–7264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.04.095
Ellis CE (1998) Wet air oxidation of refinery spent caustic. Environ Prog 17:28–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.670170116
Gajda I, Stinchcombe A, Greenman J, Melhuish C, Ieropoulos I (2017) Microbial fuel cell—a novel self-powered wastewater electrolyser for electrocoagulation of heavy metals. Int J Hydrogen Energy 42:1813–1819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.06.161
Gendel Y, Lahav O (2010) A new approach to increasing the efficiency of low-pH Fe-electrocoagulation applications. J Hazard Mater 183:596–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.07.066
Gengec E, Kobya M, Demirbas E, Akyol A, Oktor K (2012) Optimization of baker’s yeast wastewater using response surface methodology by electrocoagulation. Desalination 286:200–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2011.11.023
Khan SU, Islam DT, Farooqi IH, Ayub S, Basheer F (2019) Hexavalent chromium removal in an electrocoagulation column reactor: process optimization using CCD, adsorption kinetics and pH modulated sludge formation. Process Saf Environ Prot. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2018.11.024
Kobya M, Demirbas E, Parlak NU, Yigit S (2010) Treatment of cadmium and nickel electroplating rinse water by electrocoagulation. Environ Technol 31:1471–1481. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593331003713693
Liu F, Zhang Z, Wang Z, Li X, Dai X, Wang L et al (2019) Experimental study on treatment of tertiary oil recovery wastewater by electrocoagulation. Chem Eng Process Process Intensif 144:107640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2019.107640
Metcalf E (2003) Wasterwater engineering—treatment and reuse
Muhamad MH, Sheikh Abdullah SR, Mohamad AB, Abdul Rahman R, Kadhum AAH (2013) Application of response surface methodology (RSM) for optimisation of COD, NH3–N and 2,4-DCP removal from recycled paper wastewater in a pilot-scale granular activated carbon sequencing batch biofilm reactor (GAC-SBBR). J Environ Manag 121:179–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.02.016
Mutamim NSA, Noor ZZ (2017) Assessment of membrane bioreactor in treating spent sulfidic caustic wastewater: effects of organic biomass concentration and solid retention time. Chem Eng Res Bull 19:102. https://doi.org/10.3329/cerb.v19i0.33803
Nasr Esfahani K, Farhadian M, Solaimany Nazar AR (2019) Interaction effects of various reaction parameters on the treatment of sulfidic spent caustic through electro-photo-Fenton. Int J Environ Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-2126-8
Nidheesh PV, Gandhimathi R (2012) Trends in electro-Fenton process for water and wastewater treatment: an overview. Desalination 299:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2012.05.011
Noordin MY, Venkatesh VC, Sharif S, Elting S, Abdullah A (2004) Application of response surface methodology in describing the performance of coated carbide tools when turning AISI 1045 steel. J Mater Process Technol 145:46–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00861-6
Oncel MS, Muhcu A, Demirbas E, Kobya M (2013) A comparative study of chemical precipitation and electrocoagulation for treatment of coal acid drainage wastewater. J Environ Chem Eng 1:989–995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2013.08.008
Park JJ, Byun IG, Park SR, Lee JH, Park SH, Park TJ et al (2009) Use of spent sulfidic caustic for autotrophic denitrification in the biological nitrogen removal processes: lab-scale and pilot-scale experiments. J Ind Eng Chem 15:316–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2008.11.008
Perez Mora B, Bellú S, Mangiameli MF, Frascaroli MI, González JC (2019) Response surface methodology and optimization of arsenic continuous sorption process from contaminated water using chitosan. J Water Process Eng 32:100913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2019.100913
Potumarthi R, Mugeraya G, Jetty A (2008) Biological treatment of toxic petroleum spent caustic in fluidized bed bioreactor using immobilized cells of thiobacillus RAI01. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 151:532–546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-008-8229-9
Qiang Z, Chang JH, Huang CP (2003) Electrochemical regeneration of Fe2 + in Fenton oxidation processes. Water Res 37:1308–1319. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(02)00461-X
Rodriguez N, Hansen HK, Nuñez P, Guzman J (2008) Spent caustic oxidation using electro-generated Fenton’s reagent in a batch reactor. J Environ Sci Heal A Toxic Hazard Subst Environ Eng 43:952–960. https://doi.org/10.1080/10934520801974533
Sahu O, Mazumdar B, Chaudhari PK (2019) Electrochemical treatment of sugar industry wastewater: process optimization by response surface methodology. Int J Environ Sci Technol 16:1527–1540. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-1765-0
Seifollahi M, Forootan A, Reyhan SB (2016) Examination of the reasons for the formation of red oil in spent caustic from olefin plant. World Acad Sci Eng Technol 10:1162–1169
Sheu SH, Weng HS (2001) Treatment of olefin plant spent caustic by combination of neutralization and fenton reaction. Water Res 35:2017–2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00466-8
Vaiopoulou E, Provijn T, Prévoteau A, Pikaar I, Rabaey K (2016) Electrochemical sulfide removal and caustic recovery from spent caustic streams. Water Res 92:38–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.01.039
Wang Y, Lin H, Hu B (2019) Electrochemical removal of hydrogen sulfide from swine manure. Chem Eng J 356:210–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.08.171
Zhang H, Zhang D, Zhou J (2006) Removal of COD from landfill leachate by electro-Fenton method. J Hazard Mater 135:106–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.11.025
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the Science and Technology Vice Presidency of the Islamic Republic of Iran as well as the Resource Efficiency Laboratory of the University of Tehran (RELUT) for providing the required facilities and equipment to carry out the experiments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Editorial responsibility: Binbin Huang.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aliasghari, S., Fatehbasharzad, P., Bazargan, A. et al. Electrocoagulation for the treatment of highly sulfidic spent caustic: parametric study followed by statistical optimization. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 18, 939–948 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-020-02890-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-020-02890-y